Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

University of California's new logo

Rob Beschizza at 1:42 pm Mon, Dec 10, 2012

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Archive of documents from Rios Montt genocide trial, overturned 10 days after guilty verdict

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

The new one's on the right. Good to see them putting the freshmen to use.

⟿ Follow Rob Beschizza on Twitter.

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • jandrese

    While the clipart vibe from the old logo is pretty strong, the new logo looks like a loading screen.  

    • edgore

      Or a wait cursor.

      • http://www.takoyaki.org barron

        … for a whale-watching app.

    • Chuck

       I was about to suggest that they make it spin forever, like something’s about to load but never does.

      • beforewepost

        Which is appropriate for seniors who can’t  enroll in the classes they need to graduate.

      • Warren_Terra

        You’re in luck; this has been done already.

        From a comment by “Justin” at The Reality-Based Community.

    • http://deansli.st/ Dean Putney

      Which is perhaps oddly appropriate for a university.

  • franko

    by all means, please show us your better designs.

    • Brainspore

      You mean design a better logo on the spot, for free, just to prove a point?

      • http://twitter.com/incarnedine_v Dan Hibiki

         Although, if that new logo was done for free on the spot, it would explain things.

    • http://twitter.com/incarnedine_v Dan Hibiki

      And I assume you’ll be footing the bill?

    • http://boingboing.net/ Rob Beschizza

      $10000 to my PayPal and I get out of bed!

      • niktemadur

        $10000 to my PayPal and I stay in bed!

    • Antinous / Moderator

      by all means, please show us your better designs.

      I can’t fit my camera into the toilet bowl.

    • niktemadur

      How about something along these lines:

      • Antinous / Moderator

        Can you align the spray into the gradient?

        • niktemadur

          Do you mean something like this?
          My photo editing skills are non-existent, maybe someone here with Photoshop (which I don’t even have) can help out, fancy it up a bit.

          • Antinous / Moderator

            Yes.  Now it looks like the cop is making pepper spray graffiti.

          • niktemadur

            From where I’m standing, it looks like he’s erasing the “C” with blue pepper spray.

    • GawainLavers

      Easy: the one on the left.

      My god, how did this happen without me hearing about?  My current cards don’t have logo because of my department (which has its own very nice logo, although not quite as venerable), but if I did I would really be pissed.  Now I have to buy some t-shirts before they all look like we’re some fly-by-night dot-com.

      • penguinchris

        When I was an undergrad, my university changed the logo when I was a senior. I didn’t have anything with the logo on it – and didn’t realize I’d actually want things with the school’s logo on it at some point in my life, so I didn’t rush to buy things with the original logo – and now I can’t buy anything out of principle.

        I wouldn’t be surprised if UC schools kept some things with the original logo around in the shops, though. 

  • DrMedicine

    For some real evaluation, see Brand New:  http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/ic_uc_we_all_c_for_california.php

    • Brainspore

      OK. The clarification that this is going to augment, rather than replace, the university’s seal makes me somewhat less annoyed.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Robert-Drop/100000929402049 Robert Drop

        Yeah, and I can see what it’s real use should be – a repeated background element.

    • Warren_Terra

      They claim to have spent possibly as much as 40 person-years on this, and the result is a C dissolving in a test tube.

      Worse, there’s nothing distinctive about it. Even if you somehow discern that the test tube is meant to be a U (no certain thing; it’s too tall, for one thing), the C might mean Chicago, or Connecticut, or Colorado, or many other things.

      Rebranding for some purposes is not the worst idea in the world, though its a questionable use of resources, especially as the University of California isn’t even going to be making money by selling it on T-shirts and binders (people buy the logo of their campus, not of the statewide system). But this truly is a terrible design – and a terrible design perpetrated on a statewide university system full of brilliant artists who’d have loved to have taken a crack at the job.

      • TheMudshark

        Whatever else it is, it is more distinctive than the old one. A bunch of stuff with circular writing around it? There must be tens of thousands of logos like that.

        • Brainspore

          That’s not a logo. It’s the University seal, and it’s not actually being replaced.

  • Brainspore

    Yuck. Also, as a graphic designer I wonder if they’re really prepared for all the functional limitations they’ll encounter with a logo that depends on the use of a gradient. If people think it looks bad now then just wait until it’s embroidered on a shirt, made into a rubber stamp, made into a window graphic via vinyl cutter, etc.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Duanburge/100000313244887 Mark Duanburge

       It doesn’t need to have the gradient. Follow Broan’s link above to see how it looks on mugs, buttons, bags etc

      • Brainspore

        Fair enough.

      • http://www.ikaink.net Itsumishi

        It actually looks much, much better without the gradient in my opinion. It still doesn’t look very good though.

        • TheMudshark

          Yeah, the gradient is just frivolous.

    • Mr. Customer

       It does appear there is a non-gradient alternate. Not that any of that makes it, you know, good.

    • Preston Sturges

      How you going to emboss a diploma with that? 

      • Brainspore

        Seems they won’t have to after all. The seal isn’t going away, it’s just going to be reserved for special occasions (as most Universities already do).

  • Bevatron Repairman

    http://i.imgur.com/sCUYw.jpg

    • http://twitter.com/oligonucleotide oligonucleotide

      This is exactly it LOL

    • benher

      I didn’t realize we could just photoshop superior comments! Awesome!

  • akputney

    A travesty of the first order. Utterly meaningless, and conveys no purpose. How much did the taxpayers pay for that?

    • Darron Moore

       So glad there is a world class critic here…and where did you receive your credentials?

      • http://www.ikaink.net Itsumishi

        Do I need to go to film school to decide I don’t like rubbish movies too now?

    • Boundegar

      You forgot the part about your two-year-old.

  • http://twitter.com/mr_raccoon Jason

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6oez0lzWpA

    Much better than the last logo they tried to use

  • BarBarSeven

    Is the logo on the right, buffering? Is that what that swooshy circle thing is?

    • Donald Petersen

      Definitely looks like someone’s spent a loooong time signing into Xbox Live.

  • ROThornhill

    Awww! It’s like the Golden State Warriors logo and the old Hartford Whalers logo had a little logo baby.

  • http://twitter.com/randywalters Randy Walters

    Man… tough audience.

    • Darron Moore

       Those that can’t design…bitch a lot.

      • Donald Petersen

        Seems to me that those that can’t design go ahead and design anyway.

        • Andy Reilly

          FTW!  Couldn’t agree more. This isn’t a matter of lay people critiquing the more esoteric elements of design or design theory. It’s a matter of a logo that does almost nothing of what a logo is supposed to do and it doesn’t take a designer to recognize that. 

      • Jens Reuterberg

        Yeah… I thought it was ok. Not great but ok and better than the old one. Wasn’t there a post like this a few months back where people got really huffy about some new character design on a box of cereal? … They thought it was too unrealistic or something?

        Same kind of whine-fest where people proved their design-skills by saying something was bad (in the same way I “prove” my 1337-hacker skills by saying commonplace like “Vista was badly made”). 
        Or that Jesus-image remade by a Spanish woman. Allot of people who couldn’t draw a pair of boobs to save their life got all huffy and snort-laughing without even contemplating the difference between art-by-school or art-by-emotion.

        The trick here I think is just join the crowd of snort-laughers – or let them get on with it – because it has nothing to do with aesthetics and all about identity creation by agreement. 

        • Antinous / Moderator

          It sounds like you’re trying to posit yourself as a member of the tribe that’s Just Too Clever To Be Taken In By People Who Claim To Know About “Design”.

  • http://boingboing.net/ Rob Beschizza

    See the classic logo of the UK’s Open University. http://www.tvcream.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/openuniversity.jpg

    • millie fink

      Wow, nauseating. Literally.

      • Bob Webb

        It’s the yellow/blue colour scheme and awful jpg compression, isn’t it?

  • aldeka

    You put it next to a shitty pixelated version of the seal (this is more like it, kids: http://www.bioeng.ucr.edu/images/uc_seal.gif) and the old version still wins.

    Yeah.

  • http://www.mikezed.com mzed

    Go bears?

    • Taniwha

      no – go Banana Slugs! – surely it’s obvious

  • trackofalljades

    So anywhere else, a college has both a seal and a logo and they’re used for totally different things…and the College Relations or PR department will even have rules laid out for how each treatment is used (even a small community college often does this).

    What’s wrong with this place that they never figured that out?

    • http://BrianEaston.net/ Brian Easton

      The will continue to use the seal on official documents.

    • http://www.gildedgreen.com/ Girard

      If by “this place” you mean the UC schools, you’re mistaken, as the seal and the logo will both continue to be used, as you described.
      If by “this place” you mean Boing Boing…well, I don’t know the answer,

  • http://twitter.com/twasserman Tony Wasserman

    UC’s answer to New Coke.

  • http://www.jimdraws.com Thorzdad

    The old seal wins, hands down. The new logo looks more like something for a frozen yogurt shop.

    • http://www.gildedgreen.com/ Girard

      Well, to be fair, the old one looks like an utterly generic 19th-century bookplate or masthead logo. Neither is great. The first functions better as a seal, the second one functions better as a logo. Which, luckily, is apparently how the two images will be put to use from here on out.

  • cleveremi

    I’m a UC Santa Cruz alum. Our mascot is the banana slug. With that in mind, the new logo feels really frivolous to me. If a banana slug feels it lacks the seriousness of a quality education, what will the rest of the world think? It’s a University system, not an app, fer cryin’ out loud.

    • Preston Sturges

      Go Fighting Banana Slugs!  Whoot!

    • nate

      But you see, eventually our university system will become an app (see Coursera, for example). This new logo is slightly ahead of its time, but not much, and you can look forward to seeing this pretty little icon on a touch screen near you when the university system re-boots as College 2.0.

      • cleveremi

        Yeah, you’re probably right. I’m just an oldster who remembers, fondly, the days of written evaluations (instead of grades). Ah, the good old days… now I have to go because there are kids. on. my. lawn.

  • kichigaijin

    Is it just me, or does it look like a big blue tongue licking away at a faded C?

    • Boundegar

      I would like it to come in red, with a dark chocolate C.

  • mobobo

    i’m liking it. refreshing and bold especially for a uni.

    • millie fink

      “Yeah, that’s what we’re looking for here. ‘Refreshing.’ ‘Bold.’”

      • Darron Moore

         I would be…but maybe listless and dry would be better.  No.

    • http://lectiblog.blogspot.com/ lecti

      I guess it deserves to be called an uni instead of a university now with this logo.  I feel bad for the current students.

  • http://twitter.com/AntiBoredomTeam Dan Century

    About as good as the newest DC comics logo. 

  • http://anomicofficedrone.com/ AnomicOfficeDrone

    Something about the look of the new logo makes the recent tuition hikes even less palatable.  It looks like an education from a UC is something I can get for $0.99 at the app store.

  • http://twitter.com/cdub1900 Chris Worley

    This article is misleading.  The seal shown here is NOT being replaced.  Instead, it is this logo that is going away - https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/563829_10151312004838287_897848017_n.png

    • http://goodsharer.com/ Aloisius

      The monogram is what got refreshed: http://vimeo.com/53530934

      • http://twitter.com/cdub1900 Chris Worley

        I guess my point is the seal is not going away.  It will still appear on official stationary and letters from the UC.  However, the new logo will replace dozens of different type faces and home-grown logos to try and give a comprehensive branding approach. The seal is not going away.

      • http://www.gildedgreen.com/ Girard

        Nope. The monogram is what was used as the basis for the motifs in the logo. Both images will continue to be used by the university, but in different capacities.

  • http://lectiblog.blogspot.com/ lecti

    Looks like shit.  The brand is ruined, and I want my tuition back.

    • Antinous / Moderator

      Your tuition?  How am I supposed to tell people that I worked at “The Big C” for 15 years?

      • GawainLavers

        I’m pretty sure at some point there was a golden “UC” on the hill behind the Berkeley Campus (next to LLNL), but the U is now gone (there’s just a big gap there, and the “C” fades in and out.  There’s also something like a retaining wall to the right of the C that occasionally matches in color, providing us with a Hollywood sign version of “C-”, which feels about right.

        • ohbejoyful

          No, it’s always just been a big C.  There is a tradition to go up and repaint it the night before the annual football game with Stanford.

  • jenjen

    I’m a UC employee.  When all I saw was the badly-artifacted jpg with the gradient and thought it was replacing the seal I was horrified. (The Monkey Jesus comparison being hilariously apt)  But after watching the video they made about it and seeing the non-gradiented versions I’m much less bothered by it. I had already seen it on a mailing about healthcare benefits back in November and didn’t make the connection.  It looked fine and I like the type that goes with it (although I wish the word “OF” was smaller).  I am concerned about how absolutely craptastic the gradiented jpg looks though – we try to optimize the heck out of our web graphics so I can see bad-looking versions of this abounding on the web. 

    • fergus1948

       I  think that’s why other commenters have pointed out that putting a gradient in a logo is almost certainly bound to end in tears.

    • Festus

       Funny, I got much more irritated after watching the video. Maybe because I am an historian and know a bit about why and how the original logo was chosen. The original is gracious, it is elegant, it lasted through many technological and social changes. The new one is destined to be replaced in a few years by something equally awful and short-lived. Why?

  • novium

    Another UCSC alum here. I’d get all fired up and start making loud and angry statements about not donating any money, but as I tell the alumni fund development people every year I call, that would first require that I have money. 

  • TheOven

    People always hate a new logo. 

  • guest

    I am surprised teh internets hates this design: it is clearly the back end of a cat which is facing away. Does the internets no longer likes kittehs?

    • Donald Petersen

      LOL.  Now I can’t unsee the cat’s ass.  Thanks.

  • desiredusername

    Does this mean UC Berkeley’s blue is no longer Yale blue but some kind of abominable Skeletor blue?

    • GawainLavers

      Skeletor!  Now there’s a logo I could get behind.

    • parhelion

       Wow, being a fighting Skeletor back in the day would’ve been so much more fun than being a fighting Gaucho. Go, Skeletor blue!

  • tubacat

    If you want to see how it’s intended to be used, check out the link (it’s at the top of a very “arty” web site that scrolls two directions and has arrows that hop up and down the page — yuk):

    http://www.onwardcalifornia.com/#onward

    I don’t like the new “supplementary” logo, even given that people don’t generally like new logos. Last night I was skimming children’s books from the 60′s online, and some of those designs/illustrations are truly timeless. There is a difference between good visual design and “cheap and cheerful” – it’s too bad that my alma mater chose the latter…

  • monitorhead

    You know, my alma mater Northern Iowa got a free panther logo from a t-shirt company. A snappy logo but as a graphic design alumn, i think it would have been a good project for graduate students in the art department to come up with something. loading screen or not.

  • dawdler

    Sorry if someone already posted this.  There’s even a change.org petition against it.  As a Cal alum I signed with no hesitation.  It’s really a poor job.

    http://www.change.org/petitions/university-of-california-stop-the-change-of-the-uc-logo

  • cstatman

    am i the only one who sees this as a bad “prince albert” piercing joke???

  • oldtaku

    ‘designed by an 11-person creative team formed about three and a half years ago.’

    … 35 person-years they spent on this. Design by committee wins again.

  • Michael Dolan

    If you flip it over, will it run from Pac-Man?

  • Wingnut

    I have no opinion on this.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gijs-Peetsold/100000380468783 Gijs Peetsold

      Thank you, you just saved me 3 minutes of photoshopping. And:

      “I see designers get their ideas at the same place as the rest of us.”

      Again, thanks.

       I feel better now.

  • http://www.alwayssababa.com/ lishevita

    It hurts. I am a sad bear now.

  • Deermag

    i cant see this. It’s still didn’t loaded yet

  • http://twitter.com/hexopod hexopogs

    Looks almost exactly like a Ziiiro watch face.

  • gmills

    Oski wept. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Faith-Landsman/701156249 Faith Landsman

    It could be the logo from a UC Peyronie’s disease research group.

  • http://twitter.com/oligonucleotide oligonucleotide

    They should keep the old logo but put an iPad istead of the book

  • http://twitter.com/oligonucleotide oligonucleotide

    The problem may be that neither the old logo nor the new one look good…

  • Festus

    It is really difficult to get grads of California, UCLA, Davis and the rest to agree on anything. Congratulations, terrible overpaid branding folks, you’ve done it! We all hate what you are trying to do to a perfectly lovely and serviceable “brand.”

  • myke

    It seems  everyone has missed the most useful feature of the new logo design.  If it is meant to appear on brochures and advertisement (mentioned in the article), it is perfectly suited for California High School Seniors as it does not require literacy to understand.  It may actually be somewhat more difficult for the litterate because the ‘U’ and ‘C’ (particularly with gradient) are poor representations of the actual characters.  A truly appropriate representation of and for the California educational system.

    No, I’m not bitter :)