<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harper&#039;s publisher says Teletubby&#160;Bye-Bye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nash Rambler</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1635161</link>
		<dc:creator>Nash Rambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1635161</guid>
		<description>Oh my god Jack, you&#039;re right.  Back then, there really were publishers cruising around in Cadillacs, snorting lines of cocaine off the gleaming perfection of their solid gold medallions!  My mocking irony has been turned into a sad realization of truth. . .and thus, I suffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god Jack, you&#8217;re right.  Back then, there really were publishers cruising around in Cadillacs, snorting lines of cocaine off the gleaming perfection of their solid gold medallions!  My mocking irony has been turned into a sad realization of truth. . .and thus, I suffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adelwolf</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1634408</link>
		<dc:creator>Adelwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1634408</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s delicious is that the current (soon to be former) President of SFWA John Scalzi is a webscab of the highest caliber. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s delicious is that the current (soon to be former) President of SFWA John Scalzi is a webscab of the highest caliber. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devophill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631889</link>
		<dc:creator>devophill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 04:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631889</guid>
		<description> Ni.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ni.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hoefer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631879</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hoefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631879</guid>
		<description>When there&#039;s a gold rush on, the only way to make guaranteed money is to sell prospecting equipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When there&#8217;s a gold rush on, the only way to make guaranteed money is to sell prospecting equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladyfingers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631781</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladyfingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631781</guid>
		<description>As someone who worked in the background of SEM/SEO (content guy), I&#039;ve never really understood the point of whitelisting.

Almost nobody charges per impression unless their clients are imbeciles or it&#039;s a branding exercise, and higher impressions (with the same amount of clicks) mean a lower CTR. 

If you do click, but don&#039;t buy, you then lower the conversion rates, and the sponsors will likely pay less money per click.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who worked in the background of SEM/SEO (content guy), I&#8217;ve never really understood the point of whitelisting.</p>
<p>Almost nobody charges per impression unless their clients are imbeciles or it&#8217;s a branding exercise, and higher impressions (with the same amount of clicks) mean a lower CTR. </p>
<p>If you do click, but don&#8217;t buy, you then lower the conversion rates, and the sponsors will likely pay less money per click.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631672</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631672</guid>
		<description> I&#039;d ask you for royalties if I hadn&#039;t died in 1959.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I&#8217;d ask you for royalties if I hadn&#8217;t died in 1959.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween_Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631617</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween_Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631617</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one bit that I found very interesting:
&lt;blockquote&gt;As a journalist and board member of the Authors Guild, I’ve watched in dismay as writers, living and dead, have suffered steep drops in income and copyright control thanks to Google’s — and its smaller rivals’ — logistical support for pirating and repackaging everything that we writers, editors, and publishers hold dear.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Dead writers &quot;suffer&quot; nothing, of course, although their heirs might. Of more interest is who really made out like a bandit in the Authors Guild lawsuit against Google, and it seems to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild#Conflict_with_Google&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Authors Guild itself&lt;/a&gt;. Also of note on that same page is that the Guild helped remove text-to-speech on the Kindle, ostensibly on behalf of authors who might lose out on separate audiobook sales, although IMO the audience for audiobooks (and therefore the availability) is limited almost entirely to bestsellers, so the only authors who would suffer any drop in income (probably not terribly steep) would be those that are already bringing in tall coin. And then people like MacArthur wonder why readers end up pirating stuff with OCR and the like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one bit that I found very interesting:</p>
<blockquote><p>As a journalist and board member of the Authors Guild, I’ve watched in dismay as writers, living and dead, have suffered steep drops in income and copyright control thanks to Google’s — and its smaller rivals’ — logistical support for pirating and repackaging everything that we writers, editors, and publishers hold dear.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dead writers &#8220;suffer&#8221; nothing, of course, although their heirs might. Of more interest is who really made out like a bandit in the Authors Guild lawsuit against Google, and it seems to be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild#Conflict_with_Google" rel="nofollow">the Authors Guild itself</a>. Also of note on that same page is that the Guild helped remove text-to-speech on the Kindle, ostensibly on behalf of authors who might lose out on separate audiobook sales, although IMO the audience for audiobooks (and therefore the availability) is limited almost entirely to bestsellers, so the only authors who would suffer any drop in income (probably not terribly steep) would be those that are already bringing in tall coin. And then people like MacArthur wonder why readers end up pirating stuff with OCR and the like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween_Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631604</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween_Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631604</guid>
		<description>Certainly the &lt;i&gt;publishers&lt;/i&gt; were better off in those days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly the <i>publishers</i> were better off in those days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween_Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631586</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween_Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631586</guid>
		<description>The buggy-whip manufacturers &lt;i&gt;will be avenged&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The buggy-whip manufacturers <i>will be avenged</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hassenpfeffer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631539</link>
		<dc:creator>hassenpfeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631539</guid>
		<description>I subscribed to Harper&#039;s for four years or so during Dubya&#039;s second term. I really &quot;liked&quot; Scott Harper&#039;s investigations into &quot;we do not torture&quot; and &quot;weapons of mass destruction&quot; lies. Alas, one columnist/reporter could not justify an entire subscription, so buh-bye. I can still read Horton on harpers.org, but he (and Greenwald and god-knows-who-else) are too effing depressing for me to handle anymore.

Oh, and MacArthur needs to attend anger-management classes with Alex Jones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I subscribed to Harper&#8217;s for four years or so during Dubya&#8217;s second term. I really &#8220;liked&#8221; Scott Harper&#8217;s investigations into &#8220;we do not torture&#8221; and &#8220;weapons of mass destruction&#8221; lies. Alas, one columnist/reporter could not justify an entire subscription, so buh-bye. I can still read Horton on harpers.org, but he (and Greenwald and god-knows-who-else) are too effing depressing for me to handle anymore.</p>
<p>Oh, and MacArthur needs to attend anger-management classes with Alex Jones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl Westleigh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631437</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl Westleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631437</guid>
		<description> And some of us who use AdBlock whitelist sites we want to support with a few cents here and there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> And some of us who use AdBlock whitelist sites we want to support with a few cents here and there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631344</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631344</guid>
		<description>There was a time when entry-level salary for a New York teacher was about equal to entry-level salary for a New York lawyer.  Needless to say, it was a long time ago. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time when entry-level salary for a New York teacher was about equal to entry-level salary for a New York lawyer.  Needless to say, it was a long time ago. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deaduncledave</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631235</link>
		<dc:creator>deaduncledave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631235</guid>
		<description>http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jdsb4x09CEM/UED9HhR5OYI/AAAAAAAAAiE/b9bPLLWqsYk/s1600/yells+at+chair.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jdsb4x09CEM/UED9HhR5OYI/AAAAAAAAAiE/b9bPLLWqsYk/s1600/yells+at+chair.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jdsb4x09CEM/UED9HhR5OYI/AAAAAAAAAiE/b9bPLLWqsYk/s1600/yells+at+chair.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Postelwait</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631204</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Postelwait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631204</guid>
		<description>yes, this system definitely does punish incompetence.

by the way, on another note, I enjoyed your performance in Sullivan&#039;s Travels (the movie that inspired &quot;O Brother Where Art Thou?&quot;).  I&#039;ve even used a soundbite from your performance in this movie for a song project I was doing a few years back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, this system definitely does punish incompetence.</p>
<p>by the way, on another note, I enjoyed your performance in Sullivan&#8217;s Travels (the movie that inspired &#8220;O Brother Where Art Thou?&#8221;).  I&#8217;ve even used a soundbite from your performance in this movie for a song project I was doing a few years back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creesto</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631181</link>
		<dc:creator>creesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631181</guid>
		<description>It occurs to me that we have the Godwin Rule when Hitler is invoked, so I think we need The Circus Rule appellation when Python is invoked, neh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me that we have the Godwin Rule when Hitler is invoked, so I think we need The Circus Rule appellation when Python is invoked, neh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzyfuzzyfungus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631165</link>
		<dc:creator>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631165</guid>
		<description>Mobs of scribbling women are what cause you to lose pagerank, dontcha know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobs of scribbling women are what cause you to lose pagerank, dontcha know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzyfuzzyfungus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631163</link>
		<dc:creator>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631163</guid>
		<description>The &#039;teachers&#039; inclusion seems particularly odd to me.

A specific set of writers, one might be able to make a case for(newspaper journalism certainly hasn&#039;t had a good time of late, though the bleeding really started with cable, well before the internet was mass-market), independent writers have always had mixed fortunes(see also: &quot;Grub street&quot;) and have had both ups and downs with the internet; but teachers?

America&#039;s Grand War on Public Servants has certainly been a problem; but that isn&#039;t really an internet thing, and the internet is about as &lt;em&gt;unlikely&lt;/em&gt; to get a class full of students to sit down and start learning as anything short of amphetamines... At the college level, the ruthless gutting of actual professorships in favor of permatemps is nothing short of shameful; but also largely unrelated to the...um...less than terrifyingly competitive online degree mills.

There is definitely an argument to be made that the internet has &lt;em&gt;crushed&lt;/em&gt; paper journalism(if, not that they&#039;d want to say so) more by taking over the ad money than by even bothering to compete with the prose); but this guy wants to extend that into some full-scale decline of all prose-related intellectual functionaries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;teachers&#8217; inclusion seems particularly odd to me.</p>
<p>A specific set of writers, one might be able to make a case for(newspaper journalism certainly hasn&#8217;t had a good time of late, though the bleeding really started with cable, well before the internet was mass-market), independent writers have always had mixed fortunes(see also: &#8220;Grub street&#8221;) and have had both ups and downs with the internet; but teachers?</p>
<p>America&#8217;s Grand War on Public Servants has certainly been a problem; but that isn&#8217;t really an internet thing, and the internet is about as <em>unlikely</em> to get a class full of students to sit down and start learning as anything short of amphetamines&#8230; At the college level, the ruthless gutting of actual professorships in favor of permatemps is nothing short of shameful; but also largely unrelated to the&#8230;um&#8230;less than terrifyingly competitive online degree mills.</p>
<p>There is definitely an argument to be made that the internet has <em>crushed</em> paper journalism(if, not that they&#8217;d want to say so) more by taking over the ad money than by even bothering to compete with the prose); but this guy wants to extend that into some full-scale decline of all prose-related intellectual functionaries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viadd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631155</link>
		<dc:creator>viadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631155</guid>
		<description>In the tradition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theonion.com/personalities/t-herman-zweibel,1024/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;T. Herman Zweibel&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the tradition of <a href="http://www.theonion.com/personalities/t-herman-zweibel,1024/" rel="nofollow">T. Herman Zweibel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631132</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631132</guid>
		<description>Thge &quot;invisible hand&quot; probably works quite well over say a decade, but I can think of a few things that would throw it off in the short term:

1 - Policy decisions are often irrational &quot;me too&quot; behavior that imitates another company&#039;s mistake.
2 - Bidding may be in the hands of a bored intern who just keeps hitting the &quot;bid&quot; button as if he&#039;s playing video poker.
3 - Someone may have foolishly signed up for the &quot;let us manage your account for you&quot; feature (whatever that&#039;s called).
4 - Bids are definitely being driven by m2m transactions that are generating bullshit ads (Get Hydraulic Gravel Crushers At Walgreens!) 
5 - Monopolistic behavior such as Google setting minimum bids without regard to the number of competitors.  If there is only one competitor, Google may still demand a bid of $0.60 to get on the first page search results, not a nickle. 
6 - People have no idea what they are doing and bid to be #1 in search results. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thge &#8220;invisible hand&#8221; probably works quite well over say a decade, but I can think of a few things that would throw it off in the short term:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; Policy decisions are often irrational &#8220;me too&#8221; behavior that imitates another company&#8217;s mistake.<br />
2 &#8211; Bidding may be in the hands of a bored intern who just keeps hitting the &#8220;bid&#8221; button as if he&#8217;s playing video poker.<br />
3 &#8211; Someone may have foolishly signed up for the &#8220;let us manage your account for you&#8221; feature (whatever that&#8217;s called).<br />
4 &#8211; Bids are definitely being driven by m2m transactions that are generating bullshit ads (Get Hydraulic Gravel Crushers At Walgreens!) <br />
5 &#8211; Monopolistic behavior such as Google setting minimum bids without regard to the number of competitors.  If there is only one competitor, Google may still demand a bid of $0.60 to get on the first page search results, not a nickle.<br />
6 &#8211; People have no idea what they are doing and bid to be #1 in search results. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Saul</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631127</guid>
		<description>Interesting. As a lifelong science fiction fan who was born and raised in the same city as him, and was reading a half dozen sci fi novels a week in high school and college during his most productive period, I had never heard of him. Must be because: interweb.

Time to read some Mike Resnick to wash the taste of that guy out of my home town mental associations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. As a lifelong science fiction fan who was born and raised in the same city as him, and was reading a half dozen sci fi novels a week in high school and college during his most productive period, I had never heard of him. Must be because: interweb.</p>
<p>Time to read some Mike Resnick to wash the taste of that guy out of my home town mental associations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixiebunny</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631122</link>
		<dc:creator>nixiebunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631122</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re getting to the point. The money is made in selling clicks to neophyte merchandisers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re getting to the point. The money is made in selling clicks to neophyte merchandisers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos Geluk</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos Geluk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631116</guid>
		<description> Bat&#039;s urine, no less. Hence, the dark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Bat&#8217;s urine, no less. Hence, the dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nash Rambler</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631114</link>
		<dc:creator>Nash Rambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631114</guid>
		<description>Ah, thanks for the correction.  Honestly, I thought Kevin was just employing sarcasm in its&#039; purest form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks for the correction.  Honestly, I thought Kevin was just employing sarcasm in its&#8217; purest form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Postelwait</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631113</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Postelwait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631113</guid>
		<description>hehe, i&#039;m imagining you doing a zumba dance work out and then needing a soft place to rest.  true, seat cushions are quite the commodity on paid search for some reason.  I noticed Ikea is bidding that much currently, I wonder if they hope to convert on higher ticket items since you can&#039;t buy a cushion without a chair there.

Not that I am a fan of the &#039;invisible hand&#039; theory of capitalism (which is as real as god or the spaghetti monster), but from my 10 year experience, paid ads typically police themselves quite well in what many call a &#039;free market&#039;.  either sellers trim their bids in competiton with each other or get burned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe, i&#8217;m imagining you doing a zumba dance work out and then needing a soft place to rest.  true, seat cushions are quite the commodity on paid search for some reason.  I noticed Ikea is bidding that much currently, I wonder if they hope to convert on higher ticket items since you can&#8217;t buy a cushion without a chair there.</p>
<p>Not that I am a fan of the &#8216;invisible hand&#8217; theory of capitalism (which is as real as god or the spaghetti monster), but from my 10 year experience, paid ads typically police themselves quite well in what many call a &#8216;free market&#8217;.  either sellers trim their bids in competiton with each other or get burned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631108</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631108</guid>
		<description> I think it&#039;s a reference to a Monty Python joke.  In this joke the &quot;shaft of gold&quot; is a stream of urine IIRC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I think it&#8217;s a reference to a Monty Python joke.  In this joke the &#8220;shaft of gold&#8221; is a stream of urine IIRC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nash Rambler</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631106</link>
		<dc:creator>Nash Rambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631106</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now Larry, Sergey, and Eric are billionaires, while the average writer and teacher can barely make ends meet.&quot;


Yeah, I remember the good old days, back before the internet.  When all the teachers and average writers were cruising around in Cadillacs, snorting lines of cocaine off the gleaming perfection of their solid gold medallions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now Larry, Sergey, and Eric are billionaires, while the average writer and teacher can barely make ends meet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I remember the good old days, back before the internet.  When all the teachers and average writers were cruising around in Cadillacs, snorting lines of cocaine off the gleaming perfection of their solid gold medallions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nash Rambler</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631104</link>
		<dc:creator>Nash Rambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631104</guid>
		<description>Oh, MacArthur&#039;s a shaft, all right.  A great, big shaft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, MacArthur&#8217;s a shaft, all right.  A great, big shaft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631103</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631103</guid>
		<description>OK, , people are done bidding up Zumba DVDs.  Look at &quot;chair pads,&quot; which is about $1.20 a click.  Note that the search results bring up $15 chair pads.   Who is paying $25 to sell a $15 item?   I can think of several rationales for this, but what is conventional wisdom of the moment? 

I guess I can see it if the thought is that the consumer will browse around and buy something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, , people are done bidding up Zumba DVDs.  Look at &#8220;chair pads,&#8221; which is about $1.20 a click.  Note that the search results bring up $15 chair pads.   Who is paying $25 to sell a $15 item?   I can think of several rationales for this, but what is conventional wisdom of the moment? </p>
<p>I guess I can see it if the thought is that the consumer will browse around and buy something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Postelwait</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631099</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Postelwait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631099</guid>
		<description>i believe the correct term is auto-magic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe the correct term is auto-magic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Badger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/18/harpers-publisher-says-telet.html#comment-1631098</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206487#comment-1631098</guid>
		<description>Yes, I use AdBlock Plus too, as do most sophisticated users. But the whole reason web ads make millions for Google and the like is that the vast majority of users *don&#039;t* block ads. He had a point in the beginning when he mentioned the French ISP that was blocking ads for the user. He didn&#039;t really expand on it well, but there&#039;s a point there -- web technology will ultimately eat its own profit generating mechanism -- and then how will content creation be supported?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I use AdBlock Plus too, as do most sophisticated users. But the whole reason web ads make millions for Google and the like is that the vast majority of users *don&#8217;t* block ads. He had a point in the beginning when he mentioned the French ISP that was blocking ads for the user. He didn&#8217;t really expand on it well, but there&#8217;s a point there &#8212; web technology will ultimately eat its own profit generating mechanism &#8212; and then how will content creation be supported?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
