Snowden at SXSW: immediate impressions


Yesterday at SXSW, Barton Gellman and I did a one-hour introductory Q&A before Edward Snowden's appearance. Right after Snowden and his colleagues from the ACLU wrapped up, I sat down and wrote up their event for The Guardian, who've just posted my impressions:

Snowden described the unique recklessness of an American intelligence agency undermining internet security. “Our country’s economic success is based on our intellectual property – our ability to create, share, communicate and compete. Since 9/11, former NSA director Michael Hayden and current NSA director Keith Alexander have elevated offense at the expense of defense of our communications. They’ve eroded protection of our communications at the expense of defense of our communications.

“This is a problem because America has more to lose than anyone else when every attack can succeed. When you’re the country whose vault is more full than anyone else’s in the world it doesn’t make sense to attack all day without defending. It doesn’t make sense to weaken standards on vaults worldwide to create a back door that anyone can walk into. This weakens our national security and everyone else’s because we all rely on the same standards.

“Without security, we have nothing. Our economy can’t succeed.”

Soghoian made sure that the commercial implications of this were not lost on the entrepreneurial types in the audience, those who’d come to SXSW hoping to win the tech lottery. “Google, Yahoo and other internet companies want to sit between the conversations you have with your friends and add value. They want to mine your information, tell you about restaurants and suggest things that help you. That business model is incompatible with your security, with your having a secure, end-to-end connection to your friends.

“The irony of the fact that we’re using Google Hangouts to talk to Edward Snowden isn’t lost on me. End-to-end secure video conferencing tools aren’t polished. They’re not good enough to bounce traffic through seven proxies. In many cases, you have to choose between tools that are easy, reliable and polished and tools that are secure, but hard to use.

“Big companies have hundreds of developers to put on to user interface design. That’s not try of companies that are optimised for security. Those tend to be made by geeks, for geeks. But small developers can play a role. The next Twitter or WhatsApp should be both encrypted end-to-end and usable.

“Remember, adding security is easier for new companies than it is for the big incumbents. The big guys can’t deliver security to their users, because they’re hampered by their business-models. You can tell customers that if they give you $5 a month for encrypted communications, no one will be able to watch them. Many people will be willing to pay for that.”

Edward Snowden: 'The NSA set fire to the internet. You are the firefighters'

Notable Replies

  1. IMB says:

    Cue the snide remarks.

  2. Vnend says:

    Cory: Next to last paragraph, second sentence: "That’s not try of companies that are optimised for security."

    Sorry, I can't make sense of that.

    [edit] Until, of course, I hit send, then I realize that 'try' was probably 'true'. Sigh.

  3. IMB says:

    I love how it's all about the constitution with the pols now that they know they were spied on.

  4. I don't understand why the use of the BlackBerry Messenger service isn't brought into these discussions. It is the end-to-end secure communication system people seem to desire. Paranoid me wonders if there's been a covert public relations campaign against BlackBerry by spy organizations because they don't want people to use it. No way to know, of course, but the American population does seem rather easily led with regard to what appears in their media.

  5. That could be the case (anti-crackberry campaign), but consider all the talk about Obama having to get rid of his crackberry once he took the POTUS mantle. I recall it being somewhat related to security, but also due to the requirement that his communications go through official gov't channels so they can be adequately recorded for posterity, among other things.

Continue the discussion bbs.boingboing.net

2 more replies

Participants