<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old cold-cream ad touts beautifying benefits of&#160;radioactivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrumpySteen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1676164</link>
		<dc:creator>GrumpySteen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1676164</guid>
		<description> http://www.cosmeticsandskin.com/companies/dorothy-gray.php

Scroll way way way down to the bottom.  Apparently there was a series of buyouts and Dorothy Gray products wound up being available primarily in Argentina and Uraguay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> http://www.cosmeticsandskin.com/companies/dorothy-gray.php</p>
<p>Scroll way way way down to the bottom.  Apparently there was a series of buyouts and Dorothy Gray products wound up being available primarily in Argentina and Uraguay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyrofrog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675904</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyrofrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675904</guid>
		<description>On a somewhat related note, my parents and some of their peers have described &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe-fitting_fluoroscope&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;putting their foot in an x-ray machine at the shoe store.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a somewhat related note, my parents and some of their peers have described <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe-fitting_fluoroscope" rel="nofollow">putting their foot in an x-ray machine at the shoe store.</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675887</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675887</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine recently had prostate cancer. I say &quot;had&quot; because he went through radiation treatment and is now considered cured. So please don&#039;t forget there are health benefits to radiation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine recently had prostate cancer. I say &#8220;had&#8221; because he went through radiation treatment and is now considered cured. So please don&#8217;t forget there are health benefits to radiation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otterhead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675883</link>
		<dc:creator>otterhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675883</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s particularly pedantic to point out that the headline of this video is the complete opposite of what the video actually is :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s particularly pedantic to point out that the headline of this video is the complete opposite of what the video actually is :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill_mcgonigle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675826</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_mcgonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675826</guid>
		<description>this might be a thing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this might be a thing: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceinthedistance</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675820</link>
		<dc:creator>voiceinthedistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675820</guid>
		<description>The beautifying secret they don&#039;t mention is Marie Curie Skin Rejuvenating Clay Mask.  

Dorothy Gray Salon Cold Cream is a fine way to remove the aforementioned beauty product, leaving behind nothing but a healthy glow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beautifying secret they don&#8217;t mention is Marie Curie Skin Rejuvenating Clay Mask.  </p>
<p>Dorothy Gray Salon Cold Cream is a fine way to remove the aforementioned beauty product, leaving behind nothing but a healthy glow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petzl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675813</link>
		<dc:creator>Petzl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675813</guid>
		<description>It would appear that they were also trying to dog-whistle this as a &quot;dual-use&quot; product:  great for makeup removal, sure, but indispensable for removing radiation after an atomic blast. No doomsday prepper should be without it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that they were also trying to dog-whistle this as a &#8220;dual-use&#8221; product:  great for makeup removal, sure, but indispensable for removing radiation after an atomic blast. No doomsday prepper should be without it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendyjoy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675805</link>
		<dc:creator>wendyjoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 03:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675805</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Radium Water worked fined until his jaw came off&quot;


http://scienceofknowing.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/the-radium-water-worked-fine-until-his-jaw-came-off/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Radium Water worked fined until his jaw came off&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://scienceofknowing.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/the-radium-water-worked-fine-until-his-jaw-came-off/" rel="nofollow">http://scienceofknowing.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/the-radium-water-worked-fine-until-his-jaw-came-off/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675792</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675792</guid>
		<description>MST3K Re: The Incredible Melting Man Quotes Thread

Dr. Loring runs the Geiger counter over the dead nurse:
Ted: &quot;Great&quot;
Mike: &quot;She&#039;s full of crickets&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MST3K Re: The Incredible Melting Man Quotes Thread</p>
<p>Dr. Loring runs the Geiger counter over the dead nurse:<br />
Ted: &#8220;Great&#8221;<br />
Mike: &#8220;She&#8217;s full of crickets&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: efergus3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675782</link>
		<dc:creator>efergus3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675782</guid>
		<description>You can still get CDV-700 geiger counters on eBay for around $100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can still get CDV-700 geiger counters on eBay for around $100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlenBlank</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675774</link>
		<dc:creator>GlenBlank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675774</guid>
		<description>Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) has &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/quackcures/quackcures.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; a nice page of photos&lt;/a&gt; of a wide variety of radioactive &#039;health&#039;  devices, both historic and present-day, as well as an interesting &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.orau.org/ptp/articlesstories/quackstory.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; about them by Paul Frame of ORAU

Caveat lector: If using irradiated dirt as a tracer shocks and astounds you, you&#039;d better brace yourself for these. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) has <a href="https://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/quackcures/quackcures.htm" rel="nofollow"> a nice page of photos</a> of a wide variety of radioactive &#8216;health&#8217;  devices, both historic and present-day, as well as an interesting <a href="https://www.orau.org/ptp/articlesstories/quackstory.htm" rel="nofollow">article</a> about them by Paul Frame of ORAU</p>
<p>Caveat lector: If using irradiated dirt as a tracer shocks and astounds you, you&#8217;d better brace yourself for these. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamSam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675768</link>
		<dc:creator>SamSam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675768</guid>
		<description>Lakelady clearly understood what was going on in the ad -- her comment that Cory quoted is spot-on. I guess Cory didn&#039;t really read it, but it&#039;s only funny because he went out of his way to preemptively dismiss the comments.

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with someone who posts hundreds of items each week getting confused over the odd one, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lakelady clearly understood what was going on in the ad &#8212; her comment that Cory quoted is spot-on. I guess Cory didn&#8217;t really read it, but it&#8217;s only funny because he went out of his way to preemptively dismiss the comments.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with someone who posts hundreds of items each week getting confused over the odd one, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M. O'Hara</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675749</link>
		<dc:creator>John M. O'Hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675749</guid>
		<description>Yes, Cory missed the methodology of the ad entirely. Headline fail.

He&#039;s probably not old enough to remember what a buzzword &quot;fallout&quot; was in the 50s, somewhat like &quot;global warming&quot; today. And people were genuinely afraid of coming home covered in radioactive particulates. A goop that left your face free of Geiger clicks would have appealed to those fears. And every suburbanite was supposed to have a Geiger counter handy in their fallout shelters, right next to the Spam. I&#039;d guess the &quot;Atomic Test Booklet&quot; (!) at the end of the ad describes how to scan your own face. Geiger counters as beauty aids ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Cory missed the methodology of the ad entirely. Headline fail.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s probably not old enough to remember what a buzzword &#8220;fallout&#8221; was in the 50s, somewhat like &#8220;global warming&#8221; today. And people were genuinely afraid of coming home covered in radioactive particulates. A goop that left your face free of Geiger clicks would have appealed to those fears. And every suburbanite was supposed to have a Geiger counter handy in their fallout shelters, right next to the Spam. I&#8217;d guess the &#8220;Atomic Test Booklet&#8221; (!) at the end of the ad describes how to scan your own face. Geiger counters as beauty aids &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madopal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675748</link>
		<dc:creator>madopal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675748</guid>
		<description> Exactly, here&#039;s the transcription:
&quot;Busy you, in and out of doors every day.  Think how much dust and dirt settle on your skin. And make up clings to your skin and clogs pores. That&#039;s why your face needs a thorough cleansing each day. And that&#039;s why cleansing tests were made by an independent testing laboratory. This same kind of dirt was made just radioactive enough to register on a Geiger counter. Leading cleansing creams, complexion soaps, and Dorothy Gray Salon Cold Cream were used to remove this dirt. The Geiger counter proved that Dorothy Gray Salon Cold Cream cleanses up to two and a half times more thoroughly than any soap or other cleansing cream tested.&quot;

So they were just using irradiated dirt, which they probably didn&#039;t actually, do, seeing as how the commercial was probably made by Don Draper.  You can almost hear the &quot;ooo, atomic age&quot; pitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Exactly, here&#8217;s the transcription:<br />
&#8220;Busy you, in and out of doors every day.  Think how much dust and dirt settle on your skin. And make up clings to your skin and clogs pores. That&#8217;s why your face needs a thorough cleansing each day. And that&#8217;s why cleansing tests were made by an independent testing laboratory. This same kind of dirt was made just radioactive enough to register on a Geiger counter. Leading cleansing creams, complexion soaps, and Dorothy Gray Salon Cold Cream were used to remove this dirt. The Geiger counter proved that Dorothy Gray Salon Cold Cream cleanses up to two and a half times more thoroughly than any soap or other cleansing cream tested.&#8221;</p>
<p>So they were just using irradiated dirt, which they probably didn&#8217;t actually, do, seeing as how the commercial was probably made by Don Draper.  You can almost hear the &#8220;ooo, atomic age&#8221; pitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675743</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675743</guid>
		<description>Exactly.  But this headline looked better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.  But this headline looked better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James S Robbins</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675736</link>
		<dc:creator>James S Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675736</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t they using radioactive dirt as a metric to show how the cold cream  removes it? That is, not doing what the headline of the article suggests?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t they using radioactive dirt as a metric to show how the cold cream  removes it? That is, not doing what the headline of the article suggests?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675732</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675732</guid>
		<description>Purportedly radioactive cosmetics were fairly common in the 1910s-1930s. (In reality, most of them were about as radioactive as dishwater.) As noted above, the 1950s were actually quite radiophobic, for obvious reasons, and this commercial is selling the &lt;i&gt;absence&lt;/i&gt; of radioactive schmutz.

But yeah, not that long before, radioactivity was a selling point in and of itself. It connoted vigor, energy, and light, and besides, everyone knew it could do weird and wonderful things to the body. It wasn&#039;t that hard to convince people that just a tiny little pinch of it would give you that, ahem, healthy glow.

I wrote a whole pedantic dissertation on it once!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purportedly radioactive cosmetics were fairly common in the 1910s-1930s. (In reality, most of them were about as radioactive as dishwater.) As noted above, the 1950s were actually quite radiophobic, for obvious reasons, and this commercial is selling the <i>absence</i> of radioactive schmutz.</p>
<p>But yeah, not that long before, radioactivity was a selling point in and of itself. It connoted vigor, energy, and light, and besides, everyone knew it could do weird and wonderful things to the body. It wasn&#8217;t that hard to convince people that just a tiny little pinch of it would give you that, ahem, healthy glow.</p>
<p>I wrote a whole pedantic dissertation on it once!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Badger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675731</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675731</guid>
		<description>Yeah. There *were* health tonics and such hyping the power of radioactivity in the early 20th century, but they were well before the 1950s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. There *were* health tonics and such hyping the power of radioactivity in the early 20th century, but they were well before the 1950s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tejanarusa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/10/old-cold-cream-ad-touts-beauti.html#comment-1675716</link>
		<dc:creator>Tejanarusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217792#comment-1675716</guid>
		<description>I remember Dorothy Gray...whatever happened to it, I wonder?  But...a pedantic note, you might want to re-watch the commercial. It actually only uses the radioactivity to measure how clean, that is, how much dirt is removed by one product versus another. Not actually hyping radioactivity as a &quot;beautifying&quot; agent.  Just that one cleanser removes &quot;all&quot; the dirt, as measured by, I presume, 0 clicks. 
suppose it&#039;s too late to write for the details, hmm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Dorothy Gray&#8230;whatever happened to it, I wonder?  But&#8230;a pedantic note, you might want to re-watch the commercial. It actually only uses the radioactivity to measure how clean, that is, how much dirt is removed by one product versus another. Not actually hyping radioactivity as a &#8220;beautifying&#8221; agent.  Just that one cleanser removes &#8220;all&#8221; the dirt, as measured by, I presume, 0 clicks.<br />
suppose it&#8217;s too late to write for the details, hmm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
