<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet crackpots believe Newtown massacre was staged, citing &quot;absolute&quot; Photoshop&#160;proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChickieD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1627524</link>
		<dc:creator>ChickieD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1627524</guid>
		<description>http://cronkitenewsonline.com/2012/11/gun-store-owners-sales-up-with-fears-of-new-laws/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cronkitenewsonline.com/2012/11/gun-store-owners-sales-up-with-fears-of-new-laws/" rel="nofollow">http://cronkitenewsonline.com/2012/11/gun-store-owners-sales-up-with-fears-of-new-laws/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChickieD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1627522</link>
		<dc:creator>ChickieD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1627522</guid>
		<description>There was a tea party idea that when Mitt Romney won there was going to be a race war. The inner city blacks were expected to riot after Obama lost the election. After Mitt lost, the people who were preparing for this certain eventuality became very bitter and angry because they really thought that was going to happen. They were sure that then the country was going to see once and for all the damage Obama had done to it and see what they have known all along, that he is evil. Since Obama won the election, the tea party/right-wingers have been preparing for all of our freedoms to be taken away, specifically the 2nd Amendment rights. Since the election, gun and bullet sales have been off the charts because people are stockpiling - especially armor piecing ammo and assault weapon ammo. When the Newtown shooting happened, with the outcry for gun control legislation following it, there was a sense of inevitability to this faction. I have not so much heard the &quot;truther&quot; version of the Newtown shooting, but have heard another history of this that it was all a set up by the Obama administration to force gun control legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a tea party idea that when Mitt Romney won there was going to be a race war. The inner city blacks were expected to riot after Obama lost the election. After Mitt lost, the people who were preparing for this certain eventuality became very bitter and angry because they really thought that was going to happen. They were sure that then the country was going to see once and for all the damage Obama had done to it and see what they have known all along, that he is evil. Since Obama won the election, the tea party/right-wingers have been preparing for all of our freedoms to be taken away, specifically the 2nd Amendment rights. Since the election, gun and bullet sales have been off the charts because people are stockpiling &#8211; especially armor piecing ammo and assault weapon ammo. When the Newtown shooting happened, with the outcry for gun control legislation following it, there was a sense of inevitability to this faction. I have not so much heard the &#8220;truther&#8221; version of the Newtown shooting, but have heard another history of this that it was all a set up by the Obama administration to force gun control legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Adams</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1626860</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1626860</guid>
		<description> Nah, it has way more to do with people wanting to feel smarter/superior than others. People who are so far removed can&#039;t grasp the magnitude of something like this clearly enough for their brain to start masking it out. That guy in the video, that&#039;s what HIS brain was doing, not the brain of some dumbass who tries to understand something like this over the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Nah, it has way more to do with people wanting to feel smarter/superior than others. People who are so far removed can&#8217;t grasp the magnitude of something like this clearly enough for their brain to start masking it out. That guy in the video, that&#8217;s what HIS brain was doing, not the brain of some dumbass who tries to understand something like this over the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petzl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1626754</link>
		<dc:creator>Petzl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1626754</guid>
		<description>Speaking personally, once they faked the moon landings and began fluoridating the water against our will, it was all downhill from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking personally, once they faked the moon landings and began fluoridating the water against our will, it was all downhill from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperMatt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1625519</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1625519</guid>
		<description>Just a tip for future discussions - insulting my reading comprehension abilities is not a good way to convince me of anything.  Believe it or not, somebody can read and understand what you wrote, and still disagree with you.  It happens all the time.

By the way, I never called the list &quot;yours&quot; at all.  But I assume you wrote the paragraphs below the list.  Those are what I disagree with, as I said before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a tip for future discussions &#8211; insulting my reading comprehension abilities is not a good way to convince me of anything.  Believe it or not, somebody can read and understand what you wrote, and still disagree with you.  It happens all the time.</p>
<p>By the way, I never called the list &#8220;yours&#8221; at all.  But I assume you wrote the paragraphs below the list.  Those are what I disagree with, as I said before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plyx</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1625347</link>
		<dc:creator>plyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1625347</guid>
		<description>I did some research on Robert Parker and I believe I understand better his behavior on camera. Apparently he and his family are quite devout Mormons and his actions and words are common to the teachings of their faith. I must admit I&#039;m a bit ashamed of myself for questioning him in the first place and I sincerely hope they find peace as soon as can be hoped for. I spent a lot of time feeling distraught and generally awful when this tragedy first occurred and I&#039;ve surmised that sometimes people might see a &#039;conspiracy&#039; because they want so badly to believe something this terrible couldn&#039;t possibly be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some research on Robert Parker and I believe I understand better his behavior on camera. Apparently he and his family are quite devout Mormons and his actions and words are common to the teachings of their faith. I must admit I&#8217;m a bit ashamed of myself for questioning him in the first place and I sincerely hope they find peace as soon as can be hoped for. I spent a lot of time feeling distraught and generally awful when this tragedy first occurred and I&#8217;ve surmised that sometimes people might see a &#8216;conspiracy&#8217; because they want so badly to believe something this terrible couldn&#8217;t possibly be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron F</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1625329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1625329</guid>
		<description> Depends if he has tenure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Depends if he has tenure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody Smith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1625286</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1625286</guid>
		<description>Of course! That explains why he had to be black. They didn&#039;t have enough pixels then for a color image....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course! That explains why he had to be black. They didn&#8217;t have enough pixels then for a color image&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantome_NR</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1625238</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantome_NR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1625238</guid>
		<description>as I said, you have no idea what you&#039;re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as I said, you have no idea what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ito Kagehisa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1625109</link>
		<dc:creator>Ito Kagehisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1625109</guid>
		<description>I got one here at work with me.  He&#039;s sending me all kinds of the crazy in emails.  Did you know Dan Quayle is a front for George Soros?  I was certainly surprised.

As long as we pretend these killings aren&#039;t about people seeking word-fame, and continue to grant their wish for headlines, crazy people will continue to look for soft targets.  You can take all the guns away and lock all the doors but they will continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got one here at work with me.  He&#8217;s sending me all kinds of the crazy in emails.  Did you know Dan Quayle is a front for George Soros?  I was certainly surprised.</p>
<p>As long as we pretend these killings aren&#8217;t about people seeking word-fame, and continue to grant their wish for headlines, crazy people will continue to look for soft targets.  You can take all the guns away and lock all the doors but they will continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr P Fenderson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1625048</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr P Fenderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1625048</guid>
		<description>Fantastic rant, but I was referring to the odd notion that things can happen in secret and not be unveiled using simple investigatory techniques or muckups by the people carrying out the conspiracy successfully for years. Many of the ways that these conspiracies reached the public was due to a simple filing error that some schmuck caught, or a paper got FOIAed that shouldn&#039;t have been released. And that we should not move the opposite end and say that &quot;all conspiracies are crackpot theories, and should be ignored&quot;. I would think that there is quite enough evidence to beg the &quot;middle ground&quot; argument here, which is all that I am doing - and what you seem to have missed in my second paragraph of the original post.

Also, I&#039;m not sure how you&#039;re saying that the one item you list was not a conspiracy. First off, just because Russell was fired due to something unrelated to the CIA using Mena to smuggle cocaine into the country is completely irrelevant. If you read &lt;em&gt;Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs, and the Press&lt;/em&gt; by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair, or &lt;em&gt;Drug Crazy : How We Got into This Mess and How We Can Get Out&lt;/em&gt; by Mike Gray you will find more about the CIA using these airstrips to smuggle coke into the US, and more about the Russell Welch story. That is the conspiracy being linked to, as you can see from the sources in the WP article itself. Wikipedia is a gateway to more in-depth information, not an end-all. I suggest you use it as such.

&gt; You didn&#039;t have Conspiracy theorists proving Operation Northwoods existed before the US government released the information

No, but you did have them revealing the existence of Operation Granite Shadow before the government released information on it.

Just because there are extremists who fall prey to the &quot;chicken little&quot; fallacy, this does not preclude the existence of these other conspiracies. Since you are unwilling to back down from hyperbole and extremes, I&#039;m not sure what sort of response you&#039;re looking for. You make quite the pack of unverifiable statements using loaded language (&quot;practically every&quot;, &quot;every baseless, evidence-free&quot;, &quot;conspiracy theorist squeals&quot;, etc), so I&#039;m guessing that you&#039;re not really the best audience for the list. You have already decided. Enjoy your day though, fellow mutant! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic rant, but I was referring to the odd notion that things can happen in secret and not be unveiled using simple investigatory techniques or muckups by the people carrying out the conspiracy successfully for years. Many of the ways that these conspiracies reached the public was due to a simple filing error that some schmuck caught, or a paper got FOIAed that shouldn&#8217;t have been released. And that we should not move the opposite end and say that &#8220;all conspiracies are crackpot theories, and should be ignored&#8221;. I would think that there is quite enough evidence to beg the &#8220;middle ground&#8221; argument here, which is all that I am doing &#8211; and what you seem to have missed in my second paragraph of the original post.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not sure how you&#8217;re saying that the one item you list was not a conspiracy. First off, just because Russell was fired due to something unrelated to the CIA using Mena to smuggle cocaine into the country is completely irrelevant. If you read <em>Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs, and the Press</em> by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair, or <em>Drug Crazy : How We Got into This Mess and How We Can Get Out</em> by Mike Gray you will find more about the CIA using these airstrips to smuggle coke into the US, and more about the Russell Welch story. That is the conspiracy being linked to, as you can see from the sources in the WP article itself. Wikipedia is a gateway to more in-depth information, not an end-all. I suggest you use it as such.</p>
<p>&gt; You didn&#8217;t have Conspiracy theorists proving Operation Northwoods existed before the US government released the information</p>
<p>No, but you did have them revealing the existence of Operation Granite Shadow before the government released information on it.</p>
<p>Just because there are extremists who fall prey to the &#8220;chicken little&#8221; fallacy, this does not preclude the existence of these other conspiracies. Since you are unwilling to back down from hyperbole and extremes, I&#8217;m not sure what sort of response you&#8217;re looking for. You make quite the pack of unverifiable statements using loaded language (&#8220;practically every&#8221;, &#8220;every baseless, evidence-free&#8221;, &#8220;conspiracy theorist squeals&#8221;, etc), so I&#8217;m guessing that you&#8217;re not really the best audience for the list. You have already decided. Enjoy your day though, fellow mutant! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Churba S</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1625009</link>
		<dc:creator>Churba S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1625009</guid>
		<description>Bollocks it does. Looking over that list, I&#039;m seeing a lot of conspiracies that were either revealed by the government itself, broken by very experienced investigators(often investigative journalists) working very hard over long periods of time, or by congressional inquiry. Out of the list you posted, exactly none whatsoever were uncovered or broken open by conspiracy theorists.

And there are more than a few in there which are not really conspiracies, and one of them was just a guy who alleges that the CIA is smuggling cocaine and was almost fired for incompetence - which he agreed with. In fact, out of the list of 43 you posted, 16 are not conspiracies.

On top of that, the vast majority of them share one big thing in common - practically nobody in the general public suspected a damned thing about them, until they were revealed by other means. You didn&#039;t have conspiracy theorists carrying on about MKULTRA before the general public knew it existed. You didn&#039;t have Conspiracy theorists proving Operation Northwoods existed before the US government released the information - Hell, they didn&#039;t even have the name of the operation, it was just the usual Conspiracy theorist squeals of &quot;False Flag! False flag! Everything is a false flag!&quot;

Last of all - Despite the fact that we&#039;ve got a short list of all the documented and proven conspiracy theories, that does not actually make any other conspiracy theory true. We have IRONCLAD proof of COINTELPRO&#039;s existence, but that doesn&#039;t mean that every baseless, evidence-free conspiracy theory that comes along is true. Each must be judged on it&#039;s own merits, and so far, the vast, vast majority of conspiracy theories are just abject fucking nonsense. The fact that conspiracies do exist and some have been proven has absolutely zero bearing on the factual nature of practically every other conspiracy theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bollocks it does. Looking over that list, I&#8217;m seeing a lot of conspiracies that were either revealed by the government itself, broken by very experienced investigators(often investigative journalists) working very hard over long periods of time, or by congressional inquiry. Out of the list you posted, exactly none whatsoever were uncovered or broken open by conspiracy theorists.</p>
<p>And there are more than a few in there which are not really conspiracies, and one of them was just a guy who alleges that the CIA is smuggling cocaine and was almost fired for incompetence &#8211; which he agreed with. In fact, out of the list of 43 you posted, 16 are not conspiracies.</p>
<p>On top of that, the vast majority of them share one big thing in common &#8211; practically nobody in the general public suspected a damned thing about them, until they were revealed by other means. You didn&#8217;t have conspiracy theorists carrying on about MKULTRA before the general public knew it existed. You didn&#8217;t have Conspiracy theorists proving Operation Northwoods existed before the US government released the information &#8211; Hell, they didn&#8217;t even have the name of the operation, it was just the usual Conspiracy theorist squeals of &#8220;False Flag! False flag! Everything is a false flag!&#8221;</p>
<p>Last of all &#8211; Despite the fact that we&#8217;ve got a short list of all the documented and proven conspiracy theories, that does not actually make any other conspiracy theory true. We have IRONCLAD proof of COINTELPRO&#8217;s existence, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that every baseless, evidence-free conspiracy theory that comes along is true. Each must be judged on it&#8217;s own merits, and so far, the vast, vast majority of conspiracy theories are just abject fucking nonsense. The fact that conspiracies do exist and some have been proven has absolutely zero bearing on the factual nature of practically every other conspiracy theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister44</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624936</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624936</guid>
		<description> They must have found us hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> They must have found us hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr P Fenderson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624921</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr P Fenderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624921</guid>
		<description>It is not &quot;my&quot; list, which is explained in the very first sentence. If you don&#039;t really feel it important enough to read even the first few sentences, including some text I constructed personally just for you, then I&#039;m not sure why you feel the need to reply to it - or have me respond to you in turn. I believe that there &lt;em&gt;just might be&lt;/em&gt; a conspiracy hiding under every rock, and I again refer to Robert Anton Wilson&#039;s statement that  the history of the world is a history of conspiracies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not &#8220;my&#8221; list, which is explained in the very first sentence. If you don&#8217;t really feel it important enough to read even the first few sentences, including some text I constructed personally just for you, then I&#8217;m not sure why you feel the need to reply to it &#8211; or have me respond to you in turn. I believe that there <em>just might be</em> a conspiracy hiding under every rock, and I again refer to Robert Anton Wilson&#8217;s statement that  the history of the world is a history of conspiracies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr P Fenderson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624916</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr P Fenderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624916</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s ok! I don&#039;t really feel that there&#039;s any validity in your judgments on the seriousness of these acts based on such arbitrary measurements as &quot;list size&quot;. The list above is not mine, as I already explain in the post itself, and I did pare it to the most salient points. The original was much longer, and had more text at the end. If you cannot accept it without immediately shutting it away in your mind as &quot;crackpot&quot;, then you are clearly not the audience it is trying to reach to. :)

EDIT: Also, in response to your post above this about the definitions: nearly every single thing on that list was planned in secret, denied by officials, and was operating at the fringe of what we consider &quot;lawful&quot;. That is the very definition of a conspiracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s ok! I don&#8217;t really feel that there&#8217;s any validity in your judgments on the seriousness of these acts based on such arbitrary measurements as &#8220;list size&#8221;. The list above is not mine, as I already explain in the post itself, and I did pare it to the most salient points. The original was much longer, and had more text at the end. If you cannot accept it without immediately shutting it away in your mind as &#8220;crackpot&#8221;, then you are clearly not the audience it is trying to reach to. :)</p>
<p>EDIT: Also, in response to your post above this about the definitions: nearly every single thing on that list was planned in secret, denied by officials, and was operating at the fringe of what we consider &#8220;lawful&#8221;. That is the very definition of a conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chauncey Scott</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624798</link>
		<dc:creator>Chauncey Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624798</guid>
		<description> So everybody has the identical response after the WORST school shooting in history. MAKES SENSE. I find it incredibly unsettling, for every single person to be introspective, 3 days after. It takes years to get over the loss of a child, not days, weeks or a month. Like I said earlier, I didn&#039;t give it one thought prior to yesterday that it didn&#039;t happen. And the reason, I&#039;m feeling off about it, it not because of some kook&#039;s creative editing. Simply watching these people&#039;s reactions is unsettling. Spend 15 mins watching, and it puts a pit in your stomach. All of these folks have the same happy response? Nobody looks drained. Do you think you would be able to sleep if you lost your child? 

My cousin died in a very avoidable car accident at 17. I was 16 at the time and remember it well. My grandmother wailed for days. I&#039;ll never forget the car ride to my Aun&#039;ts house where we gathered that night, my father had a new Mark Anthony album playing and to this day if I hear any of the songs, it hearts my heart.  My GMa believes in a higher power more so than anybody I know, she had to see my cousin&#039;s body to pray over her even though she was mangled. It just doesn&#039;t make sense. These people are speaking about their children, like it&#039;s 3 yrs later. It&#039;s just odd. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> So everybody has the identical response after the WORST school shooting in history. MAKES SENSE. I find it incredibly unsettling, for every single person to be introspective, 3 days after. It takes years to get over the loss of a child, not days, weeks or a month. Like I said earlier, I didn&#8217;t give it one thought prior to yesterday that it didn&#8217;t happen. And the reason, I&#8217;m feeling off about it, it not because of some kook&#8217;s creative editing. Simply watching these people&#8217;s reactions is unsettling. Spend 15 mins watching, and it puts a pit in your stomach. All of these folks have the same happy response? Nobody looks drained. Do you think you would be able to sleep if you lost your child? </p>
<p>My cousin died in a very avoidable car accident at 17. I was 16 at the time and remember it well. My grandmother wailed for days. I&#8217;ll never forget the car ride to my Aun&#8217;ts house where we gathered that night, my father had a new Mark Anthony album playing and to this day if I hear any of the songs, it hearts my heart.  My GMa believes in a higher power more so than anybody I know, she had to see my cousin&#8217;s body to pray over her even though she was mangled. It just doesn&#8217;t make sense. These people are speaking about their children, like it&#8217;s 3 yrs later. It&#8217;s just odd. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantome_NR</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624794</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantome_NR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624794</guid>
		<description>oh for crying out loud. do you have hair? did you know hair can be parted in any direction, using a comb? 
answer me this: if this is indeed the murdered girl, where is here sister? what is more likely? that they would just leave her at home? if they were part of some cover up, wouldn&#039;t they just leave the girl who was supposed to be dead at home? this fails all tests of basic logic. you are a mental midget indeed. get a life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh for crying out loud. do you have hair? did you know hair can be parted in any direction, using a comb?<br />
answer me this: if this is indeed the murdered girl, where is here sister? what is more likely? that they would just leave her at home? if they were part of some cover up, wouldn&#8217;t they just leave the girl who was supposed to be dead at home? this fails all tests of basic logic. you are a mental midget indeed. get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mentalmidgets</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624775</link>
		<dc:creator>mentalmidgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624775</guid>
		<description>No. Look again. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. Look again. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boingerbro</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624741</link>
		<dc:creator>boingerbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624741</guid>
		<description> My best guess is that it was a prepared statement and nothing more so that in a way, it was &quot;performed&quot; and thus felt a little off. Of course, like anyone appearing before the national media, one would want to prepare a statement when addressing the country. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> My best guess is that it was a prepared statement and nothing more so that in a way, it was &#8220;performed&#8221; and thus felt a little off. Of course, like anyone appearing before the national media, one would want to prepare a statement when addressing the country. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liquidself</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624730</link>
		<dc:creator>liquidself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624730</guid>
		<description>Just want to point out that the Aurora/Dark Knight musings were originally just pop cultural/ mass killings synchronicity type speculations  that were separate from the Libor stuff originally, they ve been dragged in by the negative vortex of right wing conspiracy shills.  The libor type stuff is actually a good sign, meaning that the republican conscience is so abused by this point by the obvious that elaborate delusions are necessary now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to point out that the Aurora/Dark Knight musings were originally just pop cultural/ mass killings synchronicity type speculations  that were separate from the Libor stuff originally, they ve been dragged in by the negative vortex of right wing conspiracy shills.  The libor type stuff is actually a good sign, meaning that the republican conscience is so abused by this point by the obvious that elaborate delusions are necessary now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boingerbro</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624728</link>
		<dc:creator>boingerbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624728</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of you that to deny the shooting is in extreme bad taste but can someone speak to the strange video of the father Robbie Parker who laughs saying &quot;Are we ready to start&quot; and then hyper-ventilates before talking as an actor would preparing for a scene? Again, I am seriously not trying to talk conspiracy here but if it was my kid, I would not be so composed or light-hearted before the cameras roles. He doesn&#039;t look emotionally wrecked before the scene starts. We all handle tragedy in different ways but this is more than a bit strange and seems to strike a false chord. Thoughts?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKWgCRBR5qE

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of you that to deny the shooting is in extreme bad taste but can someone speak to the strange video of the father Robbie Parker who laughs saying &#8220;Are we ready to start&#8221; and then hyper-ventilates before talking as an actor would preparing for a scene? Again, I am seriously not trying to talk conspiracy here but if it was my kid, I would not be so composed or light-hearted before the cameras roles. He doesn&#8217;t look emotionally wrecked before the scene starts. We all handle tragedy in different ways but this is more than a bit strange and seems to strike a false chord. Thoughts?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKWgCRBR5qE" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKWgCRBR5qE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liquidself</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624713</link>
		<dc:creator>liquidself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624713</guid>
		<description> Think there might be more to recommend this theory than it might seem at first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Think there might be more to recommend this theory than it might seem at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flickerKuu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624670</link>
		<dc:creator>flickerKuu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624670</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like how the father in the video goes from joking and smiling to instantly sad. He&#039;s a real good actor. What else is make believe here?
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like how the father in the video goes from joking and smiling to instantly sad. He&#8217;s a real good actor. What else is make believe here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miasm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624634</link>
		<dc:creator>miasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624634</guid>
		<description>As I see it, the problem with the way that &#039;conscientious adults who are taking an upstanding role in society&#039; react to conspiracies mirrors closely the way that those some magnanimous sceptics used to react to drugs.

You should be able to point out that, yes methamphetimine is really fucking bad for you - don&#039;t take it you dumb shit, whilst also keeping an open mind about the medical effectiveness of CBD&#039;s in certain strains of cannabis (and, hell, ecstasy and ketamine for severe depression etc).
Just tarring the whole world of drugs with the same &#039;dumb-shit&#039; brush inclines people who then go on to have a really good drugs-experience to completely disregard your very appropriate advice to stay away from the bad stuff.

We should be able to laugh off the bollocks whilst retaining an open mind about the clear danger of cabals of criminally conspiring, public officials.
After all, treating all reports of criminal conspiracy as if they are nothing but flights of fancy engenders an atmosphere conducive to the perpetuation of the de-facto acceptance of laughably weak defences to obvious crimes with nothing but the most bare-faced lying and obfuscation, apparent to anyone watching any politician do anything.

But, you get to feel like a totally conscientious, sceptical adult, taking a responsible role in the dialogue of society, whilst child-like idiots froth around your ankles, blabbering nonsense about the bogeyman.

I mean, they cant even get governing right, what chance do they have of getting away with a crime? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I see it, the problem with the way that &#8216;conscientious adults who are taking an upstanding role in society&#8217; react to conspiracies mirrors closely the way that those some magnanimous sceptics used to react to drugs.</p>
<p>You should be able to point out that, yes methamphetimine is really fucking bad for you &#8211; don&#8217;t take it you dumb shit, whilst also keeping an open mind about the medical effectiveness of CBD&#8217;s in certain strains of cannabis (and, hell, ecstasy and ketamine for severe depression etc).<br />
Just tarring the whole world of drugs with the same &#8216;dumb-shit&#8217; brush inclines people who then go on to have a really good drugs-experience to completely disregard your very appropriate advice to stay away from the bad stuff.</p>
<p>We should be able to laugh off the bollocks whilst retaining an open mind about the clear danger of cabals of criminally conspiring, public officials.<br />
After all, treating all reports of criminal conspiracy as if they are nothing but flights of fancy engenders an atmosphere conducive to the perpetuation of the de-facto acceptance of laughably weak defences to obvious crimes with nothing but the most bare-faced lying and obfuscation, apparent to anyone watching any politician do anything.</p>
<p>But, you get to feel like a totally conscientious, sceptical adult, taking a responsible role in the dialogue of society, whilst child-like idiots froth around your ankles, blabbering nonsense about the bogeyman.</p>
<p>I mean, they cant even get governing right, what chance do they have of getting away with a crime? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedShirt77</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624615</link>
		<dc:creator>RedShirt77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624615</guid>
		<description> Lets hope Texas takes Florida with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Lets hope Texas takes Florida with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miasm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624608</link>
		<dc:creator>miasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624608</guid>
		<description>Dude, you just don&#039;t get it.
Criminal conspiracies NEVER happen and certainly no criminals exist in public office conspiring to commit crimes.
If you start from that perfectly reasonable assumption, all the other nagging evidence just slips right into place.
It&#039;s a just, just world after all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis
You nut!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, you just don&#8217;t get it.<br />
Criminal conspiracies NEVER happen and certainly no criminals exist in public office conspiring to commit crimes.<br />
If you start from that perfectly reasonable assumption, all the other nagging evidence just slips right into place.<br />
It&#8217;s a just, just world after all.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis</a><br />
You nut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624546</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624546</guid>
		<description> I don&#039;t trust the government but I still agree with Petzl that most of these conspiracy theories are just stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I don&#8217;t trust the government but I still agree with Petzl that most of these conspiracy theories are just stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624544</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624544</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re arguing that the Lewinsky scandal was a conspiracy.  Perpetrated by whom for what purpose and why would Clinton play ball instead of uncovering the conspiracy to clear his name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re arguing that the Lewinsky scandal was a conspiracy.  Perpetrated by whom for what purpose and why would Clinton play ball instead of uncovering the conspiracy to clear his name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624542</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624542</guid>
		<description> Some people look like other people.  I am mistaken for other people on average probably once a week.

It&#039;s a conspiracy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Some people look like other people.  I am mistaken for other people on average probably once a week.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a conspiracy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/09/internet-crackpots-believe-new.html#comment-1624539</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204914#comment-1624539</guid>
		<description>Petzl is absolutely right that your argument would be better served by a shorter list containing only the most salient examples of conspiracies you brought in.  When I saw the long list and a few items that I didn&#039;t think should qualify I basically stopped reading and wrote you off as a crackpot.  Huge long lists of conspiracies are usually the province of crackpots.

Shorter list really is good advice.  You&#039;re undermining your own argument here by making yourself look less-than-credible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Petzl is absolutely right that your argument would be better served by a shorter list containing only the most salient examples of conspiracies you brought in.  When I saw the long list and a few items that I didn&#8217;t think should qualify I basically stopped reading and wrote you off as a crackpot.  Huge long lists of conspiracies are usually the province of crackpots.</p>
<p>Shorter list really is good advice.  You&#8217;re undermining your own argument here by making yourself look less-than-credible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
