<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shooped (?) (but awesome) watch&#160;gizzard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: beafdog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1633412</link>
		<dc:creator>beafdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1633412</guid>
		<description>pedantic comment to follow:

Photoshopping is normally understood to mean digitally compositing more than one image.  This is pure digital illustration.

PS I too like the term &quot;watch gizzard&quot; but the word &quot;shooping&quot; makes me want to spit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pedantic comment to follow:</p>
<p>Photoshopping is normally understood to mean digitally compositing more than one image.  This is pure digital illustration.</p>
<p>PS I too like the term &#8220;watch gizzard&#8221; but the word &#8220;shooping&#8221; makes me want to spit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gellfex</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632771</link>
		<dc:creator>gellfex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632771</guid>
		<description>When I was a pro modelmaker in the mid 80&#039;s this was the kind of thing that was frequently made by hand in giant scale for advertising photography.  Rather than someone at a cheap workstation PC noodling a 3d model, picture a roomful of people cutting and sanding by hand (it was even pre-lasercutting) to make this, say 18 inches in diameter.  And folks wonder where all the jobs went...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a pro modelmaker in the mid 80&#8242;s this was the kind of thing that was frequently made by hand in giant scale for advertising photography.  Rather than someone at a cheap workstation PC noodling a 3d model, picture a roomful of people cutting and sanding by hand (it was even pre-lasercutting) to make this, say 18 inches in diameter.  And folks wonder where all the jobs went&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.J. Hayes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632744</link>
		<dc:creator>C.J. Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632744</guid>
		<description>Maybe.  But it&#039;s probably nickel silver or stainless steel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe.  But it&#8217;s probably nickel silver or stainless steel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Cruickshank</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632719</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cruickshank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632719</guid>
		<description>I resolve to used the term &quot;watch gizzard&quot; whenever possible.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I resolve to used the term &#8220;watch gizzard&#8221; whenever possible.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632696</guid>
		<description>Is that ironic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that ironic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632671</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632671</guid>
		<description>I agree with Copperwatt, Sam and Rich.

Yes....too many knives, no spoons, and it&#039;s all on the WRONG SIDE of the plate.

My guess?  Rendered by a youngster whose culinary experience is limited to drive up window meals :)

That aside, the image is decently rendered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Copperwatt, Sam and Rich.</p>
<p>Yes&#8230;.too many knives, no spoons, and it&#8217;s all on the WRONG SIDE of the plate.</p>
<p>My guess?  Rendered by a youngster whose culinary experience is limited to drive up window meals :)</p>
<p>That aside, the image is decently rendered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cellocgw</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632666</link>
		<dc:creator>cellocgw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632666</guid>
		<description>&quot;There is no spoon&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is no spoon&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632654</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632654</guid>
		<description>Apples and apples, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apples and apples, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonis Pappas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632642</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonis Pappas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632642</guid>
		<description>Apples and oranges. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apples and oranges. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vermes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632634</link>
		<dc:creator>vermes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632634</guid>
		<description>I dislike stuff like this. They could have easily consulted a watchmaker or even an watch fan to make it look like a functional watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dislike stuff like this. They could have easily consulted a watchmaker or even an watch fan to make it look like a functional watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Keller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632615</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 07:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632615</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m disconcerted by a lack of spoons. If I need that many knives, there had damned well better be some soup coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m disconcerted by a lack of spoons. If I need that many knives, there had damned well better be some soup coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Horton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632564</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632564</guid>
		<description>Nice investigative work, zizys.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice investigative work, zizys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ukegap</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632550</link>
		<dc:creator>ukegap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632550</guid>
		<description>But not nearly as authentically badass as a Dudley Masonic pocket watch.  http://www.oldwatch.com/dudleyse2cu.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But not nearly as authentically badass as a Dudley Masonic pocket watch.  <a href="http://www.oldwatch.com/dudleyse2cu.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.oldwatch.com/dudleyse2cu.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodhipaksa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632491</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodhipaksa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632491</guid>
		<description>Judging by the wallpaper-sized images, it looks more like a large-scale model rather than anything watch-sized: http://www.top-walls.com/wallpapers/2012/11/Eiffel-Tower-Guitars-Stick-Figures-Watches-1800x2880.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the wallpaper-sized images, it looks more like a large-scale model rather than anything watch-sized: http://www.top-walls.com/wallpapers/2012/11/Eiffel-Tower-Guitars-Stick-Figures-Watches-1800&#215;2880.jpg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Karter</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Karter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632490</guid>
		<description> Yes, yes you are.
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yes, yes you are.<br />
:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Feinson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632484</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Feinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632484</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one bothered by the placement of the knives and forks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one bothered by the placement of the knives and forks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph zizys</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632474</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph zizys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632474</guid>
		<description>Allright Cory, I will stop bothering you now, they are definitely by Seagulls Fly, for a 4WD magazine advert, in 2009, see http://www.touchpuppet.com/2009/07/31/seagulls-fly-creative-agency/

So you can thank me for taking a little bit of magic out of the world in order to give credit to a now defunct creative company :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allright Cory, I will stop bothering you now, they are definitely by Seagulls Fly, for a 4WD magazine advert, in 2009, see <a href="http://www.touchpuppet.com/2009/07/31/seagulls-fly-creative-agency/" rel="nofollow">http://www.touchpuppet.com/2009/07/31/seagulls-fly-creative-agency/</a></p>
<p>So you can thank me for taking a little bit of magic out of the world in order to give credit to a now defunct creative company :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph zizys</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632467</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph zizys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632467</guid>
		<description>Pretty sure they where made by a studio called Seagullsfly from Rio, so it might be by Fabiano Feijó...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure they where made by a studio called Seagullsfly from Rio, so it might be by Fabiano Feijó&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph zizys</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632456</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph zizys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632456</guid>
		<description>there are at least two more of these... but I have no idea who made them, they are from as far back as 2009 tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are at least two more of these&#8230; but I have no idea who made them, they are from as far back as 2009 tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zieroh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632388</link>
		<dc:creator>zieroh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632388</guid>
		<description>Yeah, seriously. And for that matter, why would &lt;i&gt;anyone&lt;/i&gt; pay good money for a piece of canvas smeared with pigment, when a picture from a smartphone has &lt;i&gt;much&lt;/i&gt; more resolution, detail, and realism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, seriously. And for that matter, why would <i>anyone</i> pay good money for a piece of canvas smeared with pigment, when a picture from a smartphone has <i>much</i> more resolution, detail, and realism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonis Pappas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632380</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonis Pappas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632380</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t fathom why are people so many people willing to pay top dollar for a RubeGoldberg contraption, that can easily be replicated by an RC oscilator and four counters. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t fathom why are people so many people willing to pay top dollar for a RubeGoldberg contraption, that can easily be replicated by an RC oscilator and four counters. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Urso</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632378</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Urso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632378</guid>
		<description>shooped like Salt n Peppa?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shooped like Salt n Peppa?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632376</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632376</guid>
		<description>No winding required.  It&#039;s powered by the entrapped soul of a college student who disappeared while cycling through Europe not long ago.  It happened in the woods near that creepy watch maker&#039;s house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No winding required.  It&#8217;s powered by the entrapped soul of a college student who disappeared while cycling through Europe not long ago.  It happened in the woods near that creepy watch maker&#8217;s house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyger11</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632375</link>
		<dc:creator>tyger11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632375</guid>
		<description>I think I just found Waldo! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I just found Waldo! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bozobub</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632366</link>
		<dc:creator>Bozobub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632366</guid>
		<description>Why does it have to be fake?  I&#039;ve seen quite a few &quot;faceless&quot; watches like this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does it have to be fake?  I&#8217;ve seen quite a few &#8220;faceless&#8221; watches like this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: copperwatt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/19/shooped-but-awesome-watc.html#comment-1632364</link>
		<dc:creator>copperwatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206701#comment-1632364</guid>
		<description>Strikes me as more &quot;rendered&quot; than &quot;shopped&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strikes me as more &#8220;rendered&#8221; than &#8220;shopped&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
