<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Children of the&#160;90s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrScience</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1638230</link>
		<dc:creator>MrScience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1638230</guid>
		<description>Fair enough! I agree earlier versions of IE used up &lt;i&gt;plenty&lt;/i&gt; of goodwill; I was a web/middle-tier developer in the .com boom/bust, and can readily sympathise. 

That said, I&#039;m surprised by your backing of webkit... I was under the impression that the prevelance of the webkit- prefix is a source of consternation in the industry.

I did a search for &#039;webkit standards&#039; to see if things had changed recently... and these are a few of the hits:
http://www.webstandards.org/2012/02/09/call-for-action-on-vendor-prefixes/
http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source/webkit-and-why-open-standards-matter-032
http://winsupersite.com/article/product-review/the-webkit-lie-and-the-future-of-web-standards

--As always, opinions that of my own and not my employer --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough! I agree earlier versions of IE used up <i>plenty</i> of goodwill; I was a web/middle-tier developer in the .com boom/bust, and can readily sympathise. </p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m surprised by your backing of webkit&#8230; I was under the impression that the prevelance of the webkit- prefix is a source of consternation in the industry.</p>
<p>I did a search for &#8216;webkit standards&#8217; to see if things had changed recently&#8230; and these are a few of the hits:<br />
<a href="http://www.webstandards.org/2012/02/09/call-for-action-on-vendor-prefixes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webstandards.org/2012/02/09/call-for-action-on-vendor-prefixes/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source/webkit-and-why-open-standards-matter-032" rel="nofollow">http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source/webkit-and-why-open-standards-matter-032</a><br />
<a href="http://winsupersite.com/article/product-review/the-webkit-lie-and-the-future-of-web-standards" rel="nofollow">http://winsupersite.com/article/product-review/the-webkit-lie-and-the-future-of-web-standards</a></p>
<p>&#8211;As always, opinions that of my own and not my employer &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrScience</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1638223</link>
		<dc:creator>MrScience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1638223</guid>
		<description>In researching this problem, IE devs discovered this was usually due to add-ins. Now, IE prompts me whenever a new add-in is detected that delays startup time by a predetermined threshold (something like .1s), giving me the option to disable it if it&#039;s unwanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In researching this problem, IE devs discovered this was usually due to add-ins. Now, IE prompts me whenever a new add-in is detected that delays startup time by a predetermined threshold (something like .1s), giving me the option to disable it if it&#8217;s unwanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoned Panguin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637971</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoned Panguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637971</guid>
		<description> Mosaic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Mosaic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rausantaella</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637911</link>
		<dc:creator>rausantaella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637911</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one to notice the small glitch between IE icons? As in, when the icon shrinks to go to tablet size... it kind of stutters at the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one to notice the small glitch between IE icons? As in, when the icon shrinks to go to tablet size&#8230; it kind of stutters at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobtato</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637862</link>
		<dc:creator>bobtato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637862</guid>
		<description>I am totally willing to give Microsoft credit where it&#039;s due; I&#039;ve had good experiences with many of their products, I grew up with DOS and Windows, I&#039;m named after Microsoft Bob (not really), but... Internet Explorer is an awful, poisonous, &lt;em&gt;evil&lt;/em&gt; piece of software that should have been taken out behind the woodshed and shot through the head at least 10 years ago.I have opinions on lots of software, but IE is in a different league.  I despise it from the bottom of my heart.  The &lt;em&gt;hundreds upon hundreds&lt;/em&gt; of hours I&#039;ve spent working around its incompatibilities since the late nineties, including the &quot;fully standards-compliant&quot; versions 7 and later...  and I am but one man.  The total payload of suffering IE has doled out during its miserable, poxy lifetime is beyond imagining.The claim, &lt;em&gt;again,&lt;/em&gt; that it&#039;s finally fixed this time just makes me angrier.  No, IE, no.  Any goodwill you were due was exhausted long before this century began.  Until IE is replaced with a WebKit fork, I&#039;m not willing to spend even 20 seconds giving it another chance.  It&#039;s filth.

Oh, and I haven&#039;t even touched on its role as the world&#039;s malware superhighway.  I think I had my latest PC about a week before the first shitty toolbar managed to install itself in IE9.  Kill it.  KILL IT WITH FIRE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am totally willing to give Microsoft credit where it&#8217;s due; I&#8217;ve had good experiences with many of their products, I grew up with DOS and Windows, I&#8217;m named after Microsoft Bob (not really), but&#8230; Internet Explorer is an awful, poisonous, <em>evil</em> piece of software that should have been taken out behind the woodshed and shot through the head at least 10 years ago.I have opinions on lots of software, but IE is in a different league.  I despise it from the bottom of my heart.  The <em>hundreds upon hundreds</em> of hours I&#8217;ve spent working around its incompatibilities since the late nineties, including the &#8220;fully standards-compliant&#8221; versions 7 and later&#8230;  and I am but one man.  The total payload of suffering IE has doled out during its miserable, poxy lifetime is beyond imagining.The claim, <em>again,</em> that it&#8217;s finally fixed this time just makes me angrier.  No, IE, no.  Any goodwill you were due was exhausted long before this century began.  Until IE is replaced with a WebKit fork, I&#8217;m not willing to spend even 20 seconds giving it another chance.  It&#8217;s filth.</p>
<p>Oh, and I haven&#8217;t even touched on its role as the world&#8217;s malware superhighway.  I think I had my latest PC about a week before the first shitty toolbar managed to install itself in IE9.  Kill it.  KILL IT WITH FIRE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baanrit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637803</link>
		<dc:creator>Baanrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637803</guid>
		<description> Does this mean that I am now officially old? Seriously though, IE is still dreadful. Besides, the big browser was Netscape Navigator and was the one used on May 18th, 1995 when I first used that thing called the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Does this mean that I am now officially old? Seriously though, IE is still dreadful. Besides, the big browser was Netscape Navigator and was the one used on May 18th, 1995 when I first used that thing called the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donovan acree</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637796</link>
		<dc:creator>donovan acree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637796</guid>
		<description>There is also the investment MS has in active x to consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also the investment MS has in active x to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lolotehe</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637583</link>
		<dc:creator>Lolotehe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637583</guid>
		<description>How does that modem work with no phone cord or connector cable? All it has is a power-line. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does that modem work with no phone cord or connector cable? All it has is a power-line. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobLeslie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637550</link>
		<dc:creator>RobLeslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637550</guid>
		<description>Good riddance to all that nonsense, especially Internet Explorer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good riddance to all that nonsense, especially Internet Explorer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BadIdeaSociety</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637456</link>
		<dc:creator>BadIdeaSociety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637456</guid>
		<description>That commercial was totally lame. So what if your browser changed? It still propagates content in counter-intuitive ways.

If Microsoft wants to make me nostalgic, revive Netscape Navigator. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That commercial was totally lame. So what if your browser changed? It still propagates content in counter-intuitive ways.</p>
<p>If Microsoft wants to make me nostalgic, revive Netscape Navigator. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Kooheji</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637435</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Kooheji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637435</guid>
		<description>My biggest issue with IE and the reason I never use it is the fact that it seems to take an age to start up. I stopped using Firefox for the same reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My biggest issue with IE and the reason I never use it is the fact that it seems to take an age to start up. I stopped using Firefox for the same reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguinchris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637384</link>
		<dc:creator>penguinchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637384</guid>
		<description>I grew up in the 90&#039;s (b. 1986) and while I remember all of this stuff, none of it is nostalgic. I was a weird kid, granted - but there &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; a lot of things from the 90&#039;s that have some nostalgia value to me, and they managed to miss all of them. 

Funnily enough, many 90&#039;s Microsoft products would make my list of things that make me feel nostalgic, bad as they were!

Another observation though - lots of people are pointing out that they&#039;re sort of mixing up 70&#039;s, 80&#039;s, and 90&#039;s stuff. The thing is that I remember all of this stuff - including the old-school Apple - from the 90&#039;s. It was a time of rapid technological progress, but it was unevenly distributed... but not really in the Gibsonian way, even. 

We used Apple IIs (with the Oregon Trail featured here) alongside more modern computers (with the next-gen but still old school Oregon Trail, the one they should have used here really) in school - things like that weren&#039;t tossed out and replaced immediately. I had a cassette walkman, too (my dad continued to use them until he got a smartphone last year... and he might still use them, actually, for all I know). And Hungry Hungry Hippos was quite popular for a couple of years, as I recall. 

I&#039;m obviously not the target audience - I didn&#039;t go in for the popular or cool stuff in the 90&#039;s, I knew better even then (and I did use Microsoft stuff, which was never cool, until the early 2000s). I also know better now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up in the 90&#8242;s (b. 1986) and while I remember all of this stuff, none of it is nostalgic. I was a weird kid, granted &#8211; but there <i>are</i> a lot of things from the 90&#8242;s that have some nostalgia value to me, and they managed to miss all of them. </p>
<p>Funnily enough, many 90&#8242;s Microsoft products would make my list of things that make me feel nostalgic, bad as they were!</p>
<p>Another observation though &#8211; lots of people are pointing out that they&#8217;re sort of mixing up 70&#8242;s, 80&#8242;s, and 90&#8242;s stuff. The thing is that I remember all of this stuff &#8211; including the old-school Apple &#8211; from the 90&#8242;s. It was a time of rapid technological progress, but it was unevenly distributed&#8230; but not really in the Gibsonian way, even. </p>
<p>We used Apple IIs (with the Oregon Trail featured here) alongside more modern computers (with the next-gen but still old school Oregon Trail, the one they should have used here really) in school &#8211; things like that weren&#8217;t tossed out and replaced immediately. I had a cassette walkman, too (my dad continued to use them until he got a smartphone last year&#8230; and he might still use them, actually, for all I know). And Hungry Hungry Hippos was quite popular for a couple of years, as I recall. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m obviously not the target audience &#8211; I didn&#8217;t go in for the popular or cool stuff in the 90&#8242;s, I knew better even then (and I did use Microsoft stuff, which was never cool, until the early 2000s). I also know better now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fnordius</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637376</link>
		<dc:creator>Fnordius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637376</guid>
		<description>Yeah, for some reason this looked more like my teenage years in the early to mid 1980&#039;s. The bulky Walkman, the clothing, Oregon Trail… only the Hungry Hungry Hippos were already passé by then.

Then again, I suppose Microsoft wants to pretend that life began with Windows 3.11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, for some reason this looked more like my teenage years in the early to mid 1980&#8242;s. The bulky Walkman, the clothing, Oregon Trail… only the Hungry Hungry Hippos were already passé by then.</p>
<p>Then again, I suppose Microsoft wants to pretend that life began with Windows 3.11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Churchill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637343</link>
		<dc:creator>James Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637343</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hi! I&#039;m that bully from high school who used to beat you up and steal your stuff... now I&#039;m back and I wanna be friends. Pleeeease?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hi! I&#8217;m that bully from high school who used to beat you up and steal your stuff&#8230; now I&#8217;m back and I wanna be friends. Pleeeease?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joelogs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637244</link>
		<dc:creator>joelogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637244</guid>
		<description>People are lazy. How many Chrome users do you know who changed the default search from Google to Bing? Hook most people on a browser, and they&#039;ll never change a single setting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are lazy. How many Chrome users do you know who changed the default search from Google to Bing? Hook most people on a browser, and they&#8217;ll never change a single setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chesterfield</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637212</link>
		<dc:creator>Chesterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637212</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t they just advertise Bing? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they just advertise Bing? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha K-S</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637155</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha K-S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637155</guid>
		<description>I remember meeting you in the 90s. Fuck you, I didn&#039;t like you then﻿ either.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember meeting you in the 90s. Fuck you, I didn&#8217;t like you then﻿ either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Off White</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1637004</link>
		<dc:creator>Off White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1637004</guid>
		<description> Yeah, like Craig Finn from The Hold Steady says,

&quot;The 80&#039;s almost killed me
Lets not remember them quite so fondly&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yeah, like Craig Finn from The Hold Steady says,</p>
<p>&#8220;The 80&#8242;s almost killed me<br />
Lets not remember them quite so fondly&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcsizemo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636966</link>
		<dc:creator>bcsizemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636966</guid>
		<description>I dug up my old XP150 which was in a box at my parents house.  The nozzle is missing and it still reeks of gas...but lets just say that baby can make one hell of a flame thrower...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dug up my old XP150 which was in a box at my parents house.  The nozzle is missing and it still reeks of gas&#8230;but lets just say that baby can make one hell of a flame thrower&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrScience</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636959</link>
		<dc:creator>MrScience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636959</guid>
		<description>Fair disclosure up front: I work for a subdivision of Microsoft on one of their games... and I agree they completely stalled until competition showed up. But IE10&#039;s doing pretty well (I searched for IE10, Chrome, Standards, Independant on google.com and bing.com, and could only find articles like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.extremetech.com/internet/140337-ie10-on-windows-7-benchmarked-how-does-it-fare-against-google-chrome&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt; that say that IE10 and Chrome are pretty neck-and-neck). I attended the Penny Arcade Game Developer&#039;s Conference last year, and in the Angry Birds / Google panel Google employees were saying that IE&#039;s passing them in performance areas critical to game developers... Microsoft really is investing heavily in their web technology stacks.

Edit: To be clear, I personally think it&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;great&lt;/i&gt; thing that there&#039;s healthy competition, and wish everyone weighed their choices intelligently. Choose what&#039;s best for you based on facts, not dogma, as this is the only way to ensure that the environment continues to improve.

--All opinions that of my own, and not my employer--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair disclosure up front: I work for a subdivision of Microsoft on one of their games&#8230; and I agree they completely stalled until competition showed up. But IE10&#8242;s doing pretty well (I searched for IE10, Chrome, Standards, Independant on google.com and bing.com, and could only find articles like <a href="http://www.extremetech.com/internet/140337-ie10-on-windows-7-benchmarked-how-does-it-fare-against-google-chrome" rel="nofollow">this one</a> that say that IE10 and Chrome are pretty neck-and-neck). I attended the Penny Arcade Game Developer&#8217;s Conference last year, and in the Angry Birds / Google panel Google employees were saying that IE&#8217;s passing them in performance areas critical to game developers&#8230; Microsoft really is investing heavily in their web technology stacks.</p>
<p>Edit: To be clear, I personally think it&#8217;s a <i>great</i> thing that there&#8217;s healthy competition, and wish everyone weighed their choices intelligently. Choose what&#8217;s best for you based on facts, not dogma, as this is the only way to ensure that the environment continues to improve.</p>
<p>&#8211;All opinions that of my own, and not my employer&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Schmeer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636886</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Schmeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636886</guid>
		<description>Total apostrophe fail. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total apostrophe fail. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian Barajas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636869</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian Barajas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636869</guid>
		<description> They&#039;re trying to make us old guys feel young. C&#039;mon! Walkmans? I got my first portable CD player in the 90&#039;s. i had a walkman in the 80´s. and pogs are really late 90&#039;s they were still popular in 2000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> They&#8217;re trying to make us old guys feel young. C&#8217;mon! Walkmans? I got my first portable CD player in the 90&#8242;s. i had a walkman in the 80´s. and pogs are really late 90&#8242;s they were still popular in 2000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian Barajas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636864</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian Barajas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636864</guid>
		<description> I think everyone got that. But they´re still playing catch up, the biggest improvements to IE have been made after everyone else innovated. Netscape, Firefox, Opera, Chrome. They say they&#039;ve grown up, but it only means they&#039;ve caught up (maybe) and for how long?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I think everyone got that. But they´re still playing catch up, the biggest improvements to IE have been made after everyone else innovated. Netscape, Firefox, Opera, Chrome. They say they&#8217;ve grown up, but it only means they&#8217;ve caught up (maybe) and for how long?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pickledbeatnik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636853</link>
		<dc:creator>pickledbeatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636853</guid>
		<description>Cuz Mac costs several thousands of dollars!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuz Mac costs several thousands of dollars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pickledbeatnik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636851</link>
		<dc:creator>pickledbeatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636851</guid>
		<description>My school totally had Oregon Trail, but not in color. I don&#039;t know where this ad got that idea.

Also, slap sticks and fanny packs were the bomb, durhay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My school totally had Oregon Trail, but not in color. I don&#8217;t know where this ad got that idea.</p>
<p>Also, slap sticks and fanny packs were the bomb, durhay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pickledbeatnik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636846</link>
		<dc:creator>pickledbeatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636846</guid>
		<description>POGS. Oh my god, Trolls! And there&#039;s Hungry Hungry Hippos! Aww, all my buddies showed up in this video to party, and then Internet Explorer walked into the room and farted :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POGS. Oh my god, Trolls! And there&#8217;s Hungry Hungry Hippos! Aww, all my buddies showed up in this video to party, and then Internet Explorer walked into the room and farted :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pickledbeatnik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636849</link>
		<dc:creator>pickledbeatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636849</guid>
		<description>Whatever, better known as Nutscrape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever, better known as Nutscrape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pakeha</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636845</link>
		<dc:creator>Pakeha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636845</guid>
		<description>Made me think of this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made me think of this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joelogs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636834</link>
		<dc:creator>joelogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636834</guid>
		<description>If you use IE, you&#039;re more likely to use Bing as your default search engine. Step 2: Profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use IE, you&#8217;re more likely to use Bing as your default search engine. Step 2: Profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jardine</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/children-of-the-90s.html#comment-1636829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jardine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208065#comment-1636829</guid>
		<description>I expect a lot of school districts were probably still running computers with Oregon Trail in the 90s. I think we still had some Commodore 64s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect a lot of school districts were probably still running computers with Oregon Trail in the 90s. I think we still had some Commodore 64s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
