Discuss this post in our forums

19 Responses to “Android developer fights evil patent troll”

  1. joe blough says:

    i have been this guy’s customer since xplane-3 i think. he’s certainly a character (read some of his adventures here: http://www.x-plane.com/x-world/austins_adventures/ ). in fact he must be a dang good pilot because some of the stuff there is truly scary…

    i don’t understand why he has to fight this fight instead of google.

    • Drew_Gehringer says:

       Because he specifically is the one being sued.

      Wouldn’t surprise me if part of his defense ends up being ‘I’m not even the right person to sue for this, google is’

      • joe blough says:

         oh right – but what i meant is that can’t google join this fight with an amicus motion or such? clearly it’s in their interest to keep the android ecosystem up and running. having some random troll running around saying that you can’t contact a server for authorization really messes up the android marketplace!

        i thought i remember apple having intervened in a similar case with app store apps. but i could be wrong.

    • EH says:

      Patent trolls see the little guy as low-hanging fruit. It’s as simple as that: bullying.

    • oasisob1 says:

      The first random post I picked was frightening:

      Thanks for the link, I’m officially hooked!

  2. JoelCave says:

    Because the patent troll doesn’t have the resources to fight Google, so they go after easy targets. 

  3. Scott Elyard says:

    I almost want to call patent trolls patent parasites.

  4. AGC says:

    Crowd researched patent fight?  We all add our 2bits in about the legal procedures and documents required? 

  5. Nadreck says:

    I suggest we patent the Patent Troll business model and charge exorbitant  licensing fees.

  6. Guest says:

    Hi Cory — maybe you could link to his app from the story. I think any benefit he can get from standing up to these trolls would be much appreciated.

  7. arikol says:

    X-Plane is first class software. I haven’t tried that Android version, but I would be very surprised if it weren’t quite impressive. These patent trolls selected the wrong target, because Austin may be a small developer but he’s going to fight this. 

    As he points out, he’s not broke and he can fight this, but it is a serious hit. Supporting him is a cool thing to do. If you’re interested in a very good flight simulator and have a computer running an OS (seriously, almost any OS) then X-Plane is the best simulator there is, and not expensive. Very realistic flight characteristics. I had to renew my license last year and did so in an aircraft type I had never flown before. I practiced in X-Plane and knew the airplane and its characteristics before I ever climbed into it… pretty cool. (because X-Plane does airflow simulations it is much more realistic than any other sim).

  8. “When a computer runs a paid application, one way that developers can assure that a customer has actually purchased the application is by coding the application to match a license code with an encrypted database. This is a method that most paid applications on the Android market use. It’s a method that Meyer argues has been in use since at least the late ’80s. This is the idea that Uniloc claims to own.”

    Isn’t that a form of DRM which will never fly if the app is free software? So in a way, Austin Meyer doesn’t want people to control their phones any more than Uniloc do. So in a way it’s not stand-up little guy vs. evil big guy, it’s bad little guy vs. bad big guy.

  9. AGC says:

    Here is one that I built from an old bottle, works like a charm.