<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar system forms &quot;vortex&quot; as it moves through&#160;space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Bisker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1617699</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Bisker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1617699</guid>
		<description>OK, that is just completely mind blowing. Just ... that is amazing in every way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, that is just completely mind blowing. Just &#8230; that is amazing in every way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Berg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1617486</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1617486</guid>
		<description>Rob, you&#039;re grounded.  Maggie, please revoke Rob&#039;s &quot;science&quot; posting privileges for one week.

We were all having fun laughing at that silly creationist textbook in Cory&#039;s post today until we scrolled down and saw this.  Now we&#039;re just sad.  So sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, you&#8217;re grounded.  Maggie, please revoke Rob&#8217;s &#8220;science&#8221; posting privileges for one week.</p>
<p>We were all having fun laughing at that silly creationist textbook in Cory&#8217;s post today until we scrolled down and saw this.  Now we&#8217;re just sad.  So sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GertaLives</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1617169</link>
		<dc:creator>GertaLives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1617169</guid>
		<description>Pregnancy is actually by far the most prevalent STI. Your argument is invalid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pregnancy is actually by far the most prevalent STI. Your argument is invalid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Miller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616400</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616400</guid>
		<description> So, I know everyone here knows this, but posting it in the Youtube comments seemed futile.

The video&#039;s artist claims in the video and elaborates on the blog and in the comments that this model is not just a different viewpoint, but actually makes different predictions about the motion of the planets.

In one Youtube comment, the artist says &quot;The heliocentric model and the helical model﻿ are both hypotheses.&quot; That&#039;s true, and excellent news — science to the rescue here. If the two models make different predictions, all we need to do is use each one to make a prediction about future observations the planets, and then see which is right.

Me, I&#039;m placing my money on the model developed to match  hundreds of years of observed data and which we routinely use to land robots on other planets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> So, I know everyone here knows this, but posting it in the Youtube comments seemed futile.</p>
<p>The video&#8217;s artist claims in the video and elaborates on the blog and in the comments that this model is not just a different viewpoint, but actually makes different predictions about the motion of the planets.</p>
<p>In one Youtube comment, the artist says &#8220;The heliocentric model and the helical model﻿ are both hypotheses.&#8221; That&#8217;s true, and excellent news — science to the rescue here. If the two models make different predictions, all we need to do is use each one to make a prediction about future observations the planets, and then see which is right.</p>
<p>Me, I&#8217;m placing my money on the model developed to match  hundreds of years of observed data and which we routinely use to land robots on other planets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildemar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616357</link>
		<dc:creator>wildemar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616357</guid>
		<description>&#039;You can stop it at 2m&#039; means &#039;no need to stop it before 2m&#039;, effectively endorsing the first two minutes. Also note how I made no reference to the part we were told to ignore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;You can stop it at 2m&#8217; means &#8216;no need to stop it before 2m&#8217;, effectively endorsing the first two minutes. Also note how I made no reference to the part we were told to ignore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans von Tagg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616327</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans von Tagg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 07:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616327</guid>
		<description>








&lt;blockquote&gt;Thank you, Boing Boing, for lending credence to this claptrap.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Don&#039;t whine.  Instead, read the post again.  Especially this part: &quot;You can stop it at 2m...&quot;.  That would be after the amusing bit, and before the woowoo bit.  Any lending of credence has been erroneously inferred, not actually implied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thank you, Boing Boing, for lending credence to this claptrap.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t whine.  Instead, read the post again.  Especially this part: &#8220;You can stop it at 2m&#8230;&#8221;.  That would be after the amusing bit, and before the woowoo bit.  Any lending of credence has been erroneously inferred, not actually implied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Emmett</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616282</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Emmett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616282</guid>
		<description>Just because a point being made isn&#039;t &quot;SCIENCE,&quot; does not mean that the point cannot be interesting or revelatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because a point being made isn&#8217;t &#8220;SCIENCE,&#8221; does not mean that the point cannot be interesting or revelatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Bösch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616183</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Bösch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616183</guid>
		<description>Stupid strikes, tragic victims of video bemoan loss of IQ for watching, senate debates regulating youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid strikes, tragic victims of video bemoan loss of IQ for watching, senate debates regulating youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuyNamedMark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616167</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuyNamedMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616167</guid>
		<description>Well you can use the center point of the galaxy as your frame of reference, especially for something like rotational velocity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you can use the center point of the galaxy as your frame of reference, especially for something like rotational velocity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616149</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616149</guid>
		<description>Typical scientism! Always falling back on the facts. You guys are so squared, man. It&#039;s life, maaaan. I found mad vortices in my Jello the other day. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical scientism! Always falling back on the facts. You guys are so squared, man. It&#8217;s life, maaaan. I found mad vortices in my Jello the other day. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616143</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616143</guid>
		<description>Do you mean we have already discovered the core explosion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean we have already discovered the core explosion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Adams</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616141</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616141</guid>
		<description>Life is vortiffic, not spiracular. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life is vortiffic, not spiracular. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildemar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616131</link>
		<dc:creator>wildemar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616131</guid>
		<description>Yes, but it does so sloppily (and dismissively). This makes it sound like a vortex motion is somehow fundamentally different from a rotation, while calling the heliocentric model &quot;incorrect&quot;. Add to that the fact that the motion is animated incorrectly, and there is plenty to be annoyed at.

It&#039;s the equivalent of explaining sexual reproduction as the process of &quot;infecting&quot; a female &quot;egg&quot; with a male &quot;virus&quot;, causing the resulting &quot;fetus&quot; to &quot;mutate&quot; into human form. That&#039;s not simplified, it&#039;s a misleading, incompetently presented jumble. (Yes, my example is worse than the (first part of the) video. But subtlety is hard.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but it does so sloppily (and dismissively). This makes it sound like a vortex motion is somehow fundamentally different from a rotation, while calling the heliocentric model &#8220;incorrect&#8221;. Add to that the fact that the motion is animated incorrectly, and there is plenty to be annoyed at.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the equivalent of explaining sexual reproduction as the process of &#8220;infecting&#8221; a female &#8220;egg&#8221; with a male &#8220;virus&#8221;, causing the resulting &#8220;fetus&#8221; to &#8220;mutate&#8221; into human form. That&#8217;s not simplified, it&#8217;s a misleading, incompetently presented jumble. (Yes, my example is worse than the (first part of the) video. But subtlety is hard.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B A</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616125</link>
		<dc:creator>B A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616125</guid>
		<description>This looks like it was possibly done with &lt;a href=&quot;http://universesandbox.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Universe Sandbox&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like it was possibly done with <a href="http://universesandbox.com" rel="nofollow">Universe Sandbox</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Fugate</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616110</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Fugate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616110</guid>
		<description>I fail to see the point this video is trying to make.  If it wants to claim the model of the planets circling the sun in a disk is wrong, then this video itself is also wrong as it shows the sun travelling in a straight line.  The sun itself is orbiting the supermassive black hole at the center of the milky way, and the milky way itself is shooting through space.  So this video is just as wrong as what they decry, for the exact same reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see the point this video is trying to make.  If it wants to claim the model of the planets circling the sun in a disk is wrong, then this video itself is also wrong as it shows the sun travelling in a straight line.  The sun itself is orbiting the supermassive black hole at the center of the milky way, and the milky way itself is shooting through space.  So this video is just as wrong as what they decry, for the exact same reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheOven</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616103</link>
		<dc:creator>TheOven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616103</guid>
		<description>Please forgive my ignorance, but I don&#039;t understand what the woowoo is.They&#039;re not claiming magic or anything. I saw this as a sort of layman&#039;s animation explaining the larger movements of the universe, like something you might see on a PBS science special. Totally accurate? No, but it illustrates the point that the sun is not static. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please forgive my ignorance, but I don&#8217;t understand what the woowoo is.They&#8217;re not claiming magic or anything. I saw this as a sort of layman&#8217;s animation explaining the larger movements of the universe, like something you might see on a PBS science special. Totally accurate? No, but it illustrates the point that the sun is not static. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie B</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616070</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616070</guid>
		<description>Amused by the haters...  Rob has offended against their faith!  Perhaps we should burn him at the stake for heresy, that&#039;d be totally scientific I bet.

But I suggest we call the 2:00 mark the &quot;Schauberger point&quot; of this video, after Viktor Schauberger.  That&#039;s where a legitimate interest in vortex phenomena (which are in fact fascinating) spirals off into highly dubious mysticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amused by the haters&#8230;  Rob has offended against their faith!  Perhaps we should burn him at the stake for heresy, that&#8217;d be totally scientific I bet.</p>
<p>But I suggest we call the 2:00 mark the &#8220;Schauberger point&#8221; of this video, after Viktor Schauberger.  That&#8217;s where a legitimate interest in vortex phenomena (which are in fact fascinating) spirals off into highly dubious mysticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616069</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616069</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t want that.  It would always be pegged at 70,000 kph, so you would get speeding tickets even while parked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t want that.  It would always be pegged at 70,000 kph, so you would get speeding tickets even while parked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teto85</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616045</link>
		<dc:creator>Teto85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616045</guid>
		<description>The answer is 42.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is 42.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianOman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616043</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianOman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616043</guid>
		<description>http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6ruhsjBHP1qeevc3o1_500.gif 

Is this better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6ruhsjBHP1qeevc3o1_500.gif" rel="nofollow">http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6ruhsjBHP1qeevc3o1_500.gif</a> </p>
<p>Is this better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClintonD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616039</link>
		<dc:creator>ClintonD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616039</guid>
		<description>Hmm, so Gurren Lagann was true after all. I think we should petition the White House to prepare a defense against the imminent attack by the Antispirals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, so Gurren Lagann was true after all. I think we should petition the White House to prepare a defense against the imminent attack by the Antispirals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bemopolis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616009</link>
		<dc:creator>Bemopolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616009</guid>
		<description>The Sun&#039;s motion relative to the LSR (Local Standard of Rest), known as the &quot;solar apex&quot;, is in the direction of Hercules.  For those familiar with celestial coordinates, it&#039;s about RA = 18.5 h, DEC = +30.  The north ecliptic pole (NEP), which is roughly perpendicular to the planets&#039; orbits, is 36.5 degrees north of that, so the orbits will be tilted relative to the Sun&#039;s motion by that amount.

The Sun&#039;s north pole is roughly aligned with theNEP.  The planets&#039; orbital motions are all prograde, so looking from the Sun&#039;s south pole towards its north pole the motion would appear to be clockwise.None of this is related to the North Star, since that has to do with the Earth&#039;s north pole.  However, since the earth&#039;s pole precesses it goes through a series of north stars; in about AD 13 700 the North Star will be Vega, which is particularly close to the solar apex.  Purely coincidence, but interesting nonetheless.

It should go without saying that the text that accompanies the video is drivel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sun&#8217;s motion relative to the LSR (Local Standard of Rest), known as the &#8220;solar apex&#8221;, is in the direction of Hercules.  For those familiar with celestial coordinates, it&#8217;s about RA = 18.5 h, DEC = +30.  The north ecliptic pole (NEP), which is roughly perpendicular to the planets&#8217; orbits, is 36.5 degrees north of that, so the orbits will be tilted relative to the Sun&#8217;s motion by that amount.</p>
<p>The Sun&#8217;s north pole is roughly aligned with theNEP.  The planets&#8217; orbital motions are all prograde, so looking from the Sun&#8217;s south pole towards its north pole the motion would appear to be clockwise.None of this is related to the North Star, since that has to do with the Earth&#8217;s north pole.  However, since the earth&#8217;s pole precesses it goes through a series of north stars; in about AD 13 700 the North Star will be Vega, which is particularly close to the solar apex.  Purely coincidence, but interesting nonetheless.</p>
<p>It should go without saying that the text that accompanies the video is drivel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1616004</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1616004</guid>
		<description>The elliptic plane of our solar system is not normal to the motion of the sun relative to the galactic plane, therefore the whole imagery is bunk, currently off by 60 degrees. The 70K/hr is w.r.t the galaxy center but he claims he&#039;s ignoring it. By his reasoning the earth&#039;s movement around the sun would be leading with the north pole instead of somewhere near the equator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The elliptic plane of our solar system is not normal to the motion of the sun relative to the galactic plane, therefore the whole imagery is bunk, currently off by 60 degrees. The 70K/hr is w.r.t the galaxy center but he claims he&#8217;s ignoring it. By his reasoning the earth&#8217;s movement around the sun would be leading with the north pole instead of somewhere near the equator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monostatos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1615986</link>
		<dc:creator>monostatos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1615986</guid>
		<description>The speed of the sun is arbitary depending on your reference frame. I was taught at University that there is not an absolute reference frame in space so the heliocentric model he is calling &quot;wrong&quot; is EXACTLY as wrong as his model. Whats his beef? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speed of the sun is arbitary depending on your reference frame. I was taught at University that there is not an absolute reference frame in space so the heliocentric model he is calling &#8220;wrong&#8221; is EXACTLY as wrong as his model. Whats his beef? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donovan acree</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1615965</link>
		<dc:creator>donovan acree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1615965</guid>
		<description>Agreed! I have always wanted to see an animation starting with planetary motion, followed by the motion of the solar system around the galaxy, the galaxy around our local group, the local group around the Virgo supercluster, and finally the supercluster motion itself.

I&#039;ve often wondered what the absolute speed of our planet is in relation to some imaginary fixed point in the universe but as far as I can tell, the ~1.8 billion MPH estimates are based on some petty heavy guess work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed! I have always wanted to see an animation starting with planetary motion, followed by the motion of the solar system around the galaxy, the galaxy around our local group, the local group around the Virgo supercluster, and finally the supercluster motion itself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often wondered what the absolute speed of our planet is in relation to some imaginary fixed point in the universe but as far as I can tell, the ~1.8 billion MPH estimates are based on some petty heavy guess work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuyNamedMark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1615963</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuyNamedMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1615963</guid>
		<description>The sun is round like a soccer ball so that means the solar system and soccer are related too!  Groovy man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sun is round like a soccer ball so that means the solar system and soccer are related too!  Groovy man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerwin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1615952</link>
		<dc:creator>jerwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1615952</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR_8SDNQ0ks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR_8SDNQ0ks" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR_8SDNQ0ks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xzzy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1615947</link>
		<dc:creator>xzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1615947</guid>
		<description>My next car better have a speedometer that uses the center of the universe as its reference point, or I am going to be pissed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My next car better have a speedometer that uses the center of the universe as its reference point, or I am going to be pissed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nash Rambler</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1615939</link>
		<dc:creator>Nash Rambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1615939</guid>
		<description>One of those moved through my bank account this month. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of those moved through my bank account this month. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerwin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/27/solar-system-forms-vortex.html#comment-1615933</link>
		<dc:creator>jerwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=202972#comment-1615933</guid>
		<description>I think the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_transport_network&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interplanetary transport network&lt;/a&gt; blows more minds, all other things being equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_transport_network" rel="nofollow">interplanetary transport network</a> blows more minds, all other things being equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
