— FEATURED —
The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker
Eurovision 2013: An American in London
The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: The Truth Behind the Nixonian Presidency of Obama
Brain Rot: Hip Hop Family Tree, Compton, Lonzo Williams and the Wreckin' Cru
Real Stuff: Bad Trip
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Guatemala: protests condemn annulment of Rios Montt trial, while ex-president Portillo extradited to US
NYT Editorial Board: "Justice Interrupted in Guatemala"
Guatemala's Genocide on Trial: Kate Doyle
— RECENTLY —
Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation
We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir
The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek
Odd Duck: great picture book about eccentricity and ducks
Scatter, Adapt, and Remember: How Humans Will Survive a Mass Extinction
Illustrator William Stout's Legends of the Blues - exclusive excerpt
Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor
Review: Disunion, the VR guillotine simulator
Mousetronaut: kids' picture book about mouse in space, written by a Shuttle pilot
Review: Pebble e-paper watch
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Xeni Jardin at 2:47 pm Tue, Jan 22, 2013
My big issue with a lot of the headlines I see on the web is that it seems like they try to pick words and phrasing so as to make you reread the headline a few times in order to understand it, which usually results from trying to summarize the whole article in a phrase or else using words that are both verbs and nouns or adjectives.
For example: “Clergy abuse victims: ‘We demand justice.”
Is this saying that clergy members are abusing victims? No, it’s saying “victims of clergy abuse” are saying something. So why not say more clearly, “Victims of clergy abuse?” Oh, but we have to save that precious two extra characters and a space and cause confusion.
Another example: “Time UN observers left Kashmir: India”
It’s really saying “India: It is time that UN observers left Kashmir.” I understand getting rid of “that,” but what about rephrasing it as “India: Time for UN observers to leave Kashmir” ? That seems so much clearer and doesn’t take much space.
Those conventions date back to a time when masthead space was at a premium, which is also how our presidents became FDR, JFK and LBJ. But you’re right, on the web, two extra characters don’t cost a cent. Clarity is a good thing.
Here’s another one: “Google stems advertising price declines.” It’s not all that hard to figure out, but the word choice is poor. Every single word in that headline is both a noun and a verb.
My mind registers ever single variant as spam. Do they actually link to the articles they sound like?
Ten Mind-Blowing Ways to Make Web Headlines You’d Never Expect.
Benghazi Cover-Up Aided by Liberal Web Headline Writing Policies.