<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Narrative long reads that make climate change make&#160;sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: klem</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html#comment-1642616</link>
		<dc:creator>klem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209681#comment-1642616</guid>
		<description> AGW also caused Mars to shrink, something we should worry about here on earth as well. Shrinkage, there&#039;s nothing more embarrassing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> AGW also caused Mars to shrink, something we should worry about here on earth as well. Shrinkage, there&#8217;s nothing more embarrassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klem</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html#comment-1642610</link>
		<dc:creator>klem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209681#comment-1642610</guid>
		<description> &quot;And the models? They&#039;ve made many successful predictions&quot;

There are about 25 different computer models being used, and each time they make about 1000 runs to get an average climate prediction. They do make many successful predictions, and many unsuccessful ones as well. Even a broken clock is correct at least once a day.  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8221;And the models? They&#8217;ve made many successful predictions&#8221;</p>
<p>There are about 25 different computer models being used, and each time they make about 1000 runs to get an average climate prediction. They do make many successful predictions, and many unsuccessful ones as well. Even a broken clock is correct at least once a day.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjcamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html#comment-1642003</link>
		<dc:creator>pjcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209681#comment-1642003</guid>
		<description>Works on Mars too. That&#039;s why it didn&#039;t used to be a cold wasteland. But Mars is too small to hold on to much of an atmosphere. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works on Mars too. That&#8217;s why it didn&#8217;t used to be a cold wasteland. But Mars is too small to hold on to much of an atmosphere. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finnagain</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html#comment-1641794</link>
		<dc:creator>Finnagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209681#comment-1641794</guid>
		<description> Someone done got tolded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Someone done got tolded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greebo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html#comment-1641788</link>
		<dc:creator>greebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209681#comment-1641788</guid>
		<description>Mike: You&#039;re projecting. What you mean to say is not &quot;barely understood by science&quot;, you meant to say &quot;barely understood by me&quot;. As you&#039;d know if you read some of the books on the list, the basics of climate science were established decades ago, and are now very well understood. And the models? They&#039;ve made many successful predictions. Here are a few for you to get started with:
http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/2012/12/successful-predictions-agu-2012-tyndall-lecture/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: You&#8217;re projecting. What you mean to say is not &#8220;barely understood by science&#8221;, you meant to say &#8220;barely understood by me&#8221;. As you&#8217;d know if you read some of the books on the list, the basics of climate science were established decades ago, and are now very well understood. And the models? They&#8217;ve made many successful predictions. Here are a few for you to get started with:<br />
<a href="http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/2012/12/successful-predictions-agu-2012-tyndall-lecture/" rel="nofollow">http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/2012/12/successful-predictions-agu-2012-tyndall-lecture/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Castellaneta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html#comment-1641747</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Castellaneta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209681#comment-1641747</guid>
		<description>Anectdotal &quot;evidence&quot; is exactly why a lot of people don&#039;t buy into the idea that warming is driven by carbon emissions.  Earth climate is super complex and barely understood by science, far as I can see-- so how does one weigh anectdotal information without a complete understanding of the entire process?  It would also help if the models based on that theory actually worked as against actual real world data. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anectdotal &#8220;evidence&#8221; is exactly why a lot of people don&#8217;t buy into the idea that warming is driven by carbon emissions.  Earth climate is super complex and barely understood by science, far as I can see&#8211; so how does one weigh anectdotal information without a complete understanding of the entire process?  It would also help if the models based on that theory actually worked as against actual real world data. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmarceau</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html#comment-1641729</link>
		<dc:creator>gmarceau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209681#comment-1641729</guid>
		<description>But if you are too cheap to buy a book, you can get your `history of global warming` fix on the internet: http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if you are too cheap to buy a book, you can get your `history of global warming` fix on the internet: http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peregrinus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/30/narrative-long-reads-that-make.html#comment-1641705</link>
		<dc:creator>peregrinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=209681#comment-1641705</guid>
		<description>Gosh darned didn&#039;t see Michael Crichton on the list darn </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh darned didn&#8217;t see Michael Crichton on the list darn </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
