Breast milk is weirder than you think


19 Responses to “Breast milk is weirder than you think”

  1. Brainspore says:

    *Thoughtfully sips latté.*

  2. Cicada Mania says:

    You say weird, I say amazing.

  3. Boundegar says:

    I don’t see what’s freaky and weird here.  Biology.  Evolution.  Titty milk made my son strong and healthy.

  4. JoeBuck says:

    This may be relevant to some proposals to try to re-create extinct animals from their DNA. A living thing is an ecosystem; from insects to humans, we rely on a huge number of symbiotic creatures with completely different DNA.  If termites somehow went extinct, and we cloned new ones from their DNA, they would starve: they eat wood but rely on organisms in their guts to digest the wood.  Babies need their gut bacteria. Maybe neanderthals had different gut bacteria.

    • Brainspore says:

      Probably depends on how different the species is from modern-day relatives. I suspect a baby mammoth could probably survive with the milk and bacteria from a surrogate mother elephant.

  5. timquinn says:

    Evolution does not care.

  6. peregrinus says:

    Cool.  This should throw a bone to the creationistas,  I love the complexity of biology.

  7. MurasakiMadness says:

    Also awesome: if the baby has an eye infection, you can squirt some milk into their eye straight from the jugs. 

  8. pt68 says:

     So, just thinking out loud here . . .  there are sugars (oligosaccharides, simple sugars) in human milk that humans don’t digest. Many vegans argue that we shouldn’t drink cow’s milk because there are sugars (disaccharides, simple sugars) that we can’t digest in it.
    Is it possible that the cow’s milk elements that we can’t digest have some other functions as well, even in the cow? Or that these sugars are similar?
    Interesting stuff!

  9. anankesf says:

    That’s right, TITTY milk evolved and makes SONS stronger rawr…or not…perhaps it’s the JUG spraying?

  10. Think of this the next time some formula company touts the latest and greatest micronutrient that they have added to their recipe in order to make it closer to breast milk. Nothing can compete with breast milk for infant nutrition–nothing. And even if you could simulate breast milk to a tee, you couldn’t emulate the way that it changes dynamically in response to the infant’s needs.

    There is a time and place for formula, but no one should dispute that it is nutritionally inferior to breast milk.

  11. James Churchill says:

    There’s all sorts of food that our microbiome helps us digest, so I’m not sure breast milk is particularly unusual in that respect – and since we don’t function at all well without that bacteria present, it seems increasingly obvious that those colonies *are* as much “me” or “you” as (say) a red blood cell is.

  12. DreamboatSkanky says:

    It’s sweeter than the ripple wine. Yes it’s sweeter than the wine.

  13. Also, you can dab it on cuts to help them heal faster. 

  14. Jorpho says:

    In monkeys, the chemical composition of breast milk can change, depending on factors like your baby’s sex and whether your baby is showing signs of illness.

    C’mon, the real story here is the diagnostic powers of these prescient monkeys.

    • Brainspore says:

      …the chemical composition of breast milk can change, depending on factors like your baby’s sex and whether your baby is showing signs of illness.

      I bet my wife’s boobs got mightily confused when they were producing milk for our boy/girl twins.

Leave a Reply