<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alan Friedman takes mind-blowing photos of the sun from&#160;home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1657153</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1657153</guid>
		<description>Or you could just enjoy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could just enjoy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artao</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656897</link>
		<dc:creator>artao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656897</guid>
		<description>you know, there&#039;s literally THOUSANDS of people who take stunning photos of the sun, in numerous wavelenghts. Why exactly is there this article focusing on this guy as if he&#039;s some super-stupendous photographer? sure, they&#039;re nice photos. but you make it out to sound like he developed this whole technique, which he certainly did not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, there&#8217;s literally THOUSANDS of people who take stunning photos of the sun, in numerous wavelenghts. Why exactly is there this article focusing on this guy as if he&#8217;s some super-stupendous photographer? sure, they&#8217;re nice photos. but you make it out to sound like he developed this whole technique, which he certainly did not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Renault</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656827</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Renault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656827</guid>
		<description>They do, and they don&#039;t.  

If an object is reflecting like a mirror, then it depends on too many particulars...

If an object is reflecting like the moon, then it depends (like the mirror &#039;example&#039;) of the position of the light source.  

See here, where the Sun is behind the observer, giving a full Moon.  Pretty uniform illumination:  
http://i.space.com/images/i/000/005/980/i02/moon-watching-night-100916-02.jpg?1294154541

And here, where the Sun is to the side of the observer, giving a half-moon.  Note that the surface illuminated at a shallow angle is darker.
http://ut-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/moon.0001.jpg

When you&#039;re looking at the Moon, you&#039;re looking at a sunlit object - much like looking at a sunlit object here on terra firma.  When you photograph the Moon, you &lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt; use an exposure time that&#039;s the same as taking a picture of a friend who&#039;s sunlit.  Really.

For light sources which are diffuse, like the Sun, it&#039;s kinda like the light given off by the full Moon, but for the Sun, it&#039;s a little different.
See here:
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/706436main_20121114-304-193Blend_M6-orig_full.jpg

The very thin rim/edge of the Sun is brighter, but that&#039;s the corona.  And it&#039;s a view through a thicker slice of the corona right near the surface - giving more photons coming .

Note, the brightness of the Sun in this photograph seems uniform.  I&#039;ll have to try some photographs of the Sun myself, then de-focus them slightly to confuse the surface features, to see if the brightness is uniform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do, and they don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>If an object is reflecting like a mirror, then it depends on too many particulars&#8230;</p>
<p>If an object is reflecting like the moon, then it depends (like the mirror &#8216;example&#8217;) of the position of the light source.  </p>
<p>See here, where the Sun is behind the observer, giving a full Moon.  Pretty uniform illumination: <br />
<a href="http://i.space.com/images/i/000/005/980/i02/moon-watching-night-100916-02.jpg?1294154541" rel="nofollow">http://i.space.com/images/i/000/005/980/i02/moon-watching-night-100916-02.jpg?1294154541</a></p>
<p>And here, where the Sun is to the side of the observer, giving a half-moon.  Note that the surface illuminated at a shallow angle is darker.<br />
<a href="http://ut-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/moon.0001.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://ut-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/moon.0001.jpg</a></p>
<p>When you&#8217;re looking at the Moon, you&#8217;re looking at a sunlit object &#8211; much like looking at a sunlit object here on terra firma.  When you photograph the Moon, you <i>must</i> use an exposure time that&#8217;s the same as taking a picture of a friend who&#8217;s sunlit.  Really.</p>
<p>For light sources which are diffuse, like the Sun, it&#8217;s kinda like the light given off by the full Moon, but for the Sun, it&#8217;s a little different.<br />
See here:<br />
<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/706436main_20121114-304-193Blend_M6-orig_full.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/706436main_20121114-304-193Blend_M6-orig_full.jpg</a></p>
<p>The very thin rim/edge of the Sun is brighter, but that&#8217;s the corona.  And it&#8217;s a view through a thicker slice of the corona right near the surface &#8211; giving more photons coming .</p>
<p>Note, the brightness of the Sun in this photograph seems uniform.  I&#8217;ll have to try some photographs of the Sun myself, then de-focus them slightly to confuse the surface features, to see if the brightness is uniform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656770</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656770</guid>
		<description>I see a human egg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a human egg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjcamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656614</link>
		<dc:creator>pjcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656614</guid>
		<description>The Sun doesn&#039;t actually have a surface. It&#039;s just a big cloud of gas that gets progressively less dense the further out you go. As it happens, the mean free path of photons drops off a cliff at a critical density so what looks like the surface is just the point where photons ceased experiencing significant scattering.

This moment in pedantry brought to you by I&#039;m trying to avoid finishing writing that paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sun doesn&#8217;t actually have a surface. It&#8217;s just a big cloud of gas that gets progressively less dense the further out you go. As it happens, the mean free path of photons drops off a cliff at a critical density so what looks like the surface is just the point where photons ceased experiencing significant scattering.</p>
<p>This moment in pedantry brought to you by I&#8217;m trying to avoid finishing writing that paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anechoic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656577</link>
		<dc:creator>anechoic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656577</guid>
		<description>that photo really looked like a human female egg at first glance! 

as above so below!  http://globalgoodgroup.com/blog/2012/05/09/all-about-the-human-egg/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that photo really looked like a human female egg at first glance! </p>
<p>as above so below!  <a href="http://globalgoodgroup.com/blog/2012/05/09/all-about-the-human-egg/" rel="nofollow">http://globalgoodgroup.com/blog/2012/05/09/all-about-the-human-egg/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656566</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656566</guid>
		<description>Why?  Luminous objects and reflective objects work differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why?  Luminous objects and reflective objects work differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve White</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656553</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656553</guid>
		<description>Anybody else see the gorilla? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody else see the gorilla? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Renault</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656453</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Renault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656453</guid>
		<description>Err, wouldn&#039;t the section of the Sun facing us be brighter that the sections facing away from us - notably at and near the edge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err, wouldn&#8217;t the section of the Sun facing us be brighter that the sections facing away from us &#8211; notably at and near the edge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CliffStoll</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656457</link>
		<dc:creator>CliffStoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656457</guid>
		<description>I was delighted to meet Alan Friedman at several meetings of the Buffalo Astronomical Association - wonderful guy who brings astronomy to the neighborhood.  First time I met him was on the sidewalk, where he had set up a telescope for passerbys.  Beautiful views of the moon &amp; Jupiter.

Alan follows in the footsteps of several other solar astronomers and craftspeople in Buffalo:  

Walter Semerau, who built (by hand!) a high resolution spectroheliograph.  It was squeezed next his washing machine -- and the solar tower in his backyard was on stilts alongside the clothesline.

Alan Gee, built (again, by hand!) an 8-angstrom prominence hydrogen filter - an optical filter created by grinding and polishing blocks of quartz (Before the advent of modern evaporated optical filters)

Ernst Both, the curator of astronomy at the Buffalo Museum of Science, who created a solar observatory (with spectrograph and monochrometer) located in Buffalo&#039;s inner-city.  

I&#039;m honored and humbled to have met each of these men; I studied under Ernst Both for many years.  

Later, when working at Kitt Peak National Observatory, I was struck by how much these people had accomplished in building instruments and bringing the excitement of astronomy to the community.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was delighted to meet Alan Friedman at several meetings of the Buffalo Astronomical Association &#8211; wonderful guy who brings astronomy to the neighborhood.  First time I met him was on the sidewalk, where he had set up a telescope for passerbys.  Beautiful views of the moon &amp; Jupiter.</p>
<p>Alan follows in the footsteps of several other solar astronomers and craftspeople in Buffalo:  </p>
<p>Walter Semerau, who built (by hand!) a high resolution spectroheliograph.  It was squeezed next his washing machine &#8212; and the solar tower in his backyard was on stilts alongside the clothesline.</p>
<p>Alan Gee, built (again, by hand!) an 8-angstrom prominence hydrogen filter &#8211; an optical filter created by grinding and polishing blocks of quartz (Before the advent of modern evaporated optical filters)</p>
<p>Ernst Both, the curator of astronomy at the Buffalo Museum of Science, who created a solar observatory (with spectrograph and monochrometer) located in Buffalo&#8217;s inner-city.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m honored and humbled to have met each of these men; I studied under Ernst Both for many years.  </p>
<p>Later, when working at Kitt Peak National Observatory, I was struck by how much these people had accomplished in building instruments and bringing the excitement of astronomy to the community.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656323</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656323</guid>
		<description>And the sun is also one of the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/aug/16/sun-perfect-sphere-nature&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;round objects&lt;/a&gt; ~.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the sun is also one of the most <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/aug/16/sun-perfect-sphere-nature" rel="nofollow">round objects</a> ~.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe blough</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656307</link>
		<dc:creator>joe blough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656307</guid>
		<description>very interesting tedx talk. i guess the image is going to go viral again now that it&#039;s on the boing.

he says that it&#039;s not possible to capture the faint stuff from the city, which is not strictly true. with the use of narrowband filters you can image all sorts of emission nebulae. it&#039;s challenging but not impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting tedx talk. i guess the image is going to go viral again now that it&#8217;s on the boing.</p>
<p>he says that it&#8217;s not possible to capture the faint stuff from the city, which is not strictly true. with the use of narrowband filters you can image all sorts of emission nebulae. it&#8217;s challenging but not impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Marinos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/14/alan-friedman-takes-mind-blowi.html#comment-1656287</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Marinos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213109#comment-1656287</guid>
		<description>Lesser moment of pedantry: The surface of the sun is ~5700K.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lesser moment of pedantry: The surface of the sun is ~5700K.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
