<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Los Angeles is not full of self-driving pod cars (and other disappointments from a 1988 view of&#160;2013)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko Raos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1684073</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Raos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1684073</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d prefer to be killed by a human rather than a robot. Call me quaint and sentimental but that&#039;s the way I&#039;m built.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer to be killed by a human rather than a robot. Call me quaint and sentimental but that&#8217;s the way I&#8217;m built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidCulberson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1683973</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidCulberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1683973</guid>
		<description> Kind of like the list of things that can go wrong with current cars and drivers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Kind of like the list of things that can go wrong with current cars and drivers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1683853</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1683853</guid>
		<description>I do not want a self-driving pod car.  The list of things that could go wrong is just too long and deadly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not want a self-driving pod car.  The list of things that could go wrong is just too long and deadly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Napsterista</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1683699</link>
		<dc:creator>John Napsterista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1683699</guid>
		<description>If the L.A. Times predicted in 1988 that the 25 highest grossing live musical acts of 2012 would include Madonna (#1), Bruce Springsteen (#2), Van Halen (#8), Elton John (#19), Barbara Streisand (#12), Roger Waters (#3), Rod Stewart (#21) and the Red Hot Chili Peppers (#15), people would’ve thought that was a lot crazier than driverless cars or robot maids.  Show them pictures of the cool kids at the club of 2013 dressed exactly like it was 1988, and they’d really think you were fucking with them ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the L.A. Times predicted in 1988 that the 25 highest grossing live musical acts of 2012 would include Madonna (#1), Bruce Springsteen (#2), Van Halen (#8), Elton John (#19), Barbara Streisand (#12), Roger Waters (#3), Rod Stewart (#21) and the Red Hot Chili Peppers (#15), people would’ve thought that was a lot crazier than driverless cars or robot maids.  Show them pictures of the cool kids at the club of 2013 dressed exactly like it was 1988, and they’d really think you were fucking with them &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Lesoine</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1683594</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Lesoine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1683594</guid>
		<description>Hey it put them on the map at least!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey it put them on the map at least!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Lesoine</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1683591</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Lesoine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1683591</guid>
		<description>YEAH! Exactly. I was like, wait isn&#039;t this a chapter from the Martian Chronicles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YEAH! Exactly. I was like, wait isn&#8217;t this a chapter from the Martian Chronicles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mariacher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1683588</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mariacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1683588</guid>
		<description>We are only a few years late...Driverless cars will come in 4 steps: * step 0: today’s self parking feature and Google cars * step 1: partially autonomous driverless cars * step 2: everyone can operate a driverless car * step 3: shared driverless cars“How long end drivers are allowed (technically and legally) not to pay attention to road” will be the most interesting thing to watch for the next 5 to 10 years and especially: * environmental conditions allowing it. * the price of the technical features needed. * reliability.  http://driverless-cars.blogspot.fr/2013/01/driverless-cars-for-next-decades-in-4.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are only a few years late&#8230;Driverless cars will come in 4 steps: * step 0: today’s self parking feature and Google cars * step 1: partially autonomous driverless cars * step 2: everyone can operate a driverless car * step 3: shared driverless cars“How long end drivers are allowed (technically and legally) not to pay attention to road” will be the most interesting thing to watch for the next 5 to 10 years and especially: * environmental conditions allowing it. * the price of the technical features needed. * reliability.  <a href="http://driverless-cars.blogspot.fr/2013/01/driverless-cars-for-next-decades-in-4.html" rel="nofollow">http://driverless-cars.blogspot.fr/2013/01/driverless-cars-for-next-decades-in-4.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1683560</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1683560</guid>
		<description>They looked at what happened to Brockway, Ogdenville, and North Haverbrook and decided against it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They looked at what happened to Brockway, Ogdenville, and North Haverbrook and decided against it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyrofrog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/20/los-angeles-is-not-full-of-sel.html#comment-1683519</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyrofrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=219763#comment-1683519</guid>
		<description>1988? Hell, what about 1978 -- where&#039;s the monorail? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1988? Hell, what about 1978 &#8212; where&#8217;s the monorail? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
