<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blooper reel from LA Noire reveals its excellent motion capture&#160;technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Organic Motion</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1649340</link>
		<dc:creator>Organic Motion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1649340</guid>
		<description>More real than real life. Motion Capture to the rescue!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More real than real life. Motion Capture to the rescue!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1649236</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1649236</guid>
		<description>Good point actually - they&#039;re also portraying a style of character that is kind of wooden and theatrical - which now that I think about it doesn&#039;t lend well to a game where one of the main goals is to gauge emotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point actually &#8211; they&#8217;re also portraying a style of character that is kind of wooden and theatrical &#8211; which now that I think about it doesn&#8217;t lend well to a game where one of the main goals is to gauge emotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Pourasghar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1647981</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Pourasghar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1647981</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only recently started playing LA Noire and am really impressed by the level of expression that is captured. I think that these cgi bloopers have a unique authenticity to them because the technique they use allows the genuine smiles/sneezes/tongue-bites to be transplanted into the game footage without having that end-of-toy-story-2-scripted-blooper-reel feel (which I&#039;m not knocking, but real bloopers are better). I&#039;m loving spotting actors I recognise, like &quot;Dead Meat&quot; Thompson from Hot Shots.

This is not that bit though &gt;&gt;&gt;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNhDB3Aists </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only recently started playing LA Noire and am really impressed by the level of expression that is captured. I think that these cgi bloopers have a unique authenticity to them because the technique they use allows the genuine smiles/sneezes/tongue-bites to be transplanted into the game footage without having that end-of-toy-story-2-scripted-blooper-reel feel (which I&#8217;m not knocking, but real bloopers are better). I&#8217;m loving spotting actors I recognise, like &#8220;Dead Meat&#8221; Thompson from Hot Shots.</p>
<p>This is not that bit though &gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNhDB3Aists" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNhDB3Aists</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMudshark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1647627</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMudshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1647627</guid>
		<description>Great facial expressions, movements like puppets on strings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great facial expressions, movements like puppets on strings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladyfingers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1647423</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladyfingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1647423</guid>
		<description>The separate capture certainly explains why the neck and shoulders on these things always appear to be trapped in a brace of some sort. My friends and I used to do impressions of mo-cap performances to make each other laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The separate capture certainly explains why the neck and shoulders on these things always appear to be trapped in a brace of some sort. My friends and I used to do impressions of mo-cap performances to make each other laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LogrusZed</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1647411</link>
		<dc:creator>LogrusZed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1647411</guid>
		<description>It was a very good looking and totally boring game. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a very good looking and totally boring game. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echolocate chocolate</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1647170</link>
		<dc:creator>echolocate chocolate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1647170</guid>
		<description>Part of the problem is that the body and face have to be captured separately, so the performance is always going to be a bit &quot;off&quot;.

The other problem is plain art direction: they&#039;re effectively compositing realistic-looking video (with topology info) for the face onto an overly simple body. It looks like a man wearing a slightly oversized and stiff man suit. Better deformation and some kind of cloth simulation might have helped a bit, but ultimately the faces look like they belong in a different universe.

Bear in mind this technology was well behind the state-of-the-art even when the game came out. There are games in production right now using capture systems that can capture facial animation and full body performance at the same time. There are also smarter &quot;re-targeting&quot; systems where they can map the performance from one face onto another--or, more usefully, apply whatever kind of art direction they want to the CG faces to make them fit more harmoniously with the body. I&#039;ve seen the results and they &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; look amazing.

But personally I think the performances in LA Noire will still hold up for quite a while. Just the fact they&#039;re playing regular old people down here in the real world, not space marines or wizards, lends an air of believability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the problem is that the body and face have to be captured separately, so the performance is always going to be a bit &#8220;off&#8221;.</p>
<p>The other problem is plain art direction: they&#8217;re effectively compositing realistic-looking video (with topology info) for the face onto an overly simple body. It looks like a man wearing a slightly oversized and stiff man suit. Better deformation and some kind of cloth simulation might have helped a bit, but ultimately the faces look like they belong in a different universe.</p>
<p>Bear in mind this technology was well behind the state-of-the-art even when the game came out. There are games in production right now using capture systems that can capture facial animation and full body performance at the same time. There are also smarter &#8220;re-targeting&#8221; systems where they can map the performance from one face onto another&#8211;or, more usefully, apply whatever kind of art direction they want to the CG faces to make them fit more harmoniously with the body. I&#8217;ve seen the results and they <i>can</i> look amazing.</p>
<p>But personally I think the performances in LA Noire will still hold up for quite a while. Just the fact they&#8217;re playing regular old people down here in the real world, not space marines or wizards, lends an air of believability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggamorph</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1647038</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziggamorph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1647038</guid>
		<description>In LA Noire, there is ambient noise. They haven&#039;t put that in here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In LA Noire, there is ambient noise. They haven&#8217;t put that in here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Francis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646868</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646868</guid>
		<description>I guess they wouldn&#039;t bother with bloopers, but for the game can they process the voices in the exteriors so that the people sound more like they are really outside?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they wouldn&#8217;t bother with bloopers, but for the game can they process the voices in the exteriors so that the people sound more like they are really outside?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Francis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646863</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646863</guid>
		<description> Yes but they are chicken byproducts that you can render from any angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yes but they are chicken byproducts that you can render from any angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VideoMonkey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646812</link>
		<dc:creator>VideoMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646812</guid>
		<description>Wow, the way they shot that real video and then converted it into animation almost looks like real video!  This is the best thing since they learned how to make real chicken into chicken byproducts that taste almost like chicken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the way they shot that real video and then converted it into animation almost looks like real video!  This is the best thing since they learned how to make real chicken into chicken byproducts that taste almost like chicken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Drop</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646795</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646795</guid>
		<description>The mo-cap for the screw-ups did seem a lot more real.  I&#039;m thinking that the nature of the dialog (which seemed pretty bad) and direction probably had a lot to do with it.  When the characters are impassive cops interviewing suspects trying not to let anything slip, you&#039;ll get, at best, subtle expressions from good actors that mo-cap of this sort is really bad at capturing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mo-cap for the screw-ups did seem a lot more real.  I&#8217;m thinking that the nature of the dialog (which seemed pretty bad) and direction probably had a lot to do with it.  When the characters are impassive cops interviewing suspects trying not to let anything slip, you&#8217;ll get, at best, subtle expressions from good actors that mo-cap of this sort is really bad at capturing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pease</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646779</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646779</guid>
		<description>the expressions were pretty impressive.

i wish the maker of this video hadn&#039;t gotten so cute with the long old-school film style lead-in and the clip with the beeps between each of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the expressions were pretty impressive.</p>
<p>i wish the maker of this video hadn&#8217;t gotten so cute with the long old-school film style lead-in and the clip with the beeps between each of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Able</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646763</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Able</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646763</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that it&#039;s let down particularly by the arms.  The clothing looks like it&#039;s rigidly attached to the skeleton, and the fingers look all weird and clumsy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that it&#8217;s let down particularly by the arms.  The clothing looks like it&#8217;s rigidly attached to the skeleton, and the fingers look all weird and clumsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tristan eldritch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646729</link>
		<dc:creator>tristan eldritch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646729</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m going to write a modern day Philip K Dick novel called Bloopers in the Uncanny Valley:
&quot;Soon I realized that there were others like me.......others who had noticed the bloopers, the fluffs, the laughter.......then I realized that my life came in short, plot-heavy chunks.....&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m going to write a modern day Philip K Dick novel called Bloopers in the Uncanny Valley:<br />
&#8220;Soon I realized that there were others like me&#8230;&#8230;.others who had noticed the bloopers, the fluffs, the laughter&#8230;&#8230;.then I realized that my life came in short, plot-heavy chunks&#8230;..&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon_anon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646719</link>
		<dc:creator>jon_anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646719</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s that the actors aren&#039;t very good. The mo-cap and rendering are good enough that I could recognise Ken Cosgrove immediately - I&#039;m so confident about that, I&#039;m not even going to stop and look it up! The body language and facial expressions are reproduced very well, and clearly the same actor is excellent in Mad Men. So if it looks wooden, it must be part uncanny valley, and part just plain corny dialogue, that makes you perceive his performance as bad. (I&#039;m going to look like an idiot if it&#039;s not him.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that the actors aren&#8217;t very good. The mo-cap and rendering are good enough that I could recognise Ken Cosgrove immediately &#8211; I&#8217;m so confident about that, I&#8217;m not even going to stop and look it up! The body language and facial expressions are reproduced very well, and clearly the same actor is excellent in Mad Men. So if it looks wooden, it must be part uncanny valley, and part just plain corny dialogue, that makes you perceive his performance as bad. (I&#8217;m going to look like an idiot if it&#8217;s not him.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Bösch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646696</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Bösch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646696</guid>
		<description>Was thinking the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was thinking the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizardru</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646672</link>
		<dc:creator>wizardru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646672</guid>
		<description>Hilarious might be a bit...generous, here.  This isn&#039;t exactly Burt Reynolds and Dom Deluise screw-ups or Jackie Chan out-takes.  


The facial animation captures, though, are pretty impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious might be a bit&#8230;generous, here.  This isn&#8217;t exactly Burt Reynolds and Dom Deluise screw-ups or Jackie Chan out-takes.  </p>
<p>The facial animation captures, though, are pretty impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noggin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646674</link>
		<dc:creator>noggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646674</guid>
		<description>Good start to climbing out of the uncanny valley.  The off-script discussions after the line flubs are an order of magnitude ahead of the scripted dialog on that climb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good start to climbing out of the uncanny valley.  The off-script discussions after the line flubs are an order of magnitude ahead of the scripted dialog on that climb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646667</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646667</guid>
		<description>Weirdly that&#039;s the best demonstration I&#039;ve seen of the mo-cap in LA Noire. The mistakes look so much more REAL - maybe they&#039;re just not very good actors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weirdly that&#8217;s the best demonstration I&#8217;ve seen of the mo-cap in LA Noire. The mistakes look so much more REAL &#8211; maybe they&#8217;re just not very good actors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timquinn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/blooper-reel-from-la-noire-rev.html#comment-1646645</link>
		<dc:creator>timquinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211041#comment-1646645</guid>
		<description>Some of those wertr . . . damn, sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of those wertr . . . damn, sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
