<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audeze,&#160;revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zerker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1642113</link>
		<dc:creator>zerker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1642113</guid>
		<description>Yes. You get what you pay for, and if I&#039;m getting exotic wood that means I&#039;ve paid for it in lack of quality, markup, or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. You get what you pay for, and if I&#8217;m getting exotic wood that means I&#8217;ve paid for it in lack of quality, markup, or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heavystarch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640857</link>
		<dc:creator>heavystarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640857</guid>
		<description>Why must everything be a blind test to determine superior sound quality?  

We can take quantitive measurements of freq. resp. distortion figs etc.
Compare those objectively.  Where one model is superior it is noted.
All that is what we refer to as &quot;on paper&quot; model A is better than model b.

Now where the rubber meets the road is the flip-side   In car reviews this happens all the time with head to head match-ups   NOBODY is blindfolded.  They look at the cars. Touch the cars. Feel the cars. DRIVE THE CARS.  Everything is important in that experience. 

Does not the look, feel and overall fitment apply in the world of headphones? 

I can put on a pair of headphones and then put on another set and immediately pick out the differences between the two models.  IF given more time with each model I can then make a decision which model &quot;sounds better&quot; to me.  There is NO NEED for DBX testing for that.  It&#039;s simply pointless.  I own a number of headphones and a couple of them &#039;look&#039; better than the others - however from a performance aspect I can tell both of them lack what the less visually impressive cans do better. 
GASDWD  why must everything come down to DBX TESTING?!:S?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why must everything be a blind test to determine superior sound quality?  </p>
<p>We can take quantitive measurements of freq. resp. distortion figs etc.<br />
Compare those objectively.  Where one model is superior it is noted.<br />
All that is what we refer to as &#8220;on paper&#8221; model A is better than model b.</p>
<p>Now where the rubber meets the road is the flip-side   In car reviews this happens all the time with head to head match-ups   NOBODY is blindfolded.  They look at the cars. Touch the cars. Feel the cars. DRIVE THE CARS.  Everything is important in that experience. </p>
<p>Does not the look, feel and overall fitment apply in the world of headphones? </p>
<p>I can put on a pair of headphones and then put on another set and immediately pick out the differences between the two models.  IF given more time with each model I can then make a decision which model &#8220;sounds better&#8221; to me.  There is NO NEED for DBX testing for that.  It&#8217;s simply pointless.  I own a number of headphones and a couple of them &#8216;look&#8217; better than the others &#8211; however from a performance aspect I can tell both of them lack what the less visually impressive cans do better. <br />
GASDWD  why must everything come down to DBX TESTING?!:S?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640359</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640359</guid>
		<description>My only requirement of a singer is the ability to sing. Nico&#039;s &quot;killer&quot; soliloquy in the Cale/Eno &quot;June 1, 1974&quot; live album has to be heard to be disbelieved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only requirement of a singer is the ability to sing. Nico&#8217;s &#8220;killer&#8221; soliloquy in the Cale/Eno &#8220;June 1, 1974&#8243; live album has to be heard to be disbelieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640350</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640350</guid>
		<description> I just wonder how much she charges to haunt a house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I just wonder how much she charges to haunt a house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640340</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640340</guid>
		<description> Sure, if whoppers are your idea of formal dining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Sure, if whoppers are your idea of formal dining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dculberson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640212</link>
		<dc:creator>dculberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640212</guid>
		<description> So your complaint is that they look nice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> So your complaint is that they look nice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Weisberger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Weisberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640090</guid>
		<description>No. Westerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. Westerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madopal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640081</link>
		<dc:creator>madopal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640081</guid>
		<description>So, I was a basher on the last post about these things.  Here&#039;s why my BS alarm was/is going off.  Supposedly it&#039;s the &quot;planar magnetics&quot; that make all the difference.  Then why the hell are they putting the same wood used on Mercedes dashboards on it?  To justify the markup?  I mean, even with awesome bang foozle-tech (TM), there&#039;s no way the parts in that thing make up even $500 worth of stuff.  So the fact that they&#039;re encasing them in designer clothes (maybe even shipping in a really nice black velvet bag with nice, thick drawstrings), means who, exactly, is the audience for these?  Is it audiophiles who appreciate good sound or people who like to buy their headphones at Neiman Marcus?  Any why are both usually shopping at Neiman Marcus?

I bike, and I see this kind of stuff on bikes all the time.  They save you 1% on weight, but they make it &quot;artisan&quot; and charge you 50x the price.  Or they don&#039;t even care about the weight and just waive their arms around and say how the yak leather saddle is known to be the height of comfort.  It&#039;s a classic ploy.  Make it look really nice, sound really exotic, and then use only subjective criteria to sell it.  You can&#039;t argue, because it&#039;s all about the &quot;feel.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I was a basher on the last post about these things.  Here&#8217;s why my BS alarm was/is going off.  Supposedly it&#8217;s the &#8220;planar magnetics&#8221; that make all the difference.  Then why the hell are they putting the same wood used on Mercedes dashboards on it?  To justify the markup?  I mean, even with awesome bang foozle-tech (TM), there&#8217;s no way the parts in that thing make up even $500 worth of stuff.  So the fact that they&#8217;re encasing them in designer clothes (maybe even shipping in a really nice black velvet bag with nice, thick drawstrings), means who, exactly, is the audience for these?  Is it audiophiles who appreciate good sound or people who like to buy their headphones at Neiman Marcus?  Any why are both usually shopping at Neiman Marcus?</p>
<p>I bike, and I see this kind of stuff on bikes all the time.  They save you 1% on weight, but they make it &#8220;artisan&#8221; and charge you 50x the price.  Or they don&#8217;t even care about the weight and just waive their arms around and say how the yak leather saddle is known to be the height of comfort.  It&#8217;s a classic ploy.  Make it look really nice, sound really exotic, and then use only subjective criteria to sell it.  You can&#8217;t argue, because it&#8217;s all about the &#8220;feel.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jellodyne</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jellodyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640067</guid>
		<description>Hi, Doug! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Doug! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lysdexia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640053</link>
		<dc:creator>lysdexia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640053</guid>
		<description>&quot;All my favorite singers couldn&#039;t sing&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All my favorite singers couldn&#8217;t sing&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladyfingers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640050</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladyfingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640050</guid>
		<description> Spot on. Something about Nico makes parody of &#039;60s pretentiousness redundant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Spot on. Something about Nico makes parody of &#8217;60s pretentiousness redundant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinkMan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640043</link>
		<dc:creator>LinkMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640043</guid>
		<description>Thank you!   

It would appear that my satirical mediocrity led me to Poe&#039;s Law myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!   </p>
<p>It would appear that my satirical mediocrity led me to Poe&#8217;s Law myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SporkFishGod</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640032</link>
		<dc:creator>SporkFishGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640032</guid>
		<description>Would you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackbird</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640026</link>
		<dc:creator>jackbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640026</guid>
		<description>Do you like gladiator movies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you like gladiator movies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparrow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640027</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640027</guid>
		<description>If it wasn&#039;t for the last line, I wouldn&#039;t have caught the irony in the first comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it wasn&#8217;t for the last line, I wouldn&#8217;t have caught the irony in the first comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lysdexia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640022</link>
		<dc:creator>lysdexia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640022</guid>
		<description>What a claun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a claun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lysdexia</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1640020</link>
		<dc:creator>lysdexia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1640020</guid>
		<description>My name is Doug, and I am a Douche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My name is Doug, and I am a Douche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639964</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639964</guid>
		<description>You do realise that not EVERY piece of audio equipment is for an audiophile?

I have a vision of you sitting in a corner with a record and a knitting needle shouting above the scratches that it all sounds the same anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realise that not EVERY piece of audio equipment is for an audiophile?</p>
<p>I have a vision of you sitting in a corner with a record and a knitting needle shouting above the scratches that it all sounds the same anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639963</link>
		<dc:creator>dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639963</guid>
		<description>Vintage amps tend to be low-powered by today&#039;s standards (eg, 20-50WPC), but sound great with vintage speakers which are relatively high-efficiency.  They don&#039;t always mate well with modern speakers.

echocolate: what you are looking for is a &quot;USB DAC&quot; (if your headphones are efficient) or a &quot;USB DAC Amp&quot; (if not).  Get one that is 24 bit.  These are widely available for under $100; if you&#039;re not using $2000 headphones, then DACs using the Tenor TE7022 and ESS902x chips can be had for under $50, and sound as good as DACs that cost 10 times as much 5 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vintage amps tend to be low-powered by today&#8217;s standards (eg, 20-50WPC), but sound great with vintage speakers which are relatively high-efficiency.  They don&#8217;t always mate well with modern speakers.</p>
<p>echocolate: what you are looking for is a &#8220;USB DAC&#8221; (if your headphones are efficient) or a &#8220;USB DAC Amp&#8221; (if not).  Get one that is 24 bit.  These are widely available for under $100; if you&#8217;re not using $2000 headphones, then DACs using the Tenor TE7022 and ESS902x chips can be had for under $50, and sound as good as DACs that cost 10 times as much 5 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: class_enemy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639951</link>
		<dc:creator>class_enemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639951</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I&#039;d buy anything, much less a set of $2,000 cans, based on a web post by a couple of people who are telling me how gee-whiz wonderful they are. 

Show me that a hundred listeners have rated them better than a set at one-fifth the price or less (for example my Beyer 880s) in a blind test, and I&#039;ll take this seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d buy anything, much less a set of $2,000 cans, based on a web post by a couple of people who are telling me how gee-whiz wonderful they are. </p>
<p>Show me that a hundred listeners have rated them better than a set at one-fifth the price or less (for example my Beyer 880s) in a blind test, and I&#8217;ll take this seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: class_enemy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639950</link>
		<dc:creator>class_enemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639950</guid>
		<description> About $950.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> About $950.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639930</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639930</guid>
		<description>Well, if you&#039;re going to be petit bourgeois about it and expect artists to have talent.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you&#8217;re going to be petit bourgeois about it and expect artists to have talent&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vonbobo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639927</link>
		<dc:creator>vonbobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639927</guid>
		<description>My wife is an amazing vocal impressionist... Her Nico is spot on and it makes us laugh so hard. 

I like Nico and the vu... a lot, but more than the music, for me it is also about the art and the scene, along with a really unique personality that I&#039;ve grown attached to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife is an amazing vocal impressionist&#8230; Her Nico is spot on and it makes us laugh so hard. </p>
<p>I like Nico and the vu&#8230; a lot, but more than the music, for me it is also about the art and the scene, along with a really unique personality that I&#8217;ve grown attached to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L_Mariachi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639922</link>
		<dc:creator>L_Mariachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639922</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;mind&lt;/i&gt; her; I don&#039;t have to cover my ears or run away screaming or anything. She was on the level of &quot;stoned chick karaokeing Sweet Caroline with no monitors&quot; (which is fine for what it is) but for some reason is elevated to the lofty status of Mystically Transformative Chanteuse or whatever which is so unwarranted as to be absurd.

Also her accent reminds me of my mother and I don&#039;t need to visualize my mom shooting up at the Factory while pregnant with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t <i>mind</i> her; I don&#8217;t have to cover my ears or run away screaming or anything. She was on the level of &#8220;stoned chick karaokeing Sweet Caroline with no monitors&#8221; (which is fine for what it is) but for some reason is elevated to the lofty status of Mystically Transformative Chanteuse or whatever which is so unwarranted as to be absurd.</p>
<p>Also her accent reminds me of my mother and I don&#8217;t need to visualize my mom shooting up at the Factory while pregnant with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas vesely</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639921</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas vesely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639921</guid>
		<description>send money, get rocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>send money, get rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639917</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639917</guid>
		<description>I understand that a lot of people can&#039;t stand Nico, but I still don&#039;t understand why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that a lot of people can&#8217;t stand Nico, but I still don&#8217;t understand why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L_Mariachi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639911</link>
		<dc:creator>L_Mariachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639911</guid>
		<description>You get a pair of $2000 headphones and the first things you listen to are Nico and the second-worst Clash album?  De gustibus and all that, but jesus.

edit: &quot;I heard things in that song I&#039;ve never heard before.&quot;  Like what, singing on key?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You get a pair of $2000 headphones and the first things you listen to are Nico and the second-worst Clash album?  De gustibus and all that, but jesus.</p>
<p>edit: &#8220;I heard things in that song I&#8217;ve never heard before.&#8221;  Like what, singing on key?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639912</link>
		<dc:creator>echar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639912</guid>
		<description>I think your reply needs to be framed. It&#039;s seriously so nice it hurts. It&#039;s like that moment at the movie theater when the screen is black, then wham... light. 

:)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your reply needs to be framed. It&#8217;s seriously so nice it hurts. It&#8217;s like that moment at the movie theater when the screen is black, then wham&#8230; light. </p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Francis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639909</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639909</guid>
		<description> Ow, Xeni! Harsh! (Antinous, for the record, I didn&#039;t think you were being douche-y at all)

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ow, Xeni! Harsh! (Antinous, for the record, I didn&#8217;t think you were being douche-y at all)</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladyfingers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/28/audeze-revisited.html#comment-1639902</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladyfingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209154#comment-1639902</guid>
		<description> I would guess that they were using the Beatles&#039; 24-bit USB stick, which is the only better-than-CD source of their music I&#039;m aware off. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I would guess that they were using the Beatles&#8217; 24-bit USB stick, which is the only better-than-CD source of their music I&#8217;m aware off. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
