<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possibly the greatest ad for books,&#160;ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Porter</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1645205</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1645205</guid>
		<description>These books are classics of science fiction; they were NEVER released under different titles. ROBOTS HAVE NO TAILS was a collection of stories involving Gallagher, whose creator made him when he was drunk. The robot liked to admire himself in mirrors. Beer features in all the stories, and it turns out the robot is the perfect beer.... ack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These books are classics of science fiction; they were NEVER released under different titles. ROBOTS HAVE NO TAILS was a collection of stories involving Gallagher, whose creator made him when he was drunk. The robot liked to admire himself in mirrors. Beer features in all the stories, and it turns out the robot is the perfect beer&#8230;. ack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644924</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644924</guid>
		<description>What about geegaws, gizmos, and gimcracks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about geegaws, gizmos, and gimcracks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644906</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644906</guid>
		<description>Hey, Mr. Earth Man! I want to be an Earth Man too!  
Budda-Bah. Budda-Buh-Ba. Buh-Ba.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Mr. Earth Man! I want to be an Earth Man too! <br />
Budda-Bah. Budda-Buh-Ba. Buh-Ba.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eden S.-G.</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644858</link>
		<dc:creator>Eden S.-G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644858</guid>
		<description>Sorry, you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacochuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644856</link>
		<dc:creator>tacochuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644856</guid>
		<description> GNOME is a Desktop environment, not a linux distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> GNOME is a Desktop environment, not a linux distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickPheas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644834</link>
		<dc:creator>NickPheas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644834</guid>
		<description>Can we be sure it&#039;s not a forgotten masterpiece?  5 the others have held up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we be sure it&#8217;s not a forgotten masterpiece?  5 the others have held up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween_Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644819</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween_Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644819</guid>
		<description>&quot;Crammed full of chuckles and startling gadgets&quot; sounds exactly like the sort of thing that Chris Ware used to write in his pages full of fake comic ads. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Crammed full of chuckles and startling gadgets&#8221; sounds exactly like the sort of thing that Chris Ware used to write in his pages full of fake comic ads. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Shuster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644775</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644775</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s a female robot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a female robot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Shuster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644774</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644774</guid>
		<description>Also, planetary origin assumption...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, planetary origin assumption&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kibo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644772</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re just using &quot;man&quot; as the opposite of &quot;robot&quot;. &quot;Woman&quot; wouldn&#039;t be appropriate because all right-thinking Earthmen know &quot;woman&quot; is a synonym for &quot;dishwasher&quot;.

Besides, we don&#039;t know what this scary robot&#039;s capable of. Everyone he&#039;s staring at might be a man now! GREETINGS, EARTH-MANS READING THIS, YOU HAVE JUST TURNED MALE BECAUSE OF MY EYE-RAYS. YOU HAVE BEEN GENDERVIZED. BEEP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re just using &#8220;man&#8221; as the opposite of &#8220;robot&#8221;. &#8220;Woman&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t be appropriate because all right-thinking Earthmen know &#8220;woman&#8221; is a synonym for &#8220;dishwasher&#8221;.</p>
<p>Besides, we don&#8217;t know what this scary robot&#8217;s capable of. Everyone he&#8217;s staring at might be a man now! GREETINGS, EARTH-MANS READING THIS, YOU HAVE JUST TURNED MALE BECAUSE OF MY EYE-RAYS. YOU HAVE BEEN GENDERVIZED. BEEP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamLL</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644763</link>
		<dc:creator>SamLL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644763</guid>
		<description>Jarring implicit reader gender assumption in the big headline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarring implicit reader gender assumption in the big headline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kibo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644760</link>
		<dc:creator>Kibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644760</guid>
		<description>And, for anyone who finds the big-shouldered Scary Laser Death Robot too menacing, here&#039;s some non-threatening line-art of Asimov using his mental powers to symmetrize butterflies:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tellygacitua/3941366671/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, for anyone who finds the big-shouldered Scary Laser Death Robot too menacing, here&#8217;s some non-threatening line-art of Asimov using his mental powers to symmetrize butterflies:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tellygacitua/3941366671/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/tellygacitua/3941366671/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kibo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644753</link>
		<dc:creator>Kibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644753</guid>
		<description>Ooh, that&#039;s Ludlow Tempo Heavy with the alternate characters that make it think it can try to pass as Linotype&#039;s Metroblack No. 2, rather than the ones that make it look like Futura Bold.  Such pointy &quot;A&quot;s!

I still wish someone would finally digitize all the styles of Tempo, especially the happy slightly-curly italic:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/myfonts/7008821545/sizes/o/in/photostream/

Sorry for the tangent, it just always makes me sad to see cool old graphic design using the few common fonts of the 20th century that HAVEN&#039;T been digitized to keep them in circulation. If Asimov ever writes his first book again, how will we advertise it? Arial? Papyrus?

...Comic Sans?

(Also, &quot;Daddy, what was a &#039;Please rush books I have listed on separate sheet with my enclosed remittance&#039;? When were &#039;sheets&#039;, Daddy?&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, that&#8217;s Ludlow Tempo Heavy with the alternate characters that make it think it can try to pass as Linotype&#8217;s Metroblack No. 2, rather than the ones that make it look like Futura Bold.  Such pointy &#8220;A&#8221;s!</p>
<p>I still wish someone would finally digitize all the styles of Tempo, especially the happy slightly-curly italic:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/myfonts/7008821545/sizes/o/in/photostream/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/myfonts/7008821545/sizes/o/in/photostream/</a></p>
<p>Sorry for the tangent, it just always makes me sad to see cool old graphic design using the few common fonts of the 20th century that HAVEN&#8217;T been digitized to keep them in circulation. If Asimov ever writes his first book again, how will we advertise it? Arial? Papyrus?</p>
<p>&#8230;Comic Sans?</p>
<p>(Also, &#8220;Daddy, what was a &#8216;Please rush books I have listed on separate sheet with my enclosed remittance&#8217;? When were &#8216;sheets&#8217;, Daddy?&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Rushkoff</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644744</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Rushkoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644744</guid>
		<description>Robots have no tails? 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robots have no tails? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Francis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644740</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644740</guid>
		<description>Somewhat interesting wiki page for the publisher
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnome_Press 
Asimov was not happy with them.

Location looked nice. I street viewed it out of idle curiosity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhat interesting wiki page for the publisher<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnome_Press" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnome_Press</a><br />
Asimov was not happy with them.</p>
<p>Location looked nice. I street viewed it out of idle curiosity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eden S.-G.</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644739</link>
		<dc:creator>Eden S.-G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644739</guid>
		<description>Funny that the name if the publisher is the same as the Linux distro., – GNOME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that the name if the publisher is the same as the Linux distro., – GNOME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sockdoll</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644735</link>
		<dc:creator>sockdoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644735</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a picture of a robot just looking at a banana, from the banana&#039;s point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a picture of a robot just looking at a banana, from the banana&#8217;s point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Shuster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644724</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644724</guid>
		<description>Ah, I used to read all these guys (and C. L. Moore, the distaff side of Padgett, too!) as a kid.  I don&#039;t know if I&#039;ve read anything except for I, Robot on this particular list though.  (Sometimes they re-released stuff under different titles.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I used to read all these guys (and C. L. Moore, the distaff side of Padgett, too!) as a kid.  I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ve read anything except for I, Robot on this particular list though.  (Sometimes they re-released stuff under different titles.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/02/possibly-the-greatest-ad-for-b.html#comment-1644718</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210358#comment-1644718</guid>
		<description>Definite Cybermen vibe in the graphic. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definite Cybermen vibe in the graphic. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
