<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What &quot;Twitter&quot; meant in&#160;1874</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Feerick</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Feerick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658845</guid>
		<description>That was my thought as well — as with &quot;reeb&quot; for beer, &quot;dab&quot; for bad, et cetera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my thought as well — as with &#8220;reeb&#8221; for beer, &#8220;dab&#8221; for bad, et cetera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chgoliz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658826</link>
		<dc:creator>chgoliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658826</guid>
		<description>Totally agree.  It was still very much in use in the 1960&#039;s, as I recall, so anyone around 50 or older would certainly know it.

Slightly OT: one time in the 1980&#039;s I made a reference to myself as a &quot;geek&quot; to my parents, who both looked at me with the most quizzical expression.  Turns out, they only knew the old definition -- someone in a circus sideshow who bites the heads off chickens -- and I only knew the contemporary one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree.  It was still very much in use in the 1960&#8242;s, as I recall, so anyone around 50 or older would certainly know it.</p>
<p>Slightly OT: one time in the 1980&#8242;s I made a reference to myself as a &#8220;geek&#8221; to my parents, who both looked at me with the most quizzical expression.  Turns out, they only knew the old definition &#8212; someone in a circus sideshow who bites the heads off chickens &#8212; and I only knew the contemporary one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wreckrob8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658818</link>
		<dc:creator>Wreckrob8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658818</guid>
		<description>Convention.

The same one that should prevent us knowing what cool means &#039;cos it&#039;s Victorian, criminal back slang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Convention.</p>
<p>The same one that should prevent us knowing what cool means &#8216;cos it&#8217;s Victorian, criminal back slang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658817</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658817</guid>
		<description>Well, now you&#039;ve got me all twitterpated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now you&#8217;ve got me all twitterpated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timquinn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658775</link>
		<dc:creator>timquinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658775</guid>
		<description>&quot;cool: to look&quot; 

Okay, how do we know what &quot;look&quot; means?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;cool: to look&#8221; </p>
<p>Okay, how do we know what &#8220;look&#8221; means?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Holmén</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658765</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Holmén</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658765</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know &quot;slang&quot; was a word that far back. Now i do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know &#8220;slang&#8221; was a word that far back. Now i do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shay simmons</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658733</link>
		<dc:creator>shay simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658733</guid>
		<description>I saw that book and downloaded it yesterday. Gutenberg has at least two more slang dictionaries online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that book and downloaded it yesterday. Gutenberg has at least two more slang dictionaries online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C W</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658711</link>
		<dc:creator>C W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658711</guid>
		<description>Also of interest is the &quot;cantphrases&quot; portion of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of crowds.

Archaic memes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also of interest is the &#8220;cantphrases&#8221; portion of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of crowds.</p>
<p>Archaic memes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retchdog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658705</link>
		<dc:creator>retchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658705</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twittering_Machine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twittering_Machine" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twittering_Machine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jandrese</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658697</link>
		<dc:creator>jandrese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658697</guid>
		<description>Yeah, certainly people have heard a construction like &quot;The ladies were all in a twitter.&quot; before?  It&#039;s not an everyday usage, but it&#039;s one most people should know I think. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, certainly people have heard a construction like &#8220;The ladies were all in a twitter.&#8221; before?  It&#8217;s not an everyday usage, but it&#8217;s one most people should know I think. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xzzy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658691</link>
		<dc:creator>xzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658691</guid>
		<description>Still means that here in 2013.

Not that Twitter users would enjoy having their use of the service described in that manner. But it is pretty accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still means that here in 2013.</p>
<p>Not that Twitter users would enjoy having their use of the service described in that manner. But it is pretty accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Miller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658689</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658689</guid>
		<description>It also meant that in, oh, say, 1974. And 2004, 2005, and for at least a good part of 2006. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also meant that in, oh, say, 1974. And 2004, 2005, and for at least a good part of 2006. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crashproof</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658684</link>
		<dc:creator>Crashproof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658684</guid>
		<description>Seems appropriate.  Twitter is still pretty much a kind of fidgeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems appropriate.  Twitter is still pretty much a kind of fidgeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley Robinson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/what-twitter-meant-in-1874.html#comment-1658680</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213679#comment-1658680</guid>
		<description>You mean to tell me that I&#039;ve been using these terms incorrectly all this time?

The mere notion has me in such a twitter that I feel the urge to pull out the pin.     </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean to tell me that I&#8217;ve been using these terms incorrectly all this time?</p>
<p>The mere notion has me in such a twitter that I feel the urge to pull out the pin.     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
