<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yeti: excellent sub-$100&#160;microphone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Bradley</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1661214</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1661214</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bitrate for a vocal-oriented podcast should never be below 96K. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
So I guess there&#039;s an exception to &quot;never&quot; then?

Regarding Gweek, I can think of several reasons. First of all, I doubt it would make a difference to 95% of listeners if it was encoded in 64k or 128k (and if you feel there are sound problems with Gweek, they won&#039;t be solved by a higher bitrate). Also, longer unnecessary download times, unnecessarily larger files, more bandwidth usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bitrate for a vocal-oriented podcast should never be below 96K. </p></blockquote>
<p>So I guess there&#8217;s an exception to &#8220;never&#8221; then?</p>
<p>Regarding Gweek, I can think of several reasons. First of all, I doubt it would make a difference to 95% of listeners if it was encoded in 64k or 128k (and if you feel there are sound problems with Gweek, they won&#8217;t be solved by a higher bitrate). Also, longer unnecessary download times, unnecessarily larger files, more bandwidth usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1661094</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1661094</guid>
		<description> Ah, sorry to have misunderstood. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ah, sorry to have misunderstood. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1661093</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1661093</guid>
		<description> Recorded in professional studios using compression, EQ, ducking, and high-end dithering algorithms to re-encode them from .wav to mp3 or aiff. They have massive bandwidth considerations that have to be balanced against quality recording. I can&#039;t think of a reason why a podcast on Gweek&#039;s level shouldn&#039;t be 128k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Recorded in professional studios using compression, EQ, ducking, and high-end dithering algorithms to re-encode them from .wav to mp3 or aiff. They have massive bandwidth considerations that have to be balanced against quality recording. I can&#8217;t think of a reason why a podcast on Gweek&#8217;s level shouldn&#8217;t be 128k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulDavisTheFirst</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660975</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulDavisTheFirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660975</guid>
		<description> such a device would constitute a &quot;dedicated A/D-D/A unit&quot; for the purposes i was describing above. what matters is the single sample clock inside the device, rather than different clocks for input and output.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> such a device would constitute a &#8220;dedicated A/D-D/A unit&#8221; for the purposes i was describing above. what matters is the single sample clock inside the device, rather than different clocks for input and output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Bradley</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660966</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660966</guid>
		<description>Well both BBC and NPR both use 64K for their non-music podcasts and they sound fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well both BBC and NPR both use 64K for their non-music podcasts and they sound fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660939</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660939</guid>
		<description>Mark, you have a lot of room echo &amp; resonance in your recordings. If you can&#039;t afford sound baffles &amp; deadeners (decent ones are expensive), hanging blankets on walls and reflective surfaces still improves things drastically. There are a lot of articles online about sound-treating for home recording.

The S-E Electronic Reflexion Filter is a terrific solution as well.  It attaches to your mic and acts as a kind of portable sound booth for deadening the audio. I use the Pro with terrific results.  http://www.seelectronics.com/se-reflexion-filters/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you have a lot of room echo &amp; resonance in your recordings. If you can&#8217;t afford sound baffles &amp; deadeners (decent ones are expensive), hanging blankets on walls and reflective surfaces still improves things drastically. There are a lot of articles online about sound-treating for home recording.</p>
<p>The S-E Electronic Reflexion Filter is a terrific solution as well.  It attaches to your mic and acts as a kind of portable sound booth for deadening the audio. I use the Pro with terrific results.  <a href="http://www.seelectronics.com/se-reflexion-filters/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seelectronics.com/se-reflexion-filters/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660932</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660932</guid>
		<description>Totally agree!  Bitrate for a vocal-oriented podcast should never be below 96K.  You can hear artifacts being introduced at that bitrate, but below that it&#039;s insufferable. 128 is better and doesn&#039;t eat up bandwidth (generally, 1 minute = 1MB mp3 @128K)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree!  Bitrate for a vocal-oriented podcast should never be below 96K.  You can hear artifacts being introduced at that bitrate, but below that it&#8217;s insufferable. 128 is better and doesn&#8217;t eat up bandwidth (generally, 1 minute = 1MB mp3 @128K)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660930</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660930</guid>
		<description> For the price of a dedicated A/D-D/A converter, you can get a high-quality audio interface with good mic pre-amps (Presonus AudioBox, Native Instruments Komplete, M-Audio M-Track, etc.) that will have a dedicated headphone output, mic boost, multiple in/out combinations, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> For the price of a dedicated A/D-D/A converter, you can get a high-quality audio interface with good mic pre-amps (Presonus AudioBox, Native Instruments Komplete, M-Audio M-Track, etc.) that will have a dedicated headphone output, mic boost, multiple in/out combinations, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Penrose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660553</link>
		<dc:creator>James Penrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660553</guid>
		<description>Please put in a word or two about bit rates;  I&#039;ve dropped a couple of podcasts over the years because their creator used a bit rate so low it not only sounded like a tin can but not even a very *good* tin can.

Worse than listening to AM radio on the earphone of a 60&#039;s transistor radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please put in a word or two about bit rates;  I&#8217;ve dropped a couple of podcasts over the years because their creator used a bit rate so low it not only sounded like a tin can but not even a very *good* tin can.</p>
<p>Worse than listening to AM radio on the earphone of a 60&#8242;s transistor radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemoutan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660431</link>
		<dc:creator>Lemoutan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660431</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re lucky. With me it&#039;s the tone of insufferable smugness I project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re lucky. With me it&#8217;s the tone of insufferable smugness I project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660402</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660402</guid>
		<description>I hate that I just sound so &lt;i&gt;white&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate that I just sound so <i>white</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandonmwest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660327</link>
		<dc:creator>brandonmwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660327</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got the same mic, nice job for the price. Definitely recommend a pop filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got the same mic, nice job for the price. Definitely recommend a pop filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gws</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660235</link>
		<dc:creator>gws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660235</guid>
		<description>I have a better idea: use that $100 to buy some sound treatment for your room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a better idea: use that $100 to buy some sound treatment for your room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulDavisTheFirst</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660212</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulDavisTheFirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660212</guid>
		<description>It is certainly true that if all you do is record, without a monitor path through the computer, then the sync issue doesn&#039;t matter at all.

But most people don&#039;t only do this, and so ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is certainly true that if all you do is record, without a monitor path through the computer, then the sync issue doesn&#8217;t matter at all.</p>
<p>But most people don&#8217;t only do this, and so &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Tufano</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tufano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660176</guid>
		<description>I bought a Yeti a month ago and have done my last few podcasts with it.  I agree 100%. I love how much better it sounds.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a Yeti a month ago and have done my last few podcasts with it.  I agree 100%. I love how much better it sounds.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrettyBoyTim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660158</link>
		<dc:creator>PrettyBoyTim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660158</guid>
		<description>Could you go into a bit more detail? If you&#039;re just recording yourself speaking, what is it meant to be syncing *with*?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you go into a bit more detail? If you&#8217;re just recording yourself speaking, what is it meant to be syncing *with*?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemoutan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660125</link>
		<dc:creator>Lemoutan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660125</guid>
		<description>I have a black Blue Snowball in a shockmount. I hate my voice. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a black Blue Snowball in a shockmount. I hate my voice. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Weisberger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Weisberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660112</guid>
		<description>I love the design.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchel Ahern</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Ahern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660059</guid>
		<description>You do know that Gweek sounds terrible? I had to stop listening to it, despite interest in the subject matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know that Gweek sounds terrible? I had to stop listening to it, despite interest in the subject matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thü</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660057</link>
		<dc:creator>Thü</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660057</guid>
		<description>The Yeti sure is a step up to most consumer grade mics in use, specially thinking of all those who use the video chat cam&#039;s mic. But there are some other USB mics available from more experienced producers with much better recording quality: the AKG Perception 120 USB, Audio Technica AT 2020, Shure PG 27 (the AKG and AT do not cost much more than the Yeti). I do not recommend the Samson C03U or C01U, they are too noisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Yeti sure is a step up to most consumer grade mics in use, specially thinking of all those who use the video chat cam&#8217;s mic. But there are some other USB mics available from more experienced producers with much better recording quality: the AKG Perception 120 USB, Audio Technica AT 2020, Shure PG 27 (the AKG and AT do not cost much more than the Yeti). I do not recommend the Samson C03U or C01U, they are too noisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660035</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660035</guid>
		<description>Hard drive? Fan? What are these noisy contraptions he&#039;s writing about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard drive? Fan? What are these noisy contraptions he&#8217;s writing about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coderedd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1660007</link>
		<dc:creator>coderedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1660007</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used the Yeti for telecommuting connections and for connecting the a class to a remotely-located professor. I can&#039;t endorse these enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used the Yeti for telecommuting connections and for connecting the a class to a remotely-located professor. I can&#8217;t endorse these enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulDavisTheFirst</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1659998</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulDavisTheFirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1659998</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re serious about recording audio, you will always use input and output devices that share  a single sample &quot;clock&quot;. This can be done by using a single A/D-D/A converter unit (which defines the clocks for conversions in both directions), or by sending the clock from one device to the other (e.g. using word clock or the S/PDIF clock signal).

These USB devices generally do not permit this, and I thus deem them to be useful, often elegant, but fundamentally amateur. 

Stop relying on your computer audio system to resample - starting sharing your sample clock. Sync wants to be free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re serious about recording audio, you will always use input and output devices that share  a single sample &#8220;clock&#8221;. This can be done by using a single A/D-D/A converter unit (which defines the clocks for conversions in both directions), or by sending the clock from one device to the other (e.g. using word clock or the S/PDIF clock signal).</p>
<p>These USB devices generally do not permit this, and I thus deem them to be useful, often elegant, but fundamentally amateur. </p>
<p>Stop relying on your computer audio system to resample &#8211; starting sharing your sample clock. Sync wants to be free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gluther</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1659972</link>
		<dc:creator>gluther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1659972</guid>
		<description>I still love a RE20 or SM7 + a decent preamp for voice work, but that combo is a lot more $$$ than a Yeti. having a multi-pattern option could come in handy for a guest mic in a pinch, and Blue makes mighty fine mics in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still love a RE20 or SM7 + a decent preamp for voice work, but that combo is a lot more $$$ than a Yeti. having a multi-pattern option could come in handy for a guest mic in a pinch, and Blue makes mighty fine mics in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill_mcgonigle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1659970</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_mcgonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1659970</guid>
		<description>I bought one to do radio ads for a local non-profit and it&#039;s really as good as they say.  Even better than my Roland USB interface with an XLR mic.  I assume it&#039;s because the Blue Yeti is specifically designed for voice.

I got this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0002CZW0Y/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0002CZW0Y&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=bfc03-20&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pop filter&lt;/a&gt; with it and it clamps on perfectly and makes a noticeable difference with plosives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought one to do radio ads for a local non-profit and it&#8217;s really as good as they say.  Even better than my Roland USB interface with an XLR mic.  I assume it&#8217;s because the Blue Yeti is specifically designed for voice.</p>
<p>I got this <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0002CZW0Y/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0002CZW0Y&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=bfc03-20" rel="nofollow">pop filter</a> with it and it clamps on perfectly and makes a noticeable difference with plosives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suremann</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1659969</link>
		<dc:creator>suremann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1659969</guid>
		<description>One of the best ways to decouple the mic from table/floor vibrations (aside from using a specialized shock-mount)  is to use blue-tak poster putty or Sugru.  Make 3-5 little 1/2&quot; balls of putty and apply them to the microphone base as feet. Just don&#039;t smoosh them too hard on the table, let the feet lightly rest so the plasticity of the material can dampen the vibration.  Also, use a high-pass filter set to around 80Hz in your recording software to eliminate rumble. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best ways to decouple the mic from table/floor vibrations (aside from using a specialized shock-mount)  is to use blue-tak poster putty or Sugru.  Make 3-5 little 1/2&#8243; balls of putty and apply them to the microphone base as feet. Just don&#8217;t smoosh them too hard on the table, let the feet lightly rest so the plasticity of the material can dampen the vibration.  Also, use a high-pass filter set to around 80Hz in your recording software to eliminate rumble. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corydodt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1659886</link>
		<dc:creator>corydodt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1659886</guid>
		<description>We bought a couple of these for our remote teams at work, since we&#039;re constantly having Google Hangouts and other kinds of teleconferences. Extremely good investment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We bought a couple of these for our remote teams at work, since we&#8217;re constantly having Google Hangouts and other kinds of teleconferences. Extremely good investment. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Golden</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1659870</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Golden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1659870</guid>
		<description>I agree on the Yeti Blue Mark.  While not a podcaster, I record quite a few demos, and voice is everything.  With headphones on, and cheap pop filter in front (highly advised) I can give a cool smooth FM voice when delivering demos.  It&#039;s very ideal - and the Yeti Blue delivers in spades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the Yeti Blue Mark.  While not a podcaster, I record quite a few demos, and voice is everything.  With headphones on, and cheap pop filter in front (highly advised) I can give a cool smooth FM voice when delivering demos.  It&#8217;s very ideal &#8211; and the Yeti Blue delivers in spades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Putney</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1659871</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Putney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1659871</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a handy tip! I&#039;ve had this mic for about a year now, and while it does just fine on my desk I often wish it picked up less typing noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a handy tip! I&#8217;ve had this mic for about a year now, and while it does just fine on my desk I often wish it picked up less typing noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Sides</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/yeti-excellent-sub-100-micro.html#comment-1659866</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Sides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214158#comment-1659866</guid>
		<description>I love my Blue mics. I have been looking to switch to USB though. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my Blue mics. I have been looking to switch to USB though. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
