<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1638227</link>
		<dc:creator>marilove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1638227</guid>
		<description>&quot;it didn&#039;t cross my mind&quot; is the correct answer in this context. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it didn&#8217;t cross my mind&#8221; is the correct answer in this context. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1638225</link>
		<dc:creator>marilove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1638225</guid>
		<description>Okay, tossing sexist tropes on their head? Not the same thing as killing people. Seriously, what&#039;s up with these weird false equivalencies?

The power and privileges between men and women in this society are NOT EQUAL in many areas.  &lt;i&gt;This is why&lt;/i&gt; throwing back these sexist tropes on the face of men works.  The REASON IT WORKS, is because you realize how fucking ridiculous it is when it is used toward the non-marginalized group.  It&#039;s like when you tell a straight couple, &quot;Stop talking about your opposite-sex wife! Think about the children!&quot;

That doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re being heterophobic to that straight person, does it?  No, of course not, that would be fucking ridiculous.  (THERE!  There is an analogy that actually works!  See, that wasn&#039;t that hard, was it?)
&lt;blockquote&gt;That said, people sometimes need to be shaken up and have their bad behaviour reflected back to them before they realise the consequences of their actions and how they can affect others. &lt;/blockquote&gt;No shit.  That still doesn&#039;t make this at all sexist toward men.
&lt;blockquote&gt;not objectifying men just because that&#039;s what they do all the time and so deserve it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;And no one is &lt;I&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; objectifying men with this whole stunt, anyway; they are just repeating back what is told to women, which &lt;i&gt;is not the same thing&lt;/i&gt;.  So your argument is even more ridiculous.

For the record, I think this is hilarious because it points out how ridiculous objectifying women in this way is, but I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s THAT useful -- we all know we&#039;re not *actually* objectifying men.

It&#039;s a humorous way to look at how women are treated, which isn&#039;t a bad thing, but it&#039;s not like, ground-breaking or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, tossing sexist tropes on their head? Not the same thing as killing people. Seriously, what&#8217;s up with these weird false equivalencies?</p>
<p>The power and privileges between men and women in this society are NOT EQUAL in many areas.  <i>This is why</i> throwing back these sexist tropes on the face of men works.  The REASON IT WORKS, is because you realize how fucking ridiculous it is when it is used toward the non-marginalized group.  It&#8217;s like when you tell a straight couple, &#8220;Stop talking about your opposite-sex wife! Think about the children!&#8221;</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re being heterophobic to that straight person, does it?  No, of course not, that would be fucking ridiculous.  (THERE!  There is an analogy that actually works!  See, that wasn&#8217;t that hard, was it?)</p>
<blockquote><p>That said, people sometimes need to be shaken up and have their bad behaviour reflected back to them before they realise the consequences of their actions and how they can affect others. </p></blockquote>
<p>No shit.  That still doesn&#8217;t make this at all sexist toward men.</p>
<blockquote><p>not objectifying men just because that&#8217;s what they do all the time and so deserve it.</p></blockquote>
<p>And no one is <i>actually</i> objectifying men with this whole stunt, anyway; they are just repeating back what is told to women, which <i>is not the same thing</i>.  So your argument is even more ridiculous.</p>
<p>For the record, I think this is hilarious because it points out how ridiculous objectifying women in this way is, but I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s THAT useful &#8212; we all know we&#8217;re not *actually* objectifying men.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a humorous way to look at how women are treated, which isn&#8217;t a bad thing, but it&#8217;s not like, ground-breaking or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NI MEN HAO-DY TRAMPOLINA</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637951</link>
		<dc:creator>NI MEN HAO-DY TRAMPOLINA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637951</guid>
		<description> lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NI MEN HAO-DY TRAMPOLINA</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637948</link>
		<dc:creator>NI MEN HAO-DY TRAMPOLINA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637948</guid>
		<description> Ding! Correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ding! Correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheOven</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637696</link>
		<dc:creator>TheOven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637696</guid>
		<description>Technically. Though I&#039;m just playing semantics to prove a point: Reverse bad behaviour (where we flip the stereotype/sexism/racism back onto the perpetrators), is in and of itself the exact same behaviour that we claim to hate and be fighting against. 

It&#039;s like shooting pro-gun advocates to make them aware and prove that guns do hurt people. 

That said, people sometimes need to be shaken up and have their bad behaviour reflected back to them before they realise the consequences of their actions and how they can affect others. So I get the point and agree with the issues but don&#039;t really agree with the fighting fire with fire idea. I prefer to just not objectify women and to enact change through proper behaviour - not objectifying men just because that&#039;s what they do all the time and so deserve it. 

I could probably be more eloquent than that but what do I know? I&#039;m just a dumb blonde.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically. Though I&#8217;m just playing semantics to prove a point: Reverse bad behaviour (where we flip the stereotype/sexism/racism back onto the perpetrators), is in and of itself the exact same behaviour that we claim to hate and be fighting against. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like shooting pro-gun advocates to make them aware and prove that guns do hurt people. </p>
<p>That said, people sometimes need to be shaken up and have their bad behaviour reflected back to them before they realise the consequences of their actions and how they can affect others. So I get the point and agree with the issues but don&#8217;t really agree with the fighting fire with fire idea. I prefer to just not objectify women and to enact change through proper behaviour &#8211; not objectifying men just because that&#8217;s what they do all the time and so deserve it. </p>
<p>I could probably be more eloquent than that but what do I know? I&#8217;m just a dumb blonde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Cristofaro</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637649</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Cristofaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637649</guid>
		<description>Needs moar sunglasses (in those fabulous frames).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needs moar sunglasses (in those fabulous frames).  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637541</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637541</guid>
		<description>In addition to &quot;borrowed authority&quot; (a real term) a friend and I came up with &quot;borrowed outrage.&quot;  Pretending to be outraged on behalf of other people is very high on the scale of being disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to &#8220;borrowed authority&#8221; (a real term) a friend and I came up with &#8220;borrowed outrage.&#8221;  Pretending to be outraged on behalf of other people is very high on the scale of being disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bzishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637457</link>
		<dc:creator>bzishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637457</guid>
		<description>@boingboing-e41803c944b3d68e5215c8b9cefb0196:disqus I wasn&#039;t grandstanding. You can review my history--when I see sexism I point it out. I don&#039;t do it to insult you. I do it so that you and others will be aware that these comments can be damaging. I would have posted the same thing whether Rob posted before me or not. I was a little harsh in my initial post so I&#039;m sorry for that. I shouldn&#039;t have posted in a way that made you so defensive. But I&#039;m not sorry for the criticism of sexism in your initial post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@boingboing-e41803c944b3d68e5215c8b9cefb0196:disqus I wasn&#8217;t grandstanding. You can review my history&#8211;when I see sexism I point it out. I don&#8217;t do it to insult you. I do it so that you and others will be aware that these comments can be damaging. I would have posted the same thing whether Rob posted before me or not. I was a little harsh in my initial post so I&#8217;m sorry for that. I shouldn&#8217;t have posted in a way that made you so defensive. But I&#8217;m not sorry for the criticism of sexism in your initial post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637434</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637434</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s relative of course. Hillary is well in the upper half of politicians in terms of respectability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s relative of course. Hillary is well in the upper half of politicians in terms of respectability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637430</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637430</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nothing unflattering about it. Are photos of women only about how pretty they are? This one is about how inane some questions are. It&#039;s a great photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing unflattering about it. Are photos of women only about how pretty they are? This one is about how inane some questions are. It&#8217;s a great photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DataShade</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637351</link>
		<dc:creator>DataShade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637351</guid>
		<description>... my god ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; my god &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637333</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637333</guid>
		<description>Sure enough, Ron Paul had a kid.  Was little Rand stoned or what?  Does he have a bong in his briefcase?  
   &quot;Weapons to Turkey?&quot; 
   &quot;Biggest tragedy since 9-11?&quot;
    &quot;If I were president?&quot;
Does this clown do children&#039;s parties? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure enough, Ron Paul had a kid.  Was little Rand stoned or what?  Does he have a bong in his briefcase?  <br />
   &#8221;Weapons to Turkey?&#8221; <br />
   &#8221;Biggest tragedy since 9-11?&#8221;<br />
    &#8220;If I were president?&#8221;<br />
Does this clown do children&#8217;s parties? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637331</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637331</guid>
		<description>Yeah they both did.  Actually my first thought was East of Eden. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah they both did.  Actually my first thought was East of Eden. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637307</link>
		<dc:creator>marilove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637307</guid>
		<description>Are you trying to imply that it was sexist toward men? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you trying to imply that it was sexist toward men? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637304</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637304</guid>
		<description>Did Kowalski say that?  I got it from James Dean myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Kowalski say that?  I got it from James Dean myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637295</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637295</guid>
		<description>Or James Dean

http://youtu.be/4zFg2qByF4E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or James Dean</p>
<p><a href="http://youtu.be/4zFg2qByF4E" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/4zFg2qByF4E</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637285</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637285</guid>
		<description>The GOP has had 4 months to articulate their point, but have never gotten around to it.  All they&#039;ve done is babble in exactly the same way as every grifter and addict caught with their hand in the cookie jar trying to escape by making accusations.   Or maybe these old men are speaking the conservative equivalent of the secret language of 12 year old girls.   either way, it&#039;s not pretty that they are cheerleaders for terrorists.  Oh well, there&#039;s bound to be another bombing or something and then the GOP can try to carry the ball over the goal line for the terrorists again.

Also see my comment about Rand Paul above.  His appearance was comedy gold.  I wonder if Anonymous will nail him for making neonazis part of his campaign like his dad did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP has had 4 months to articulate their point, but have never gotten around to it.  All they&#8217;ve done is babble in exactly the same way as every grifter and addict caught with their hand in the cookie jar trying to escape by making accusations.   Or maybe these old men are speaking the conservative equivalent of the secret language of 12 year old girls.   either way, it&#8217;s not pretty that they are cheerleaders for terrorists.  Oh well, there&#8217;s bound to be another bombing or something and then the GOP can try to carry the ball over the goal line for the terrorists again.</p>
<p>Also see my comment about Rand Paul above.  His appearance was comedy gold.  I wonder if Anonymous will nail him for making neonazis part of his campaign like his dad did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637228</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637228</guid>
		<description>&gt;Not seeing the use of borrowed authority here.

Rob (the editor) admonished my comment up thread, so bzishi jumped in and started grandstanding. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Not seeing the use of borrowed authority here.</p>
<p>Rob (the editor) admonished my comment up thread, so bzishi jumped in and started grandstanding. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BDiamond</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637194</link>
		<dc:creator>BDiamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637194</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll just leave this here:  feministing.com/2013/01/24/how-to-deal-with-a-mansplainer-starring-hillary-clinton-in-gifs/ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll just leave this here:  feministing.com/2013/01/24/how-to-deal-with-a-mansplainer-starring-hillary-clinton-in-gifs/ </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BDiamond</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637190</link>
		<dc:creator>BDiamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637190</guid>
		<description> All you Tommy-come-latelys ... does no one remember that Stanley Kowalski first screamed that line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> All you Tommy-come-latelys &#8230; does no one remember that Stanley Kowalski first screamed that line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BDiamond</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637183</link>
		<dc:creator>BDiamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637183</guid>
		<description> Not seeing the use of borrowed authority here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Not seeing the use of borrowed authority here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flappy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637156</link>
		<dc:creator>flappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637156</guid>
		<description>And Hillary ensues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Hillary ensues&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha K-S</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637153</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha K-S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637153</guid>
		<description>Hopefully this will knock off the talk of her running for president. It was really a bad showing.

&quot;Why did you repeatedly lie to the American people for weeks and weeks about this event?&quot; &quot;It doesn&#039;t matter! I accept full responsibility, and now that I&#039;ll do nothing let&#039;s move on!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully this will knock off the talk of her running for president. It was really a bad showing.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why did you repeatedly lie to the American people for weeks and weeks about this event?&#8221; &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t matter! I accept full responsibility, and now that I&#8217;ll do nothing let&#8217;s move on!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10xor01</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637069</link>
		<dc:creator>10xor01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637069</guid>
		<description>Looks quite presidential to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks quite presidential to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robinalabama</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637054</link>
		<dc:creator>Robinalabama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637054</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help but think that this is what she wanted to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but think that this is what she wanted to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1637037</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1637037</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m going to put my foot this far....&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m going to put my foot this far&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcsizemo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1636972</link>
		<dc:creator>bcsizemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1636972</guid>
		<description>Like we all didn&#039;t know who &quot;wore the pants&quot; in their relationship a decade ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like we all didn&#8217;t know who &#8220;wore the pants&#8221; in their relationship a decade ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1636965</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1636965</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe the editors are going to provide space for a response to your demands, so you&#039;re going to be disappointed.  But, devious use of &quot;borrowed authority,&quot; well played.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe the editors are going to provide space for a response to your demands, so you&#8217;re going to be disappointed.  But, devious use of &#8220;borrowed authority,&#8221; well played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comedian</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1636929</link>
		<dc:creator>Comedian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1636929</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been told &quot;There are no stupid questions&quot; so many times in my life I&#039;ve lost count.

Stupid people, on the other hand, are a renewable resource.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been told &#8220;There are no stupid questions&#8221; so many times in my life I&#8217;ve lost count.</p>
<p>Stupid people, on the other hand, are a renewable resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bzishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/24/hillary-2.html#comment-1636930</link>
		<dc:creator>bzishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=208080#comment-1636930</guid>
		<description>Before I respond, I want to know if you consider it a problem that women are objectified in their professions in ways that men are not? And do you acknowledge that male politicians would never receive a comment on how &#039;hot&#039; they appeared while they were testifying before Congress? Finally, do you acknowledge that women politicians routinely receive comments on how &#039;hot&#039; they appear in variety of contexts, including testifying before Congress?

If you acknowledge any of these questions and still stand by your first post, then the extraordinary evidence will have been provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I respond, I want to know if you consider it a problem that women are objectified in their professions in ways that men are not? And do you acknowledge that male politicians would never receive a comment on how &#8216;hot&#8217; they appeared while they were testifying before Congress? Finally, do you acknowledge that women politicians routinely receive comments on how &#8216;hot&#8217; they appear in variety of contexts, including testifying before Congress?</p>
<p>If you acknowledge any of these questions and still stand by your first post, then the extraordinary evidence will have been provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
