It's been a big year for "the T in LGBT," Oliver says, but "even when the news media is trying to be supportive, they can make dumb mistakes … we are weirdly comfortable celebrating trans people while dehumanizing them."
Read the rest
"Identical twin gangsters Ronald and Reginald Kray terrorize London during the 1950s and 1960s" and look great as they do so. Previously.
Read the rest
Enjoy Berliner Morgenpost's interactive graphic of where headcount is headed in Europe. Ireland, Britain and France grow as much of eastern Europe loses population. Everywhere there seems to be movement from country to city.
I guess East Germany's still not too hot a vacation destination, then.
Because its policy is to delete data 90 days after an account closure, Facebook is unable to comply with a court order that it turn over information about the revenge-porn-posting user.
Read the rest
Lawyer, social scientist and architect are very white jobs, but they've got nothing on veterinarian. With more companies posting more information about the composition of their payroll, a more detailed understanding of workplace diversity is emerging.
Overall, 81 percent of the workforce is white, but there are 33 occupations in America that are more than 90 percent white. When it comes to professions with outsized shares of minorities, blacks are overrepresented in community and social-service occupations (as well as barbers and postal-service clerks). Asians make up a large share of computer workers, medical scientists, and personal appearance workers—a category that includes manicurists, makeup artists, and facialists. Hispanics are overrepresented in construction, maintenance and agriculture work.
When Facebook offered a "rainbow filter" for images, following last week's landmark Supreme Court decision in favor of gay marriage, people joked that it was probably another creepy social experiment. Well, probably, yes.
Even seemingly small online actions—clicking the “like” button, changing one’s profile photo—are being tracked and analyzed. Just like McAdam’s research on Freedom Summer shapes our understanding of support for marriage equality, Facebook's past research on marriage equality has helped answer a question we all face when deciding to act politically:
Does the courage to visibly—if virtually—stand up for what a person believes in have an effect on that person’s social network, or is it just cheap, harmless posturing? Perhaps the rainbow colors across Facebook will become part of the answer.
Previously: Facebook's massive psychology experiment likely illegal
The song is titled "Under the Cherry Blossom." [YouTube
At Grove Farm in Bonnyrigg, Scotland, this strawberry was said by farmers Reuben and April Welch to look "exactly like a chicken," reports Civil Eats.
One hopes they are not chicken farmers.
It's all in the fine print: the deal is altered when bankruptcy or a similar corporate shakeup takes place. Then details you've let them know about you might end up on the block.
Read the rest
The general consensus on Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's notable dissents is that they reveal a Twitter-caliber quip artist rather than the "great legal writer" imagined by Jeet Heer. But either way, Scalia has nothing on Judge John Coughlan, who recently informed a defendant that he is a gobshite.
According to the Leinster Leader, Sean Byrne of Blessington, Ireland, was facing his third charge of driving without insurance at Naas District Court—a tally sitting on top of 14 prior convictions on "road traffic matters."
When his lawyer began describing his qualities as a father in mitigation, however, the judge interrupted.
"He is a gobshite," Judge Coughlan said, "It's the nicest thing I can say about him."
Then he banned Byrne from the roads for six years and fined him €500 (~$550).
News of the fast talk and stiff penalty came to the internet thanks to Frank O'Donnell, who posted a photo of the article on Twitter. It does not appear to have been posted at the Leader's website yet. [h/t Arbroath]
Naas District Court is no stranger to trouble, and Ireland is no stranger to gobshites.
Eric Joe flew a home-made hexacopter over his own yard, out in the the country near Modesto, California. A neighbor shot it down with a shotgun. Now a court has told him he must pay for what he destroyed.
Ars Technica's Cyrus Farivar posted the very polite letter that Joe had sent his apparently-deranged neighbor.
Joe started the conversation:
It was nice to meet you and your son. I wish it could have been under different circumstances, but I have to give credit to the McBay school of marksmanship. Still, I'm pretty bummed that I just built this hexacopter only to have it shot down. Also, it was a little disconcerting to know that the spread of the birdshot/buckshot was in my direction. In any case, I had a chance to test the components of the downed hexacopter. Good news is that the more expensive components (on the inside of the frame) are in tact. Stuff on the outside of the frame took the most damage.
Joe included an itemized list of the damaged parts, which rounded up to an even $700.
With all do [sic] respect $700 dollars seems excessive. Perhaps in SF it's normal for folks to have drones hovering over their property but we live in the country for privacy. I will be willing to split the cost with you but next time let us know your testing surveillance equipment in our area. I'll drop a check of [sic] this afternoon.
Joe wrote back:
Three minutes later, McBay replied. "Your facts are incorrect, I'm considering the matter now closed."
I'm sorry, but I must insist on full payment for equipment you damaged, as you shot it when it was above my property. The aircraft's GPS data positions it clearly above our orchard. Additionally, the hexacopter crashed next to our driveway, ~203 feet (per Google Maps) from the dirt road that separates our respective properties.
I also dispute your characterization that I was "testing surveillance equipment." There was no camera on the hexacopter, and had a camera been mounted, the price for repairs would have been an extra $300. Just as you asked me to give the courtesy of notifying you of my flying activities, I also ask you the courtesy of not shooting live ammunition in our direction. This is the third time discharge from your firearms has hit our house and property. The first incident left a bullet hole in the door by our garage. The second incident occurred last Thanksgiving when birdshot from your skeet shooting activities rained into our backyard. The third, of course, being what we're currently discussing.
I'm hoping to resolve this in a civil manner. An entirely new rig would have cost $1500. Instead, I'm just asking that you pay for what you broke. Let me know if you wish to discuss further.
The matter was not closed.
Man shoots down neighbor’s hexacopter in rural drone shotgun battle [Ars Technica]
A gentleman dropped his pants in the street and defecated so explosively that diarrhea alighted upon a nearby child and earned the man a charge of outraging public decency.
In its unbylined story, The Central Somerset Gazette reports that Chas Cox, 25, recently appeared before magistrates to explain himself.
Though Cox pleaded not guilty, claiming he had no choice but to do what he did, prosecutor Christine Hart told the court that "the child was caught in the backsplash" and the defendant was remanded for trial.
The proceedings will resume August 7 in Yeovil, England.
The Texas Department of Public Safety is not responding to queries about this unusual video, wherein a police officer's legs may be observed dangling haplessly from a cruiser's window.
The bumbling cop's thrashing was caught on camera by amused passers-by, whose video was later uploaded to youtube.
“This is a watershed moment for civil rights that finally brings the dream of living in an equitable society one tiny fraction of a step closer to reality,” said civil rights lawyer Helene Najjar, adding that the country could now turn its attention to closing the income gap, ending racial discrimination in law enforcement, and providing equal educational opportunities for all children, among tens of thousands of other issues
The Supreme Court of the United States of America has ruled that same-sex partners have a right to marry anywhere in the nation. The verdict strikes down remaining prohibitions on same-sex marriages and mandates recognition of such unions performed in other jurisdictions.
The 5-4 split between justices reflected an anticipated ideological divide.
“The court now holds that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry. No longer may this liberty be denied to them,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority opinion, joined by liberal justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
Justices John Roberts Jr., Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas each dissented, producing separate opinions.
Same-sex couples are currently able to wed in 36 states and the District of Columbia. The remaining 14 states must now stop enforcing their bans. According to recent polls, more than sixty percent of Americans approve of same-sex marriage, up sharply from even just a few years ago.
Immediately after the ruling, President Barack Obama wrote on twitter that "today is a big step in our march toward equality."
News is just breaking now, and it must be stressed that reportage from the Supreme Court steps tends to be premature. But @SCOTUSblog's tweets from the court, corroborated by other reports, strongly suggest the court is ruling in favor not only of same-sex marriage, but recognition of same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions.