— FEATURED —
The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker
Eurovision 2013: An American in London
The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: The Truth Behind the Nixonian Presidency of Obama
Brain Rot: Hip Hop Family Tree, Compton, Lonzo Williams and the Wreckin' Cru
Real Stuff: Bad Trip
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Photos: Throughout Latin America, protests demand justice for Guatemala after genocide trial overturned
Guatemala: protests condemn annulment of Rios Montt trial, while ex-president Portillo extradited to US
NYT Editorial Board: "Justice Interrupted in Guatemala"
— RECENTLY —
Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation
We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir
The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek
Odd Duck: great picture book about eccentricity and ducks
Scatter, Adapt, and Remember: How Humans Will Survive a Mass Extinction
Illustrator William Stout's Legends of the Blues - exclusive excerpt
Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor
Review: Disunion, the VR guillotine simulator
Mousetronaut: kids' picture book about mouse in space, written by a Shuttle pilot
Review: Pebble e-paper watch
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Xeni Jardin at 5:44 am Mon, Mar 18, 2013
Wow, Crovitz, could you make it any more obvious that you (for reasons wholly unexplained) think that being employed by a newspaper magically gives everything you do a morally superior status, one that no mere mortal could aspire to, however journalist-like their behavior may be?
“Journalism” is something you do, not who signs your paycheck (if anything, the guy signing your paycheck is generally guilty until proven innocent of inhibiting your practice of journalism, not that the newspaper who kept Judith Miller on staff and buried the NSA spying story for over a year would know anything about that…)
Wow that is a pretty fantastic retort to Crovitz’s piece; it seems pretty clear that he doesn’t really know what he’s talking about. The WSJ should be embarrassed to have printed that, but then, it IS the WSJ.
How about the irony of such bunk being published in the same paper that broke the Watergate scandal?
I think you are confusing the WSJ with the Washington Post?
Oh yeah, of course…
Seeing as the enemy in this case is ‘terror’, I’m sure a similarly loose definition of ‘aiding the enemy’ could put much of the military leadership behind bars.
You don’t need a particularly loose definition: Any cooperation with the ISI is virtually a toss-up as to whether you’ll be aiding our frenemies in Pakistan or our enemies in Pakistan; and a lot of the old-school jihad guys(if they are still alive at this point) date back to when the CIA was stirring the place up to give the Commies a quagmire to fall into…
You’ve also got our delightful little sectarian torture squads, set up by an expert with some quality Latin American experience under his belt, and our, um, ‘rigorous’ asset tracking that definitely didn’t end up financing anybody unsavory.
That last paragraph was really interesting. It seems “enemies of the state” are not journalists, and therefore not covered by the First Amendment. Just like people killed by drones are, by definition, enemies, I suppose.
Gordon Crovitz seems to support hiding war crimes and corruption.
Maybe it’s Gordon Crovitz that should be charged with treason?