America's gargantuan new corporate landlords evict the shit out of Americans

The housing recovery has been famously uneven, in every way: for one thing, it's allowed hedge-fund and publicly listed landlords to acquire a greater proportion of America's housing stock than ever, even as mass foreclosures created a new class of desperate tenants who pay rent to these corporate giants, who charge higher rents than ever.

But it's not just higher rents that distinguish corporate landlords from the mom-n-pop rentiers of yesteryear: it's also the propensity to evict tenants.

The mass evictions are helped along by increasingly streamlined eviction processes, and the phenomena are related. When a small number of landlords capture a large proportion of rents, they are left with surplus capital they can use to lobby to dismantle tenant protections.

Making life harder on tenants also makes property values go up; it's like the coach/business dichotomy in aviation: the worse coach gets, the more travellers will do to get themselves into business class, from making demands on their corporate travel departments to signing up for expensive airline-issued financial products that deliver upgrades as perks.

The worse life is for tenants, the more debt people will go into to become homeowners, and the more people borrow to buy houses, the higher house-prices climb. (See also: university tuitions climbing as employment prospects for uncredentialed workers decline and credit gets easier and defaulting on student debt gets harder).

Also: the people most likely to be evicted are brown.

Now, the Atlanta Fed’s own research suggests that the eviction practices of big landlords may also be destabilizing. An eviction notice can ruin a family’s credit and make it more difficult to rent elsewhere or qualify for public assistance.

In Atlanta, evictions are much easier on landlords. They are cheap: about $85 in court fees and another $20 to have the tenant ejected, according to Michael Lucas, a co-author of the report and deputy director of the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation. With few of the tenant protections of places like New York, a family can find itself homeless in less than a month.

In interviews and court filings, renters and housing advocates said that some investment firms are impersonal and unresponsive, slow to make necessary repairs and quick to evict tenants who withhold rent because of complaints about maintenance. The researchers said some landlords use an eviction notice as a “routine rent-collection strategy.”

Aaron Kuney, HavenBrook’s former executive director of acquisitions, said the companies would rather keep their existing tenants as long as possible to avoid turnover costs.

But “they want to get them out quickly if they can’t pay,” said Kuney, now chief executive officer of Piedmont Asset Management, a private equity landlord in Atlanta. “Finding people these days to rent your homes is not a problem.”

Wall Street, America’s New Landlord, Kicks Tenants to the Curb [Prashant Gopal/Bloomberg]

Notable Replies

  1. Never thought I would live to see the decline of America into a third world shit hole with a first world military.

  2. Atlanta, huh? Well, don't expect me to be moving away from tenant protections provided by the state of NJ anytime soon, and I'm not even a renter. I just prefer my government to make some semblance of wanting to help people out when they need a hand instead of kicking them to the curb.

    Fuck the south. Right in it's sanctimonious, union-busting, hypocritical orifices. I'd never move back and, at this point, am unlikely to even visit.

  3. Well, it depends on the skin colour and politics of the defenders. I didn't see any battering rams being used against Cliven Bundy's gang at the nature reserve, and they had no tenant rights to begin with.

  4. Too true.

  5. The Bloomberg article and this one focus on for-cause, or court ordered evictions of working class people, but the impact of mega-corporate landlords goes far beyond these specific and obviously deplorable actions.

    Last year, 2 weeks before Christmas I received a 45 day (as mandated in my month-to-month lease) eviction notice. The complex I'd lived in had been bought out of receivership by an out of state (Houston, TX) management company that was branching into direct ownership. They wanted to mass renovate the (undeniably) crappy stock at this complex. However, they chose to do so in the most offensive, damaging way possible. Despite the fact that they were upgrading piecemeal, they gave evicted tenants no option to move into other similar units onsite, no deals to do so, and did not offer any assistance with moving. It was a 3 bdrm, 2.5 bath 2 story townhouse apt.

    The cost to move on short notice in winter wound up at c. $6500. I suspect my cost were on the high side because I hired a mover, but even with a Ryder truck and friends, you're out thousands. I upgraded to a SFR with a 2-car garage and a local, non-corporate landlord. I'm in great shape. However, even in that west hills complex many of the renters would have been strapped in the face of this. Screwing para-professionals in "middle class" complexes like that one is how the elite create the poor sons-of-guns who show up in this Bloomberg piece. A few hits like that one, and most families are unable to pay rent when a childcare crisis hits. Just like the guy in the article.

    The readership here is very well educated, but I'll bet you anything most aren't far above being victims of these kinds of acts. And significantly damaged if they are.

Continue the discussion bbs.boingboing.net

32 more replies

Participants