<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women with 7-foot-long legs now have a place to shop online for&#160;pants!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Doherty</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1627506</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Doherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1627506</guid>
		<description>Where Jack Skellington buys his pants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where Jack Skellington buys his pants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niktemadur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1626380</link>
		<dc:creator>niktemadur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1626380</guid>
		<description>Much like steroids in baseball (topical this week because of the Hall Of Fame vote), Photoshop is a plague in advertisement, the lazy shortcut.
But unlike baseball, which addressed steroids although much too late to contain long-lasting legacy damage, advertising will continue to sink further down the hole.

Then again, advertisement is a plague in itself, isn&#039;t it?  So a plague that affects a plague may not be something that we should be concerned about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like steroids in baseball (topical this week because of the Hall Of Fame vote), Photoshop is a plague in advertisement, the lazy shortcut.<br />
But unlike baseball, which addressed steroids although much too late to contain long-lasting legacy damage, advertising will continue to sink further down the hole.</p>
<p>Then again, advertisement is a plague in itself, isn&#8217;t it?  So a plague that affects a plague may not be something that we should be concerned about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1626334</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1626334</guid>
		<description>The fact that I didn&#039;t even notice the fun house flooring is probably due to decades of living in warped old Edwardians in SF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that I didn&#8217;t even notice the fun house flooring is probably due to decades of living in warped old Edwardians in SF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Larratt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1626223</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Larratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1626223</guid>
		<description> No, the floor is the proof, if anything. They&#039;re using a type of scaling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seam_carving that selectively stretches some areas more than others in an attempt to change the image dimensions without damaging areas of high-detail. This is why the top part of the image (the chair, etc.), which are much more detailed, have remained &quot;normal&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> No, the floor is the proof, if anything. They&#8217;re using a type of scaling (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seam_carving" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seam_carving</a> that selectively stretches some areas more than others in an attempt to change the image dimensions without damaging areas of high-detail. This is why the top part of the image (the chair, etc.), which are much more detailed, have remained &#8220;normal&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Larratt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1626222</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Larratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1626222</guid>
		<description> It&#039;s the result of a &quot;content-aware scale&quot; (ie. Seam Carving --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seam_carving ... They&#039;ve probably got an automated tool (or a very lazy employee) that they run on their photos, which includes using a &quot;smart&quot; scaling function in order to make it fit the desired size. You can tell this is the likely culprit by the strange skewing of the floorboards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It&#8217;s the result of a &#8220;content-aware scale&#8221; (ie. Seam Carving &#8212; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seam_carving" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seam_carving</a> &#8230; They&#8217;ve probably got an automated tool (or a very lazy employee) that they run on their photos, which includes using a &#8220;smart&#8221; scaling function in order to make it fit the desired size. You can tell this is the likely culprit by the strange skewing of the floorboards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jandrese</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1626189</link>
		<dc:creator>jandrese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1626189</guid>
		<description>Look at the floor, this isn&#039;t web server scaling, someone did that on purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the floor, this isn&#8217;t web server scaling, someone did that on purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625868</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625868</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad the high waist went away.  Nobody looks good in those, not Freddie Prinze, not Bob Mitchum, not John Ritter, certainly not me.  I like the current low-rise jeans (within reason).  But I sure do miss bell-bottoms.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://headbangorgtfo.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/cliffburton.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Only Cliff Burton&lt;/a&gt; knew how to wear jeans in the 80s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad the high waist went away.  Nobody looks good in those, not Freddie Prinze, not Bob Mitchum, not John Ritter, certainly not me.  I like the current low-rise jeans (within reason).  But I sure do miss bell-bottoms.  <a href="http://headbangorgtfo.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/cliffburton.jpg" rel="nofollow">Only Cliff Burton</a> knew how to wear jeans in the 80s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Gunn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625601</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625601</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d guess this isn&#039;t really a PS disaster but a web server disaster.  They probably made photos to fit one set of x-y dimensions but the slot on the page is for a different size.  The server is resizing the image to fit by stretching it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d guess this isn&#8217;t really a PS disaster but a web server disaster.  They probably made photos to fit one set of x-y dimensions but the slot on the page is for a different size.  The server is resizing the image to fit by stretching it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: welcomeabored</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625588</link>
		<dc:creator>welcomeabored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625588</guid>
		<description>I loved button-fly Levi&#039;s.  I never felt cooler, slimmer or more comfortable than when I could wear them.  

I&#039;ll be making fun of you for shopping at Sears later, though.  :^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved button-fly Levi&#8217;s.  I never felt cooler, slimmer or more comfortable than when I could wear them.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be making fun of you for shopping at Sears later, though.  :^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLamb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625578</link>
		<dc:creator>CLamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625578</guid>
		<description>Bah!  It only fits women with two legs the same length. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah!  It only fits women with two legs the same length. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625499</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625499</guid>
		<description>These&#039;d go great with my stilts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These&#8217;d go great with my stilts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625467</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625467</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for that to get blasted off the internet by Disney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for that to get blasted off the internet by Disney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625464</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625464</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always worn the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always worn the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helloworld49</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625442</link>
		<dc:creator>helloworld49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625442</guid>
		<description>Never mind the legs, I want a floor like that. I&#039;d never have to drink again to feel dizzy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind the legs, I want a floor like that. I&#8217;d never have to drink again to feel dizzy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DisGuest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625438</link>
		<dc:creator>DisGuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625438</guid>
		<description> That&#039;s kind of terrifying, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> That&#8217;s kind of terrifying, if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigtrendy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625435</link>
		<dc:creator>bigtrendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625435</guid>
		<description>A perfect gift for the transvestite slenderman.  Also available in ominious black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A perfect gift for the transvestite slenderman.  Also available in ominious black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625431</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625431</guid>
		<description>@Antinous_Moderator:disqus : You kinda just gave me a flashback to childhood.  There was that extended period of time - let&#039;s call it the 80&#039;s - when Levis were not at all cool.  So they were cheap, which meant my mom bought them for me.  I hated them with a fiery passion because they were stupidly high-waisted, and I&#039;m short-waisted.  Damn things rode on my ribs. They were hands-down the most uncomfortable garment on earth.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Antinous_Moderator:disqus : You kinda just gave me a flashback to childhood.  There was that extended period of time &#8211; let&#8217;s call it the 80&#8242;s &#8211; when Levis were not at all cool.  So they were cheap, which meant my mom bought them for me.  I hated them with a fiery passion because they were stupidly high-waisted, and I&#8217;m short-waisted.  Damn things rode on my ribs. They were hands-down the most uncomfortable garment on earth.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625425</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625425</guid>
		<description>Maybe just a disgruntled employee with little supervisory oversight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe just a disgruntled employee with little supervisory oversight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625390</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625390</guid>
		<description> Xeni is just happy that she&#039;s Finally found a merchant who can outfit her space-lengthened frame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Xeni is just happy that she&#8217;s Finally found a merchant who can outfit her space-lengthened frame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625356</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625356</guid>
		<description>The other leggings/pants seem to be on humans or passably humanoid mannequins.  In this one, the back heel is off the floor, which would be pretty hard to balance without muscles and a cerebral cortex.

On the other hand, the forearm appears to be about six inches long, but taking foreshortening into consideration, possibly in proportion to the thighs.  It&#039;s the lower legs that are the problem.  My guess is that there&#039;s a very thin person &lt;i&gt;en pointe&lt;/i&gt; and attached to some kind of stilts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other leggings/pants seem to be on humans or passably humanoid mannequins.  In this one, the back heel is off the floor, which would be pretty hard to balance without muscles and a cerebral cortex.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the forearm appears to be about six inches long, but taking foreshortening into consideration, possibly in proportion to the thighs.  It&#8217;s the lower legs that are the problem.  My guess is that there&#8217;s a very thin person <i>en pointe</i> and attached to some kind of stilts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phiis161803</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625354</link>
		<dc:creator>phiis161803</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625354</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe this is a PS disaster.  Rather it looks like the &quot;model&quot; is just a wire frame if some sort.  Check out this additional photo from the gallery below the main pic: http://www.romwe.com/low-waist-red-pants-p-52122.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe this is a PS disaster.  Rather it looks like the &#8220;model&#8221; is just a wire frame if some sort.  Check out this additional photo from the gallery below the main pic: <a href="http://www.romwe.com/low-waist-red-pants-p-52122.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.romwe.com/low-waist-red-pants-p-52122.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigismund</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625344</link>
		<dc:creator>sigismund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625344</guid>
		<description> Don&#039;t you know ? Manga girls are real</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Don&#8217;t you know ? Manga girls are real</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625332</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625332</guid>
		<description>I would normally wear a 34 now, mostly because the fit is just completely different.  No more zipping your jeans up to your sternum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would normally wear a 34 now, mostly because the fit is just completely different.  No more zipping your jeans up to your sternum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625318</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625318</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also the fact that shrink-to-fit button-fly 501s (what we just called &quot;Levis&quot; back then) shrink a &lt;b&gt;lot&lt;/b&gt;.  My 30 X 38 Levis fit a skinny guy who was 6&#039;2&quot; and 140 lbs.  Not all &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; incredibly tall.  But I used to be able to find that size at Sears.  I&#039;m still 6&#039;2&quot;, but now the same length inseam in the shrink-to-fit indigo denim is labeled a 36, and the preshrunk ones are 34.  In my experience, I haven&#039;t been able to find 30 X 38 Levis anywhere in over fifteen years, not at Levis.com, nor in one of their stores.

Though it really seems to me that their sizing numbers got changed a few years ago, I still have trouble finding Levis long enough for my legs in Los Angeles, particularly in the Valley.  And again, I&#039;m only 6&#039;2&quot;.  Sure, I see a lot of relatively short guys buying their jeans at the North Hollywood Sears, but not to the point where I feel like the lone giraffe in a veldt full of springbok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also the fact that shrink-to-fit button-fly 501s (what we just called &#8220;Levis&#8221; back then) shrink a <b>lot</b>.  My 30 X 38 Levis fit a skinny guy who was 6&#8217;2&#8243; and 140 lbs.  Not all <b>that</b> incredibly tall.  But I used to be able to find that size at Sears.  I&#8217;m still 6&#8217;2&#8243;, but now the same length inseam in the shrink-to-fit indigo denim is labeled a 36, and the preshrunk ones are 34.  In my experience, I haven&#8217;t been able to find 30 X 38 Levis anywhere in over fifteen years, not at Levis.com, nor in one of their stores.</p>
<p>Though it really seems to me that their sizing numbers got changed a few years ago, I still have trouble finding Levis long enough for my legs in Los Angeles, particularly in the Valley.  And again, I&#8217;m only 6&#8217;2&#8243;.  Sure, I see a lot of relatively short guys buying their jeans at the North Hollywood Sears, but not to the point where I feel like the lone giraffe in a veldt full of springbok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manybellsdown</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625307</link>
		<dc:creator>manybellsdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625307</guid>
		<description>They&#039;d clash with a 3 Wolf Moon shirt, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;d clash with a 3 Wolf Moon shirt, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Myers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625293</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625293</guid>
		<description>Wow, the undulating floorboards make it kind of trippy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the undulating floorboards make it kind of trippy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625256</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625256</guid>
		<description>In San Francisco?  A) Levi Strauss headquarters.  B) Stores buying for the gay market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In San Francisco?  A) Levi Strauss headquarters.  B) Stores buying for the gay market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjcamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625244</link>
		<dc:creator>pjcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625244</guid>
		<description>I dunno. Kinda looks like the bottom half of Keith Richards circa 1967. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno. Kinda looks like the bottom half of Keith Richards circa 1967. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uglyredhonda</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625242</link>
		<dc:creator>uglyredhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625242</guid>
		<description>For any 90s Disney World fans:

&quot;OR MAYBE HAVE LEGS THAT ARE REEAAALLLL LOOOOOOOOOONNNNG.&quot;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5Am7D_4568 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any 90s Disney World fans:</p>
<p>&#8220;OR MAYBE HAVE LEGS THAT ARE REEAAALLLL LOOOOOOOOOONNNNG.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5Am7D_4568" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5Am7D_4568</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: welcomeabored</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/10/women-with-7-foot-long-legs-no.html#comment-1625237</link>
		<dc:creator>welcomeabored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205142#comment-1625237</guid>
		<description>Long Elegant Legs caters to inseams of 36&quot; and up to size 24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long Elegant Legs caters to inseams of 36&#8243; and up to size 24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
