<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cats and optical illusions: Now with control&#160;experiments!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cola Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1677372</link>
		<dc:creator>Cola Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1677372</guid>
		<description>Well... I&#039;ve just taken extensive video showing my cat laying on the test and then trying to eat the control. Then she attacked the tiny pieces she ripped off of it. And my other cat tried to attack her by biting her neck during the test.

Um... hm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; I&#8217;ve just taken extensive video showing my cat laying on the test and then trying to eat the control. Then she attacked the tiny pieces she ripped off of it. And my other cat tried to attack her by biting her neck during the test.</p>
<p>Um&#8230; hm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmarsden</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1677153</link>
		<dc:creator>gmarsden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1677153</guid>
		<description>It looks to me that the non-rotating one has radial lines running straight out from the centre, while the lines in the rotating one form spirals away from the centre (in both clockwise and counter-clockwise directions). 

Ah, I see now that this is a result of the offsetting colours. So I would say that it&#039;s not the order of the colours *within* a ring that matters, but the colours shift as you move from ring to ring.

Edit: This was meant to be a reply to jimkirk above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks to me that the non-rotating one has radial lines running straight out from the centre, while the lines in the rotating one form spirals away from the centre (in both clockwise and counter-clockwise directions). </p>
<p>Ah, I see now that this is a result of the offsetting colours. So I would say that it&#8217;s not the order of the colours *within* a ring that matters, but the colours shift as you move from ring to ring.</p>
<p>Edit: This was meant to be a reply to jimkirk above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felicitas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676801</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicitas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676801</guid>
		<description>I just tried the circles from the link on my cat. I used the laptop, so he wouldn&#039;t be distracted by paper. He was so unimpressed that it was nearly impossible to keep him in front of the screen, he just didn&#039;t get what I wanted him to do. This is interesting, as he is sometimes distracted by gifs or videos I watch when he is on my lap. He even tried to catch the figure on the screen one or two times. So I would say, he doesn&#039;t notice the optical illusion at all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried the circles from the link on my cat. I used the laptop, so he wouldn&#8217;t be distracted by paper. He was so unimpressed that it was nearly impossible to keep him in front of the screen, he just didn&#8217;t get what I wanted him to do. This is interesting, as he is sometimes distracted by gifs or videos I watch when he is on my lap. He even tried to catch the figure on the screen one or two times. So I would say, he doesn&#8217;t notice the optical illusion at all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurasbadideas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676522</link>
		<dc:creator>laurasbadideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676522</guid>
		<description>Over the weekend, I tried this using Escher&#039;s &quot;Circle Limit With Butterflies&quot; as a control image. One of my cats ignored both pictures; the other ignored the rotating snakes but was fascinated by the Escher painting: http://youtu.be/KzV0k9j_uB8

Tonight I tried using all three pictures (the illusion, the &quot;official&quot; control, and the Escher painting), and my cats didn&#039;t really react to any of them: http://youtu.be/4gOAQRwGVh4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, I tried this using Escher&#8217;s &#8220;Circle Limit With Butterflies&#8221; as a control image. One of my cats ignored both pictures; the other ignored the rotating snakes but was fascinated by the Escher painting: <a href="http://youtu.be/KzV0k9j_uB8" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/KzV0k9j_uB8</a></p>
<p>Tonight I tried using all three pictures (the illusion, the &#8220;official&#8221; control, and the Escher painting), and my cats didn&#8217;t really react to any of them: <a href="http://youtu.be/4gOAQRwGVh4" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/4gOAQRwGVh4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Faris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676418</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Faris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676418</guid>
		<description>Oh, I see... I was only focused on the outside ring of each circle. Now that you&#039;ve pointed it out, I see the difference. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I see&#8230; I was only focused on the outside ring of each circle. Now that you&#8217;ve pointed it out, I see the difference. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rizz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676235</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676235</guid>
		<description>Yeah, only the first one on the page seemed to rotate for me, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, only the first one on the page seemed to rotate for me, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimkirk</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676212</link>
		<dc:creator>jimkirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676212</guid>
		<description>rotating:  green white blue.
Non-rotating:  green white green, blue white blue

The red/blue one doesn&#039;t rotate for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rotating:  green white blue.<br />
Non-rotating:  green white green, blue white blue</p>
<p>The red/blue one doesn&#8217;t rotate for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Faris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676209</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Faris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676209</guid>
		<description>Hey, so why does one seem like it&#039;s moving, and the other doesn&#039;t? I tried to discern the difference, but I can&#039;t spot it. Same colors, same orientation. What&#039;s the crucial difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, so why does one seem like it&#8217;s moving, and the other doesn&#8217;t? I tried to discern the difference, but I can&#8217;t spot it. Same colors, same orientation. What&#8217;s the crucial difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rizz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676193</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676193</guid>
		<description>That would cause your cat to both attack and not attack the paper until you opened your eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would cause your cat to both attack and not attack the paper until you opened your eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorpho</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorpho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676141</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never actually seen the illusion designed specifically so as not to rotate.  At this stage it is rather unnerving seeing something that clearly looks like it should be moving that isn&#039;t moving.

Perhaps next we can have a grid of black squares which definitely do not have any grey squares in between them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never actually seen the illusion designed specifically so as not to rotate.  At this stage it is rather unnerving seeing something that clearly looks like it should be moving that isn&#8217;t moving.</p>
<p>Perhaps next we can have a grid of black squares which definitely do not have any grey squares in between them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doniphon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676060</link>
		<dc:creator>doniphon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676060</guid>
		<description> No, no, no.... true double-blind would require you to tape your eyes shut as well as your cat&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> No, no, no&#8230;. true double-blind would require you to tape your eyes shut as well as your cat&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: relawson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676051</link>
		<dc:creator>relawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676051</guid>
		<description>I just tried it with both eyes on my cat taped shut. It did not react to either illustration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried it with both eyes on my cat taped shut. It did not react to either illustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doniphon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676039</link>
		<dc:creator>doniphon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676039</guid>
		<description>Next Step: Double-Blind! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next Step: Double-Blind! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theophrastvs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/cats-and-optical-illusions-no.html#comment-1676034</link>
		<dc:creator>theophrastvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=217992#comment-1676034</guid>
		<description>egads, Ms Koerth-Baker, you ought to be included as a minor author or at least in the acknowledgements  (...of the resulting paper)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>egads, Ms Koerth-Baker, you ought to be included as a minor author or at least in the acknowledgements  (&#8230;of the resulting paper)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
