<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent troll beats racketeering&#160;claim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/02/13/patent-troll-beats-racketeerin.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/13/patent-troll-beats-racketeerin.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexicat</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/13/patent-troll-beats-racketeerin.html#comment-1655230</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexicat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=212658#comment-1655230</guid>
		<description>RICO is also used (successfully) against tobacco companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RICO is also used (successfully) against tobacco companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crenquis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/13/patent-troll-beats-racketeerin.html#comment-1654846</link>
		<dc:creator>crenquis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=212658#comment-1654846</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how they can get by with such general accusations -- they should need to specify exactly what device/etc the end-user is employing that infringes on the patent.
I assume that if one&#039;s WIFI-hotspot/router/etc has either Broadcom or Qualcomm chips (i.e. licensed broadcom patents) that one should be able to tell them to shove off...
My question is &quot;What chipsets haven&#039;t been licensed?&quot;  Marvell? MediaTek? Quantenna? Redpine? Other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how they can get by with such general accusations &#8212; they should need to specify exactly what device/etc the end-user is employing that infringes on the patent.<br />
I assume that if one&#8217;s WIFI-hotspot/router/etc has either Broadcom or Qualcomm chips (i.e. licensed broadcom patents) that one should be able to tell them to shove off&#8230;<br />
My question is &#8220;What chipsets haven&#8217;t been licensed?&#8221;  Marvell? MediaTek? Quantenna? Redpine? Other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snapdragon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/13/patent-troll-beats-racketeerin.html#comment-1654819</link>
		<dc:creator>snapdragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=212658#comment-1654819</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we need to go the other way and make Innovatio an offer they can&#039;t refuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we need to go the other way and make Innovatio an offer they can&#8217;t refuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/13/patent-troll-beats-racketeerin.html#comment-1654620</link>
		<dc:creator>elix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=212658#comment-1654620</guid>
		<description>Time to get the patents formally invalidated, no? Or is that somehow not an option. (I did not RTFA, I&#039;ll admit.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to get the patents formally invalidated, no? Or is that somehow not an option. (I did not RTFA, I&#8217;ll admit.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigmund_Jung</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/13/patent-troll-beats-racketeerin.html#comment-1654624</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigmund_Jung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=212658#comment-1654624</guid>
		<description>So, since the patents were invalid but they can continue their bogus claims, what could a business owner do? If this is a risk-free business for Innovatio, I don&#039;t know why other companies cannot enter such &#039;market&#039;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, since the patents were invalid but they can continue their bogus claims, what could a business owner do? If this is a risk-free business for Innovatio, I don&#8217;t know why other companies cannot enter such &#8216;market&#8217;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
