<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Instagram&#039;s new legalese pisses off&#160;users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611634</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611634</guid>
		<description> FB already took care of that, you can&#039;t enter into any class action against them. Check it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> FB already took care of that, you can&#8217;t enter into any class action against them. Check it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coal Miki-Restall</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611529</link>
		<dc:creator>Coal Miki-Restall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611529</guid>
		<description>I really wish the internet wasn&#039;t this easily duped. The controversial section of the revised ToS doesn&#039;t allow them anything they weren&#039;t already allowed under the current ToS. Please BB, do some basic fact checking before perpetuating mass hysteria!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish the internet wasn&#8217;t this easily duped. The controversial section of the revised ToS doesn&#8217;t allow them anything they weren&#8217;t already allowed under the current ToS. Please BB, do some basic fact checking before perpetuating mass hysteria!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611523</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611523</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a legal document, so it&#039;s written in legaleze.  By your logic all laws would be invalid and no-one would have to pay taxes.  

&quot;Tech&quot; bloggers generally get most of the tech in the articles they write dead wrong, so you shouldn&#039;t be surprised when they get the legal aspects of it completely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a legal document, so it&#8217;s written in legaleze.  By your logic all laws would be invalid and no-one would have to pay taxes.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Tech&#8221; bloggers generally get most of the tech in the articles they write dead wrong, so you shouldn&#8217;t be surprised when they get the legal aspects of it completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611522</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611522</guid>
		<description> What? people overreacting to TOS contracts they don&#039;t understand and saying they are going to quit the service forever because of them?  Yup, happens all the time.  At least once every 6 months for the last 8 years or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> What? people overreacting to TOS contracts they don&#8217;t understand and saying they are going to quit the service forever because of them?  Yup, happens all the time.  At least once every 6 months for the last 8 years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611339</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611339</guid>
		<description>Is your real name Daria?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your real name Daria?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611323</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611323</guid>
		<description>Was that a roundabout way of saying, &lt;i&gt;Bitch, your pancakes look fine to me&lt;/i&gt; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was that a roundabout way of saying, <i>Bitch, your pancakes look fine to me</i> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611250</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611250</guid>
		<description>Nothing says &quot;Friendship&quot; like batch processing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing says &#8220;Friendship&#8221; like batch processing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Kim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611245</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611245</guid>
		<description>i hate the fact that when facebook bought instagram...all of a sudden...SPAM became tremendously BAD </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate the fact that when facebook bought instagram&#8230;all of a sudden&#8230;SPAM became tremendously BAD </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Griffin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611199</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611199</guid>
		<description>The problem here is the model.  I don&#039;t care if they want to slip a little ad over the bottom edge of my photo, because that&#039;s &quot;paying&quot; for their hosting of my photos.  But as soon as &quot;my&quot; photos become &quot;their&quot; photos, they have stolen from me -- literally -- as I wanted to use a sharing service, not a charity service.  So, in addition to my artwork, they want to use my likeness as well, to potentially peddle products that I either did not endorse or receive compensation for endorsing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem here is the model.  I don&#8217;t care if they want to slip a little ad over the bottom edge of my photo, because that&#8217;s &#8220;paying&#8221; for their hosting of my photos.  But as soon as &#8220;my&#8221; photos become &#8220;their&#8221; photos, they have stolen from me &#8212; literally &#8212; as I wanted to use a sharing service, not a charity service.  So, in addition to my artwork, they want to use my likeness as well, to potentially peddle products that I either did not endorse or receive compensation for endorsing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Griffin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611190</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611190</guid>
		<description>I understand what you&#039;re driving at here, but this is exactly what&#039;s wrong with TOUs -- if I have to pay a lawyer to understand what I&#039;m agreeing to, then the system is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you&#8217;re driving at here, but this is exactly what&#8217;s wrong with TOUs &#8212; if I have to pay a lawyer to understand what I&#8217;m agreeing to, then the system is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Brown</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611150</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611150</guid>
		<description>If they are using these for advertising does that mean they will have to get a model release for each person pictured?.   
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are using these for advertising does that mean they will have to get a model release for each person pictured?.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Williams</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611139</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611139</guid>
		<description>As soon as I get home, I&#039;m dropping Instagram quicker than Facebook stock.  My GNex auto-saves all Instagram photos so I don&#039;t have to use an online service.  I&#039;ve moved much of my stuff over to Flickr for the time being, and have also checked out apps like Snapseed and BeFunky (who are offering free premium accounts to people who post a pic of their closed Instagram account).

I hate Facebook but I need it for various groups that I belong to, or I wouldn&#039;t have it.  I loved Instagram &#039;cause it was fun and the community was great.  This is too much though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as I get home, I&#8217;m dropping Instagram quicker than Facebook stock.  My GNex auto-saves all Instagram photos so I don&#8217;t have to use an online service.  I&#8217;ve moved much of my stuff over to Flickr for the time being, and have also checked out apps like Snapseed and BeFunky (who are offering free premium accounts to people who post a pic of their closed Instagram account).</p>
<p>I hate Facebook but I need it for various groups that I belong to, or I wouldn&#8217;t have it.  I loved Instagram &#8217;cause it was fun and the community was great.  This is too much though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611063</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611063</guid>
		<description>This is not a sucide note. My sister has 500 facebook friends and I am sure they all think this is wonderful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a sucide note. My sister has 500 facebook friends and I am sure they all think this is wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethicalcannibal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611059</link>
		<dc:creator>ethicalcannibal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611059</guid>
		<description>I did too, earlier this morning. I had a feeling this was coming with Facebook buying them, but it&#039;s still disappointing. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did too, earlier this morning. I had a feeling this was coming with Facebook buying them, but it&#8217;s still disappointing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bo1n6bo1n6</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611055</link>
		<dc:creator>bo1n6bo1n6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611055</guid>
		<description>Makes me miss Polaroid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes me miss Polaroid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: da_phonz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611049</link>
		<dc:creator>da_phonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611049</guid>
		<description>I did just that. But they have almost the same license I think. Still, not facebook tho so it&#039;s better in my opinion. Sadly, Flickr isn&#039;t anything that Instagram used to be. I like the phone only interface and sort of even enjoyed the exclusivity of it when they only had a platform for Iphones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did just that. But they have almost the same license I think. Still, not facebook tho so it&#8217;s better in my opinion. Sadly, Flickr isn&#8217;t anything that Instagram used to be. I like the phone only interface and sort of even enjoyed the exclusivity of it when they only had a platform for Iphones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mccrum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611045</link>
		<dc:creator>mccrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611045</guid>
		<description>According to their TOS, the poster is responsible for the content and legal repercussions, so they get the money and you still get your weendis cut off.

I mean, the TOS doesn&#039;t specifically call out your weendis, but it probably should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to their TOS, the poster is responsible for the content and legal repercussions, so they get the money and you still get your weendis cut off.</p>
<p>I mean, the TOS doesn&#8217;t specifically call out your weendis, but it probably should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Wallace</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611038</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611038</guid>
		<description> The difference being, that in Instagram&#039;s case, the entire raison d&#039;etre is photographs, unlike Facebook where you might not sign up specifically to annoy people with pictures of your food, your cat, or your cat&#039;s food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The difference being, that in Instagram&#8217;s case, the entire raison d&#8217;etre is photographs, unlike Facebook where you might not sign up specifically to annoy people with pictures of your food, your cat, or your cat&#8217;s food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Wallace</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611036</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611036</guid>
		<description>I just sent the following to Instagram in response:

Hello Instagram folks. Please know that I LOVE Instagram but if the reports I am reading in BoingBoing.net and elsewhere are right regarding your new terms of service, I am afraid I will not only terminate my account, but use my position as a web blogger and online culture commentator to encourage my colleagues, coworkers, subscribers and FB friends to do the same. 

I am referring to the following:

&quot; To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.&quot;

Please understand-I am a multi-media professional and can in no way, shape, or form allow a third party to exploit my work--however casual--without compensating me fairly. 

I would rather pay a small subscription fee or one-time charge to use Instagram. Dotcoms have to make money, this is understood. But for me to give away my intellectual property rights and/or digital media rights simply for the privilege of making my photos look like old Polaroids is asking far too much.

Not only will I delete my Instagram account and not permit this, but I will also loudly and annoyingly encourage everyone I know to do the same.

Sorry, Instagram, but some us know the value of our work and even if we&#039;re not actively trying to sell these images, we certainly are NOT willing to let them be exploited by third parties for no compensation whatsoever. Charge me a subscription fee, ask me to pay for an app, whatever--I am very willing to do this. I&#039;m not willing to stand still for that other foolish thing you want to do.

Have a nice day, please reconsider, and better luck next time.

Joe Wallace
Turntabling.net </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just sent the following to Instagram in response:</p>
<p>Hello Instagram folks. Please know that I LOVE Instagram but if the reports I am reading in BoingBoing.net and elsewhere are right regarding your new terms of service, I am afraid I will not only terminate my account, but use my position as a web blogger and online culture commentator to encourage my colleagues, coworkers, subscribers and FB friends to do the same. </p>
<p>I am referring to the following:</p>
<p>&#8221; To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please understand-I am a multi-media professional and can in no way, shape, or form allow a third party to exploit my work&#8211;however casual&#8211;without compensating me fairly. </p>
<p>I would rather pay a small subscription fee or one-time charge to use Instagram. Dotcoms have to make money, this is understood. But for me to give away my intellectual property rights and/or digital media rights simply for the privilege of making my photos look like old Polaroids is asking far too much.</p>
<p>Not only will I delete my Instagram account and not permit this, but I will also loudly and annoyingly encourage everyone I know to do the same.</p>
<p>Sorry, Instagram, but some us know the value of our work and even if we&#8217;re not actively trying to sell these images, we certainly are NOT willing to let them be exploited by third parties for no compensation whatsoever. Charge me a subscription fee, ask me to pay for an app, whatever&#8211;I am very willing to do this. I&#8217;m not willing to stand still for that other foolish thing you want to do.</p>
<p>Have a nice day, please reconsider, and better luck next time.</p>
<p>Joe Wallace<br />
Turntabling.net </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611032</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611032</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t deleted, but it somehow got caught in the spam bin.  I fished it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t deleted, but it somehow got caught in the spam bin.  I fished it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AwesomeRobot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611023</link>
		<dc:creator>AwesomeRobot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611023</guid>
		<description>Wait, what? Did you guys delete my comment for pointing out that the Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram TOS all contain the same language? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, what? Did you guys delete my comment for pointing out that the Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram TOS all contain the same language? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Protocol</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611009</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Protocol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611009</guid>
		<description>dpreview.com points out that Instagram&#039;s old ToS also claimed an unlimited license to use your stuff - the new terms just make it clearer.  The only substantive change is that paid ads will no longer be labeled as such, which, while in violation of net best practices, isn&#039;t (may not be) illegal.  Facebook has always claimed such a license, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dpreview.com points out that Instagram&#8217;s old ToS also claimed an unlimited license to use your stuff &#8211; the new terms just make it clearer.  The only substantive change is that paid ads will no longer be labeled as such, which, while in violation of net best practices, isn&#8217;t (may not be) illegal.  Facebook has always claimed such a license, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Mielke</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1611011</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Mielke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1611011</guid>
		<description>No way! 1040p HD Full Colour pics of a wide range of interesting and distinctive poos, if you want to clog a server up RIGHT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way! 1040p HD Full Colour pics of a wide range of interesting and distinctive poos, if you want to clog a server up RIGHT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Daniel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1610992</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1610992</guid>
		<description>Time to dust off those Flickr accounts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to dust off those Flickr accounts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Nafarrete</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1610983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Nafarrete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1610983</guid>
		<description>As a Instagram photographer, thought I would give my take as well:  http://jonathannafarrete.com/my-take-instagram-tos-rights-update/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Instagram photographer, thought I would give my take as well:  <a href="http://jonathannafarrete.com/my-take-instagram-tos-rights-update/" rel="nofollow">http://jonathannafarrete.com/my-take-instagram-tos-rights-update/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1610977</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1610977</guid>
		<description>The entire point of Facebook purchasing Instagram was to kill competition.  They&#039;re just finishing the job.

One of these days Americans are going to learn that whether it&#039;s technology, radio, television or the Internet, &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Channel_Communications#Criticism_of_Clear_Channel&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;consolidation hurts everyone&lt;/a&gt; except the corporatists at the very top of the food chain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire point of Facebook purchasing Instagram was to kill competition.  They&#8217;re just finishing the job.</p>
<p>One of these days Americans are going to learn that whether it&#8217;s technology, radio, television or the Internet, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Channel_Communications#Criticism_of_Clear_Channel" rel="nofollow">consolidation hurts everyone</a> except the corporatists at the very top of the food chain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1610951</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1610951</guid>
		<description>Hipstamatic is just a camera app. After I take pictures, I can choose what to do with them, and share them anywhere I like, google, email, twitter, flickr... etc.

As for seeing other people&#039;s pictures, I don&#039;t have to be on instagram to search it. I can still see those other perspectives if I like. And as far as a cellphone is concerned, I use Hipstamatic on an ipod touch, and my provider has warned me that they will soon drop 2G coverage, and that I will really, really need to get a new phone... But that has more to do with not needing a phone I can&#039;t use for most of the day - they&#039;re not allowed at work - than desire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hipstamatic is just a camera app. After I take pictures, I can choose what to do with them, and share them anywhere I like, google, email, twitter, flickr&#8230; etc.</p>
<p>As for seeing other people&#8217;s pictures, I don&#8217;t have to be on instagram to search it. I can still see those other perspectives if I like. And as far as a cellphone is concerned, I use Hipstamatic on an ipod touch, and my provider has warned me that they will soon drop 2G coverage, and that I will really, really need to get a new phone&#8230; But that has more to do with not needing a phone I can&#8217;t use for most of the day &#8211; they&#8217;re not allowed at work &#8211; than desire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asmodeus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1610944</link>
		<dc:creator>Asmodeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1610944</guid>
		<description>The site http://tos-dr.info/ has a lot of easy to digest comparisons of different TOS of service for copyright and other matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site http://tos-dr.info/ has a lot of easy to digest comparisons of different TOS of service for copyright and other matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invictus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1610937</link>
		<dc:creator>invictus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1610937</guid>
		<description>In that case the pockets would be deep on both sides of the argument. There&#039;s little that&#039;s uniquely evil or bribery-enabling about FB, to the best of my knowledge. It&#039;s not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/business/at-wal-mart-in-mexico-a-bribe-inquiry-silenced.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Walmart&lt;/a&gt;, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that case the pockets would be deep on both sides of the argument. There&#8217;s little that&#8217;s uniquely evil or bribery-enabling about FB, to the best of my knowledge. It&#8217;s not <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/business/at-wal-mart-in-mexico-a-bribe-inquiry-silenced.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0" rel="nofollow">Walmart</a>, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian mulligan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/instagrams-new-legalese-piss.html#comment-1610927</link>
		<dc:creator>brian mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201186#comment-1610927</guid>
		<description>For me, Instagram was a thing of JOY. Sharing pics w/ people in Brazil, Thailand, Sweden, Holland, Spain, Mexico. Never felt so GLOBAL. But this reinforces the wired age adage: if you&#039;re not paying for a service, you are the product....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, Instagram was a thing of JOY. Sharing pics w/ people in Brazil, Thailand, Sweden, Holland, Spain, Mexico. Never felt so GLOBAL. But this reinforces the wired age adage: if you&#8217;re not paying for a service, you are the product&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
