By David Pescovitz at 10:48 am Tue, Jan 22, 2013
Oh, and in case you were wondering: "Genetic analysis shows that the sessile crustaceans can broadcast sperm in water." (Science News)
“Genetic analysis shows that the sessile crustaceans can broadcast sperm in water.”
I have the weirdest boner right now.
I guess that makes me a sessile crustacean. Amirite?
Correlation does not imply causation!
I thought this was already known. Isn’t Sacculina (which I’ve been reading about again because, honestly, it fascinates the hell out of me) a variety of barnacle?
Well, broadcasting (or to be more technically correct “dudecasting”) does have advantages over point-to-point transmission. For one thing the source can’t be overloaded by demands from the receivers.
My life is now complete.
One more reason to never go into the water.
Insert obligatory Monty Python here.
Didn’t we already knew about the sexlife of Barnacle Bill ?
Why is it that organisms evolved out of the need to be surronded by water and can live and move about on land yet sperm remain so primitive? Why is it that sperm haven’t evolved legs and lungs so they can cruise the boulevards in search of ripe ova?
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Submit a tip
The rules you agree to by using this website.
Who will be eaten first?
Jason Weisberger, Publisher
Ken Snider, Sysadmin