<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US to beef up missile defense along West Coast, to defend against possible North Korea&#160;attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humbabella</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681952</link>
		<dc:creator>Humbabella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681952</guid>
		<description>The US can devastate a nation without the use of nuclear weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US can devastate a nation without the use of nuclear weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humbabella</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681951</link>
		<dc:creator>Humbabella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681951</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the US would be very hesitant to ruffle some feathers.  Unless, I guess, North Korea decides to build missile launch sites in the middle of populated areas to ensure collateral damage in the event they are taken out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the US would be very hesitant to ruffle some feathers.  Unless, I guess, North Korea decides to build missile launch sites in the middle of populated areas to ensure collateral damage in the event they are taken out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681858</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681858</guid>
		<description> I took it to be dismissive mocking rather than sarcasm.  Of course the jury is out since we can&#039;t read minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I took it to be dismissive mocking rather than sarcasm.  Of course the jury is out since we can&#8217;t read minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Mander</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681819</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Mander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681819</guid>
		<description> I also think it&#039;s a bad idea to take sarcasm as serious suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I also think it&#8217;s a bad idea to take sarcasm as serious suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornan_KotW</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681589</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornan_KotW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681589</guid>
		<description>Robert Heinlein wrote a short story about this which was featured in the Expanded Universe book. If I remember correctly the story had been written back in the 50&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Heinlein wrote a short story about this which was featured in the Expanded Universe book. If I remember correctly the story had been written back in the 50&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RElgin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681400</link>
		<dc:creator>RElgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681400</guid>
		<description>You will need a place, high up where you can also launch homing pigeons and enjoy viewing the surprise when you release the cats that have incendiary devices attached to their bellies.  Considering the old fear of cats many Koreans have, this would be most unsettling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will need a place, high up where you can also launch homing pigeons and enjoy viewing the surprise when you release the cats that have incendiary devices attached to their bellies.  Considering the old fear of cats many Koreans have, this would be most unsettling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RElgin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681399</link>
		<dc:creator>RElgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681399</guid>
		<description>I would have to sadly agree with you James, regarding the difference of mindset that can be found with political/military leadership in the PRC.  There is an imbalance between the male/female ratio in the PRC - all due to this old fashion notion of having a male heir to continue the family lineage, thus having a war would solve two problems in the PRC - deflecting societies distrust and hate of the CCP leadership and dealing with the problem of too many males in society.

Nukes, however, make no distinction in whom they cull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to sadly agree with you James, regarding the difference of mindset that can be found with political/military leadership in the PRC.  There is an imbalance between the male/female ratio in the PRC &#8211; all due to this old fashion notion of having a male heir to continue the family lineage, thus having a war would solve two problems in the PRC &#8211; deflecting societies distrust and hate of the CCP leadership and dealing with the problem of too many males in society.</p>
<p>Nukes, however, make no distinction in whom they cull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gilliland</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681360</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gilliland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681360</guid>
		<description>And the Snork community isn&#039;t happy about it, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Snork community isn&#8217;t happy about it, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gilliland</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681359</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gilliland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681359</guid>
		<description>Japan and ROK are even more likely than the US, simply because it would be within their means.  No long-range missiles required.  But for the NK audience, the US is both a sweeter target and sufficiently out of reach that they don&#039;t have to worry about imminent war.

The &quot;Seoul be damned&quot; preemptive strike is unlikely.  A credible intercontinental attack launching from NK would be... well... incredible.  Unilateral preemptive action by the US or Japan would have to meet a massive burden of proof, as anyone in the neighbourhood would be affected by destabilizing NK and wouldn&#039;t be likely to accept the &quot;sorry, no time&quot; story.

A tactical strike on NK offensive launch sites can be easily done.  Executing it without stirring up the hornets&#039; nest is less so.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan and ROK are even more likely than the US, simply because it would be within their means.  No long-range missiles required.  But for the NK audience, the US is both a sweeter target and sufficiently out of reach that they don&#8217;t have to worry about imminent war.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Seoul be damned&#8221; preemptive strike is unlikely.  A credible intercontinental attack launching from NK would be&#8230; well&#8230; incredible.  Unilateral preemptive action by the US or Japan would have to meet a massive burden of proof, as anyone in the neighbourhood would be affected by destabilizing NK and wouldn&#8217;t be likely to accept the &#8220;sorry, no time&#8221; story.</p>
<p>A tactical strike on NK offensive launch sites can be easily done.  Executing it without stirring up the hornets&#8217; nest is less so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gilliland</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681336</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gilliland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681336</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/4999429/North-Korea-launches-perfect-Italian-pizza.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Our intelligence estimates were wrong.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/4999429/North-Korea-launches-perfect-Italian-pizza.html" rel="nofollow">Our intelligence estimates were wrong.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gilliland</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681332</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gilliland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681332</guid>
		<description>1. Cut a hole in a box.
2. Put your nuke in that box.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Cut a hole in a box.<br />
2. Put your nuke in that box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gilliland</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681328</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gilliland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681328</guid>
		<description>If you read the article, they mention that all 14 of the new missiles are going to Fort Greely, Alaska.  That will mean an arsenal of 40 missiles stationed in Alaska, 4 at Vandenberg in California.

An actual offensive launch from NK would mean their own destruction, and in that case none of this speculation means anything.  From a political standpoint, if NK threatened to use a polar trajectory they would lose a lot of support from China and whatever positive ties they have with Russia.  Even to use a more China-friendly high-latitude trajectory would take a missile over Sakhalin and Kamchatka.  Russia doesn&#039;t want a failed NK nuclear missile raining debris on Kamchatka, and they certainly don&#039;t want any US-bound missile to pass through their airspace.  In a real attack, NK would be committed to death and wouldn&#039;t care about neighbour relations, but whatever.

And these are just fixed, silo-based interceptors.  The Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense system is installed on &lt;a&gt;at least 16 US Navy ships (cruisers and destroyers) in the Pacific&lt;/a&gt;, and there are 4 Japanese destroyers with &quot;operational capabilities&quot;.  PAC-3 Patriots are also available. etc. etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read the article, they mention that all 14 of the new missiles are going to Fort Greely, Alaska.  That will mean an arsenal of 40 missiles stationed in Alaska, 4 at Vandenberg in California.</p>
<p>An actual offensive launch from NK would mean their own destruction, and in that case none of this speculation means anything.  From a political standpoint, if NK threatened to use a polar trajectory they would lose a lot of support from China and whatever positive ties they have with Russia.  Even to use a more China-friendly high-latitude trajectory would take a missile over Sakhalin and Kamchatka.  Russia doesn&#8217;t want a failed NK nuclear missile raining debris on Kamchatka, and they certainly don&#8217;t want any US-bound missile to pass through their airspace.  In a real attack, NK would be committed to death and wouldn&#8217;t care about neighbour relations, but whatever.</p>
<p>And these are just fixed, silo-based interceptors.  The Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense system is installed on <a>at least 16 US Navy ships (cruisers and destroyers) in the Pacific</a>, and there are 4 Japanese destroyers with &#8220;operational capabilities&#8221;.  PAC-3 Patriots are also available. etc. etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681310</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681310</guid>
		<description>They could ship one into Long Beach this summer.  Our Homeland Security is a theater group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could ship one into Long Beach this summer.  Our Homeland Security is a theater group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gilliland</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681299</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gilliland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681299</guid>
		<description>You must be a defense contractor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be a defense contractor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RATBURL</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681270</link>
		<dc:creator>RATBURL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681270</guid>
		<description>Any country that&#039;s able to start a nuclear war and does so must know the consequences of their decision,like losing their whole country! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any country that&#8217;s able to start a nuclear war and does so must know the consequences of their decision,like losing their whole country! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RATBURL</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681269</link>
		<dc:creator>RATBURL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681269</guid>
		<description>Love that! Nuke in a box </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love that! Nuke in a box </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Penrose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681245</link>
		<dc:creator>James Penrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681245</guid>
		<description> I don&#039;t think that&#039;d work in any event.  As a Chinese general said back in the Korean War about getting nuked:  &quot;So what if we lose a million or two troops?&quot;

Their government doesn&#039;t think like we do about people.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;d work in any event.  As a Chinese general said back in the Korean War about getting nuked:  &#8220;So what if we lose a million or two troops?&#8221;</p>
<p>Their government doesn&#8217;t think like we do about people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Penrose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681244</link>
		<dc:creator>James Penrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681244</guid>
		<description> North Chorea (delibarate bad pun) seems unlikely to be able to deliver a pizza anytime soon, let alone a nuke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> North Chorea (delibarate bad pun) seems unlikely to be able to deliver a pizza anytime soon, let alone a nuke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Penrose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681243</link>
		<dc:creator>James Penrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681243</guid>
		<description>If the &quot;Dear leader&quot; says it is shorter to aim them due east, then by god it is shorter if you want to stay breathing in that land of the morning calm.

Have you ever read his &quot;official&quot; biography?  I am surprised he doesn&#039;t just make us vanish via mind power like that kid in the old Twilight Zone episode;  &quot;You be dead!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the &#8220;Dear leader&#8221; says it is shorter to aim them due east, then by god it is shorter if you want to stay breathing in that land of the morning calm.</p>
<p>Have you ever read his &#8220;official&#8221; biography?  I am surprised he doesn&#8217;t just make us vanish via mind power like that kid in the old Twilight Zone episode;  &#8220;You be dead!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Penrose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681242</link>
		<dc:creator>James Penrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681242</guid>
		<description> Japan has interceptors if I am not mistaken as the whackjob in NK has indicated he&#039;d like to see Tokyo glowing and both sides remember how the Japanese treated Korea when they &quot;owned&quot; it.

Memories of wrongs done are long in that part of the world and while Kim Jong makes me ill, the Japanese are quite rightly nervous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Japan has interceptors if I am not mistaken as the whackjob in NK has indicated he&#8217;d like to see Tokyo glowing and both sides remember how the Japanese treated Korea when they &#8220;owned&#8221; it.</p>
<p>Memories of wrongs done are long in that part of the world and while Kim Jong makes me ill, the Japanese are quite rightly nervous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RElgin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681237</link>
		<dc:creator>RElgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681237</guid>
		<description>Engagement with the PRC has not worked.  A new course is long overdue and something that is as direct and simple an equation that even the CCP leadership can figure out what is in their best long term interests and I am pretty sure they would baulk at the math and motivate their proxy accordingly.

No one need die - yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engagement with the PRC has not worked.  A new course is long overdue and something that is as direct and simple an equation that even the CCP leadership can figure out what is in their best long term interests and I am pretty sure they would baulk at the math and motivate their proxy accordingly.</p>
<p>No one need die &#8211; yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agonist</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681197</link>
		<dc:creator>agonist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681197</guid>
		<description>I live near the beach and am installing a crossbow turret above my garage to deal with any potential naval landings. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live near the beach and am installing a crossbow turret above my garage to deal with any potential naval landings. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681186</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681186</guid>
		<description> If you listen closely, you can hear the sound of wallets creaking and fatcats purring.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If you listen closely, you can hear the sound of wallets creaking and fatcats purring.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681184</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681184</guid>
		<description>I like Dennis Rodman&#039;s idea better.  Just call Kim. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Dennis Rodman&#8217;s idea better.  Just call Kim. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681182</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681182</guid>
		<description> You think it&#039;s a good idea to taunt the irrational?  I don&#039;t.  There&#039;s many ways to deliver a nuke, and we&#039;re wide open to lots of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You think it&#8217;s a good idea to taunt the irrational?  I don&#8217;t.  There&#8217;s many ways to deliver a nuke, and we&#8217;re wide open to lots of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681181</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681181</guid>
		<description> And it only has to fit in a shipping container, instead of a flyable warhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> And it only has to fit in a shipping container, instead of a flyable warhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681180</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681180</guid>
		<description> Forget that!  What about Alaska?  Sarah Palin can see Kim from her deck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Forget that!  What about Alaska?  Sarah Palin can see Kim from her deck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashwath T.R.</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681134</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashwath T.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681134</guid>
		<description>Work with &lt;i&gt;whom&lt;/i&gt; in favour of democracy &lt;i&gt;anywhere&lt;/i&gt; again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work with <i>whom</i> in favour of democracy <i>anywhere</i> again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Privatti</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681120</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Privatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681120</guid>
		<description>Red Dawn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Dawn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CH</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/15/us-to-beef-up-missile-defense.html#comment-1681119</link>
		<dc:creator>CH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219207#comment-1681119</guid>
		<description>And you think that would impress China? I&#039;m pretty sure they know that nobody wants to start a war with them.

I rather work with China trying to get North Korea to get it finally to snap out of dictatorship and into the path of a democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you think that would impress China? I&#8217;m pretty sure they know that nobody wants to start a war with them.</p>
<p>I rather work with China trying to get North Korea to get it finally to snap out of dictatorship and into the path of a democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
