<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aerial photography ban proposed for all but&#160;government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: donovan acree</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670481</link>
		<dc:creator>donovan acree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670481</guid>
		<description>From your link
&quot;The bill is HB-619-FH. It is different than an earlier version that would have outlawed all aerial photography by drone, plane or even satellite. That proposal drew attention online, as well as some ridicule, but was altered before the first committee hearing.&quot;
So it seems that the original article was correct and sites like this helped change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From your link<br />
&#8220;The bill is HB-619-FH. It is different than an earlier version that would have outlawed all aerial photography by drone, plane or even satellite. That proposal drew attention online, as well as some ridicule, but was altered before the first committee hearing.&#8221;<br />
So it seems that the original article was correct and sites like this helped change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donovan acree</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670480</link>
		<dc:creator>donovan acree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670480</guid>
		<description>Send a camera up in a balloon  take a photo of a large swath of the US - you are now a criminal.
Why do lawmakers seem intent of making everyone a criminal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send a camera up in a balloon  take a photo of a large swath of the US &#8211; you are now a criminal.<br />
Why do lawmakers seem intent of making everyone a criminal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Heatherington</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670422</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Heatherington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670422</guid>
		<description>Oregon has similar pending legislation:  SB 71. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oregon has similar pending legislation:  SB 71. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorzdad</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670357</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorzdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670357</guid>
		<description>In other illegal-photography news, here in Indiana, the Republican-controlled legislature is seriously considering a bill that would make it a &lt;i&gt;felony &lt;/i&gt; to photograph any farm or operation that processes animals. The bill&#039;s supporters go so far as to call animal-rights supporters &quot;terrorists&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other illegal-photography news, here in Indiana, the Republican-controlled legislature is seriously considering a bill that would make it a <i>felony </i> to photograph any farm or operation that processes animals. The bill&#8217;s supporters go so far as to call animal-rights supporters &#8220;terrorists&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Winchester</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670104</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Winchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670104</guid>
		<description>no man made objects are visible there so you&#039;re good </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no man made objects are visible there so you&#8217;re good </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Winchester</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Winchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670103</guid>
		<description> aqueous threat? don&#039;t you mean morpheus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> aqueous threat? don&#8217;t you mean morpheus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awjt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670087</link>
		<dc:creator>awjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670087</guid>
		<description> Jumping is next.  And after that: movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Jumping is next.  And after that: movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awjt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670086</link>
		<dc:creator>awjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670086</guid>
		<description>I actually would agree with that.  The problem is that the people who make a legitimate beef with the government get all mixed up with the crazies who use that same complaint to also advance their extremist point of view.  And then it *all* looks crazy.  Meanwhile, the original point was sane, but it&#039;s being fought over by all the crazies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually would agree with that.  The problem is that the people who make a legitimate beef with the government get all mixed up with the crazies who use that same complaint to also advance their extremist point of view.  And then it *all* looks crazy.  Meanwhile, the original point was sane, but it&#8217;s being fought over by all the crazies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awjt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1670082</link>
		<dc:creator>awjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1670082</guid>
		<description>Well, you know me personally Bill... I live in VT.   I would put California much higher on the tolerance scale than NH or VT, and many parts of CA aren&#039;t all that tolerant.  It&#039;s a very subtle thing that is hard to pick up on unless you&#039;ve lived elsewhere.  I would say that the UV is *not* all that tolerant.  Perhaps in a basic way, but dig down a little past the smile at the grocery store, and it seethes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you know me personally Bill&#8230; I live in VT.   I would put California much higher on the tolerance scale than NH or VT, and many parts of CA aren&#8217;t all that tolerant.  It&#8217;s a very subtle thing that is hard to pick up on unless you&#8217;ve lived elsewhere.  I would say that the UV is *not* all that tolerant.  Perhaps in a basic way, but dig down a little past the smile at the grocery store, and it seethes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Penrose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669989</link>
		<dc:creator>James Penrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669989</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget those kids who have been sending balloons to the edge of space with cameras on board. 

Probably selling the films to the bad guys by pretending it&#039;s science research.

You really have to wonder what motivates people like this to introduce such obvious insanity as a bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget those kids who have been sending balloons to the edge of space with cameras on board. </p>
<p>Probably selling the films to the bad guys by pretending it&#8217;s science research.</p>
<p>You really have to wonder what motivates people like this to introduce such obvious insanity as a bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getback</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669965</link>
		<dc:creator>getback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669965</guid>
		<description>HA HA !!  Check out the incredibly reliable AG BEAT staff...the source contributors to this murky boingboing story.

You&#039;ll notice their amazing collection of contributors are predominantly real estate bloggers, (by the way, if you&#039;d like to throw in your opinion on anything, it seems anyone can join and post on AG BEAT then voila you&#039;re a REPORTER too!!)  It&#039;s easy kids!

The full story on NH&#039;s drone legislation ideas -- as written by a NH news source -- gives a much more detailed account of what this new NH anti-surveillance legislation may mean.  None of the complete reporting of this legislation is provided in this ridiculous and alarmist boingboing article, attributed to AG BEAT -- a source whose wrtiers &quot;love HGTV&quot; or are in commercial real estate in TEXAS...

The story by the Nashua Telegraph below offers a much different report.  Unfortunately for boing boing and its readers, this link below is not nearly as salacious, slanted, or -- to be perfectly honest -- mythical, as quoting a site written by real estate agents with laptops.

How can you give credence to Lani Rosales Mark?-- a so-called influential blogger -- when the full report below is so much more complete?  influential? Maybe.  Accurate?  NOT AT ALL!

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/statenewengland/995218-469/n.h.-bill-would-curtail-use-of-drones.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA HA !!  Check out the incredibly reliable AG BEAT staff&#8230;the source contributors to this murky boingboing story.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice their amazing collection of contributors are predominantly real estate bloggers, (by the way, if you&#8217;d like to throw in your opinion on anything, it seems anyone can join and post on AG BEAT then voila you&#8217;re a REPORTER too!!)  It&#8217;s easy kids!</p>
<p>The full story on NH&#8217;s drone legislation ideas &#8212; as written by a NH news source &#8212; gives a much more detailed account of what this new NH anti-surveillance legislation may mean.  None of the complete reporting of this legislation is provided in this ridiculous and alarmist boingboing article, attributed to AG BEAT &#8212; a source whose wrtiers &#8220;love HGTV&#8221; or are in commercial real estate in TEXAS&#8230;</p>
<p>The story by the Nashua Telegraph below offers a much different report.  Unfortunately for boing boing and its readers, this link below is not nearly as salacious, slanted, or &#8212; to be perfectly honest &#8212; mythical, as quoting a site written by real estate agents with laptops.</p>
<p>How can you give credence to Lani Rosales Mark?&#8211; a so-called influential blogger &#8212; when the full report below is so much more complete?  influential? Maybe.  Accurate?  NOT AT ALL!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/statenewengland/995218-469/n.h.-bill-would-curtail-use-of-drones.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/statenewengland/995218-469/n.h.-bill-would-curtail-use-of-drones.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill_mcgonigle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669929</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_mcgonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669929</guid>
		<description>Also, this is NH.  People are going to do what they want anyway. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, this is NH.  People are going to do what they want anyway. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill_mcgonigle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669928</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_mcgonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669928</guid>
		<description>So I hear the Free Staters are going to fill the hearing room to speak against this bill - are you going to show up to oppose them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I hear the Free Staters are going to fill the hearing room to speak against this bill &#8211; are you going to show up to oppose them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill_mcgonigle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669927</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_mcgonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669927</guid>
		<description>It is a good idea and people are working on  it.  

The idea that a UPS truck should be able to just come up your driveway without being pre-announced is just insanity - I mean, what if somebody is sunbathing in the driveway!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good idea and people are working on  it.  </p>
<p>The idea that a UPS truck should be able to just come up your driveway without being pre-announced is just insanity &#8211; I mean, what if somebody is sunbathing in the driveway!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill_mcgonigle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669926</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_mcgonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669926</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a constant fight against the Nanny Staters.  I suppose the only different is that New Hampshiremen are willing to put up the fight.

That we even have to is evidence of a broken system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a constant fight against the Nanny Staters.  I suppose the only different is that New Hampshiremen are willing to put up the fight.</p>
<p>That we even have to is evidence of a broken system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill_mcgonigle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669925</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_mcgonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669925</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know where you live in NH, but in my part (West Central) the people are more tolerant than anywhere else I&#039;ve been in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know where you live in NH, but in my part (West Central) the people are more tolerant than anywhere else I&#8217;ve been in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pag</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669902</link>
		<dc:creator>Pag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669902</guid>
		<description> Typical politicians: trying to save money by getting rid of the free part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Typical politicians: trying to save money by getting rid of the free part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awjt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669901</link>
		<dc:creator>awjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669901</guid>
		<description>Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, etc., contain people who proudly fly their confederate flags and think of it as overtly reasonable behavior.  They are often obvious about it, not always, but more often.  

In New England, and NH in particular, people are socially more restrained from overt displays.  But the feelings: the bigotry, the extreme political views, the conservative reluctance to social changes ...are all still there.  So you can walk around here and not see or hear stuff that really is here.

Malcolm X described it well in his book.  He described how Northerners were more racist than Southerners, because the bigotry is insidious, seeped into every crack of the Great White Way.  Whereas in the South, you pretty much knew a good ole boy when you saw him in his truck and could probably avoid him if you needed to.  Less so in the North. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, etc., contain people who proudly fly their confederate flags and think of it as overtly reasonable behavior.  They are often obvious about it, not always, but more often.  </p>
<p>In New England, and NH in particular, people are socially more restrained from overt displays.  But the feelings: the bigotry, the extreme political views, the conservative reluctance to social changes &#8230;are all still there.  So you can walk around here and not see or hear stuff that really is here.</p>
<p>Malcolm X described it well in his book.  He described how Northerners were more racist than Southerners, because the bigotry is insidious, seeped into every crack of the Great White Way.  Whereas in the South, you pretty much knew a good ole boy when you saw him in his truck and could probably avoid him if you needed to.  Less so in the North. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669886</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669886</guid>
		<description>We are idiots who elect ourselves into government. They are us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are idiots who elect ourselves into government. They are us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Freeman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669861</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669861</guid>
		<description>Pretty much what I came in here to say, 

I suppose it comes down to letter of the law vs spirit of the law and it would be up to a judge to decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much what I came in here to say, </p>
<p>I suppose it comes down to letter of the law vs spirit of the law and it would be up to a judge to decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackPanda</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669860</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackPanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669860</guid>
		<description> Pulse jet, perhaps? Those are illegal over here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Pulse jet, perhaps? Those are illegal over here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackPanda</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669858</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackPanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669858</guid>
		<description> Please explain this to a Britisher. New Hampshire is the only part of &#039;Murka I&#039;ve been to, and notwithstanding the GIANT nativity scenes and glow-in-the-dark Grinches, etc (it was winter) in just about everybody&#039;s garden, they seemed reasonably normal compared to say, the Texans I&#039;ve met.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Please explain this to a Britisher. New Hampshire is the only part of &#8216;Murka I&#8217;ve been to, and notwithstanding the GIANT nativity scenes and glow-in-the-dark Grinches, etc (it was winter) in just about everybody&#8217;s garden, they seemed reasonably normal compared to say, the Texans I&#8217;ve met.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euansmith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669859</link>
		<dc:creator>euansmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669859</guid>
		<description>You might need to use crayon and short words to get you point across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might need to use crayon and short words to get you point across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euansmith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669857</link>
		<dc:creator>euansmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669857</guid>
		<description>Is that Isengard or Dunsinane?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that Isengard or Dunsinane?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatthewKrohn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669855</link>
		<dc:creator>MatthewKrohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669855</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  As a NH voter, I&#039;ll be writing him today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  As a NH voter, I&#8217;ll be writing him today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatthewKrohn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669853</link>
		<dc:creator>MatthewKrohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669853</guid>
		<description>Actually, they get free admission to state parks, not state-owned resorts (of which, to the best of my knowledge, there are none).  Also, they just revoked their own free admission to the state-owned ski area, Cannon Mountain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, they get free admission to state parks, not state-owned resorts (of which, to the best of my knowledge, there are none).  Also, they just revoked their own free admission to the state-owned ski area, Cannon Mountain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669826</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 08:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669826</guid>
		<description>but what about NASA provided maps? Would I have to use my wii-weather channel as a make-shift gps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but what about NASA provided maps? Would I have to use my wii-weather channel as a make-shift gps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669786</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669786</guid>
		<description>This is partly hilarious because New Hampshire from the air mostly just looks like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is partly hilarious because New Hampshire from the air mostly just looks like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669781</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669781</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the death of rational thought and the triumph of the cult of false equivalency.
&lt;i&gt;Summer camps for kids?  Hitler had camps!!!!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the death of rational thought and the triumph of the cult of false equivalency.<br />
<i>Summer camps for kids?  Hitler had camps!!!!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/aerial-photography-ban-propose.html#comment-1669775</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216311#comment-1669775</guid>
		<description>If we&#039;re going with idle fantasies, I can think of a much quieter delivery service vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we&#8217;re going with idle fantasies, I can think of a much quieter delivery service vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
