By Maggie Koerth-Baker at 9:06 am Mon, Feb 4, 2013
Rarely read a research paper with such a meager Methods section. They even don’t define their basic statistics. Like, which correlation coefficient died they calculate, how the data was recorded and transformed, and so on and so on. I’m not going to jump on the “correlation is not causality” train.
Sorry, Sir Mick: this is unsexy science, that is.
even looking at when he was young (you know, fifty years ago or so), i never understood the “sexy moves” thing attributed to the way jagger moves. nothing could be further from sexy to me.
unless you get aroused by roosters on crack.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Annals of Improbable Research Science Sex
Submit a tip
The rules you agree to by using this website.
Who will be eaten first?
Jason Weisberger, Publisher
Ken Snider, Sysadmin