— FEATURED —
Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling
The 'Geisters: spooky, scary novel
Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy
The Snowden Principle
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Real Stuff: The Joeist Philosophy
Brain Rot: Hip Hop Family Tree, Chuck D and Spectrum City
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: Workin' in the Data Mine...
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Guatemala: Genocide in Our Hemisphere—livestreamed event in D.C. today
Guatemala: Genocide in Our Hemisphere event D.C. May 29 with scholars, survivors; Xeni moderating
Photos: Throughout Latin America, protests demand justice for Guatemala after genocide trial overturned
— RECENTLY —
Carl Hiaasen's Bad Monkey
Atoms for Peace play a surprise intimate show in Los Angeles
Blunders of Genius: interesting errors by Darwin, Pauling, and Einstein
"By His Things Will You Know Him," a short story
Topsy Turvy World: surreal kids' picture book, now out in the USA
Hubsan X4 quadcopters: tiny cheap, powerful copter
Monsters and Legends: kids' monster book now in the USA!
Akissi: kids' comic about a mischievous girl in Cote D'Ivoire [now in the USA!]
A User's Guide to Neglectful Parenting, by Guy Delisle
Walking Dead 18: a magnificent villain who makes Hannibal Lecter look like Mr Rogers
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Rob Beschizza at 9:02 am Mon, Jan 7, 2013
“B-b-b-but-but the recording business model is antiquated, record labels aren’t adapting to evolving technologyyyyy”
No, the business model is adapting. The problem is the declining content evidenced by these oh-so-antiquated labels being forced to hire robots and third-world slaves to consume their content for free.
“Oh, oh no, what is to do?”
Blame the pirates (read: the people who used to sit in record stores all day, trying before they buy. Bastards!)
And yet, for years, continuing unto today, “This content is not available on [your platform|mobile].” — until you change your user agent string, and prestochangeo! Suddenly it is available!
Can they claim their right hand was so incompetent that it induced view fraud in order to merely reach their own audience?
Winston Churchill said a lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its trousers on.
I read the record companies moved over their videos to the Vevo channel a few years ago, and YouTube took its time to adjust the numbers to reflect this. Surprised to see myself defending the record companies, but there you go.
You may have read it here - http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/dec/28/youtube-video-views-disappear-migrate?INTCMP=SRCH
It seems as though the story has already been somewhat debunked
There are reputable sources for this news item, but still Boing Boing quotes from the Daily Mail. If Boing Boing want’s credibility then they need to stop doing silly things like that. US readers will start thinking the Daily Mail has standards, because they don’t. The Daily Mail still go on about Princess Di, at least once a week, and if it’s not that then it’s about William and Kate. This about sums up the paper pretty well.
Sadly it doesn’t sum up the paper very well; it doesn’t begin to convey the true callous, brain-melting evil.
You have a very good point there.
Keep fuckin’ that chicken.
“If Boing Boing want’s credibility then . . . ”
There’s your problem, right there.
Boing Boing want’s credibility then they need to stop doing silly things like that. US readers will start thinking the Daily Mail has standards, because they don’t.
Boing Boing has referred to the Daily Mail as a trash rag many, many times in the past.
Via Boing Boing:
Precisely why the Daily Mail is irredeemable shit
Regular readers know there’s no love affair. ^_^
The DM is trash, but they also regularly break stories three days ahead of legitimate news sources. If you believe any news source, you’ve got a gullibility problem. You just have to use different trust filters for different sources.
The views were removed because the videos were moved to another account.
The narrative is wonderful but the truth came out about a week ago.
[Thanks to David Wall for the link] When they migrated to VEVO views got a little mixed up and that’s been resolved. There’s no news here, just an inflated narrative blown out of proportion.