Discuss this post in our forums

33 Responses to “HOWTO convert an MP3 to a playable, 3D printed record”

  1. davidrice says:


  2. Mitch_M says:

    The Nirvana song sounded like Kurt Cobain signing from the other side and I liked that effect. Now why did she channel hop to New Order without letting the first song finish?

  3. But will it have that warm vinyl sound? :-p

    • bcsizemo says:

      I can see it now, it’s going to be the wav/flac/mp3 wars all over again.  Pressed vinyl vs. printed…

  4. Charles Richter says:

    “I’m waiting for the way when taking a snapshot of a vinyl disc can be the first step toward deriving its audio content, converting that back to a shapefile, and printing out a high-fidelity duplicate.”

    That’s been the first step in the process since 1889.  It’s just that we haven’t gone beyond that step until recently:


  5. soap says:

    The howto forgot to mention the need for RIAA equalization.  Though you can skip this step if you disconnect your turntable from the phono preamp and plug directly into a line-in you’ll still suffer some distortion due to poor tracking.

    And to get nit-picky MP3 isn’t 16bit, it is internally 32bit float and output is set to whatever the input bitdepth was…

    EDIT: and I’m curious how much the distortion due to the printer’s (relatively) poor granularity would improve if you printed at the wider 78rpm width and used the much larger 78-standard stylus? A larger stylus should get “kicked” much less by the relatively bumpy grooves and in doing so decrease the HF distortion…

  6. robcat2075 says:

    Not many printers will do a 12×12 object.

    I have a completely non-electronic crank Victrola.  I’d be curious to try this to make 78’s for it.  But what printer will do objects this large?

    edit: I read the article, she has a fairly exotic 3D printer at her disposal.

  7. DJBudSonic says:

    If you want to make your own records, why not buy a lathe?  You can probably get a used one for less than a 3D printer.

    • daemonsquire says:

      Maybe with a 3D printer, one’s home is less likely to join the list of vinyl record factories that have burned down. I can’t back that up with any links (record plant fire doesn’t Google well, in my hands, at least), but I’m told it was somewhat common–particularly in places like Jamaica, with lots of small record plants–by a friend who had his own disc lathe, on which we cut some records. As he demonstrated for me, the skewings from the grooves of a single disc form a loose ball of vinyl wool, which a spark consumes alarmingly fast in a great ball of flame! Ramp up to production pace, and there’s a lot of flammable wool around, which is… on the one hand, another fun reason to use a record lathe! On the other hand… well, no, you’re right: people should get record lathes. 

      But we’re all high on 3D printing, up here in BB! Plus, all the aural artifacts in the embedded video above are the abode of weird lo-fi magic!

  8. Andrew Suber says:

    What a colossal waste of time and resources.

    • Antinous / Moderator says:

      What a shame that you took time away from feeding the hungry and curing cancer to read about it.

      • Andrew Suber says:

        I do feed the hungry. I feed myself.

        From an engineering standpoint, you’re spending vast resources to create entropy. You have a portable, clean recording. You expend energy and use an incredibly complex machine to create a hissy, poppy wasteful physical copy that’s less useful. You lose energy, you lose the signal to noise, you waste limited time. Maybe I just don’t get it… but it seems a waste.

        As a pre-cursor to processing the MP3, you presumably have the capacity to play it. Therefore, the record is nearly useless.

        Are you suggesting a frank discussion of technology can’t encompass how useful that technology is? I think that debate should be at the heart of the discussion of technology.

        At least a Rube Goldberg machine has aesthetic appeal. If you are going to fuck around, at least do something fun and humorous.

      • capawesome says:

         Oh Jesus, really?

    • Shane Simmons says:

      You never know.  This could lead to someone having a “Eureka!” moment on a more weighty problem.

      Maybe not, but surely you’ve done something in your lifetime which others see as a “collosal waste of time”.  Such as sitting around and making critical comments on BoingBoing.

      • Andrew Suber says:

        If I sent a telegram with the content of my comment to Novogorod, had it translated into Russian, sent back to me, re-translated it into English and then finally posted it, it would be as wasteful as this process.

        It’s actually more efficient with less loss of signal to cut an acetate with the MP3 playing loudly over your computer’s speakers. MP3>Processor>Audio Output>Dictation Machine> Acetate Record vs. MP3>Processor>Digital Output>Transcription Program>Digital Output>Printer>Record

        By commenting on BoingBoing I am expressing my views in an efficient fashion (at least from a thermodynamic view).

        Even for a hobby, this technology is a waste of time. Try Legos or Ouspenskianism!

  9. Nathaniel says:

    I *love* the sound of the aliasing!

  10. newhavenstumpjumper says:

    Do it the old fashioned way.

    Here is a good How To vid.


    this guy is way into it.


  11. nixiebunny says:

    This is such an obtuse way to solve this particular problem. Records are made using radial, not Cartesian coordinates. On a lathe, not a mill.

    • Scott Elyard says:

      Maybe, but there’s a thing called a digital painting. Brushstrokes (arcs created by motions of the fingers, wrists, and/or arm) can be laid down in arcs on a cartesian-type grid, in a raster. I’m certain the argument that it was a less than optimal solution a problem was advanced many times. But it still didn’t do much to deter its development. 

      (Or CAD plotters. Remember when they used to be printed entirely with cartridges of pens like RapidoGraphs?)
      Personally, I think this is neat as hell.

  12. Chris DiBona says:

    Would this amount to a $250,000 fine for copyright infringement?

  13. jimkirk says:

    If printable guns won’t be the death of 3D printers, this will be…
    (Hopefully sarcastic)

    • Bashtarle says:

      I will give them it is a cool project but yeah that’s sorta how I felt when I saw the article.

      My logical/rational side says no one is dumb enough to think that this is anything more than a curiosity…. Sadly It wouldn’t surprise me if some lobbyist spoon feeds an elected official who is completely ignorant to the technology and this molehill suddenly turns into a mountain.

  14. carloscarlson says:

    As if musicians didn’t have a hard enough time getting paid for recordings already

    • Bashtarle says:

      I can only assume and hope that was sarcasm.

      Because if it wasn’t and your desk is laid out anything like mine, Look down and to your right at your CD/DVD burner. As it is far more effective/practical than 3D printing your own record will be and will likely stay that way for the next century or so.

  15. Matt Snyder says:

    why don’t you just start a killer fuckin band, tour hard, and press vinyl that someone would actually buy?

  16. mhsenkow says:

    Noone else remembers that this was originally a april fools joke by makerbot?  http://fabbaloo.com/blog/2011/4/2/3d-printing-april-fools-round-up-2011.html#.UNZtOInjnKA There is a similar example, there was an april fools joke about 3d printing wood. Recently, architecture research has been developing ways to print in wood.

  17. mjennings says:

    Sounds like an Edison player cylinder being played through a broken stylus.

  18. shutz says:

    One way to drastically improve the results would be to create a radial or cylindrical 3D printer.  Basically, instead of having a platform that translates in cartesian coordiantes, it would only translate along the Z (height) axis, and then rotate around a central point, with the print head on a single axis to set the radius.  Object layers would be printed from the inside-out.  That would remove the whooshing aliasing we’re hearing here.  It would probably introduce other artifacts, though, such as a kind of aliasing when the stylus goes from an arc that is printed to an unprinted arc (as in, during printing, the platform spins, and the print head just draws “dotted arcs”, so that during playback, the stylus would end up jumping slightly every time an arc starts or ends in the area of the groove.)

  19. Joe Danko says:

    I have always wondered if anyone has attempted to design an optical transducer to directly produce the original audio signals from a microgroove LP. 

  20. Dee says:

    These guys do it (optical laser conversion / “no touch” LP decode) for $10 – 20k:
    And, well, it’s a pretty good 1st step:
    http://hackteria.org/?p=380… ‘course if you just make an LP from imiploex you can have it “groove” into whatever you want to play…