I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

### Watch these next

• PhosPhorious

Cool. . .  but how the hell. . . ?

Does each arm measure a strip?

• relawson

That’s what i’m guessing. Measures from when arm goes up, to when arm goes down, then adds it all up for the dial.

• CaptainPedge

Amazing, but it looks like it would rip your arm off as soon as look at you

• PhosPhorious

”Amazing, BECAUSE it looks like it would rip your arm off as soon as look at you”

FIFY.  :-)

• steve_wildstrom

A planimeter, of which I have a couple, is a mechanical device that does more or less the same thing–more slowly and requiring more operator skill. It traces the outside of an irregular shape and computes the area through a hardware–as in wheels, gears, and arms–implementation of Green’s Theorem, an algorithm for computing the double integral of a surface by a path integral of its boundary. Newer planimeters are electronic and not nearly as much fun, or as good to look at. The instruction booklet that came with my K+E planimeter, bought on eBay, actually explains the math of how it works.

• Marla

I am enjoying how much the mechanism reminds me of piano keys/hammer/frames.

• http://repeaterband.com skeletoncityrepeater

This machine looks really ingenious and very accurate, but I don’t think it’s performing calculus, at least not what we commonly consider calculus. It’s measuring discrete strips of area and mechanically adding them together as a sum on the main dial. This machine could probably be used to demonstrate the fundamentals of calculus though. That planimeter described above seems like an implementation of calculus.

What you described is calculus.

• KWillets

It’s just not infinitesimal calculus.  Finitesimal?

• knappa

Discrete! As opposed to the indiscreet kind.

• Paul Renault

Or Simpson’s Rule.

• Charlie B

Nope, trap rule.  Simpson’s uses parabolas doesn’t it?

• Paul Renault

Yes, but I was thinking the parts where you divide the area under the curve into strips.  The Trapezium Rule is closer to what the machine is doing, but Simpson’s Rule also uses the same trick.

• Ito Kagehisa

I’ve always heard it called the trapezoidal rule, myself.  First thing I learned in calculus, only thing I ever needed… just program your computer to start at one and increment the number of trapezoids until the result suddenly goes loony tunes – that’s where you’ve reached the limit of precision of your device, so take the last result before the meltdown and that’s the area under your curve, or close enough for any real-world physical need.  You can do this with Simpson’s rule too, I suppose.

• http://repeaterband.com skeletoncityrepeater

No, what the other guy described (the planimeter) is performing calculus. This machine seems to use the ‘Method Of Exhaustion’ to approximate the area of the shape in rectangular strips of discrete width and possibly of discrete increments of height. This makes it a mechanical brute-force computer of area. As someone else pointed out, and as I pointed out in my comment, this machine demonstrates how calculus works, but doesn’t perform it. It doesn’t derive from the curve what the area is.

• retchdog

the planimeter is more elegant and much more precise, but they are both “just measuring” approximations to an integral. operator error and mechanical tolerances are never exact and if you want to get ridiculously pedantic, there is always the planck length…
the method displayed above is much more practical for directly measuring solid objects rather than just closed plane curves.

It’s measuring discrete strips of area and mechanically adding them together as a sum on the main dial.

Take the limit of that function as the number of strips approaches infinity, and you will have invented the integral. Calculus!

• http://repeaterband.com skeletoncityrepeater

Indeed it does. But it isn’t actually performing calculus. It’s just measuring.

it’s calculating Riemann sums

Now play it back with blades and cut later things into the approximate shape of the first thing.

• morcheeba

but play it back 10% bigger. And hide it in this machine, so every time you put a hide in, a larger one comes out.

That’s enough, you two.

• shutz

The machine in the background on the freeze-frame that is displayed before you play the video looks like a mutant Dalek.

• unclegabby

It’s called an air compressor.

• noah django

very cool.  y’all might also want to check out this post from Mark last year about cams:
http://boingboing.net/2011/03/09/using-cams-to-solve.html

I *think* this might be the patent for this machine….. (from back when a patent actual was for something novel and was required to actually do something)

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/2021218.html

• retchdog

78 years ago, some disgruntled engineers were grumbling to each other after work about how this device is trivial, and back in their educations/apprenticeships they did basically the same thing with stuff lying around the lab, and if you want to see a real patent, just look at James Watt’s steam engine but man of course he got screwed out of the money, just like every real innovator, and…

• siloxane

Pretty clever machine. I’ve always enjoyed Dirty Jobs, so am still kind of bummed out that Discovery has cancelled it.

• morcheeba

:-(  I’ll take a good educational program over faked drama any day.

• robuluz

Mike Rowe is awesome.

• Antinous / Moderator

Is he allowed to wear a shirt?  Isn’t partial nudity in his contract?

• robuluz

Workplace safety regulations. They’ll send in hired goons, make no mistake.

• userw014

The first computers available for (wealthy) home use were analog – very suitable for implementing algorithms of calculus.

See: http://www.heathkit-museum.com/computers/hvmec-1.shtml

• phuzz

“It’s pre-metric…”
Well, maybe, the metric system was invented in 1799 according to wikipedia, so unlikely
“It’s pre-roman numerals”
No.