Ben Ho is a behavioral economist who studies apologies. He presents an economic theory of apologies that predicts when apologies will change the outcome of disputes, and proposes policies to increase the frequency and sincerity of apologies. The best evidence for economics-driven apology policies are the laws that make doctors' apologies inadmissible in court; Ho cites research that claims that this leads to more physicians' apologies, which reduces patient grief and anger, and cuts down on malpractice suits.
As a behavioural economist, my own research has focused on three goals, namely showing that:
* apologies can have real economic consequences;
* models based on economic incentives can explain how and when people give and receive apologies; and
* economic theory can help us understand what it means when we say the words “I am sorry.”
Corporations frequently become the target of public outrage, like General Motors in its handling of recent safety issues and automobile recalls. The public apologies by GM CEO Mary Barra have come under attack and scrutiny. Do such apologetic words have any meaning? Lee et al. (2004) analysed annual reports from publicly traded companies and found that companies that admitted responsibility for bad earnings had higher stock prices one year later than those who did not.
Although compelling, Lee et al. can only establish a correlation between apologies and economic outcomes. In recent work, Elaine Liu and I find a causal link between doctors’ apologies and their patients’ inclinations to litigate (Ho and Liu 2011). At the time of writing, 36 US states had passed laws that encourage doctors to apologise. These laws are premised on two ideas:
Doctors are often hesitant to apologise because they are scared of lawsuits.
* Patients most often sue out of anger, sometimes because their doctor never apologised.
The science of apologies with experimental evidence [Ben Ho/Vox]
(via Naked Capitalism)
(Image: Sorry on Australia Day-sky writing, National Apology Day , National Sorry Day 2014 "such unthinkable theft", Butupa, CC-BY)
Tim Harford, the Financial Times’s Undercover Economist, writes about the Happy Birthday to You court case, which finally settled the question of whether the familiar birthday song was still in copyright (it isn’t) and uses that as a springboard to ask the question: how long should copyright last?
Warren Ellis ruminates on the the way that the old idea that the Internet was birthing an “attention economy” has been transformed by Facebook, which has literally monetized attention, charging you money to reach the people who’ve asked to hear from you.
An excerpt from Monical Helsey’s new book I Can’t Believe it’s Not Better: A Woman’s Guide to Coping With Life called “Getting a Job, a Short Story by Your Parents” shows off both Helsey’s razor wit and the generational unfairness captured so well by Old Economy Steve.
Watching Netflix, Hulu or other streaming services can unfortunately be difficult while traveling outside the US. Rather than bypass these restrictions with the help of a complex and slow VPN, choose a faster and simpler solution with Getflix. Instead of rerouting all your Internet traffic through a different server, this handy service only routes the […]
Shake, stir, and muddle your way to delicious homemade cocktails with this must-have bar set. Expect only the finest quality tools from MakersKit — enabling you to unleash your inner mixologist.Top 12 Favorite Things of 2014, Sunset MagazineQuart-size vintage-style Mason jar shakerRetro double jigger for accurate measurementsStrainer & spouts for a mixologist-style smooth pourHardwood muddler […]
The Lytro Illum dares to be different, boasting even more robust features than its first generation predecessor and a sleek design reminiscent of professional DSLRs. What’s so cool about it? Most cameras capture the position of light rays, producing a statoc 2D image.