<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress demands DoJ explain prosecution of Aaron&#160;Swartz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/29/congress-demands-doj-explain-p.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/29/congress-demands-doj-explain-p.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjcamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/29/congress-demands-doj-explain-p.html#comment-1640786</link>
		<dc:creator>pjcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209343#comment-1640786</guid>
		<description>The problem is this is just grandstanding by Darrell Issa, who wants to embarrass the administration for a few news cycles. There is a scandal in here which is, as Orrin Kerr at Volokh pointed out, this treatment is pretty standard for prosecutors and is abetted by a Congress given to passing overly broad and vague laws (RICO anyone?) which they then entrust to prosecutors (sieze your car to fill out this month&#039;s budget?). But no Republican is ever going to touch that. Fixing the law is hard policy. Collecting one prosecutor&#039;s scalp is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is this is just grandstanding by Darrell Issa, who wants to embarrass the administration for a few news cycles. There is a scandal in here which is, as Orrin Kerr at Volokh pointed out, this treatment is pretty standard for prosecutors and is abetted by a Congress given to passing overly broad and vague laws (RICO anyone?) which they then entrust to prosecutors (sieze your car to fill out this month&#8217;s budget?). But no Republican is ever going to touch that. Fixing the law is hard policy. Collecting one prosecutor&#8217;s scalp is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/29/congress-demands-doj-explain-p.html#comment-1640664</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209343#comment-1640664</guid>
		<description>Will this be as hard hitting as when they asked them why no one at the top on Wall Street was ever indicted let alone brought to justice? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this be as hard hitting as when they asked them why no one at the top on Wall Street was ever indicted let alone brought to justice? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/29/congress-demands-doj-explain-p.html#comment-1640651</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209343#comment-1640651</guid>
		<description>Well actually, he was a well-off college-educated internet &lt;i&gt;hero&lt;/i&gt;.

And however ulterior the motive for bringing the DoJ goons to task is, at least some part of the government is ostensibly saying that shit was not cool.

That&#039;s something, at least. And perhaps it can be leveraged and pursued, with the merest glimmer of hope of some DoJ reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well actually, he was a well-off college-educated internet <i>hero</i>.</p>
<p>And however ulterior the motive for bringing the DoJ goons to task is, at least some part of the government is ostensibly saying that shit was not cool.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s something, at least. And perhaps it can be leveraged and pursued, with the merest glimmer of hope of some DoJ reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GawainLavers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/29/congress-demands-doj-explain-p.html#comment-1640451</link>
		<dc:creator>GawainLavers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209343#comment-1640451</guid>
		<description>Congress: &quot;Did our embarrassment with SOPA play any role in the Justice Department (which has nothing to do with us) aggressively prosecuting Aaron Swartz?&quot;

Justice Department:  &quot;Uh, no.  Why the hell would we...&quot;

Congress: &quot;Oh, okay, then.  But SOPA was totally not our fault.&quot;

Totally fucking pointless.  This isn&#039;t about specific politics, this isn&#039;t about &quot;teh gubmint&quot; vs. &quot;internet heroes&quot;.  This is about general politics: this is how you climb the prosecutoral ladder, by going after soft targets and crushing people underfoot to show how &quot;tough&quot; you are.  It just happened that this time it wasn&#039;t some poor black kid from the projects having his life ruined on a stupid weed charge, it was a well-off college educated guy with a large number of internet friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress: &#8220;Did our embarrassment with SOPA play any role in the Justice Department (which has nothing to do with us) aggressively prosecuting Aaron Swartz?&#8221;</p>
<p>Justice Department:  &#8221;Uh, no.  Why the hell would we&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Congress: &#8220;Oh, okay, then.  But SOPA was totally not our fault.&#8221;</p>
<p>Totally fucking pointless.  This isn&#8217;t about specific politics, this isn&#8217;t about &#8220;teh gubmint&#8221; vs. &#8220;internet heroes&#8221;.  This is about general politics: this is how you climb the prosecutoral ladder, by going after soft targets and crushing people underfoot to show how &#8220;tough&#8221; you are.  It just happened that this time it wasn&#8217;t some poor black kid from the projects having his life ruined on a stupid weed charge, it was a well-off college educated guy with a large number of internet friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
