Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Whale Sushi, and why "maximum sentences" don't often equal actual sentences

Xeni Jardin at 3:50 pm Tue, Feb 5, 2013

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Archive of documents from Rios Montt genocide trial, overturned 10 days after guilty verdict

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
Law blogger Popehat was annoyed by the way I referenced the maximum sentence threatened by prosecutors in that Los Angeles whale sushi case.

At his blog today, he vents about this latest item on his "increasingly prolix and impossible-to-catalogue list of pet peeves: confusion about federal sentences." It's a really instructive read, and I recommend it.

For the record, I do understand the difference; but the threat of a theoretical sentence that amounts to life in prison is intended to scare the bejeezus out of the defendant in this case (and others!). As a threat, it's worth noting. No, I doubt he'd actually do that time if convicted and sentenced.

Boing Boing editor/partner and tech culture journalist Xeni Jardin hosts and produces Boing Boing's in-flight TV channel on Virgin America airlines (#10 on the dial), and writes about living with breast cancer. Diagnosed in 2011. @xeni on Twitter. email: xeni@boingboing.net.

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • $19428857

    Gee, I got into a slap fight with another commenter on this very subject on the original thread. Guess I might know what the fuck I’m talking about after all.

    • SumAnon

       A winner is you.

  • Michael Curran

    Note that the defendants in this case are pleading guilty as do the vast majority of those charged with federal crimes. Should they not choose plead guilty, their right to a trial by jury is going to cost them around a 33% increase to their sentence on top of whatever additional “enhancements” the prosecutors can dig up. I mean, has anyone working at that organization committed a crime before? Might as well tack a RICO charge on there. Maybe they dig around and check some visas and green cards, maybe a nice little structuring charge for those two $9,500 deposits they made, etc.

    • Guest_whos_coming_to_dinner

      “I mean, has anyone working at that organization committed a crime before? Might as well tack a RICO charge on there.”
      I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you seem to be operating on an understanding of RICO law that’s almost as erroneous as the federal sentencing myths circulating the Internet. 

  • GawainLavers

    THIS PERSON CHARGED OF MINOR CRIMES FACES MORE JAIL TIME THAN YOU’D GET IF YOU BEAT A TODDLER TO DEATH WITH AN UNCONSCIOUS NUN WHILE RAPING A BLIND LIBRARIAN, or words to that effect.

    To be completely fair, that leap occurred in the comments, not in your article.