Boing Boing editor/partner and tech culture journalist Xeni Jardin hosts and produces Boing Boing's in-flight TV channel on Virgin America airlines (#10 on the dial), and writes about living with breast cancer. Diagnosed in 2011. @xeni on Twitter. email: xeni@boingboing.net.

  • http://imcravingpresidency.tumblr.com/ SedanChair

    <– God Damn America

    • millie fink

      I think s/he already has.

  • Jim Gorski

    I remember the first time I read BB.  I sent an email to the site admin asking them why they didn’t use BB.com.  The human reply made me a fan and I’ve been back ever since.

    However the marriage (years past a honeymoon) is over.

    Government and soldiers do terrible things sometimes and none of it should be hidden from the people that they serve.  We (the people) have a moral obligation to demand that from our government and our military.

    But some person who has access (however limited) to information blindly putting it out on the internet should not be celebrated.

    Perhaps this one time – some good came from this.

    Perhaps next time – people who volunteer to serve others (soldiers, etc.) will be killed as a result of information release.

    The military has channels for disagreeing with the chain of command, but you get significantly less press coverage by using them.

    I’ll miss you guys – it’s been fun.

    Cya.

    • millie fink

      But some person who has access (however limited) to information blindly putting it out on the internet should not be celebrated.

      “Blindly”? You are clearly not paying attention.

      Either that or you’re wearing your own (ideological) blinders.

      And I for one applaud BB for caring overtly about politics. In human interactions, EVERYTHING is political. Ignoring important stories like this one would also be a political act.

      • Jim Gorski

        Blindly in the sense that he did not review all the material and then post only specific information.

        • http://www.facebook.com/cheryl.anderson.965 Cheryl Anderson

          Your premise is off, Jim.That’s exactly what Manning DID do! He shared selectively – didn’t publish classified material, or so I’ve heard from several sources. 

    • Pink Frankenstein

      Please let the door hit you on the way out.

    • Brainspore

      Perhaps next time – people who volunteer to serve others (soldiers, etc.) will be killed as a result of information release.

      It’s entirely possible that American service members were killed in retaliation for the Mai Lai massacre. That doesn’t mean that the people who sacrificed their careers to bring those horrible events to light betrayed their country.

    • http://boingboing.net/ Rob Beschizza

      “Conservative Boing Boing readers who haven’t really noticed what neighborhood they are in” are like WWII mines floating around the North Sea. You never quite know if they will suddenly explode, continue to bob around harmlessly, or become delightfully entertaining beach art.

    • Mark_Frauenfelder
      • Antinous / Moderator

        And notarized.

    • NoBigGovDuh

      According to his testimony he went through the info it was not as blind as we have been lead to think.

      Even if it was “blind” that is the new reality given the amount of information stored compared to the past.

      • http://twitter.com/bradbelltv Brad Bell

        More specifically, all the documents are categorised by security level. Manning explains how the low security, general consumption documents were actually more interesting than the top secret level documents. He chose to release documents with the lowest security level, ie. nothing that would have any significant impact on life and death. He did this because he worked on this for hours, days and weeks, months. In contrast, most people’s opinions on his actions are formed based on 2 minutes of what the media reports say when it has nothing to report.

        Like Chavez – and Assange – this is one of those cases where the media plays an overt propaganda function, reporting on toilet habits and sexual preferences, grooming, hearsay, conspiracy, and whatever the government tells them to say when they have nothing factually interesting to report. In this world, essentially “bad” people do things for deep seated psychological reasons. They do not act rationally. They are mad. All that is left to discuss is the depths of their depravity.
        “They must be egomaniacs to be so driven by sex and ego and narcism.” 
        “Yes, it stands to reason they are.” 
        And so everyone agreed they were. And just as they were tucking back in to their tomato soup, a drone strike evaporated their lovely little house and the neighbours on each side. It is later reported to have been the result of a practical joke gone wrong. Drone pilots will now be housed in individual, sealed cockpits to protect them from distracting paper projectiles. No one was injured in the incident.

        • Jim Gorski

          Blindly in that he did not read them all – and is not experienced or knowledgeable enough to truly determine what would have any impact on ‘life or death’.  I agree that the media is ‘steering’ this discussion.  Unfortunately BB is (it seems) over correcting in my humble opinion.

          • http://twitter.com/kpkpkp Kevin Pierce

            Hey, I thought you did a rage-quit yesterday.   You leaving or what?

    • TheMudshark

      Oh noes! After officialy announcing your departure as a reader of Wired now you´re leaving boingboing? Admit it, you just want to ruin the techy leftist happy mutant blogosphere in one fell swoop of evil brilliance.

    • madopal

       Good luck Mr. Gorski.

    • rtb61

       The art of propaganda, perhaps, maybe, forget the facts, ignore the truth and make judgement on current actions based around pretend scenarios.
      The US military was involved in perverting the course of justice, with holding evidence of crimes, falsifying evidence and all of those who failed to report it are guilty of being accessories to crime before, during and after the fact.
      The ludicrous claim is the truth would have harmed the war, rather than the reality it simply protects the negligent and the incompetent.
      This court case is all about protecting lies and those who knowingly and with intent breach their oath to the constitution which they have sworn to uphold in order to protect the criminal activity of the US military and the select few who live protected existences within the US military, no crime too great, no incompetence too excessive.

  • NoBigGovDuh

    I THINK WE NOW HAVE THE VOCABULARY NEEDED TO USE FOIA AND PROBE THE MILITARY BETTER THAN EVER, DUE TO ALL THE DETAILS GIVEN IN HIS TESTIMONY

  • gregor diepenbroek

    Thanks for posting this.

  • http://twitter.com/trempls tré

    Here is the mythical “good apple.” Amongst all of the bullshit behavior that gets passed off, here’s the one person stepping up and doing the right thing.

    Remember: the military runs this government. The military’s interests are this government’s interests.

  • kanawah

    Instead of being prosecuted, manning should be honored and given a medal.
    Secrecy is the greatest enemy of our nation.