<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eric Standley&#8217;s intricate laser-cut &quot;stained glass&quot; paper&#160;windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chgoliz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628723</link>
		<dc:creator>chgoliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628723</guid>
		<description>I think the right term is: exquisite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the right term is: exquisite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Box of Cotton Swabs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628684</link>
		<dc:creator>Box of Cotton Swabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628684</guid>
		<description>Yes, but when the image is sized down to 525 x 520 in HTML, you’ve thrown that detail away anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but when the image is sized down to 525 x 520 in HTML, you’ve thrown that detail away anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628648</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628648</guid>
		<description>Not for detailed art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not for detailed art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChickieD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628564</link>
		<dc:creator>ChickieD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628564</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in love. It&#039;s beautiful. Not sure where to put this in my house but trying to figure out a spot. LOVE!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in love. It&#8217;s beautiful. Not sure where to put this in my house but trying to figure out a spot. LOVE!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackbird</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628548</link>
		<dc:creator>jackbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628548</guid>
		<description>The laser is purpose-designed to cut paper.  it uses short pulses to punch lots of tiny holes.  It&#039;s the same technology that perforates the pages of spiral-bound notebooks and junk-mail postpaid cards so they tear off with a clean edge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The laser is purpose-designed to cut paper.  it uses short pulses to punch lots of tiny holes.  It&#8217;s the same technology that perforates the pages of spiral-bound notebooks and junk-mail postpaid cards so they tear off with a clean edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esquire</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628526</link>
		<dc:creator>esquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628526</guid>
		<description>1. This is way cool.

2. Some of the other designs on this page are more stained glassy: http://hifructose.com/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricate-laser-cut-stained-glass-paper-windows/

3. I wonder if there would be a way to make them less fragile so they could actually be used as windows? (mount the whole thing within a lucite block?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. This is way cool.</p>
<p>2. Some of the other designs on this page are more stained glassy: http://hifructose.com/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricate-laser-cut-stained-glass-paper-windows/</p>
<p>3. I wonder if there would be a way to make them less fragile so they could actually be used as windows? (mount the whole thing within a lucite block?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: relawson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628487</link>
		<dc:creator>relawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628487</guid>
		<description>no, i&#039;m pretty sure &quot;Laser cut&quot; means &quot;cut by a laser&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, i&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;Laser cut&#8221; means &#8220;cut by a laser&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Perkins</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628399</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628399</guid>
		<description>Why does the laser not char the edges of the paper? Is it done in an inert environment? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the laser not char the edges of the paper? Is it done in an inert environment? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timquinn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628383</link>
		<dc:creator>timquinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628383</guid>
		<description>OK I can see the hostility. The first thought I had was,&quot;I fucking quit!&quot; Those are too good, I can&#039;t even exist in the same universe. Then I looked again and decided I could go on. Next thought was how could I adapt his technique to my work. 

Thanks, Mark, this is a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I can see the hostility. The first thought I had was,&#8221;I fucking quit!&#8221; Those are too good, I can&#8217;t even exist in the same universe. Then I looked again and decided I could go on. Next thought was how could I adapt his technique to my work. </p>
<p>Thanks, Mark, this is a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628336</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628336</guid>
		<description>Enjoy your glue gun and art car. Fake leopard fur is on sale this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy your glue gun and art car. Fake leopard fur is on sale this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aperturehead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628314</link>
		<dc:creator>aperturehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628314</guid>
		<description>I guess &quot;WINDOW + DESIGN&quot; equals stained glass window in most minds - &quot;intricate and beautifully constructed&quot; does not always mean good looking. These designs lack certain imperfections that would otherwise make them human and warm. I get a distinctly sterile feeling from these squiggles. &quot;Laser cut&quot; must be code for fussy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess &#8220;WINDOW + DESIGN&#8221; equals stained glass window in most minds &#8211; &#8220;intricate and beautifully constructed&#8221; does not always mean good looking. These designs lack certain imperfections that would otherwise make them human and warm. I get a distinctly sterile feeling from these squiggles. &#8220;Laser cut&#8221; must be code for fussy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CH</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628295</link>
		<dc:creator>CH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628295</guid>
		<description>That is... absolutely amazing!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is&#8230; absolutely amazing!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuyNamedMark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628276</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuyNamedMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628276</guid>
		<description>It reminds me more of the intricate lacy designs and calligraphy I&#039;ve seen in Islamic art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reminds me more of the intricate lacy designs and calligraphy I&#8217;ve seen in Islamic art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gjbloom</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628215</link>
		<dc:creator>gjbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628215</guid>
		<description>Very reminiscent of the sound hole rose in old stringed instruments.  Except that the sound hole decorations are cut by hand.  See: http://www.vihuelademano.com/rosesinvihuelas.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very reminiscent of the sound hole rose in old stringed instruments.  Except that the sound hole decorations are cut by hand.  See: http://www.vihuelademano.com/rosesinvihuelas.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Murphy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628211</link>
		<dc:creator>David Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628211</guid>
		<description>It looks very much like stained glass. Does that count as being like it in some way? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks very much like stained glass. Does that count as being like it in some way? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628162</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628162</guid>
		<description>This is gorgeous work.  I&#039;d be terrified of holding one of these in my hands, afraid that I&#039;d feel that old irresistible urge to poke my thumb right through the lace.  Five-year-old Donald destroyed a few beautiful Xmas ornaments that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is gorgeous work.  I&#8217;d be terrified of holding one of these in my hands, afraid that I&#8217;d feel that old irresistible urge to poke my thumb right through the lace.  Five-year-old Donald destroyed a few beautiful Xmas ornaments that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628157</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628157</guid>
		<description>This is so beautiful but it is not like stained glass in any way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so beautiful but it is not like stained glass in any way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Box of Cotton Swabs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/eric-standleys-intricat.html#comment-1628134</link>
		<dc:creator>Box of Cotton Swabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205767#comment-1628134</guid>
		<description>1,024 x 1,015 2.5M PNG on this article, 2,412 x 1,608 2.3M JPEG on the crab article… I know bandwidth’s not as constrained as it once was, but doesn’t anyone optimize for the web any more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1,024 x 1,015 2.5M PNG on this article, 2,412 x 1,608 2.3M JPEG on the crab article… I know bandwidth’s not as constrained as it once was, but doesn’t anyone optimize for the web any more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
