J.J. Abrams to direct new Star Wars movie


64 Responses to “J.J. Abrams to direct new Star Wars movie”

  1. Do lightsabers give off lens flare?

  2. bruceburbank says:


  3. niktemadur says:

    Christopher Nolan would be the right man for the job, I still say.

  4. Just_Ok says:

    Yah, and it turns out, Luke will be Vader’s father.

  5. anansi133 says:

    The question used to be, “How many times have you seen (the only) Star Wars?

    then it was, “What order do you think they should be viewed?”

    next it’s going to be, “When do you think the franshise jumped the shark?”

    For that question, I’m gonna stick with the last 10 minutes of _Empire_.

  6. Stefan Jones says:

    Abrams has already put together a design team. The set of the third Death Star will feature lots of spurious water-filled glass tubes for the characters to be hilariously trapped in.

    Also, you can see Alderaan from the surface of Tatooine.

  7. Jim Saul says:

    So, the whole “Force” phenomena throughout the galaxy is going to be controlled by a donkey wheel on Hoth and a fucking cork inside the hollow tree on Dagobah?

  8. Avram Grumer says:

    Not long, then, till we get Prequel Trilogy purists complaining about how Abrams has ruined their childhood memories. 

  9. dethbird says:

    I for one am happy Star Wars is FINALLY heading in the direction of a serial melodrama. F***ing finally.

  10. Jellodyne says:

    Give me the MI4 team instead — Abrams can produce, but Brad Bird can direct. Bird’s MI4 was better than Abrams’ MI3 – in terms of pacing, action, dialog, tone, etc. Bird can do epic. Bird can do emotive. Bird can do iconic. The tone of Iron Giant and The Incredibles are more akin the Star Wars original trilogy than anything Abrams has done. Don’t get me wrong, I like Abrams. Frankly, I think his style was a better match for Star Trek. I just think Brad Bird would be a better match for Star Wars.

  11. Matt Blind says:

    Wrong ‘Abrams’ – what the franchise needs is Zucker Abrahams Zucker

  12. Donald Petersen says:

    Weird.  Unlike all the tweets showing up in the sidebar at The Wrap, so far I’ve yet to see anyone here happy about this development.

    Are all you guys as old and crotchety as I am?

    • Ramone says:

      Not at all. I think this is great news, especially since he’s a bigger ‘Wars fan than Trek (he’s on the record as never being a trekkie). He’s a good director and Lucas, for all his efforts, was not great with actors. Abrams can put the opera back into space opera!

      • Donald Petersen says:

        I’m not optimistic.  I think I blame Orci & Kurtzman for most of my issues with Star Trek, but I kinda hated Super 8 as well, and that’s a movie that should have been right in my wheelhouse.

        I’d have been tickled pink if del Toro or Blomkamp had been picked.  They can tell a genre story without the particular irritating visual tics (yeah, the lens flare is just the most obvious) that Abrams employs.

    • Dan Hibiki says:

      Red Letter Media seemed happy. Several years ago in fact:

  13. feetleet says:

    “Star Wars of the Roses.” No colon. Like the Sarlacc, I imagine.

  14. EeyoreX says:

    It’ll be fun to see how he’ll shoehorn “Slusho” in there.

  15. Conan Librarian says:

    I would have preferred David Lynch myself, but I’ll give it a chance. 

  16. skyhawk1 says:

    Damn, now light saber duels will come with lens flares.

  17. The 11 minute intro to his Star Trek movie is some of the best and most effective space opera i’ve ever seen. I cried! (and yes i’m a bit of a sissy), but that was some A+ moviemaking!


  18.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5BONJcookQ

  19. Peacen1k says:

    It couldn’t be any worse than the last 3 and a half movies. The thing died when the ewoks hit the stage. RIP.

  20. peregrinus says:


    * cue bushweed tumble, whistling breeze *

    So this saga pivots from the slim possibility of re-igniting the fun in a new generation to a full on cash-sucking yomp through treasured memories and powerful talismans.  It’s a last-gasp cash-grab by the studios before the the goodwill of ANH finally dissipates.

    Star Trek was good, although I found the sets to be more 1960s Supermarionation / Space 1999 than even ANH’s visually persuasive level.  But that movie, after the initial thrill of it, lacks depth or impulse for me.

    I mean, it’s Hollywood ‘n’ all, so whatever, but there was such opportunity here.

    JJA is a nice producer.  He’s hooked into what delivers rush for audiences.  But he’s also hooked into the studio way, which is why, in a sense, with such an expensive project, he’s the right guy for the job.  But not really for me.  I’m feeling sad.

    And then, the imdb trivia quotes him as saying – “I’m an impatient guy and tend not to like to stay with one thing for a long time”,  “I’m just too impatient these days. I want to get on to the next project.”.  I’m not sensing investment here.

    I say, guerrilla time – with the lowering cost of CGI and hoardes of out-of-work actors, I might just put up an alternative #7 flick before this baby gets born!

  21. morgane says:

    What? They didn’t give it to Lea Dunham?

  22. Senor Schaffer says:

    I was hoping for John Waters. :(

  23. I’m gonna go out on a (incredibly fragile) limb and say I can’t wait to see Star Wars directed by J. J. Abrams! Loved Lost and loved his Star Trek reboot. Can I preorder my ticket yet?

    *lies down on cross*

    K, ready!

Leave a Reply