<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Origami&quot; condom&#160;prototype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1632134</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1632134</guid>
		<description> Thank you, I now have another piece of hilarious and mostly useless trivia to shock my friends with. I quite enjoy finding them :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Thank you, I now have another piece of hilarious and mostly useless trivia to shock my friends with. I quite enjoy finding them :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1632132</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1632132</guid>
		<description> ymmv. my ex partner of 5 years quite liked ribbed and studded condoms sometimes, perhaps overall lubrication is a factor here? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> ymmv. my ex partner of 5 years quite liked ribbed and studded condoms sometimes, perhaps overall lubrication is a factor here? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1632131</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1632131</guid>
		<description> Speaking of improper lubrication, that demo rolled condom is suffering from it Very badly. Considering most condoms come with some lubrication, plus often a few sachets of lube, they&#039;re being quite disingenuous, making me quite unlikely to trust them overall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Speaking of improper lubrication, that demo rolled condom is suffering from it Very badly. Considering most condoms come with some lubrication, plus often a few sachets of lube, they&#8217;re being quite disingenuous, making me quite unlikely to trust them overall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capsteve</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1631085</link>
		<dc:creator>capsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1631085</guid>
		<description>yeah, i don&#039;t think the origami condom is going to work so well... lubricating the inside of the &quot;traditional&quot; condom before rolling it on provides the same slip benefit that the origami touts. the loose slip-and-slide action of the origami will probably increase the chances of blunt puncture failure. and then there&#039;s the heat transfer issue... a snug fitting roll condom probably has better heat transference between partners, versus the origami. lastly, the origami probably wont work for anything other than vaginal sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i don&#8217;t think the origami condom is going to work so well&#8230; lubricating the inside of the &#8220;traditional&#8221; condom before rolling it on provides the same slip benefit that the origami touts. the loose slip-and-slide action of the origami will probably increase the chances of blunt puncture failure. and then there&#8217;s the heat transfer issue&#8230; a snug fitting roll condom probably has better heat transference between partners, versus the origami. lastly, the origami probably wont work for anything other than vaginal sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ando bobando</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1631025</link>
		<dc:creator>ando bobando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1631025</guid>
		<description>True, it&#039;s not a production ready idea by any means! But perhaps still useful for monogamous couples who aren&#039;t worried about transmitting STIs. Not to mention sperm are surprisingly crap at surviving outside in the real world. Letting the thing dry for an hour would kill them all. So, I guess, buy two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, it&#8217;s not a production ready idea by any means! But perhaps still useful for monogamous couples who aren&#8217;t worried about transmitting STIs. Not to mention sperm are surprisingly crap at surviving outside in the real world. Letting the thing dry for an hour would kill them all. So, I guess, buy two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1631000</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1631000</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all here. You have babes, boys, beasts, thinner, fatter, hunks, chunks, monks, twins dipped in batter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all here. You have babes, boys, beasts, thinner, fatter, hunks, chunks, monks, twins dipped in batter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phuzz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630985</link>
		<dc:creator>phuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630985</guid>
		<description> I watched it and thought &quot;at least it&#039;s not just me that has problems putting a condom on...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I watched it and thought &#8220;at least it&#8217;s not just me that has problems putting a condom on&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630972</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630972</guid>
		<description>The jiggle, the wiggle, the ooh-la-la,
Someone to spank you and sheep that go &#039;baa&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jiggle, the wiggle, the ooh-la-la,<br />
Someone to spank you and sheep that go &#8216;baa&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630958</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630958</guid>
		<description>because the code is alive, and it keeps inserting spaces to tell the world how much pain it is in having to nest comments to oblivion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because the code is alive, and it keeps inserting spaces to tell the world how much pain it is in having to nest comments to oblivion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630957</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630957</guid>
		<description>Watch it wiggle, see it jiggle....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch it wiggle, see it jiggle&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch_M</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630831</guid>
		<description>Does it mimic the penile terrain as well as it mimics the vaginal environment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it mimic the penile terrain as well as it mimics the vaginal environment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630684</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630684</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;d have lost interest by the point I&#039;d finally got it on&lt;/blockquote&gt;I&#039;m pretty sure that I&#039;d have lost interest when I discovered that my partner&#039;s dick was gelatinous and jiggly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&#8217;d have lost interest by the point I&#8217;d finally got it on</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that I&#8217;d have lost interest when I discovered that my partner&#8217;s dick was gelatinous and jiggly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drabkikker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630645</link>
		<dc:creator>drabkikker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630645</guid>
		<description>WTF, Evolution? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF, Evolution? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630620</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630620</guid>
		<description>Because it&#039;s evil.  If you&#039;re not careful, the space will get into your tags (like masked links) and render them non-functional.  They claim to be unable to fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#8217;s evil.  If you&#8217;re not careful, the space will get into your tags (like masked links) and render them non-functional.  They claim to be unable to fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Müller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630618</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Müller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630618</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t this make women feel less?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t this make women feel less?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptainPedge</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630575</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptainPedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630575</guid>
		<description>NSFW on the front page? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NSFW on the front page? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gilliland</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630508</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gilliland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630508</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time.  There&#039;s quite an experiential overlap between origami and condom use.  One requires intense focus, inhuman patience, skilled hands, and is done very badly by amateurs.  The other is origami.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time.  There&#8217;s quite an experiential overlap between origami and condom use.  One requires intense focus, inhuman patience, skilled hands, and is done very badly by amateurs.  The other is origami.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Noise</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630469</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630469</guid>
		<description>A squishy Fleshlight, no less.  It looks like a horrible alien dong.  DNW in my nethers, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A squishy Fleshlight, no less.  It looks like a horrible alien dong.  DNW in my nethers, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Noise</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630466</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630466</guid>
		<description>But does it simulate a swan-shaped vagina?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But does it simulate a swan-shaped vagina?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blank blank</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630462</link>
		<dc:creator>blank blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630462</guid>
		<description>Relevant (nsfw)
http://www.reddit.com/r/GonewildAlbums/comments/16kuql/i_fucked_a_guy_with_a_fleshlight_hidden_in_my/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relevant (nsfw)<br />
<a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/GonewildAlbums/comments/16kuql/i_fucked_a_guy_with_a_fleshlight_hidden_in_my/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit.com/r/GonewildAlbums/comments/16kuql/i_fucked_a_guy_with_a_fleshlight_hidden_in_my/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rezmuff</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630447</link>
		<dc:creator>rezmuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630447</guid>
		<description>The condom on the right is obviously much looser than the traditional one, which completely kills their &quot;easier to put on&quot; argument. I&#039;m sure a Magnum XXXXXL is also really easy to put on.

Also, the new design seems to have a lot of edges and seams, which is likely to be painful for both partners, and also creates points of weakness, compared to the smooth regular condom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The condom on the right is obviously much looser than the traditional one, which completely kills their &#8220;easier to put on&#8221; argument. I&#8217;m sure a Magnum XXXXXL is also really easy to put on.</p>
<p>Also, the new design seems to have a lot of edges and seams, which is likely to be painful for both partners, and also creates points of weakness, compared to the smooth regular condom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangedesperado</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630437</link>
		<dc:creator>orangedesperado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630437</guid>
		<description>Except for the part where the silicone condom can&#039;t be sterilized properly to not transmit STI&#039;s between partners. Boiling or a rubbing alcohol bath does not render a silicone object sterile, despite what some people claim. I would also be scared of pregnancy from a condom that had been washed off. It&#039;s not like live sperm are visible to the naked eye.

A Diva Cup is also about 1000x as thick as a silicone condom would be, and is subjected to much less friction.

Silicone as a condom material = maybe good. Reusable condom with goofy folds = probably not so good. 

Plus Mr. Hand in the video definitely strokes the origami condom demo penis differently ! The only good baggy condom is the female condom. Not a functional or safe solution to the penis fit/comfort problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except for the part where the silicone condom can&#8217;t be sterilized properly to not transmit STI&#8217;s between partners. Boiling or a rubbing alcohol bath does not render a silicone object sterile, despite what some people claim. I would also be scared of pregnancy from a condom that had been washed off. It&#8217;s not like live sperm are visible to the naked eye.</p>
<p>A Diva Cup is also about 1000x as thick as a silicone condom would be, and is subjected to much less friction.</p>
<p>Silicone as a condom material = maybe good. Reusable condom with goofy folds = probably not so good. </p>
<p>Plus Mr. Hand in the video definitely strokes the origami condom demo penis differently ! The only good baggy condom is the female condom. Not a functional or safe solution to the penis fit/comfort problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630405</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630405</guid>
		<description>The weird part of that Durex study summary is that they don&#039;t mention that Durex&#039;s conclusion was that the &quot;blunt puncture&quot; wasn&#039;t the predominant CAUSE, it was a SYMPTOM of the predominant cause: improper lubrication.

Off topic: Why does Disqus always insert a space at the beginning of replies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The weird part of that Durex study summary is that they don&#8217;t mention that Durex&#8217;s conclusion was that the &#8220;blunt puncture&#8221; wasn&#8217;t the predominant CAUSE, it was a SYMPTOM of the predominant cause: improper lubrication.</p>
<p>Off topic: Why does Disqus always insert a space at the beginning of replies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElfSternberg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630390</link>
		<dc:creator>ElfSternberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630390</guid>
		<description>Obviously designed by a man.  Those &quot;ribbed for her pleasure&quot; things are actually quite painful for many women.  They may as well be made of sandpaper, especially when the sex gets especially vigorous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously designed by a man.  Those &#8220;ribbed for her pleasure&#8221; things are actually quite painful for many women.  They may as well be made of sandpaper, especially when the sex gets especially vigorous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ando bobando</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630391</link>
		<dc:creator>ando bobando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630391</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t watch the video on this computer but now that I think about it, I can&#039;t believe someone didn&#039;t come up with a viable reusable silicone condom sooner! My silicone Diva Cup does a fantastic job during my period, and the amount of tampons and pads that I&#039;m not using is staggering. A silicone condom would be basically the same idea but in reverse - keep a particular liquid on one side of the cervix. I like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t watch the video on this computer but now that I think about it, I can&#8217;t believe someone didn&#8217;t come up with a viable reusable silicone condom sooner! My silicone Diva Cup does a fantastic job during my period, and the amount of tampons and pads that I&#8217;m not using is staggering. A silicone condom would be basically the same idea but in reverse &#8211; keep a particular liquid on one side of the cervix. I like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630383</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630383</guid>
		<description>Neat but that cap on it looks cumbersome. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat but that cap on it looks cumbersome. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630373</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630373</guid>
		<description>http://www.everythingisterrible.com/2009/09/infomercial-hell.html

Time to add a new first world problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.everythingisterrible.com/2009/09/infomercial-hell.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.everythingisterrible.com/2009/09/infomercial-hell.html</a></p>
<p>Time to add a new first world problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senorglory</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630369</link>
		<dc:creator>senorglory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630369</guid>
		<description>lube on the inside is a good idea for regular latex condoms.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lube on the inside is a good idea for regular latex condoms.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fang Xianfu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630363</link>
		<dc:creator>Fang Xianfu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630363</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting. If we&#039;re talking about birth control methods, we&#039;re obviously very concerned about rates of failure. The predominant cause of failure in the traditional condom design is so-called &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18402853&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;blunt puncture&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and the firms that make condoms have spent a lot of time trying to reduce or prevent it. It will be interesting to see how this new design compares to the old in terms of blunt puncture, and also in terms of other failure modes. I for one would be pretty worried about the folds increasing the likelihood of tearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting. If we&#8217;re talking about birth control methods, we&#8217;re obviously very concerned about rates of failure. The predominant cause of failure in the traditional condom design is so-called <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18402853" rel="nofollow">&#8220;blunt puncture&#8221;</a> and the firms that make condoms have spent a lot of time trying to reduce or prevent it. It will be interesting to see how this new design compares to the old in terms of blunt puncture, and also in terms of other failure modes. I for one would be pretty worried about the folds increasing the likelihood of tearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pope Ratzo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/origami-condom-prototype.html#comment-1630349</link>
		<dc:creator>Pope Ratzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206370#comment-1630349</guid>
		<description>Can also be used as an harmonica cozy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can also be used as an harmonica cozy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
