<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FedEx&#039;s file-transfer capacity versus the&#160;Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMB98115</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1647940</link>
		<dc:creator>JMB98115</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1647940</guid>
		<description> &quot;latency,&quot; to be accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;latency,&#8221; to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roselan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1647634</link>
		<dc:creator>roselan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1647634</guid>
		<description>And what about good old magnetic tapes data density? I feel you can squeeze one order of magnitude or two in that data plane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about good old magnetic tapes data density? I feel you can squeeze one order of magnitude or two in that data plane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndexMe</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1647517</link>
		<dc:creator>IndexMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1647517</guid>
		<description>Tokyo. Though I could be mixing it up with FamilyMart or Lawson their arch-rivals. 7/11 has awesome 7 and i Holdings Bank atms which can withdraw from credit cards even. They also (unless I am thinking FamilyMart) have Internet-connected copying machines so you can upload PDFs and print in A3 color - or use a USB stick. The kiosk machines let you access a ton of services including international phone card purchase, e-money, software purchases, and reservations for concerts and events. You can also pay your electric and gas bills at these places and at least some (am/pm) let you ship boxes via popular couriers. Not available in the U.S.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tokyo. Though I could be mixing it up with FamilyMart or Lawson their arch-rivals. 7/11 has awesome 7 and i Holdings Bank atms which can withdraw from credit cards even. They also (unless I am thinking FamilyMart) have Internet-connected copying machines so you can upload PDFs and print in A3 color &#8211; or use a USB stick. The kiosk machines let you access a ton of services including international phone card purchase, e-money, software purchases, and reservations for concerts and events. You can also pay your electric and gas bills at these places and at least some (am/pm) let you ship boxes via popular couriers. Not available in the U.S.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Borsi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646941</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Borsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646941</guid>
		<description>Technically yes, but the trials that I have been able to find have ruled in favor of the person and not the MPAA. So I feel fairly safe with that, seeing as I still have my entire DVD collection in safe storage in the attic and I only watch them on my own devices.


From what I understand, BluRay discs use another type of encryption that is protected under something more than DVD&#039;s. That is why it is still a bigger NO-NO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically yes, but the trials that I have been able to find have ruled in favor of the person and not the MPAA. So I feel fairly safe with that, seeing as I still have my entire DVD collection in safe storage in the attic and I only watch them on my own devices.</p>
<p>From what I understand, BluRay discs use another type of encryption that is protected under something more than DVD&#8217;s. That is why it is still a bigger NO-NO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulDavisTheFirst</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646921</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulDavisTheFirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646921</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If only FedEx would publish an API and put a user-defined QR code on the waybill, we could make them a transparent part of the fabric! &lt;/blockquote&gt;it used to be called &quot;netflix&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If only FedEx would publish an API and put a user-defined QR code on the waybill, we could make them a transparent part of the fabric! </p></blockquote>
<p>it used to be called &#8220;netflix&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Nelson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646897</guid>
		<description>It wouldn&#039;t be prohibitively difficult to make a system that turns all those cards into a giant RAID array.  In a properly designed system you wouldn&#039;t need to keep track of which card goes where.  But then you&#039;d just have to  have thousands of card readers on the host machine.  Of course, that would require multiple USB controllers because of the addressing limitations of USB.  

... Perhaps the milk jug idea is a bit ridiculous after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be prohibitively difficult to make a system that turns all those cards into a giant RAID array.  In a properly designed system you wouldn&#8217;t need to keep track of which card goes where.  But then you&#8217;d just have to  have thousands of card readers on the host machine.  Of course, that would require multiple USB controllers because of the addressing limitations of USB.  </p>
<p>&#8230; Perhaps the milk jug idea is a bit ridiculous after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaymonBeal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646731</link>
		<dc:creator>TaymonBeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646731</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it still technically a DMCA violation to rip DVDs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it still technically a DMCA violation to rip DVDs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batmanroxus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646678</link>
		<dc:creator>batmanroxus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646678</guid>
		<description>I really wish they could condense this into one sentence and tell me exactly what they are trying to say. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish they could condense this into one sentence and tell me exactly what they are trying to say. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646599</link>
		<dc:creator>Fark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646599</guid>
		<description>My local 7/11 has an ATM &amp; a smoothie machine. Where the hell are you located!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My local 7/11 has an ATM &amp; a smoothie machine. Where the hell are you located!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646510</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646510</guid>
		<description>Many years ago, when Netflix was in the DVD-by-mail rental business rather than the download business, somebody estimated that their bandwidth was about 1/3 of the total Internet&#039;s.  4 GB/day is about 300 kbps for an individual user, and Netflix was shipping a lot of DVDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many years ago, when Netflix was in the DVD-by-mail rental business rather than the download business, somebody estimated that their bandwidth was about 1/3 of the total Internet&#8217;s.  4 GB/day is about 300 kbps for an individual user, and Netflix was shipping a lot of DVDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646507</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646507</guid>
		<description> Is it time to rewrite RFC1149 to update the kinds of avian carriers to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Is it time to rewrite RFC1149 to update the kinds of avian carriers to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Borsi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646502</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Borsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646502</guid>
		<description>The only issue here is that there are legal ways to rip my DVD movies but there is none for BluRay movies--that I am aware of. Last I checked it was still illegal to rip them, even though the process is technically exactly the same as the DVD movies.

Please, someone enlighten me on if there has been any development in this area. I would so gladly spend the next month ripping my movies and buying 4TB hard drives if it were legal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only issue here is that there are legal ways to rip my DVD movies but there is none for BluRay movies&#8211;that I am aware of. Last I checked it was still illegal to rip them, even though the process is technically exactly the same as the DVD movies.</p>
<p>Please, someone enlighten me on if there has been any development in this area. I would so gladly spend the next month ripping my movies and buying 4TB hard drives if it were legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rider</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646496</link>
		<dc:creator>Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646496</guid>
		<description>Again you are totally ignoring the real world.  How are these hard drives hooked up and interfaced?   How are they packed and taken to the airport? There are tons of real world issues that are totally ignored.  

How is the information accessed and indexed?  

Why are we totally ignoring the cost involved here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again you are totally ignoring the real world.  How are these hard drives hooked up and interfaced?   How are they packed and taken to the airport? There are tons of real world issues that are totally ignored.  </p>
<p>How is the information accessed and indexed?  </p>
<p>Why are we totally ignoring the cost involved here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndexMe</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646494</link>
		<dc:creator>IndexMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646494</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m saying there is no reason to clog up satellites and undersea cables when delay is acceptable, or you have a local cache. There is a use-case for high latency, high volume data distribution such as 4K video. 


I&#039;m not living in another age. Though I have been lucky enough to be part of some experiments along these lines, such as doing the first live streaming of motion capture data between California and Japan with Silicon Graphics, and getting involved in Carl Malamud&#039;s Internet World Expo which built a 45Mbps Internet Railroad around the world in 1996.


More recently (at the past few years of the Tokyo International Film Festival) I have seen demonstrations of live global 4K video, from Cinegrid.org (see  http://cinegrid.kmd.keio.ac.jp/english.html ) which for example enables live connections between studio and filming location, or CAVE connections for education. Obviously these are fabulously resource hungry and only usable for limited use-cases. Whereas the world&#039;s P2P bandwidth or Fedex bandwidth offer alternatives. And how does Hollywood distribute their movies globally? I believe by fedexing a hard drive. Sure, streaming is okay. Unless you are the Australian government with a soda straw for a pipe, or want to actually send a high enough quality file to play in a theater or other big screen.


I&#039;m saying it is prohibitive for any one producer to start mailing hard disks to every country in the world, but if there was an easy to board Internet railroad, or you could think of it as chucking your hard disk into that fabled station wagon as it drives by, just get your content to a single node and would be replicated by fedex and friends and that would be a fabulously enabling global resource.


Think of it another way: Usenet is over 10TB/day. http://www.newsdemon.com/average-feed-size.php


Now consider automatic cascading updates - a petabyte sized repository backing a huge, constantly updated library of 10,000 blue-ray quality (50GB) video titles. That&#039;s 500TB. You don&#039;t have to view every one. But it might be a good use for a town library too, wouldn&#039;t it? And if half of it is commercial content, a small fee could pay for the servers. The media (64GB SD cards) is selling for $50 on Amazon. So it makes sense to think of what kind of an application could make use of postal bandwidth (doesn&#039;t need to be fedex) and I think this might be one of them.


As another data point I was approached last year by a documentary film director who had been tasked at building a very low-cost cultural library of documentary films. His idea was to make a library of USB sticks that fold into a credit card sized piece of plastic, onto which you could affix a printed label like a record cover. A small bookcase would be enough to display a hundred cards - each full of documentaries on a given subject area - which could be copied freely by visitors or viewed there. It seems that postal bandwidth is the only way to maintain an offering like this, and I&#039;m thinking of helping implement it. It would probably be for free or close to it, but could be a useful resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m saying there is no reason to clog up satellites and undersea cables when delay is acceptable, or you have a local cache. There is a use-case for high latency, high volume data distribution such as 4K video. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not living in another age. Though I have been lucky enough to be part of some experiments along these lines, such as doing the first live streaming of motion capture data between California and Japan with Silicon Graphics, and getting involved in Carl Malamud&#8217;s Internet World Expo which built a 45Mbps Internet Railroad around the world in 1996.</p>
<p>More recently (at the past few years of the Tokyo International Film Festival) I have seen demonstrations of live global 4K video, from Cinegrid.org (see  http://cinegrid.kmd.keio.ac.jp/english.html ) which for example enables live connections between studio and filming location, or CAVE connections for education. Obviously these are fabulously resource hungry and only usable for limited use-cases. Whereas the world&#8217;s P2P bandwidth or Fedex bandwidth offer alternatives. And how does Hollywood distribute their movies globally? I believe by fedexing a hard drive. Sure, streaming is okay. Unless you are the Australian government with a soda straw for a pipe, or want to actually send a high enough quality file to play in a theater or other big screen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m saying it is prohibitive for any one producer to start mailing hard disks to every country in the world, but if there was an easy to board Internet railroad, or you could think of it as chucking your hard disk into that fabled station wagon as it drives by, just get your content to a single node and would be replicated by fedex and friends and that would be a fabulously enabling global resource.</p>
<p>Think of it another way: Usenet is over 10TB/day. http://www.newsdemon.com/average-feed-size.php</p>
<p>Now consider automatic cascading updates &#8211; a petabyte sized repository backing a huge, constantly updated library of 10,000 blue-ray quality (50GB) video titles. That&#8217;s 500TB. You don&#8217;t have to view every one. But it might be a good use for a town library too, wouldn&#8217;t it? And if half of it is commercial content, a small fee could pay for the servers. The media (64GB SD cards) is selling for $50 on Amazon. So it makes sense to think of what kind of an application could make use of postal bandwidth (doesn&#8217;t need to be fedex) and I think this might be one of them.</p>
<p>As another data point I was approached last year by a documentary film director who had been tasked at building a very low-cost cultural library of documentary films. His idea was to make a library of USB sticks that fold into a credit card sized piece of plastic, onto which you could affix a printed label like a record cover. A small bookcase would be enough to display a hundred cards &#8211; each full of documentaries on a given subject area &#8211; which could be copied freely by visitors or viewed there. It seems that postal bandwidth is the only way to maintain an offering like this, and I&#8217;m thinking of helping implement it. It would probably be for free or close to it, but could be a useful resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xzzy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646488</link>
		<dc:creator>xzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646488</guid>
		<description>Once a year or so we have to move vast chunks of data between servers at work, allowing us to retire old machines and get users working on the new ones. Our smallest machines these days are in the 16TB range, the newest ones are over 100TB.

At any rate, migrating this data is no fun. We have bonded gigabit connections all over the place and never get to use all of it because hard drives are just too damn slow at reading out data. Anecdotally, the best transfer speeds I see are about 2TB copied per day. If either end of the copy is doing other work, rates rapidly go down from there.

Gonna be a good day when we stop relying on spinning sheets of metal to store our data.. we might actually be able to saturate the network then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once a year or so we have to move vast chunks of data between servers at work, allowing us to retire old machines and get users working on the new ones. Our smallest machines these days are in the 16TB range, the newest ones are over 100TB.</p>
<p>At any rate, migrating this data is no fun. We have bonded gigabit connections all over the place and never get to use all of it because hard drives are just too damn slow at reading out data. Anecdotally, the best transfer speeds I see are about 2TB copied per day. If either end of the copy is doing other work, rates rapidly go down from there.</p>
<p>Gonna be a good day when we stop relying on spinning sheets of metal to store our data.. we might actually be able to saturate the network then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddh819</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646482</link>
		<dc:creator>ddh819</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646482</guid>
		<description>you also have to take into account all the other traffic to the net your pipe is handling (email, workers streaming viral videos and music, other actual work related large file transfers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you also have to take into account all the other traffic to the net your pipe is handling (email, workers streaming viral videos and music, other actual work related large file transfers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daneel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646471</link>
		<dc:creator>Daneel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646471</guid>
		<description>So when Ted Stevens said the internet was a series of tubes he was referring to fuselages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when Ted Stevens said the internet was a series of tubes he was referring to fuselages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Molloy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646464</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Molloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646464</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of an information systems lecture I had many many years ago involving calculating the data rate of sending a transport aircraft across the Atlantic carrying floppys. Was actually surprisingly high in the hypothetical situation we were given at the time versus traditional internet traffic at the time.

I guess the main thing was trying to make sure we weren&#039;t too hung up on data and information always meaning electronics or photonics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of an information systems lecture I had many many years ago involving calculating the data rate of sending a transport aircraft across the Atlantic carrying floppys. Was actually surprisingly high in the hypothetical situation we were given at the time versus traditional internet traffic at the time.</p>
<p>I guess the main thing was trying to make sure we weren&#8217;t too hung up on data and information always meaning electronics or photonics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dculberson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646437</link>
		<dc:creator>dculberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646437</guid>
		<description> Fedex does publish an API - thousands of businesses use it to ship through them - and the tracking number is  encoded as a standard bar code that&#039;s inherently machine readable.  No need for a QR code when there&#039;s already a bar code on there identifying the package and tracking its location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Fedex does publish an API &#8211; thousands of businesses use it to ship through them &#8211; and the tracking number is  encoded as a standard bar code that&#8217;s inherently machine readable.  No need for a QR code when there&#8217;s already a bar code on there identifying the package and tracking its location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dross1260</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646407</link>
		<dc:creator>dross1260</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646407</guid>
		<description>&quot;Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuyNamedMark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646405</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuyNamedMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646405</guid>
		<description>The problem with sneakernet is that it has a massive capacity but it is extremely spikey and the packet size is huge. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with sneakernet is that it has a massive capacity but it is extremely spikey and the packet size is huge. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just_Ok</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646404</link>
		<dc:creator>Just_Ok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646404</guid>
		<description>Horses can&#039;t draw carriages. They can&#039;t hold the pens with their hooves, and if you put a pen in their mouth, they eat it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horses can&#8217;t draw carriages. They can&#8217;t hold the pens with their hooves, and if you put a pen in their mouth, they eat it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mccrum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646403</link>
		<dc:creator>mccrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646403</guid>
		<description>But why use a private contractor to pick up and drop off simple e-mails?  I think a government service could send an e-mail anywhere in the US for, oh, carry the one, divide the... my math says 46 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But why use a private contractor to pick up and drop off simple e-mails?  I think a government service could send an e-mail anywhere in the US for, oh, carry the one, divide the&#8230; my math says 46 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnQPublic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646400</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnQPublic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646400</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if you are the only customer, carbon footprint can further be reduced by swapping trucks with horse drawn carriages</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if you are the only customer, carbon footprint can further be reduced by swapping trucks with horse drawn carriages</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnQPublic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646398</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnQPublic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646398</guid>
		<description>Funny you say that because for infrequent users, a brick and mortar blockbuster pay-per-use model is cheaper than the more &quot;advanced&quot; online subscription based provider. User consumption pattern is a big determining factor. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you say that because for infrequent users, a brick and mortar blockbuster pay-per-use model is cheaper than the more &#8220;advanced&#8221; online subscription based provider. User consumption pattern is a big determining factor. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Davies</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646391</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646391</guid>
		<description>Seems like a small task to revise  RFC 1149 (Transmission of IP over Avian Carriers) to encompass IP over Fedex Courier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a small task to revise  RFC 1149 (Transmission of IP over Avian Carriers) to encompass IP over Fedex Courier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stooge</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646384</link>
		<dc:creator>Stooge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646384</guid>
		<description>Without a time machine you&#039;re simply saying you want to be the new Blockbuster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without a time machine you&#8217;re simply saying you want to be the new Blockbuster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glatt1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646380</link>
		<dc:creator>glatt1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646380</guid>
		<description> Exactly.  Especially with the example of the milk jug full of 25,000 micro SDs.  How do you find the one correct micro SD that contains the file you want?  And then you have to put it in a card reader and do the actual file transfer. You need an excellent indexing and card storage system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Exactly.  Especially with the example of the milk jug full of 25,000 micro SDs.  How do you find the one correct micro SD that contains the file you want?  And then you have to put it in a card reader and do the actual file transfer. You need an excellent indexing and card storage system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elpollodiablo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646374</link>
		<dc:creator>elpollodiablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646374</guid>
		<description>With a really good consummer SSD hard drive you can maybe get 400MB/s write speed, with good-ol&#039; platter-spinning hard drives or micro-SD cards you&#039;ll be lucky if you get a 1/4 of that : way faster than your home ISP, but if you got the money you can already buy a faster pipe to the net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a really good consummer SSD hard drive you can maybe get 400MB/s write speed, with good-ol&#8217; platter-spinning hard drives or micro-SD cards you&#8217;ll be lucky if you get a 1/4 of that : way faster than your home ISP, but if you got the money you can already buy a faster pipe to the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GuyInMilwaukee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/fedexs-file-transfer-capacit.html#comment-1646369</link>
		<dc:creator>GuyInMilwaukee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210890#comment-1646369</guid>
		<description>So FedEx should deliver me a new internet everyday? hmm.. not a bad business model. They also could pick up my emails at the end of the day for delivery. I LOVE the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So FedEx should deliver me a new internet everyday? hmm.. not a bad business model. They also could pick up my emails at the end of the day for delivery. I LOVE the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
