<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Games Workshop trademark bullying goes thermonuclear: now they say you can&#039;t use &quot;space marine&quot; in science&#160;fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1651662</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1651662</guid>
		<description> Spaces Marines by tac games reviewed in issue 8 of white dwarf. Read earlier post about appearing in dragon mag 13?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Spaces Marines by tac games reviewed in issue 8 of white dwarf. Read earlier post about appearing in dragon mag 13?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1651660</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1651660</guid>
		<description>The one by TAC games? was reviewed in issue 8 of White Dwarf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one by TAC games? was reviewed in issue 8 of White Dwarf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1651344</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1651344</guid>
		<description>UK law
The main reasons why you may want to invalidate, or partly invalidate, the registration of a trade mark are:
1) you think the trade mark is one which is not unique to the proprietor and should be free for you (or anyone) in that line of trade to use; or
2) you own a trade mark (which does not have to be registered itself) which is the same as, or similar to, the proprietor’s trade mark.

As space marines or SPACE MARINES or Space Marines are not unique spellings to GW but appear in sci fi literature, it can be invalidated under rule 1.

Rule 2) could be applied by anyone who used the words space marines

Also the trademark for goods is rather suspect as Asgard minitures sold space marines (re laserburn rules), Minifigs (not the Lego version but MINIATURE FIGURINES LTD.) sold space marines and both advertised in White Dwarf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK law<br />
The main reasons why you may want to invalidate, or partly invalidate, the registration of a trade mark are:<br />
1) you think the trade mark is one which is not unique to the proprietor and should be free for you (or anyone) in that line of trade to use; or<br />
2) you own a trade mark (which does not have to be registered itself) which is the same as, or similar to, the proprietor’s trade mark.</p>
<p>As space marines or SPACE MARINES or Space Marines are not unique spellings to GW but appear in sci fi literature, it can be invalidated under rule 1.</p>
<p>Rule 2) could be applied by anyone who used the words space marines</p>
<p>Also the trademark for goods is rather suspect as Asgard minitures sold space marines (re laserburn rules), Minifigs (not the Lego version but MINIATURE FIGURINES LTD.) sold space marines and both advertised in White Dwarf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1651035</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1651035</guid>
		<description>BBC covered it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBC covered it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John J. Pierce</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1650753</link>
		<dc:creator>John J. Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1650753</guid>
		<description>Can anyone get major media like The New York Times, CNN, Fox News, etc., to play this up? That might give GW pause, or at least make it easier to raise money to sue them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone get major media like The New York Times, CNN, Fox News, etc., to play this up? That might give GW pause, or at least make it easier to raise money to sue them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Duncan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1650452</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1650452</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think that scene perfectly illustrates Heinlein&#039;s position on why the grunt will always be a part of war: because they can provide a more scaled offensive than a planetary bombardment. Paraphrasing here, but : we&#039;ve never been ordered to go down and kill every left-handed redhead in a city, but we could if we needed to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think that scene perfectly illustrates Heinlein&#8217;s position on why the grunt will always be a part of war: because they can provide a more scaled offensive than a planetary bombardment. Paraphrasing here, but : we&#8217;ve never been ordered to go down and kill every left-handed redhead in a city, but we could if we needed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadreck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1650450</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1650450</guid>
		<description>The wikipedia entry on &quot;Space Marines&quot; points out short story usage going back to 1932.  Also many other table top games going back to the 70s.  Anyway, you can&#039;t trademark a phrase.  Only a particular representation of a phrase when used to identify a product.  You might be able to copyright it but I doubt even that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wikipedia entry on &#8220;Space Marines&#8221; points out short story usage going back to 1932.  Also many other table top games going back to the 70s.  Anyway, you can&#8217;t trademark a phrase.  Only a particular representation of a phrase when used to identify a product.  You might be able to copyright it but I doubt even that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eldanesh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1650289</link>
		<dc:creator>Eldanesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1650289</guid>
		<description>They can bill me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can bill me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris B-Loq Irving</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649811</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B-Loq Irving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649811</guid>
		<description>The movie is, in many ways, a parody of the book. Verhoeven frequently takes the piss out of the issues Heinlein was seriously exploring. I love both incarnations though, they each have their appeal (if for very different reasons)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie is, in many ways, a parody of the book. Verhoeven frequently takes the piss out of the issues Heinlein was seriously exploring. I love both incarnations though, they each have their appeal (if for very different reasons)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Page</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649775</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649775</guid>
		<description> It&#039;s a shame no-one submitted an opposition to the TM: http://www.houstoninternetlaw.com/trademark/trademark-opposition.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It&#8217;s a shame no-one submitted an opposition to the TM: <a href="http://www.houstoninternetlaw.com/trademark/trademark-opposition.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.houstoninternetlaw.com/trademark/trademark-opposition.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Drop</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649679</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649679</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m aware of the novels. That just means they&#039;d &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; to have a trademark in fiction, which is quite different from actually having a trademark.  This bullying seems like an extra-legal attempt to enforce a trademark that doesn&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m aware of the novels. That just means they&#8217;d <i>like</i> to have a trademark in fiction, which is quite different from actually having a trademark.  This bullying seems like an extra-legal attempt to enforce a trademark that doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azrell</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649678</link>
		<dc:creator>Azrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649678</guid>
		<description>You should be payed for product placement like that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should be payed for product placement like that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lohkamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649645</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lohkamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649645</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;ve been a long time player of 40k table top.

 I own some of the computer games.
And was planning on expanding my army as well as several other friends who were going to join.
This will give me something to consider before giving them any more money.  I have long felt that as far as &quot;space marines&quot; are concerned 40k is about the worst science fiction ever written. But the game was fun, so what did I care?   If they feel some how a &quot;God Given right&quot; to push anyone who uses the two words around. I will not be supporting their company further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;ve been a long time player of 40k table top.</p>
<p> I own some of the computer games.<br />
And was planning on expanding my army as well as several other friends who were going to join.<br />
This will give me something to consider before giving them any more money.  I have long felt that as far as &#8220;space marines&#8221; are concerned 40k is about the worst science fiction ever written. But the game was fun, so what did I care?   If they feel some how a &#8220;God Given right&#8221; to push anyone who uses the two words around. I will not be supporting their company further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley Cartee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649629</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley Cartee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649629</guid>
		<description>You know... that particular scene in the movie TOTALLY MISSED the point that the book was making.  It&#039;s one of the things that really detracts from the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know&#8230; that particular scene in the movie TOTALLY MISSED the point that the book was making.  It&#8217;s one of the things that really detracts from the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Marine Jon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649406</link>
		<dc:creator>Space Marine Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649406</guid>
		<description>...what about &#039;Eldar&#039;? And &#039;space marine&#039; has been in use since the 1930s. It was used by Heinlein in &#039;Space Cadet&#039; in 1947. Old enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;what about &#8216;Eldar&#8217;? And &#8216;space marine&#8217; has been in use since the 1930s. It was used by Heinlein in &#8216;Space Cadet&#8217; in 1947. Old enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STUCARIUS</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649382</link>
		<dc:creator>STUCARIUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649382</guid>
		<description>I love  the idea of starting a kickstarter like service to help creatives fight companies like this who are just using money to bully and intimidate their way into IP ownership not by law but by racketeering.

Some kind of crowd sourced legal fund that is tied to specific cases would do a HUGE amount to stop this kind of behavior. Is there one right now? If not who on here has the know how to set it up so we can save the creative properties we all love from Monsters like GW.

For what its worth GW is also a hugely biased company who almost exclusively only hires white males and only has one female employee of note among its 3000+ staff in a position higher than store manager or secretarial type positions. I am not positive but I actually think she works for an outside company and not GW specifically but that could be wrong. In a country with a large ethnic population you will be very hard pressed to find anything but white male faces in Nottingham. 

See if you can even get a job on the creative staff of this company if your not a White Male from  the UK? The only one who has is now gone. There have even been articles written in the European press about how misogynistic this company is. This is a international company who see&#039;s fit to sue artist in other countries where their behavior as employers would never be tolerated.

This is a bad company who deserves to be taken down several notches....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love  the idea of starting a kickstarter like service to help creatives fight companies like this who are just using money to bully and intimidate their way into IP ownership not by law but by racketeering.</p>
<p>Some kind of crowd sourced legal fund that is tied to specific cases would do a HUGE amount to stop this kind of behavior. Is there one right now? If not who on here has the know how to set it up so we can save the creative properties we all love from Monsters like GW.</p>
<p>For what its worth GW is also a hugely biased company who almost exclusively only hires white males and only has one female employee of note among its 3000+ staff in a position higher than store manager or secretarial type positions. I am not positive but I actually think she works for an outside company and not GW specifically but that could be wrong. In a country with a large ethnic population you will be very hard pressed to find anything but white male faces in Nottingham. </p>
<p>See if you can even get a job on the creative staff of this company if your not a White Male from  the UK? The only one who has is now gone. There have even been articles written in the European press about how misogynistic this company is. This is a international company who see&#8217;s fit to sue artist in other countries where their behavior as employers would never be tolerated.</p>
<p>This is a bad company who deserves to be taken down several notches&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STUCARIUS</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649357</link>
		<dc:creator>STUCARIUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649357</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not true at all. Chapter House got a positive ruling from the court on almost everything of importance int eh case. GW failed to get the core of the case ruled on summarily and it is going to a jury where GW is likely to have a problem since they are a foreign corporation suing a U.S. company over something very very nefarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not true at all. Chapter House got a positive ruling from the court on almost everything of importance int eh case. GW failed to get the core of the case ruled on summarily and it is going to a jury where GW is likely to have a problem since they are a foreign corporation suing a U.S. company over something very very nefarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert John Walker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649270</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert John Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649270</guid>
		<description>Or better still, combine their might to launch a pre-emptive strike on GW HQ in Lenton, Nottingham, UK (yes, I am being silly - about as silly as trying to enforce &#039;rights&#039; to the term Space Marine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or better still, combine their might to launch a pre-emptive strike on GW HQ in Lenton, Nottingham, UK (yes, I am being silly &#8211; about as silly as trying to enforce &#8216;rights&#8217; to the term Space Marine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus Calvo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649130</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Calvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649130</guid>
		<description>Go fight, man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go fight, man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Smith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649117</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649117</guid>
		<description>I made some adverts for other English games stores back in like 2009, they&#039;ll stay nameless because i know how goddamn vile this companies legal representation is. I jokingly quipped &quot;why no warhammer?&quot; when talking about their vast stock of nerd lust worthy objects.
All joking stopped, every store was the same, people got very grim and explained what outright monsters GW are in the market of minatures and how they would like nothing more than every competitor to be run out of business. These stores had been around for decades, they all mentioned something very similar without being connected in any way.
About when 40k came out something changed at GW and they became militantly aggressive. They would only let stores stock their product by paying them a charge that meant only gw made a profit on sales. There were threats when american games like warmachine showed up to &quot;shut down stores stocking inferior imitation merchandise&quot;. 
The tales of bullying, threats -almost to the point of &quot;this is a nice place, be a shame if something happened to it&quot; were mind blowing. I suppose its an ironic turn considering the nature of the 40k&#039;s bleak, hyper-fascist universe view.

Now i used to love warhammer like most teenage boys in england not into sports or videogames at the time, i was young and never knew a thing about them.  Now as an adult i cannot fathom how they are still around. They make all the worst stories about microsoft and sony seem like nothing.

Thing i always think of the most when i walk past one of their stores is the speech a friend of mine was told when he got employed at a games workshop for a while by the store manager: 

&quot;all that matters is the sale, be the friend, be the gm, but always remember they are scum. and their wallets are filled with our money and its time to claim the debt&quot;.

Its like the scientology before scientology in some respects i suppose. Whatever though, just dont give these douchebags money if you appreciate fantasy and sci-fi, because they exist only to kill it and have you pay them to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made some adverts for other English games stores back in like 2009, they&#8217;ll stay nameless because i know how goddamn vile this companies legal representation is. I jokingly quipped &#8220;why no warhammer?&#8221; when talking about their vast stock of nerd lust worthy objects.<br />
All joking stopped, every store was the same, people got very grim and explained what outright monsters GW are in the market of minatures and how they would like nothing more than every competitor to be run out of business. These stores had been around for decades, they all mentioned something very similar without being connected in any way.<br />
About when 40k came out something changed at GW and they became militantly aggressive. They would only let stores stock their product by paying them a charge that meant only gw made a profit on sales. There were threats when american games like warmachine showed up to &#8220;shut down stores stocking inferior imitation merchandise&#8221;. <br />
The tales of bullying, threats -almost to the point of &#8220;this is a nice place, be a shame if something happened to it&#8221; were mind blowing. I suppose its an ironic turn considering the nature of the 40k&#8217;s bleak, hyper-fascist universe view.</p>
<p>Now i used to love warhammer like most teenage boys in england not into sports or videogames at the time, i was young and never knew a thing about them.  Now as an adult i cannot fathom how they are still around. They make all the worst stories about microsoft and sony seem like nothing.</p>
<p>Thing i always think of the most when i walk past one of their stores is the speech a friend of mine was told when he got employed at a games workshop for a while by the store manager: </p>
<p>&#8220;all that matters is the sale, be the friend, be the gm, but always remember they are scum. and their wallets are filled with our money and its time to claim the debt&#8221;.</p>
<p>Its like the scientology before scientology in some respects i suppose. Whatever though, just dont give these douchebags money if you appreciate fantasy and sci-fi, because they exist only to kill it and have you pay them to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valourousheart</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649113</link>
		<dc:creator>Valourousheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649113</guid>
		<description>Especially when you tell a marine what M.A.R.I.N.E. stands for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially when you tell a marine what M.A.R.I.N.E. stands for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Christie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649100</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Christie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649100</guid>
		<description>GW has never been the same since 40K came along. It ruined White Dwarf magazine and pushed out coverage of all other game systems, leaving just it and WFB.

I would gladly donate to a legal fund to teach these guys not to be such shitbags. The bad PR alone of people donating to the cause might be enough to convince them to back down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GW has never been the same since 40K came along. It ruined White Dwarf magazine and pushed out coverage of all other game systems, leaving just it and WFB.</p>
<p>I would gladly donate to a legal fund to teach these guys not to be such shitbags. The bad PR alone of people donating to the cause might be enough to convince them to back down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azrell</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649099</link>
		<dc:creator>Azrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649099</guid>
		<description>You might want to look a little closer at what chapter house studios was claiming as original work. GW was clearly in the right with almost everything in that case. The owner was known for blatantly telling people he was ripping GW off. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to look a little closer at what chapter house studios was claiming as original work. GW was clearly in the right with almost everything in that case. The owner was known for blatantly telling people he was ripping GW off. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Anderson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649097</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649097</guid>
		<description>Well, those terms are very old, orc is probably the only trademark-able name. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, those terms are very old, orc is probably the only trademark-able name. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azrell</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649096</link>
		<dc:creator>Azrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649096</guid>
		<description>But IP does. Trademarks are a US thing. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But IP does. Trademarks are a US thing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azrell</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649092</link>
		<dc:creator>Azrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649092</guid>
		<description>GW owns a publishing company that has produced hundreds of books, most of which have space marines in them.

And now you know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GW owns a publishing company that has produced hundreds of books, most of which have space marines in them.</p>
<p>And now you know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Moore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649083</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649083</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a game called &quot;Space Marines&quot; that appears in the June 1977 &quot;The Dragon&quot; magazine. Page 13.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a game called &#8220;Space Marines&#8221; that appears in the June 1977 &#8220;The Dragon&#8221; magazine. Page 13.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euansmith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649084</link>
		<dc:creator>euansmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649084</guid>
		<description>I think the case is being tried in America. Maybe the plaintives; Chapterhouse, should play the bogeyman card and accuse GW of promoting the worship of Satan. That might get a groundswell of indignation to defend them against GW Chaoshound Attack Lawyers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the case is being tried in America. Maybe the plaintives; Chapterhouse, should play the bogeyman card and accuse GW of promoting the worship of Satan. That might get a groundswell of indignation to defend them against GW Chaoshound Attack Lawyers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Hudson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1649032</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1649032</guid>
		<description>be funny to see the Tolkien estate sue GW for use of elf, dwarf, goblin..... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>be funny to see the Tolkien estate sue GW for use of elf, dwarf, goblin&#8230;.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malindrome</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-1648999</link>
		<dc:creator>malindrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211264#comment-1648999</guid>
		<description>If you call a US soldier (Army) a marine, or vice versa, you&#039;re liable to have a lot more than litigation to worry about. Some consider that &quot;fighting words&quot; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you call a US soldier (Army) a marine, or vice versa, you&#8217;re liable to have a lot more than litigation to worry about. Some consider that &#8220;fighting words&#8221; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
