<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tarantino to interviewer: &quot;I&#039;m not your slave and you&#039;re not my&#160;master&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hayday</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1627517</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hayday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1627517</guid>
		<description>Channel 4 , not BBC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Channel 4 , not BBC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris coreline</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1627485</link>
		<dc:creator>chris coreline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1627485</guid>
		<description>the wierd thing is that Krishnan Guru-Murthy is the soft-ball of the BBC news team - they are probably trying to harden him up to compete with John Snow (&#039;Avatar of News&#039; not &#039;Bastard from the North&#039; - though both are endearingly accurate)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the wierd thing is that Krishnan Guru-Murthy is the soft-ball of the BBC news team &#8211; they are probably trying to harden him up to compete with John Snow (&#8216;Avatar of News&#8217; not &#8216;Bastard from the North&#8217; &#8211; though both are endearingly accurate)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petros</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1627311</link>
		<dc:creator>Petros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1627311</guid>
		<description>tarantino is an overrated douche</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tarantino is an overrated douche</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MurasakiMadness</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1627227</link>
		<dc:creator>MurasakiMadness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1627227</guid>
		<description>I could see if someone felt that interview segment itself was &quot;unfortunate&quot;, or even the irritation, &quot;unfortunate&quot;, but....if the quote in the headline is what&#039;s being labeled as &quot;unfortunate&quot;...meh. I&#039;m not biting. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see if someone felt that interview segment itself was &#8220;unfortunate&#8221;, or even the irritation, &#8220;unfortunate&#8221;, but&#8230;.if the quote in the headline is what&#8217;s being labeled as &#8220;unfortunate&#8221;&#8230;meh. I&#8217;m not biting. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MurasakiMadness</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1627225</link>
		<dc:creator>MurasakiMadness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1627225</guid>
		<description>Exactly. It&#039;s not like he said, &quot;I&#039;m not your n****r&quot;. Like I just did. F--k. *ducks*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. It&#8217;s not like he said, &#8220;I&#8217;m not your n****r&#8221;. Like I just did. F&#8211;k. *ducks*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626999</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626999</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny as I just saw him in &quot;From dusk till dawn&quot; and was wondering, is this really a character part or the real Tarentino ? What&#039;s also funny is how I really admire some of his work and absolutely despise the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny as I just saw him in &#8220;From dusk till dawn&#8221; and was wondering, is this really a character part or the real Tarentino ? What&#8217;s also funny is how I really admire some of his work and absolutely despise the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNGMug</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626996</link>
		<dc:creator>TNGMug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626996</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little disappointed by all Tarentino&#039;s fans sort of group-thinking in this thread to collectively slander the interviewer.  Often in little backhanded remarks like &quot;he&#039;s stupid&quot;, and nothing else.

Quentin Tarentino is pretty much the patron saint of violent movies.  In light of recent events there has been plenty of questions regarding the role of violence in culture.  If I&#039;m going to be running an interviewer with him, and I already know his position, then it seems to be a pretty bloody obvious question to simply ask &quot;Why?&quot;.  

Of course Tarentino wasn&#039;t interested in this, he was interested in marketing the movie, as he said so.  Well sorry buddy, but that&#039;s the deal.  You answer the questions, and in return your movie gets plug time.  It&#039;s not a slave-model, it&#039;s a perfectly fair exchange that you agreed to beforehand.

Now to be perfectly clear, I like his movies, and I like his movies alot.  But I also like BBC reporters that don&#039;t just softball their questions, even when it&#039;s Quentin Tarentino.  

I mean seriously, what would make the reporter not &quot;an idiot&quot;?  a bunch of lowball milktoast questions that essentially turned his program into nothing more than free advert time for Tarentino?  Gimmeabreak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little disappointed by all Tarentino&#8217;s fans sort of group-thinking in this thread to collectively slander the interviewer.  Often in little backhanded remarks like &#8220;he&#8217;s stupid&#8221;, and nothing else.</p>
<p>Quentin Tarentino is pretty much the patron saint of violent movies.  In light of recent events there has been plenty of questions regarding the role of violence in culture.  If I&#8217;m going to be running an interviewer with him, and I already know his position, then it seems to be a pretty bloody obvious question to simply ask &#8220;Why?&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Of course Tarentino wasn&#8217;t interested in this, he was interested in marketing the movie, as he said so.  Well sorry buddy, but that&#8217;s the deal.  You answer the questions, and in return your movie gets plug time.  It&#8217;s not a slave-model, it&#8217;s a perfectly fair exchange that you agreed to beforehand.</p>
<p>Now to be perfectly clear, I like his movies, and I like his movies alot.  But I also like BBC reporters that don&#8217;t just softball their questions, even when it&#8217;s Quentin Tarentino.  </p>
<p>I mean seriously, what would make the reporter not &#8220;an idiot&#8221;?  a bunch of lowball milktoast questions that essentially turned his program into nothing more than free advert time for Tarentino?  Gimmeabreak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iserlohn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626922</link>
		<dc:creator>iserlohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626922</guid>
		<description>Wining an argument by making yourself look like a jackass during the promotion of your film is a new one to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wining an argument by making yourself look like a jackass during the promotion of your film is a new one to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626911</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626911</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;mental health issues&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq#what-is-single-payer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;That could be addressed.&lt;/a&gt; But there&#039;s simply too much money to be made with war, etc. instead, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>mental health issues</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq#what-is-single-payer" rel="nofollow">That could be addressed.</a> But there&#8217;s simply too much money to be made with war, etc. instead, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Kalgreen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Kalgreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626699</guid>
		<description>I think the amount of enjoyment I get from his films is pretty much mirrors the amount of annoyance I get from his interviews. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the amount of enjoyment I get from his films is pretty much mirrors the amount of annoyance I get from his interviews. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626681</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626681</guid>
		<description>Jackie Brown was excellent. Proof positive of what he has the potential to do. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackie Brown was excellent. Proof positive of what he has the potential to do. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626678</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626678</guid>
		<description>Kind of funny that you ask me about knowing things &quot;first hand&quot; without obviously having bothered to read my full post.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of funny that you ask me about knowing things &#8220;first hand&#8221; without obviously having bothered to read my full post&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarBarSeven</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626590</link>
		<dc:creator>BarBarSeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626590</guid>
		<description>I used to think Spike Lee was hyperbolic when he said regarding Quentin Tarantino’s use of the “n” word in &lt;i&gt;Jackie Brown&lt;/i&gt;, “What does he want to be made--an honorary black man?” But you know what, he’s right.

Quentin made two really good movies: &lt;i&gt;Resevoir Dogs&lt;/i&gt; &amp; &lt;i&gt;Pulp Fiction&lt;/i&gt;. And that’s it. Now he’s just milking genre for all it’s worth &amp; he’s just obsessed with being a black bad ass when he’s white as hell.  And please don’t bring up his Cherokee heritage. The guy is obsessed with being the white guy who knows black people because he “studied” them.  Can’t stand him anymore. Not going to see &lt;i&gt;Django: Unchained&lt;/i&gt; since it just seems like a bad, bloated remake of his last film, &lt;i&gt;Inglourious Basterds&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think Spike Lee was hyperbolic when he said regarding Quentin Tarantino’s use of the “n” word in <i>Jackie Brown</i>, “What does he want to be made&#8211;an honorary black man?” But you know what, he’s right.</p>
<p>Quentin made two really good movies: <i>Resevoir Dogs</i> &amp; <i>Pulp Fiction</i>. And that’s it. Now he’s just milking genre for all it’s worth &amp; he’s just obsessed with being a black bad ass when he’s white as hell.  And please don’t bring up his Cherokee heritage. The guy is obsessed with being the white guy who knows black people because he “studied” them.  Can’t stand him anymore. Not going to see <i>Django: Unchained</i> since it just seems like a bad, bloated remake of his last film, <i>Inglourious Basterds</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chentzilla</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626453</link>
		<dc:creator>Chentzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626453</guid>
		<description>Bu-ut doesn&#039;t a man who treats it as such automatically become a racist, then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bu-ut doesn&#8217;t a man who treats it as such automatically become a racist, then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rastronomicals</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626443</link>
		<dc:creator>rastronomicals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626443</guid>
		<description>I think Pulp Fiction was less cartoony than Django, but more so than Reservoir Dogs.  

In real life gun violence has consequences. 

 In Reservoir Dogs, guns cause the guy to die an agonizing death.  This part of it gets forgotten a little quick by QT, but Pulp Fiction still does remind us that at after gun violence at the least you&#039;re gonna have to clean shit up.

I wasn&#039;t saying that the average Hollywood action flick isn&#039;t guilty of the same thing, but in the cartoon world, you shoot bang he&#039;s dead forget about it and go to the next guy, which is EXACTLY what Django was.  And Tarantino in Reservoir--and in a decreasing amount since--HAD looked like he was willing to look at gun violence in a way that went beyond that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Pulp Fiction was less cartoony than Django, but more so than Reservoir Dogs.  </p>
<p>In real life gun violence has consequences. </p>
<p> In Reservoir Dogs, guns cause the guy to die an agonizing death.  This part of it gets forgotten a little quick by QT, but Pulp Fiction still does remind us that at after gun violence at the least you&#8217;re gonna have to clean shit up.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t saying that the average Hollywood action flick isn&#8217;t guilty of the same thing, but in the cartoon world, you shoot bang he&#8217;s dead forget about it and go to the next guy, which is EXACTLY what Django was.  And Tarantino in Reservoir&#8211;and in a decreasing amount since&#8211;HAD looked like he was willing to look at gun violence in a way that went beyond that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626393</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626393</guid>
		<description>Ron Howard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Howard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gijs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626336</link>
		<dc:creator>Gijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626336</guid>
		<description>journalists are often stupid and annoying, just like everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>journalists are often stupid and annoying, just like everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitrios Papagiannis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626329</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitrios Papagiannis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626329</guid>
		<description>I think that Quentin wins this one. I also like that he was completely honest about why he was there, to promote the movie and not to engage in a philosophical debate with a cheese grater. And in answer to Xeni&#039;s question, the answer is a sort of 3 but that&#039;s just the way he is fame or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Quentin wins this one. I also like that he was completely honest about why he was there, to promote the movie and not to engage in a philosophical debate with a cheese grater. And in answer to Xeni&#8217;s question, the answer is a sort of 3 but that&#8217;s just the way he is fame or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Billings</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626318</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 07:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626318</guid>
		<description> Except for the epic Gene Simmons interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Except for the epic Gene Simmons interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rindan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626315</link>
		<dc:creator>Rindan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 06:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626315</guid>
		<description>You are a far more awesome person than the rest of us I guess.  The vast majority of us lame humans, when primed with a particular topic, have a nasty habit of actually referring to said topic.  If it blows your mind that Tarantino, having just done a movie about movie about slaves and being interviewed about a movie about slaves busts out a slave analogy when pissed and put on the spot, then you are a far more bad ass and in control human than the rest of us.  Most humans, when primed in such an extreme way as having thought about nothing but fucking slaves for a few months as writing and directing a movie about slaves, are likely to do a same fucking thing.  You are just fucking special and don&#039;t have that defect.  Good for you!  You are special!  You should give interviews.

I suppose it will also blow your mind in half to know that when I am around my rural relatives with a strong accent my normally non-existent northeastern US accent suddenly comes out in full force, especially when agitated.  Holy fucking shit.  Lets go pahk ouah cahs in Havahad yahd an then geh wicked fuhkin pissed while we contemplate yah amazin&#039; powahs of restinin&#039; primen, ayup.

Jack ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a far more awesome person than the rest of us I guess.  The vast majority of us lame humans, when primed with a particular topic, have a nasty habit of actually referring to said topic.  If it blows your mind that Tarantino, having just done a movie about movie about slaves and being interviewed about a movie about slaves busts out a slave analogy when pissed and put on the spot, then you are a far more bad ass and in control human than the rest of us.  Most humans, when primed in such an extreme way as having thought about nothing but fucking slaves for a few months as writing and directing a movie about slaves, are likely to do a same fucking thing.  You are just fucking special and don&#8217;t have that defect.  Good for you!  You are special!  You should give interviews.</p>
<p>I suppose it will also blow your mind in half to know that when I am around my rural relatives with a strong accent my normally non-existent northeastern US accent suddenly comes out in full force, especially when agitated.  Holy fucking shit.  Lets go pahk ouah cahs in Havahad yahd an then geh wicked fuhkin pissed while we contemplate yah amazin&#8217; powahs of restinin&#8217; primen, ayup.</p>
<p>Jack ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rindan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626307</link>
		<dc:creator>Rindan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 06:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626307</guid>
		<description>I dated (and nearly married) a manic bi-polar women for 5 years.  I can safely say that none of her pissed off rants were half as pleasant to the ears as one of Tarantino&#039;s vulgar monologues.

I guess what I am saying is that the magical powers that you ascribe to the manic bi-polar are not nearly as prevalent as you think they are.  Any person that can spew that kind of shit in a coherent and hilarious stream isn&#039;t sick, they are fucking brilliant.  

Stick to  your house in the &#039;burbs and send you bi-polar manics my way.  Those are some folks I want to hear talk shit into my ear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dated (and nearly married) a manic bi-polar women for 5 years.  I can safely say that none of her pissed off rants were half as pleasant to the ears as one of Tarantino&#8217;s vulgar monologues.</p>
<p>I guess what I am saying is that the magical powers that you ascribe to the manic bi-polar are not nearly as prevalent as you think they are.  Any person that can spew that kind of shit in a coherent and hilarious stream isn&#8217;t sick, they are fucking brilliant.  </p>
<p>Stick to  your house in the &#8216;burbs and send you bi-polar manics my way.  Those are some folks I want to hear talk shit into my ear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Simmons</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626305</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 06:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626305</guid>
		<description>I actually laughed out loud when I saw Wayne la Pierre&#039;s response.  I mean, cripes, no, you can&#039;t blame Bushmaster&#039;s &quot;Consider Your Man Card Reissued&quot; campaign for the gun used by Adam Lanza, but hey, we&#039;re pretty sure watching violence in video games and movies makes you kill!

Cripes...

I think it IS a cop-out.  Several different sides are trying to find the one, true, quick fix to the issue.  I don&#039;t think there is one.  We have a culture that, as Quentin Tarantino himself has pointed out, is obsessed with violence, but then profits from it.  There&#039;s also the huge elephant in the room, mental health issues, which nobody seems to want to talk about...I guess because it&#039;s more important to restrict 1st and 2nd Amendment rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually laughed out loud when I saw Wayne la Pierre&#8217;s response.  I mean, cripes, no, you can&#8217;t blame Bushmaster&#8217;s &#8220;Consider Your Man Card Reissued&#8221; campaign for the gun used by Adam Lanza, but hey, we&#8217;re pretty sure watching violence in video games and movies makes you kill!</p>
<p>Cripes&#8230;</p>
<p>I think it IS a cop-out.  Several different sides are trying to find the one, true, quick fix to the issue.  I don&#8217;t think there is one.  We have a culture that, as Quentin Tarantino himself has pointed out, is obsessed with violence, but then profits from it.  There&#8217;s also the huge elephant in the room, mental health issues, which nobody seems to want to talk about&#8230;I guess because it&#8217;s more important to restrict 1st and 2nd Amendment rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Simmons</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626298</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 06:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626298</guid>
		<description>I, too, enjoy a good reductio ad absurdum.

No, seriously, I snorted more air out of my nose than usual.  Keep fighting the good fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, enjoy a good reductio ad absurdum.</p>
<p>No, seriously, I snorted more air out of my nose than usual.  Keep fighting the good fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Billings</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626291</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626291</guid>
		<description>Because it wasn&#039;t true? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it wasn&#8217;t true? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Billings</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626289</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 06:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626289</guid>
		<description> Have you seen the movie? If not, you really don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about first hand, do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Have you seen the movie? If not, you really don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about first hand, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cub</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626272</link>
		<dc:creator>cub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626272</guid>
		<description>of Tarantino, or of Mr. Brainwash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of Tarantino, or of Mr. Brainwash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cub</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626269</link>
		<dc:creator>cub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 05:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626269</guid>
		<description>not without a sex change, i can&#039;t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not without a sex change, i can&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cub</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626267</link>
		<dc:creator>cub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 04:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626267</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s actually my reference to another&#039;s claim-- that of FILM THREAT about &lt;i&gt;Reservoir Dogs&lt;/i&gt; being heavily lifted from &lt;i&gt;City on Fire&lt;/i&gt;.  the assertion was shared among at least three sources at the time that the lack of acknowledgement for such cribbing should not pass without comment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s actually my reference to another&#8217;s claim&#8211; that of FILM THREAT about <i>Reservoir Dogs</i> being heavily lifted from <i>City on Fire</i>.  the assertion was shared among at least three sources at the time that the lack of acknowledgement for such cribbing should not pass without comment. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian Barajas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626246</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian Barajas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626246</guid>
		<description>Yes, thats it isnt it? Its a cop out. I&#039;ll just leave this here: http://kotaku.com/5974648/the-daily-show-calls-out-scapegoat-artists-in-the-video-games-and-gun-control-debate </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, thats it isnt it? Its a cop out. I&#8217;ll just leave this here: http://kotaku.com/5974648/the-daily-show-calls-out-scapegoat-artists-in-the-video-games-and-gun-control-debate </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake0748</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/tarantino-to-interviewer-i.html#comment-1626244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake0748</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205271#comment-1626244</guid>
		<description>Reckon I&#039;d rather see a movie I enjoy, (ie. I don&#039;t like Tarantino movies, they turn me off), whether made by either a savant an arse or a jack of all whatever. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reckon I&#8217;d rather see a movie I enjoy, (ie. I don&#8217;t like Tarantino movies, they turn me off), whether made by either a savant an arse or a jack of all whatever. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
