<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kickstarting a cheap, versatile, sophisticated 3D printed robotic&#160;hand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html#comment-1680090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218702#comment-1680090</guid>
		<description>A few ounces makes it as effective as one of those pincer-type prosthetics. I used lifting strength as a benchmark because it&#039;s a clear comparison, but the fingers also have to exert sufficient force to hold things between fingers. I doubt these will. 

Also, there are much more advanced hands like the Shadow hand that, while expensive, still can&#039;t come anywhere close to the dexterity of the human hand. The hand above is probably 5 years from application to prosthetics. Again, it&#039;s great that these dudes are doing this and selling it with the prosthetics angle, but the reality is, it&#039;s not going to be suitable for that purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few ounces makes it as effective as one of those pincer-type prosthetics. I used lifting strength as a benchmark because it&#8217;s a clear comparison, but the fingers also have to exert sufficient force to hold things between fingers. I doubt these will. </p>
<p>Also, there are much more advanced hands like the Shadow hand that, while expensive, still can&#8217;t come anywhere close to the dexterity of the human hand. The hand above is probably 5 years from application to prosthetics. Again, it&#8217;s great that these dudes are doing this and selling it with the prosthetics angle, but the reality is, it&#8217;s not going to be suitable for that purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html#comment-1680078</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218702#comment-1680078</guid>
		<description>Nope. Machining labor is not free. It&#039;s pretty expensive because it&#039;s a skilled craft and you need years of experience to do it correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope. Machining labor is not free. It&#8217;s pretty expensive because it&#8217;s a skilled craft and you need years of experience to do it correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html#comment-1679803</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218702#comment-1679803</guid>
		<description>What, this is the 21c.  Labor is practically free, and the price is dropping fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, this is the 21c.  Labor is practically free, and the price is dropping fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Jones</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html#comment-1679783</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218702#comment-1679783</guid>
		<description>Remember, you&#039;re talking about something for PEOPLE WHO DO NOT HAVE A HAND. A robotic hand that can be used to help put on clothes, eat food, tie shoes, hold phones, etc. could be life changing even if it&#039;s not as capable as a much more expensive hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, you&#8217;re talking about something for PEOPLE WHO DO NOT HAVE A HAND. A robotic hand that can be used to help put on clothes, eat food, tie shoes, hold phones, etc. could be life changing even if it&#8217;s not as capable as a much more expensive hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hypnosifl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html#comment-1679617</link>
		<dc:creator>hypnosifl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218702#comment-1679617</guid>
		<description>&quot;A few ounces&quot; could cover a lot of things that are useful to grasp in everyday life--utensils, writing instruments, remote controls, books, phones, etc. Most people don&#039;t actually need to lift heavier things very often, I think, and a person with one of these could be aware of the weight limits and switch it for something less dextrous but more sturdy when needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A few ounces&#8221; could cover a lot of things that are useful to grasp in everyday life&#8211;utensils, writing instruments, remote controls, books, phones, etc. Most people don&#8217;t actually need to lift heavier things very often, I think, and a person with one of these could be aware of the weight limits and switch it for something less dextrous but more sturdy when needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html#comment-1679594</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218702#comment-1679594</guid>
		<description>The labor is the real cost here. Probably a couple hundred hours of machining per hand, considering all the individual parts, which drives the price up super high. It&#039;s great to see someone trying as a proof of concept, even if the actual product is going to be more or less useless, but the convenience of  materials sacrifices a lot of actual usefulness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The labor is the real cost here. Probably a couple hundred hours of machining per hand, considering all the individual parts, which drives the price up super high. It&#8217;s great to see someone trying as a proof of concept, even if the actual product is going to be more or less useless, but the convenience of  materials sacrifices a lot of actual usefulness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jandrese</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html#comment-1679589</link>
		<dc:creator>jandrese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218702#comment-1679589</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much more it would cost to have the thing machined out of aluminum or something so it doesn&#039;t break right away?  Plastic 3D printers are cool but kind of suck for moving parts.  Whatever actuators they&#039;re getting for $300 are probably going to be pretty bad/weak too.  Still, if this could be leveraged to jumpstart a $1,000 useful version. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much more it would cost to have the thing machined out of aluminum or something so it doesn&#8217;t break right away?  Plastic 3D printers are cool but kind of suck for moving parts.  Whatever actuators they&#8217;re getting for $300 are probably going to be pretty bad/weak too.  Still, if this could be leveraged to jumpstart a $1,000 useful version. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/14/kickstarting-a-cheap-versatil.html#comment-1679568</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218702#comment-1679568</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very skeptical. This hand is gonna be able to lift only a few ounces, and probably won&#039;t stand up under a lot of strain like most printed components. but if they can drive that price down so low with electronics, it&#039;s gonna put the academics to shame. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very skeptical. This hand is gonna be able to lift only a few ounces, and probably won&#8217;t stand up under a lot of strain like most printed components. but if they can drive that price down so low with electronics, it&#8217;s gonna put the academics to shame. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
