<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TOM THE DANCING BUG: Judge Scalia, in &quot;Legislative Soul&#160;Search&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbasch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1679595</link>
		<dc:creator>pbasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1679595</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t there an odd inconsistency of Scalia decisions... the one on the 2nd amendment, where the text about a militia was treated as so much chuffa (i.e., pointless verbiage), and another one where it was asserted specifically that the founders (or whoever) knew EXACTLY what they were doing and not a SINGLE WORD could be disregarded. I can&#039;t remember that second one. Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there an odd inconsistency of Scalia decisions&#8230; the one on the 2nd amendment, where the text about a militia was treated as so much chuffa (i.e., pointless verbiage), and another one where it was asserted specifically that the founders (or whoever) knew EXACTLY what they were doing and not a SINGLE WORD could be disregarded. I can&#8217;t remember that second one. Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary_Bos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1679541</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary_Bos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1679541</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just sent an email to RB, asking if a nomination might be in order. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just sent an email to RB, asking if a nomination might be in order. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Napsterista</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1679480</link>
		<dc:creator>John Napsterista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1679480</guid>
		<description>Here’s the info:  http://www.herbblockfoundation.org/herblock-prize/rules-eligibility

tl;dr: No entry fee, winner gets a $15,000 tax-free cash award and a trophy from Tiffany &amp; Co. Second place gets a $5,000 tax-free cash award.  Entries must be &quot;published&quot; works and can be submitted by the cartoonist his/her/itself or by publisher of said Work.  Bolling’s not gonna submit his own work, not even after a Louis Maltby-like night of tortured introspection, so we’ll have to get his publisher to do it behind his back.  Hmmm, not sure if web publication counts as &quot;publication&quot; for purposes of the prize, so boingboing might not be able to submit it.  Whoa, wait....  Boingboing &lt;i&gt;used to be&lt;/i&gt; a paper publication.  We&#039;re gonna need Percival Dunwoody&#039;s help on this one.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the info:  <a href="http://www.herbblockfoundation.org/herblock-prize/rules-eligibility" rel="nofollow">http://www.herbblockfoundation.org/herblock-prize/rules-eligibility</a></p>
<p>tl;dr: No entry fee, winner gets a $15,000 tax-free cash award and a trophy from Tiffany &amp; Co. Second place gets a $5,000 tax-free cash award.  Entries must be &#8220;published&#8221; works and can be submitted by the cartoonist his/her/itself or by publisher of said Work.  Bolling’s not gonna submit his own work, not even after a Louis Maltby-like night of tortured introspection, so we’ll have to get his publisher to do it behind his back.  Hmmm, not sure if web publication counts as &#8220;publication&#8221; for purposes of the prize, so boingboing might not be able to submit it.  Whoa, wait&#8230;.  Boingboing <i>used to be</i> a paper publication.  We&#8217;re gonna need Percival Dunwoody&#8217;s help on this one.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagodjur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678772</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagodjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678772</guid>
		<description> Justice Scalia, did you google yourself again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Justice Scalia, did you google yourself again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary_Bos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678666</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary_Bos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678666</guid>
		<description>Thirded. Tell us here, won&#039;t you, if you find out about that nomination?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thirded. Tell us here, won&#8217;t you, if you find out about that nomination?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie B</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678576</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678576</guid>
		<description>&lt;Strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;Minority&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; of states with a history of voter suppression?

I thought this was a comic about America!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><i>Minority</i></strong> of states with a history of voter suppression?</p>
<p>I thought this was a comic about America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattAtDoyle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678411</link>
		<dc:creator>MattAtDoyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678411</guid>
		<description>I have no idea what&#039;s going on here, but I enjoyed the pretty pictures. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what&#8217;s going on here, but I enjoyed the pretty pictures. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678158</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678158</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve long been fascinated by Scalia&#039;s stated belief that the Constitution must be interpreted according to what its original authors intended and his decisions which reflect a much deeper belief that the original authors were a bunch of wishy-washy liberals whose document only annoys him. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long been fascinated by Scalia&#8217;s stated belief that the Constitution must be interpreted according to what its original authors intended and his decisions which reflect a much deeper belief that the original authors were a bunch of wishy-washy liberals whose document only annoys him. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678115</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678115</guid>
		<description>You mean there&#039;s not much effort in him contemplating which decision of his would be most pleasing to people like the Koch Bros and then choosing accordingly?

Scalia alone is enough reason to laugh when people babble about the sacredness of constitution as if it was chiseled by God on a mystical monolith... serious credibility probs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean there&#8217;s not much effort in him contemplating which decision of his would be most pleasing to people like the Koch Bros and then choosing accordingly?</p>
<p>Scalia alone is enough reason to laugh when people babble about the sacredness of constitution as if it was chiseled by God on a mystical monolith&#8230; serious credibility probs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Napsterista</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678073</link>
		<dc:creator>John Napsterista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678073</guid>
		<description> Seconded.  Let&#039;s look into how to get him nominated. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Seconded.  Let&#8217;s look into how to get him nominated. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678026</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678026</guid>
		<description>The real joke is Scalia putting that much effort into coming to a legal decision. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real joke is Scalia putting that much effort into coming to a legal decision. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR Anderson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678021</link>
		<dc:creator>RR Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678021</guid>
		<description>When is Bolling going to win the Herblock prize?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is Bolling going to win the Herblock prize?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Krause</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678015</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Krause</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678015</guid>
		<description>I like that there are no female justices in Scalie&#039;s world. Weird that Thomas speaks instead of simply nodding though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that there are no female justices in Scalie&#8217;s world. Weird that Thomas speaks instead of simply nodding though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhosPhorious</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/tom-the-dancing-bug-judge-sca-2.html#comment-1678014</link>
		<dc:creator>PhosPhorious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218361#comment-1678014</guid>
		<description>Scalia:  50% Punisher, 50% Doctor Strange.

100% Awesome. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scalia:  50% Punisher, 50% Doctor Strange.</p>
<p>100% Awesome. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
