<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patrick Kennedy: I was hooked on cocaine, painkillers and booze, therefore no one is allowed to smoke&#160;pot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiptw</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1628167</link>
		<dc:creator>kiptw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1628167</guid>
		<description>Coffee&#039;s a much bigger gateway drug, too. Look how many users of all drugs started with coffee! And how many murderers can be shown to have consumed it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee&#8217;s a much bigger gateway drug, too. Look how many users of all drugs started with coffee! And how many murderers can be shown to have consumed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin_hunt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1627014</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin_hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1627014</guid>
		<description>Looking at the comments here, it is obvious why Kennedy&#039;s SAM Facebook page censors negative comments. I got banned after less than one minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the comments here, it is obvious why Kennedy&#8217;s SAM Facebook page censors negative comments. I got banned after less than one minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin_hunt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1627013</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin_hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1627013</guid>
		<description>It would be like Hogan&#039;s Heroes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be like Hogan&#8217;s Heroes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin_hunt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1627011</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin_hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1627011</guid>
		<description>Why not grow your own if you live in CA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not grow your own if you live in CA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin_hunt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1627008</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin_hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1627008</guid>
		<description>If there was ever a candy that looked like a drug, Pixie Sticks would be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there was ever a candy that looked like a drug, Pixie Sticks would be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin_hunt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1627006</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin_hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1627006</guid>
		<description>I propose a three-way pud-chugging fest with Kennedy, David Frum, and Kevin Sabet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I propose a three-way pud-chugging fest with Kennedy, David Frum, and Kevin Sabet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626887</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626887</guid>
		<description>@boingboing-965a89aa841f0807220ff7c6678dd0e4:disqus Fair enough, I do encourage to look into it more if you&#039;re interested, I think you&#039;ll find that almost all credible sources will back up my claim.

I guess I get frustrated as someone that has felt many of the physical withdrawal symptoms, especially as the science backs me up; yet the myth is still very persistant across general society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@boingboing-965a89aa841f0807220ff7c6678dd0e4:disqus Fair enough, I do encourage to look into it more if you&#8217;re interested, I think you&#8217;ll find that almost all credible sources will back up my claim.</p>
<p>I guess I get frustrated as someone that has felt many of the physical withdrawal symptoms, especially as the science backs me up; yet the myth is still very persistant across general society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626827</link>
		<dc:creator>elix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626827</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that I&#039;m 100% convinced by the citations you&#039;ve provided, but thank you for following through.

I asked for citations not as a flippant dismissal but because, as a frequent cannabis user for theraputic reasons, claims that go counter to received wisdom are worth investigating. As you were the one making the claim, the onus of proof does, to a certain degree, fall upon you. (On the other hand, as you state, we can both use Google, so don&#039;t feel obligated to continue finding more links. It was enough to get started.) I think it&#039;s reasonable to provide citations when challenged for taking a contrary position over widely-held beliefs if you believe in it, and I respect that you&#039;ve taken the time to follow through. Simply the act of doing that has gotten me to look into this a bit more and challenge my assumptions. At the very least, I won&#039;t be so quick to state &quot;marijuana has no physically-addictive properties&quot; without hesitating and qualifying it as a complicated situation.

On the other hand, I think we&#039;ve all seen all sorts of things said on the Internet, and no followup ever again once challenged to put some gold on top of all the shit they&#039;ve been talking to prove it&#039;s worth something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that I&#8217;m 100% convinced by the citations you&#8217;ve provided, but thank you for following through.</p>
<p>I asked for citations not as a flippant dismissal but because, as a frequent cannabis user for theraputic reasons, claims that go counter to received wisdom are worth investigating. As you were the one making the claim, the onus of proof does, to a certain degree, fall upon you. (On the other hand, as you state, we can both use Google, so don&#8217;t feel obligated to continue finding more links. It was enough to get started.) I think it&#8217;s reasonable to provide citations when challenged for taking a contrary position over widely-held beliefs if you believe in it, and I respect that you&#8217;ve taken the time to follow through. Simply the act of doing that has gotten me to look into this a bit more and challenge my assumptions. At the very least, I won&#8217;t be so quick to state &#8220;marijuana has no physically-addictive properties&#8221; without hesitating and qualifying it as a complicated situation.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I think we&#8217;ve all seen all sorts of things said on the Internet, and no followup ever again once challenged to put some gold on top of all the shit they&#8217;ve been talking to prove it&#8217;s worth something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lee Scarlett</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626159</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lee Scarlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626159</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s a Kennedy and this latest scheme of his smells like a signal that he might be in a position to lose power. I&#039;m picking up aromas of desperation and greed with a strong hint of hypocrisy in the nose.

Isn&#039;t this the Kennedy who crashed his car into the barriers at the foot of the Capitol while taking a 3 am drive on Ambien? Despite reports that he&#039;d been drinking at a bar as recently as 4 hours prior to his little smash-up, he got out of that DUI-for-the-hoi-polloi conviction by claiming he was simply confused from mixing Ambien with some other prescription drugs he was concurrently ingesting. 

Telling the judge I was blitzed on Drugs X, Y, and Z instead of just alcohol never seems to work for me. Maybe it&#039;s what I&#039;m wearing? I kid. I don&#039;t take driving and intoxication lightly and I&#039;ve dropped $60 on a cab to drive me across the Bay Bridge when too impaired to get home. This guy has a history of endangering others by combing driving and intoxication. With his position and connections, I can only imagine what his record would look like if he were one of the unwashed like me.

He&#039;s got a lot of personal reasons to be pointing fingers at one drug population he can&#039;t count himself a member of. Addiction&#039;s a bitch. He would have my sympathy if he weren&#039;t a greedy hypocrite whose venal pandering to BigPharma will damage others in the interest of saving his own political skin and enriching his bank accounts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s a Kennedy and this latest scheme of his smells like a signal that he might be in a position to lose power. I&#8217;m picking up aromas of desperation and greed with a strong hint of hypocrisy in the nose.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this the Kennedy who crashed his car into the barriers at the foot of the Capitol while taking a 3 am drive on Ambien? Despite reports that he&#8217;d been drinking at a bar as recently as 4 hours prior to his little smash-up, he got out of that DUI-for-the-hoi-polloi conviction by claiming he was simply confused from mixing Ambien with some other prescription drugs he was concurrently ingesting. </p>
<p>Telling the judge I was blitzed on Drugs X, Y, and Z instead of just alcohol never seems to work for me. Maybe it&#8217;s what I&#8217;m wearing? I kid. I don&#8217;t take driving and intoxication lightly and I&#8217;ve dropped $60 on a cab to drive me across the Bay Bridge when too impaired to get home. This guy has a history of endangering others by combing driving and intoxication. With his position and connections, I can only imagine what his record would look like if he were one of the unwashed like me.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s got a lot of personal reasons to be pointing fingers at one drug population he can&#8217;t count himself a member of. Addiction&#8217;s a bitch. He would have my sympathy if he weren&#8217;t a greedy hypocrite whose venal pandering to BigPharma will damage others in the interest of saving his own political skin and enriching his bank accounts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lee Scarlett</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626135</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lee Scarlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626135</guid>
		<description>Not to mention widely available, affordably priced vaporizers. I have no vocal horse in this game, but I wonder why MMJ advocates haven&#039;t made a point of educating the public about the safety benefits of vaporizers.

I know quite a few weed users in the 20-35 yo range who scorn smoking (of anything) and carry portable vaporizers with them when they intend to vape away from home.

While eating cannabis is a viable alternative to making it, those of us with experience know that titrating one&#039;s dose can be difficult if guessing at the effects of the concentration of THC in an edible. As an infrequent user of cannabis, should I choose to ingest orally, I would have to go through a trial period of several days to determine a proper dose even if I were consuming an edible from a dispensary which labels its products with THC contents.

For the uninitiated, such a process would not spring handily to mind. Smoking allows the user to titrate easily. Vaporizing allows for the same ease of dose control, minus the negative effects of smoking, but the barrier to entry is higher because of price.

Still, the fact that the public automatically associates cannabis with smoking works against the interests of MMJ advocates and legalization supporters. I imagine that MMJ advocates have had their hands full simply elevating the debate to a larger platform, but I think that educating and proselytizing about vaporizing as a practical, relatively safe means of ingestion would have a positive impact on the legalization debate at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention widely available, affordably priced vaporizers. I have no vocal horse in this game, but I wonder why MMJ advocates haven&#8217;t made a point of educating the public about the safety benefits of vaporizers.</p>
<p>I know quite a few weed users in the 20-35 yo range who scorn smoking (of anything) and carry portable vaporizers with them when they intend to vape away from home.</p>
<p>While eating cannabis is a viable alternative to making it, those of us with experience know that titrating one&#8217;s dose can be difficult if guessing at the effects of the concentration of THC in an edible. As an infrequent user of cannabis, should I choose to ingest orally, I would have to go through a trial period of several days to determine a proper dose even if I were consuming an edible from a dispensary which labels its products with THC contents.</p>
<p>For the uninitiated, such a process would not spring handily to mind. Smoking allows the user to titrate easily. Vaporizing allows for the same ease of dose control, minus the negative effects of smoking, but the barrier to entry is higher because of price.</p>
<p>Still, the fact that the public automatically associates cannabis with smoking works against the interests of MMJ advocates and legalization supporters. I imagine that MMJ advocates have had their hands full simply elevating the debate to a larger platform, but I think that educating and proselytizing about vaporizing as a practical, relatively safe means of ingestion would have a positive impact on the legalization debate at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626137</guid>
		<description>Show Kennedy what you think by shutting down liquor stores and replacing them with marijuana dispensaries.

http://wh.gov/PHy5

Any liquor store that stops selling alcohol gets an automatic license to sell marijuana.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show Kennedy what you think by shutting down liquor stores and replacing them with marijuana dispensaries.</p>
<p><a href="http://wh.gov/PHy5" rel="nofollow">http://wh.gov/PHy5</a></p>
<p>Any liquor store that stops selling alcohol gets an automatic license to sell marijuana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626128</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626128</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So you want a re-education camp that can hold 35 million recreational marijuana users?&lt;/blockquote&gt;I&#039;d rather go with Max Flatow&#039;s plan for mandatory LSD-based re-education camps for everyone over 35.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So you want a re-education camp that can hold 35 million recreational marijuana users?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d rather go with Max Flatow&#8217;s plan for mandatory LSD-based re-education camps for everyone over 35.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DisGuest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626054</link>
		<dc:creator>DisGuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626054</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about your last question. I wish it was legal because although I&#039;ve never grown any, I am really good with plants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about your last question. I wish it was legal because although I&#8217;ve never grown any, I am really good with plants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626044</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626044</guid>
		<description>Pot Brownies are &lt;i&gt;dangerous!&lt;/i&gt;  It takes an hour after you eat one to get high, but often you get the munchies first, and there&#039;s this plate of tasty tasty chocolatey brownies &lt;i&gt;right there!&lt;/i&gt;  Of &lt;i&gt;course&lt;/i&gt; you want another, even though if your judgement processes were running at full steam you&#039;d remember that it&#039;s really not a good idea, and you&#039;d be much better off ordering pizza, or going to the kitchen to see what&#039;s in the fridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pot Brownies are <i>dangerous!</i>  It takes an hour after you eat one to get high, but often you get the munchies first, and there&#8217;s this plate of tasty tasty chocolatey brownies <i>right there!</i>  Of <i>course</i> you want another, even though if your judgement processes were running at full steam you&#8217;d remember that it&#8217;s really not a good idea, and you&#8217;d be much better off ordering pizza, or going to the kitchen to see what&#8217;s in the fridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626036</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626036</guid>
		<description>Here in California, we &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; paying top dollar for marijuana from the medical industry, but if it were simply legalized, marijuana is easy enough to grow that it would be at least as cheap as oregano, if not zucchini.  

Out of curiosity, does anybody know if the FDA or its predecessors ever approved any cannabis medicines between the time it was created and the beginning of marijuana prohibition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in California, we <i>are</i> paying top dollar for marijuana from the medical industry, but if it were simply legalized, marijuana is easy enough to grow that it would be at least as cheap as oregano, if not zucchini.  </p>
<p>Out of curiosity, does anybody know if the FDA or its predecessors ever approved any cannabis medicines between the time it was created and the beginning of marijuana prohibition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1626022</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1626022</guid>
		<description>So you want a re-education camp that can hold 35 million recreational marijuana users?  California has 35 million people - it&#039;s just the right size!  And many of us are already here*, so that&#039;d be really efficient!  Dude, let&#039;s go to marijuana camp this summer!

And re-education camp is what it would take, because unlike the addictive drugs that Kennedy used, where medical help to get you past withdrawal symptoms is helpful and sometimes critically necessary, or like marijuana self-medication for mental issues that could be treated better with pharmaceuticals, for occasional recreational users, medical rehab isn&#039;t useful, we just like the stuff, which is a politically incorrect set of values that can only be cured by re-education.

(*Ok, officially I&#039;m not a recreational user, I&#039;ve got a doctor&#039;s recommendation to use it for RSI.  It does actually help a bit, though NSAIDs do a better job.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you want a re-education camp that can hold 35 million recreational marijuana users?  California has 35 million people &#8211; it&#8217;s just the right size!  And many of us are already here*, so that&#8217;d be really efficient!  Dude, let&#8217;s go to marijuana camp this summer!</p>
<p>And re-education camp is what it would take, because unlike the addictive drugs that Kennedy used, where medical help to get you past withdrawal symptoms is helpful and sometimes critically necessary, or like marijuana self-medication for mental issues that could be treated better with pharmaceuticals, for occasional recreational users, medical rehab isn&#8217;t useful, we just like the stuff, which is a politically incorrect set of values that can only be cured by re-education.</p>
<p>(*Ok, officially I&#8217;m not a recreational user, I&#8217;ve got a doctor&#8217;s recommendation to use it for RSI.  It does actually help a bit, though NSAIDs do a better job.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625986</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625986</guid>
		<description>Unlike his 1992/1996 running mate, Al knew enough to inhale, and did so frequently, but that just made him a frequent flyer, not an addict.  No idea if he also smoked tobacco or was addicted to caffeine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike his 1992/1996 running mate, Al knew enough to inhale, and did so frequently, but that just made him a frequent flyer, not an addict.  No idea if he also smoked tobacco or was addicted to caffeine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625985</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625985</guid>
		<description>Joe Kennedy also did really well by not trusting the market before the 1929 crash, getting out and keeping his money in cash, and buying up lots of stuff cheap after the crash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Kennedy also did really well by not trusting the market before the 1929 crash, getting out and keeping his money in cash, and buying up lots of stuff cheap after the crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625949</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625949</guid>
		<description>Just like priests have struggled with and overcome sexual urges, so they should be the ones telling us how to live our sex lives, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like priests have struggled with and overcome sexual urges, so they should be the ones telling us how to live our sex lives, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jandrese</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625744</link>
		<dc:creator>jandrese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625744</guid>
		<description>If you let people drink sodas pretty soon they&#039;ll be moving on to the harder stuff.  Pop Rocks, Jawbreakers, even eventually the dreaded Pixie Stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you let people drink sodas pretty soon they&#8217;ll be moving on to the harder stuff.  Pop Rocks, Jawbreakers, even eventually the dreaded Pixie Stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sluggo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625639</link>
		<dc:creator>sluggo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625639</guid>
		<description>The whole principle is wrong; it&#039;s like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can&#039;t eat steak.

- Robert A. Heinlein</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole principle is wrong; it&#8217;s like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can&#8217;t eat steak.</p>
<p>- Robert A. Heinlein</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Carrasco</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625579</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Carrasco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625579</guid>
		<description> YOUR LOGIC IS FLAWED!

People who have struggled with and ultimately overcome substance abuse problems are THE EXACT people who should be advising on drug policy reform. 

By your logic, astronauts should not talk about space, lawyers should not teach law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> YOUR LOGIC IS FLAWED!</p>
<p>People who have struggled with and ultimately overcome substance abuse problems are THE EXACT people who should be advising on drug policy reform. </p>
<p>By your logic, astronauts should not talk about space, lawyers should not teach law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625516</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625516</guid>
		<description> If you wildly misrepresent what&#039;s actually going on there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If you wildly misrepresent what&#8217;s actually going on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Griggs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625512</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Griggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625512</guid>
		<description>We should listen to Kennedy.  Afterall, if cocaine wasn&#039;t legal he wouldn&#039;t have been able to get it and become addicted to it. No one smokes marijuana today.  It&#039;s illegal.  You can&#039;t buy it. If we legalize it, everybody will smoke it. No one will think about what they&#039;re doing because none of us are capable of thinking for ourselves or making our own decisions. If something is legal, that means the government wants us to do it. It&#039;s good for us. If it&#039;s illegal, we trust our all knowing government&#039;s wisdom on that and none of us ever go against the government&#039;s wishes even if our actions will hurt no one.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should listen to Kennedy.  Afterall, if cocaine wasn&#8217;t legal he wouldn&#8217;t have been able to get it and become addicted to it. No one smokes marijuana today.  It&#8217;s illegal.  You can&#8217;t buy it. If we legalize it, everybody will smoke it. No one will think about what they&#8217;re doing because none of us are capable of thinking for ourselves or making our own decisions. If something is legal, that means the government wants us to do it. It&#8217;s good for us. If it&#8217;s illegal, we trust our all knowing government&#8217;s wisdom on that and none of us ever go against the government&#8217;s wishes even if our actions will hurt no one.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Kyle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625368</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625368</guid>
		<description>* Patrick has acknowledged being treated for cocaine use during his teenage years, and admitted that he abused drugs and alcohol while he was a student at Providence College. 

* Patrick assaulting a security guard at an airport checkpoint in 2000. He paid an undisclosed civil settlement to the alleged victim almost two years later. 

 * Also in 2000, Atlantic Navigation Company of Mystic, Connecticut, claimed that a boat they rented to Patrick Kennedy was found abandoned off Martha&#039;s Vineyard, Massachusetts, with US$28,000 worth of damage.

* In 2003, Kennedy was criticized for saying &quot;I have never worked a f***ing day in my life&quot;

* On May 4, 2006, Patrick crashed his automobile into a barricade on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. A Capitol Police official said the congressman had appeared intoxicated, but Kennedy claimed that he was merely disoriented from prescription medications Ambien and Phenergan. Anonymous sources are alleged to have seen Kennedy drinking at the nearby Hawk &amp; Dove bar prior to the accident.

* On May 5, 2006, Kennedy admitted that he had an addiction to prescription medication and announced he would be re-admitting himself to a drug-rehabilitation facility at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota where he has sought treatment for prior addictions. He has stated that he has no recollection of the car crash. 

* On Friday, June 12, 2009, Kennedy again announced that he &quot;has checked into a medical facility for treatment&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Patrick has acknowledged being treated for cocaine use during his teenage years, and admitted that he abused drugs and alcohol while he was a student at Providence College. </p>
<p>* Patrick assaulting a security guard at an airport checkpoint in 2000. He paid an undisclosed civil settlement to the alleged victim almost two years later. </p>
<p> * Also in 2000, Atlantic Navigation Company of Mystic, Connecticut, claimed that a boat they rented to Patrick Kennedy was found abandoned off Martha&#8217;s Vineyard, Massachusetts, with US$28,000 worth of damage.</p>
<p>* In 2003, Kennedy was criticized for saying &#8220;I have never worked a f***ing day in my life&#8221;</p>
<p>* On May 4, 2006, Patrick crashed his automobile into a barricade on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. A Capitol Police official said the congressman had appeared intoxicated, but Kennedy claimed that he was merely disoriented from prescription medications Ambien and Phenergan. Anonymous sources are alleged to have seen Kennedy drinking at the nearby Hawk &amp; Dove bar prior to the accident.</p>
<p>* On May 5, 2006, Kennedy admitted that he had an addiction to prescription medication and announced he would be re-admitting himself to a drug-rehabilitation facility at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota where he has sought treatment for prior addictions. He has stated that he has no recollection of the car crash. </p>
<p>* On Friday, June 12, 2009, Kennedy again announced that he &#8220;has checked into a medical facility for treatment&#8221;.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625345</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625345</guid>
		<description>Did I argue that they were severe? Did I argue that mild withdrawal symptoms were of great concern? Did I argue that marijuana produces more severe withdrawals than caffine? Your strawman arguments would certainly imply that you did indeed miss my point.

I only pointed out that about 9% of (regular) users experience withdrawal symptoms because inevitably someone will chime in with &quot;I smoked x amount for x years and when I stopped I didn&#039;t get these symptoms, therefore marijuana isn&#039;t addictive&quot;.

I will state clearly again: I fully support legalisation of marijuana for recreational and medicinal use. I only contradict the argument that marijuana isn&#039;t physically addictive because myths and falsehoods make poor arguments in the legalisation debate.

The truth is a smaller fraction of people get addicted to marijuana than most drugs including many legal drugs, the symptoms they feel are usually less severe than most drugs including many legal ones. That a small percentage of regular users become dependent on marijuana and may suffer mild withdrawal symptoms is not a good reason for continued prohibition; it does however need to be acknowledged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I argue that they were severe? Did I argue that mild withdrawal symptoms were of great concern? Did I argue that marijuana produces more severe withdrawals than caffine? Your strawman arguments would certainly imply that you did indeed miss my point.</p>
<p>I only pointed out that about 9% of (regular) users experience withdrawal symptoms because inevitably someone will chime in with &#8220;I smoked x amount for x years and when I stopped I didn&#8217;t get these symptoms, therefore marijuana isn&#8217;t addictive&#8221;.</p>
<p>I will state clearly again: I fully support legalisation of marijuana for recreational and medicinal use. I only contradict the argument that marijuana isn&#8217;t physically addictive because myths and falsehoods make poor arguments in the legalisation debate.</p>
<p>The truth is a smaller fraction of people get addicted to marijuana than most drugs including many legal drugs, the symptoms they feel are usually less severe than most drugs including many legal ones. That a small percentage of regular users become dependent on marijuana and may suffer mild withdrawal symptoms is not a good reason for continued prohibition; it does however need to be acknowledged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625340</link>
		<dc:creator>marilove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625340</guid>
		<description>Still not particularly impressed.  Okay, so how about this:  &quot;Withdrawal symptoms are unlikely but if they do occur  they are very mild, especially in comparison to something as common as caffeine&quot;.  How about that?

But, no, I didn&#039;t miss your point.  You seem to think that the rate of withdrawal symptoms is somehow RELEVANT.  It&#039;s really not.  It doesn&#039;t change the discussion in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still not particularly impressed.  Okay, so how about this:  &#8221;Withdrawal symptoms are unlikely but if they do occur  they are very mild, especially in comparison to something as common as caffeine&#8221;.  How about that?</p>
<p>But, no, I didn&#8217;t miss your point.  You seem to think that the rate of withdrawal symptoms is somehow RELEVANT.  It&#8217;s really not.  It doesn&#8217;t change the discussion in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhertzli</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625338</link>
		<dc:creator>jhertzli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625338</guid>
		<description>I diagnose brain damage caused by drug use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I diagnose brain damage caused by drug use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625323</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625323</guid>
		<description>See the loose citations above. I&#039;m not pointing to any one study because there are plenty to choose from.

Secondly, &lt;em&gt;thank you for missing my point entirely&lt;/em&gt;. I pointed out that only a small number of users get symptoms, I also pointed out that they&#039;re mild and I concluded by saying that I support legalisation. 

As far as symptoms go they vary, as do any withdrawal symptoms. Personally I&#039;ve experienced irritability, a lot of difficulty sleeping and general nausea as well difficulty keeping food down over the first few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the loose citations above. I&#8217;m not pointing to any one study because there are plenty to choose from.</p>
<p>Secondly, <em>thank you for missing my point entirely</em>. I pointed out that only a small number of users get symptoms, I also pointed out that they&#8217;re mild and I concluded by saying that I support legalisation. </p>
<p>As far as symptoms go they vary, as do any withdrawal symptoms. Personally I&#8217;ve experienced irritability, a lot of difficulty sleeping and general nausea as well difficulty keeping food down over the first few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/patrick-kennedy-i-was-hooked.html#comment-1625322</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205002#comment-1625322</guid>
		<description>I love how every time this debate comes up the nobody ever quips in with &quot;citation please&quot; for the person that inaccurately claims marijuana has no physically addictive symptoms.

I know Rolling Stone isn&#039;t going to appease anyone as a credible source on the matter, but this short article is concise and accurate:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/lists/top-10-marijuana-myths-and-facts-20120822/myth-marijuana-use-leads-to-dependence-or-addiction-19691231&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Number 5 covers addiction and cites the National Institute of Health&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://healthland.time.com/2010/10/19/is-marijuana-addictive-it-depends-how-you-define-addiction/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This article goes into a little more detail&lt;/a&gt;, and sums up the state of evidence pretty well; but once again isn&#039;t a journal article.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&amp;q=cannabis+dependence&amp;btnG=&amp;as_sdt=1%2C5&amp;as_sdtp=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;As for scientific studies, well you can google as well as I can so take your pick.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how every time this debate comes up the nobody ever quips in with &#8220;citation please&#8221; for the person that inaccurately claims marijuana has no physically addictive symptoms.</p>
<p>I know Rolling Stone isn&#8217;t going to appease anyone as a credible source on the matter, but this short article is concise and accurate:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/lists/top-10-marijuana-myths-and-facts-20120822/myth-marijuana-use-leads-to-dependence-or-addiction-19691231" rel="nofollow">Number 5 covers addiction and cites the National Institute of Health</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://healthland.time.com/2010/10/19/is-marijuana-addictive-it-depends-how-you-define-addiction/" rel="nofollow">This article goes into a little more detail</a>, and sums up the state of evidence pretty well; but once again isn&#8217;t a journal article.</p>
<p><a href="http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&amp;q=cannabis+dependence&amp;btnG=&amp;as_sdt=1%2C5&amp;as_sdtp=" rel="nofollow">As for scientific studies, well you can google as well as I can so take your pick.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
