<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalists took secret money for critical pieces about Malaysian opposition&#160;candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1670725</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1670725</guid>
		<description>I missed that.  Either a very fucked up perspective or a very inarticulate expression.  Two wrongs and all that.

Yulia Tymoshenko is a great example.  On the one hand, she&#039;s probably guilty of any crime that you could imagine.  On the other hand, she was railroaded.  The fact that both are true doesn&#039;t really make either case &#039;nuanced&#039;, just seriously fucked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed that.  Either a very fucked up perspective or a very inarticulate expression.  Two wrongs and all that.</p>
<p>Yulia Tymoshenko is a great example.  On the one hand, she&#8217;s probably guilty of any crime that you could imagine.  On the other hand, she was railroaded.  The fact that both are true doesn&#8217;t really make either case &#8216;nuanced&#8217;, just seriously fucked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spacedmonkey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1670645</link>
		<dc:creator>spacedmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1670645</guid>
		<description>Yup.  The original author said the sodomy charges were &quot;nuanced.&quot; It&#039;s u p at the top of the page.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  The original author said the sodomy charges were &#8220;nuanced.&#8221; It&#8217;s u p at the top of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669997</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669997</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dude, deep breaths.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Dude, you&#039;re blathering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dude, deep breaths.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude, you&#8217;re blathering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R_Young</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669991</link>
		<dc:creator>R_Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669991</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing he was being sarcastic there.  


But Poe&#039;s law strikes again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing he was being sarcastic there.  </p>
<p>But Poe&#8217;s law strikes again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R_Young</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669990</link>
		<dc:creator>R_Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669990</guid>
		<description>Oh it is inappropriate   Very.  And I can still taste some lingering shame on my lips, but also the guilty glee for connecting two otherwise unrelated neurons in my brain; from Zoolander to Joshua Trevino.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh it is inappropriate   Very.  And I can still taste some lingering shame on my lips, but also the guilty glee for connecting two otherwise unrelated neurons in my brain; from Zoolander to Joshua Trevino.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669897</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669897</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, America is well populated by people quite different from you:
http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, America is well populated by people quite different from you:<br />
<a href="http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Slemmons</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669889</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Slemmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669889</guid>
		<description>As has already been pointed out, there&#039;s a link to the actual filing. Is that not enough for you? Or did you just post here to say, &quot;Wah, I don&#039;t like Buzzfeed&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has already been pointed out, there&#8217;s a link to the actual filing. Is that not enough for you? Or did you just post here to say, &#8220;Wah, I don&#8217;t like Buzzfeed&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derick William Vance Hill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669876</link>
		<dc:creator>Derick William Vance Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669876</guid>
		<description> a) Dude, deep breaths. We&#039;re commenting on an article about an article about journalistic integrity. It&#039;s not important enough to get as worked up as you&#039;re clearly getting.

b) What I&#039;m saying is that since I&#039;ve been burned once by BuzzFeed, I now treat things they say with skepticism, even when I agree with their premises. I think that&#039;s pretty healthy.

c) Since BuzzFeed now requires extra vetting work, the threshold for me to care enough to read their stuff is higher. I have plenty of other things I could be doing or reading. I have a limited number of minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> a) Dude, deep breaths. We&#8217;re commenting on an article about an article about journalistic integrity. It&#8217;s not important enough to get as worked up as you&#8217;re clearly getting.</p>
<p>b) What I&#8217;m saying is that since I&#8217;ve been burned once by BuzzFeed, I now treat things they say with skepticism, even when I agree with their premises. I think that&#8217;s pretty healthy.</p>
<p>c) Since BuzzFeed now requires extra vetting work, the threshold for me to care enough to read their stuff is higher. I have plenty of other things I could be doing or reading. I have a limited number of minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren_Terra</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669872</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren_Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669872</guid>
		<description>WTF? Demonstrating that there was ample primary evidence readily available hyperlinked from within the Buzzfeed story &lt;i&gt;bolsters your opinion that stories in Buzzfeed are to be considered suspect?&lt;/i&gt; In that case, what could possibly &lt;i&gt;fail&lt;/i&gt; to bolster your prejudice?

And the whole point of my comment was that a dismissive &quot;the reporter is probably lying&quot; is a pretty bold claim to make. I did the work you didn&#039;t do, because &lt;i&gt;it&#039;s wrong to call someone presumptively dishonest when two minutes of checking will back their story&lt;/i&gt;. You&#039;re awfully comfortable with not having made that effort, and with my having made it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF? Demonstrating that there was ample primary evidence readily available hyperlinked from within the Buzzfeed story <i>bolsters your opinion that stories in Buzzfeed are to be considered suspect?</i> In that case, what could possibly <i>fail</i> to bolster your prejudice?</p>
<p>And the whole point of my comment was that a dismissive &#8220;the reporter is probably lying&#8221; is a pretty bold claim to make. I did the work you didn&#8217;t do, because <i>it&#8217;s wrong to call someone presumptively dishonest when two minutes of checking will back their story</i>. You&#8217;re awfully comfortable with not having made that effort, and with my having made it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derick William Vance Hill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669870</link>
		<dc:creator>Derick William Vance Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669870</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re only bolstering my case. Now that BuzzFeed has a little marker next to it that says &quot;Do Not Automatically Treat As Credible&quot; I have to do extra work (which you helpfully did for me; cheers) making sure their article isn&#039;t just a hit piece from somebody with a grudge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re only bolstering my case. Now that BuzzFeed has a little marker next to it that says &#8220;Do Not Automatically Treat As Credible&#8221; I have to do extra work (which you helpfully did for me; cheers) making sure their article isn&#8217;t just a hit piece from somebody with a grudge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren_Terra</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669863</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren_Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669863</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t recognize the pop culture reference you feel is obligatory, and to which you do not link (Google gives some prominence to &quot;We must kill the Batman&quot;, but a connection would seem extremely tenuous). In any case, this seems quite inappropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recognize the pop culture reference you feel is obligatory, and to which you do not link (Google gives some prominence to &#8220;We must kill the Batman&#8221;, but a connection would seem extremely tenuous). In any case, this seems quite inappropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren_Terra</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669862</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren_Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669862</guid>
		<description>An excellent question, in theory. I propose that rather than sneeringly refusing to believe anything Buzzfeed claims, you &lt;i&gt;actually look at their article&lt;/i&gt;. Specifically, you might be interested in a hyperlink there, where it says &quot;The filing&quot;:&lt;blockquote&gt;The payments to conservative American opinion writers — whose work appeared in outlets from the Huffington Post and San Francisco Examiner to the Washington Times to National Review and RedState — emerged in a filing this week to the Department of Justice. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fara.gov/docs/6152-Registration-Statement-20130124-1.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The filing&lt;/a&gt; under the Foreign Agent Registration Act outlines a campaign spanning May 2008 to April 2011 and led by Joshua Trevino, a conservative pundit, who received $389,724.70 under the contract and paid smaller sums to a series of conservative writers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;(other hyperlinks in the piece demonstrate articles praising Malaysia written by people the filing says Trevino paid, using money Trevino received to lobby for Malaysia).
You might also be interested in the part of the article where &lt;i&gt;Trevino is quoted apologizing for his past lies about this question&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent question, in theory. I propose that rather than sneeringly refusing to believe anything Buzzfeed claims, you <i>actually look at their article</i>. Specifically, you might be interested in a hyperlink there, where it says &#8220;The filing&#8221;:<br />
<blockquote>The payments to conservative American opinion writers — whose work appeared in outlets from the Huffington Post and San Francisco Examiner to the Washington Times to National Review and RedState — emerged in a filing this week to the Department of Justice. <a href="http://www.fara.gov/docs/6152-Registration-Statement-20130124-1.pdf" rel="nofollow">The filing</a> under the Foreign Agent Registration Act outlines a campaign spanning May 2008 to April 2011 and led by Joshua Trevino, a conservative pundit, who received $389,724.70 under the contract and paid smaller sums to a series of conservative writers.</p></blockquote>
<p>(other hyperlinks in the piece demonstrate articles praising Malaysia written by people the filing says Trevino paid, using money Trevino received to lobby for Malaysia).<br />
You might also be interested in the part of the article where <i>Trevino is quoted apologizing for his past lies about this question</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R_Young</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669847</link>
		<dc:creator>R_Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669847</guid>
		<description>I feel both honored and humbled by the respect that this comment thread has given me; I am the first to give the obligatory pop-culture reference demanded by this topic.  Apologies for any disrespect to the serious nature of the topic at hand.
.
...

WE MUST KILL THE MALAYSIAN PRIME MINISTER!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel both honored and humbled by the respect that this comment thread has given me; I am the first to give the obligatory pop-culture reference demanded by this topic.  Apologies for any disrespect to the serious nature of the topic at hand.<br />
.<br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>WE MUST KILL THE MALAYSIAN PRIME MINISTER!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669784</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669784</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;To accuse one&#039;s opponent of sodomy once may be regarded as malice; to do it twice looks like the government is decided by who yells, &quot;You&#039;re so gay!!!&quot; most loudly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To accuse one&#8217;s opponent of sodomy once may be regarded as malice; to do it twice looks like the government is decided by who yells, &#8220;You&#8217;re so gay!!!&#8221; most loudly.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty_MY</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669708</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty_MY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669708</guid>
		<description>Nuance? There&#039;s nothing nuance-y or subtle-ly about charging a 60+ year old with wife, kids and a bad back for &quot;non consensually&quot; sodomizing a healthy, strong 23-year old who, instead of spending more time with a doctor for a checkup, or a psychologist, went straight to the Prime Minister, who is also the 60+ year old man&#039;s rival for political power.
The guy says Mr. Ibrahim raped him. And proudly proclaimed the fact, like some nanny who had happy times with David Beckham hoping to make some money from the tabloids. Which traumatized victim does this?

And the proof besides his word? &quot;A mattress with a sample of Mr. Ibrahim&#039;s semen confiscated from a condo&quot;. Makes no sense. But which was still made admissible by the judge. 

And Mr. Ibrahim was acquitted. Then they charged him again like Antinous said, with no evidence. So that he could be put in jail away from his family and not run for elections against the current ruling party.

This is politically-motivated at the most ridiculous. They couldn&#039;t even dream of a more plausible fake charge. 

The judges, the cops, all rank and file have corrupt elements. 

They also killed a Mongolian model allegedly related to a submarine deal, blew up her body with military-grade C4 explosives. and deleted immigration records of her ever entering the country. This obviously involved high levels in the government, military and immigration departments.

Rest in peace, Altantuya Shaariibuu.

An opposition member, Teoh Beng Hock, was found dead while being interrogated over a trivial matter at the &quot;corruption office&quot;, and they said he committed suicide by jumping off the building. 

Billions are stolen every year from the public coffers through dubiously-awarded contracts. A large portion of government contracts in Malaysia are not awarded by open tenders, but instead given to cronies. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuance? There&#8217;s nothing nuance-y or subtle-ly about charging a 60+ year old with wife, kids and a bad back for &#8220;non consensually&#8221; sodomizing a healthy, strong 23-year old who, instead of spending more time with a doctor for a checkup, or a psychologist, went straight to the Prime Minister, who is also the 60+ year old man&#8217;s rival for political power.<br />
The guy says Mr. Ibrahim raped him. And proudly proclaimed the fact, like some nanny who had happy times with David Beckham hoping to make some money from the tabloids. Which traumatized victim does this?</p>
<p>And the proof besides his word? &#8220;A mattress with a sample of Mr. Ibrahim&#8217;s semen confiscated from a condo&#8221;. Makes no sense. But which was still made admissible by the judge. </p>
<p>And Mr. Ibrahim was acquitted. Then they charged him again like Antinous said, with no evidence. So that he could be put in jail away from his family and not run for elections against the current ruling party.</p>
<p>This is politically-motivated at the most ridiculous. They couldn&#8217;t even dream of a more plausible fake charge. </p>
<p>The judges, the cops, all rank and file have corrupt elements. </p>
<p>They also killed a Mongolian model allegedly related to a submarine deal, blew up her body with military-grade C4 explosives. and deleted immigration records of her ever entering the country. This obviously involved high levels in the government, military and immigration departments.</p>
<p>Rest in peace, Altantuya Shaariibuu.</p>
<p>An opposition member, Teoh Beng Hock, was found dead while being interrogated over a trivial matter at the &#8220;corruption office&#8221;, and they said he committed suicide by jumping off the building. </p>
<p>Billions are stolen every year from the public coffers through dubiously-awarded contracts. A large portion of government contracts in Malaysia are not awarded by open tenders, but instead given to cronies. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derick William Vance Hill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669686</link>
		<dc:creator>Derick William Vance Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669686</guid>
		<description>After the whole Matthew Inman kerfuffle (you know, the one where they made stuff up) why are we treating BuzzFeed like a reputable source? I want to hate on this Trevino character as much as the next guy, but I&#039;d like to know I have a leg to stand on first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the whole Matthew Inman kerfuffle (you know, the one where they made stuff up) why are we treating BuzzFeed like a reputable source? I want to hate on this Trevino character as much as the next guy, but I&#8217;d like to know I have a leg to stand on first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669667</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669667</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I don&#039;t really get that.  UK, Canada, Australia, Mordor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t really get that.  UK, Canada, Australia, Mordor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669662</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669662</guid>
		<description>??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peregrinus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669655</link>
		<dc:creator>peregrinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669655</guid>
		<description>They get away with this, they get away with it in 100% of the (civilized) world.

Because commonwealth. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They get away with this, they get away with it in 100% of the (civilized) world.</p>
<p>Because commonwealth. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peregrinus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669646</link>
		<dc:creator>peregrinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669646</guid>
		<description> I agree, but I was thus well-informed at age 7.  That simple sentence prescribing skepticism as a medicament against the torrential rain of propaganda and the influence of fakery strips out 90% of the believers, should they so choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I agree, but I was thus well-informed at age 7.  That simple sentence prescribing skepticism as a medicament against the torrential rain of propaganda and the influence of fakery strips out 90% of the believers, should they so choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SedanChair</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669638</link>
		<dc:creator>SedanChair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669638</guid>
		<description>They and all their ilk are but the tentacles of an eldritch beast known as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thebaffler.com/past/the_long_con&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Richard Viguerie&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They and all their ilk are but the tentacles of an eldritch beast known as the <a href="http://www.thebaffler.com/past/the_long_con" rel="nofollow">Richard Viguerie</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smut clyde</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669613</link>
		<dc:creator>smut clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669613</guid>
		<description> You read the comments? That was your first mistake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You read the comments? That was your first mistake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spacedmonkey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669609</link>
		<dc:creator>spacedmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669609</guid>
		<description>The real takeaway from this will be watching who publishes stoff from any of these guys after these revelations.   The reasonable assumption about any news organization that does put its imprimatur on anything from these guys in the future is that everything they publish about anything is a deliberate lie.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real takeaway from this will be watching who publishes stoff from any of these guys after these revelations.   The reasonable assumption about any news organization that does put its imprimatur on anything from these guys in the future is that everything they publish about anything is a deliberate lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spacedmonkey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669589</link>
		<dc:creator>spacedmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669589</guid>
		<description>Yeah, all you lefties can call them a bunch of fucking savages for arresting people for sodomy, but it&#039;s really more nuanced than that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, all you lefties can call them a bunch of fucking savages for arresting people for sodomy, but it&#8217;s really more nuanced than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669582</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669582</guid>
		<description>For those of you who don&#039;t read Malaysian Sodomy Weekly, this is the second time that Mr. Ibrahim has been arrested on sodomy charges with no evidence in order to get him out of politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who don&#8217;t read Malaysian Sodomy Weekly, this is the second time that Mr. Ibrahim has been arrested on sodomy charges with no evidence in order to get him out of politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Slemmons</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669554</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Slemmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669554</guid>
		<description>Well, like just about everything else about the modern conservatives, it&#039;s ALL about projection. They accuse all liberals of being funded by secret, shadowy George Soros because most of their opinionators are funded by secret, shadowy billionaires and organizations...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, like just about everything else about the modern conservatives, it&#8217;s ALL about projection. They accuse all liberals of being funded by secret, shadowy George Soros because most of their opinionators are funded by secret, shadowy billionaires and organizations&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren_Terra</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669548</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren_Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669548</guid>
		<description>I think the directness is fairly unusual. There is a whole range of conflicts of interests, such as underwritten think-tank gigs that free an opinionator to write, rarely against the interests of the sponsor; lucrative speaking gigs that reward a speaker for promoting views acceptable to the sponsor and give them a reason to continue to do so; or perhaps the most common sort, the free trip to &quot;see the facts for yourself&quot;, which is usually gifted to sympathetic writers and results in the expected sort of writing. But to actually pay an op-ed writer to sing your praises, directly rather than simply providing incentives for them to have a track record of doing so - that is more unusual. I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the directness is fairly unusual. There is a whole range of conflicts of interests, such as underwritten think-tank gigs that free an opinionator to write, rarely against the interests of the sponsor; lucrative speaking gigs that reward a speaker for promoting views acceptable to the sponsor and give them a reason to continue to do so; or perhaps the most common sort, the free trip to &#8220;see the facts for yourself&#8221;, which is usually gifted to sympathetic writers and results in the expected sort of writing. But to actually pay an op-ed writer to sing your praises, directly rather than simply providing incentives for them to have a track record of doing so &#8211; that is more unusual. I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderachievingSheep</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669542</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderachievingSheep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669542</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is there such a market in reading other people&#039;s opinions?&lt;/blockquote&gt; The irony of this comment... on a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is there such a market in reading other people&#8217;s opinions?</p></blockquote>
<p> The irony of this comment&#8230; on a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phlip</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669533</link>
		<dc:creator>Phlip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669533</guid>
		<description>What&#039;&#039;s the big deal? Our right-wing journalists take bribes routinely to oppose Democracy in Muslim countries. Starting with Saudi Arabia...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8221;s the big deal? Our right-wing journalists take bribes routinely to oppose Democracy in Muslim countries. Starting with Saudi Arabia&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/02/journalists-took-secret-money.html#comment-1669531</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=216289#comment-1669531</guid>
		<description>You cannot prosecute something if it has been legalized.  Welcome to the 21c.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot prosecute something if it has been legalized.  Welcome to the 21c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
