<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boing Boing &#187; biology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/tag/biology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two months aboard an Antarctic ice breaker, condensed to 5&#160;minutes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/05/06/two-months-aboard-an-antarctic.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/05/06/two-months-aboard-an-antarctic.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=228621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Featuring five different kinds of sea ice + penguins on fast forward]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!--youtu.be--><div class="video-container"><iframe width="600" height="450" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BNZu1uxNvlo?showinfo=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

<p>Here's an incredibly cool video showing the prow of a massive ice breaking ship as it plows through Antarctica's Ross Sea. The footage is sped up, to pack two months of travel into five minutes. But, unlike a lot of time-lapse videos, this one also has a really informative audio track, in which marine scientist Cassandra Brooks waxes poetic about the many different kinds of ice and explains why she and her team were out there, breaking through the stuff, to begin with.</p> 

<p>Bonus: At the end, you get to see the absolute adorableness that is penguins on high-speed fast forward.</p> 

<p>Via <a href="http://deepseanews.com/2013/05/break-through-2-months-of-antarctic-sea-ice-in-5-minutes/">Deep Sea News</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/05/06/two-months-aboard-an-antarctic.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell model&#160;cake</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/30/cell-model-cake.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/30/cell-model-cake.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 02:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy mutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=227565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian artist/photographer NicoleWilliam created this cell model cake for her BIOL330 class in 2010. I hereby grant her a retrospective A+. It even comes apart! Biology Cell Cake (via Geeks Are Sexy)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/biology_cell_cake_by_nicolewilliam-d32y0sa1.jpg" class="bordered"><br />
Canadian artist/photographer NicoleWilliam created this cell model cake for her BIOL330 class in 2010. I hereby grant her a  retrospective A+. It even comes apart! 
<p>
<a href="http://nicolewilliam.deviantart.com/art/Biology-Cell-Cake-186345082">Biology Cell Cake</a>

(<i>via <a href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/">Geeks Are Sexy</a></i>)

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/30/cell-model-cake.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buildings built by&#160;bacteria</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/29/buildings-built-by-bacteria.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/29/buildings-built-by-bacteria.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pescovitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=227216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at Fast Company, our pal Chris Arkenberg wrote about how advances in synthetic biology and biomimicry could someday transform how we build our built environments: Innovations emerging across the disciplines of additive manufacturing, synthetic biology, swarm robotics, and architecture suggest a future scenario when buildings may be designed using libraries of biological templates and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="display:block; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;" src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/NewImage72.png" alt="NewImage" title="NewImage.png" border="0" width="600" height="337" class="alignnone"/>
<P>Over at Fast Company, our pal Chris Arkenberg wrote about how advances in synthetic biology and biomimicry could someday transform how we build our built environments:
<blockquote>
<P>
Innovations emerging across the disciplines of additive manufacturing, synthetic biology, swarm robotics, and architecture suggest a future scenario when buildings may be designed using libraries of biological templates and constructed with biosynthetic materials able to sense and adapt to their conditions. Construction itself may be handled by bacterial printers and swarms of mechanical assemblers.<p>
Tools like Project Cyborg make possible a deeper exploration of biomimicry through the precise manipulation of matter. David Benjamin and his Columbia Living Architecture Lab explore ways to integrate biology into architecture. Their recent work investigates bacterial manufacturing--the genetic modification of bacteria to create durable materials. Envisioning a future where bacterial colonies are designed to print novel materials at scale, they see buildings wrapped in seamless, responsive, bio-electronic envelopes.
</blockquote>
"<a href="http://www.fastcoexist.com/1681891/cities-of-the-future-built-by-drones-bacteria-and-3-d-printers">Cities Of The Future, Built By Drones, Bacteria, And 3-D Printers</a>"]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/29/buildings-built-by-bacteria.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be an armchair taxonomist! A challenge from the Encyclopedia of&#160;Life</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/22/armchairtaxonomist.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/22/armchairtaxonomist.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encyclopedia of life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=225789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trouble is, a lot of information about living things is hidden behind paywalls or scattered across random sources where the general public can't easily get to it. That's where you come in! Help fill the Encyclopedia of Life's open-source database with information about animals, plants, fungi, protozoa, and bacteria.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://boingboing.net/features/armchairtaxonomist/title0.png" style="margin-top:100px;max-width:90%;">


<div id="bblogo">
</div>


<div style="position:absolute;width:100%;">

	<div id="l1" data-stellar-ratio="0.025"></div>
	<div id="l2" data-stellar-ratio="0.05"></div>
	<div id="l3" data-stellar-ratio="0.2"></div>
	<div id="l4" data-stellar-ratio="0.3"></div>
	<div id="l5" data-stellar-ratio="0.4"></div>
	

</div>


<div class="o" id="o1" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o2" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o3" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o4" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o5" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o6" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o7" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o8" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o9" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o10" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>
<div class="o" id="o11" data-stellar-ratio="0.5"></div>


<div id="column">

<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" style="margin: 0px auto 50px;
width: 250px;">
<a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_compact"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_bubble_style"></a>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="//s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js#pubid=xa-517566eb01bc42e5"></script>
<!-- AddThis Button END -->

<p><span class="firstcharacter">V</span>ariety is the spice of life and taxonomy is the science we use to understand that seasoning. Taxonomists describe and organize the billions of living things on this planet, creating vast collections of information that help us understand how all life on Earth is connected. Their work has been the basis of medical breakthroughs, lead to the great discoveries of ecology, and opened our eyes to the wonders of evolution. Taxonomy even plays a role in how you and I think about the things that live in our own backyards.</p>

<p>Trouble is, a lot of that information is hidden behind paywalls or scattered across random sources where the general public can't easily get to it. </p>


<p>That's where you come in.</p> 

<p>The <a href="http://eol.org/">Encyclopedia of Life</a> is hosting a challenge. The goal: bring information about animals, plants, fungi, protozoa, and bacteria to the world. Readers are asked to research and write short descriptions of some of nature's most fascinating species. Those descriptions will be reviewed by curators for inclusion in the Encyclopedia of Life &mdash; a crowd-created, open-source effort to make scientific information about the world we live in available to all the people who live in it. And here's the kicker: the best descriptions will earn their writers a place in history &mdash; <strong>a private behind-the-scenes tour of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History is up for grabs.</strong> </p>

<span id="more-225789"></span> 

<p>Humans have probably been naming things and making lists since our earliest ancestors began to separate "Stuff That Tastes Good" from "Stuff That Killed That Other Guy That One Time". But taxonomy, as we know it today, really began in the 18th-century, when Carl Linnaeus started assigning Latin names to different plants and animals and organizing them into a hierarchy where humans (the obvious pinnacle of creation) lorded over the rest of of the Earth.</p>

<p>We think about species (and, really, taxonomy itself) very differently today. But we still use a lot of pieces left over from Linnaeus' organizational structure &mdash; grouping living things into kingdoms, phylums, classes, orders, families, genera, and species. Taken altogether, those different groups are called taxa. Primates are an order and a taxon. Hominids are a family, and a taxon. Homo is a genus, and also a taxon. Homo sapiens is a species ... and, yes, still a taxon.</p>

<p>For this project, your help describing different taxa is required.</p>

<h2>What To Do</h2>

<p>Readers pick the taxon they like the best (the Encyclopedia of Life has <a href="http://eol.org/collections/54060">a list of suggested taxa</a> that can help one get started). Then it's time to hunt down credible sources; a look around online or a visit to the local library may be in order. Either way, you'll use the information to write a short summary of what makes a taxon tick &mdash; where does it live, what does it look like, and what does it need to survive? &mdash; is the objective, using original language and a style that general readers would enjoy. Don't worry about writing the Great American Taxonomic Description; all the Encyclopedia needs is a paragraph or two. Somewhere between 300 and 500 words should do it. (<a href="http://eol.wufoo.com/forms/armchair-taxonomist/">Check out the entry form</a> for guidelines and some great examples.)</p>

<p>All entries will have to have at least two sources. Wikipedia is a good place to start looking for sources, but its preferable not to be a <em>primary</em> source itself. For one thing, the temptation to cut-paste must be avoided. For another, it's best to find stuff that isn't already easily available ... and Wikipedia is kind of the definition of easily available. </p>

<p><strong>Good sources:</strong> University websites or the personal websites of scientists who study that plant or animal; peer-reviewed journal articles; books; websites for zoos, aquariums, or conservation organizations; specialty encyclopedias, such as The New Encyclopedia of Mammals published by Oxford University Press; educational documentaries, like what you’d see on NOVA or the BBC; magazine articles (interviews with experts are especially helpful!).</p>
<p><strong>Sources to avoid:</strong> Fan sites put together by people who aren’t experts; any information that, itself, isn’t sourced; message boards; publications more than 30 years old (the information may be inaccurate because it’s out of date); works of fiction or religious tracts.</p>

<p>The finished descriptions will be part of the Encyclopedia of Life. It's a lot like writing for Wikipedia, only more specialized. The Encyclopedia of Life will eventually become a place where anybody can find basic information about all the other forms of life that share our home planet. Nobody has to pay. Everything is Creative Commons licensed. By participating, you're helping to move information from places where it might be hard for the average person to find, to places where that same information can be freely and quickly accessed.</p>

<h2>Who Can Enter</h2>

<p>Anybody over the age of 13. Those younger than that, though, can still participate, they just need an adult co-author. </p>

<h2>How To Enter</h2>

<p>It's super-easy. Just <a href="http://eol.wufoo.com/forms/armchair-taxonomist/">visit the entry form site</a>. Entries are sent directly through that form, and the site has a bunch of great resources and tips &mdash; including writing guidelines and examples of descriptions already published on the Encyclopedia of Life. </p>

<p>Readers have until May 20th to enter. And they can enter as many different descriptions as they want. </p>

<h2>Score!</h2>

<p>All of the entries will be judged by a team of science writers, scientists, and editors from the Encyclopedia of Life, who'll be making selections in three categories.</p>

<p><strong>Best Sources: A mini-library of awesome, recently published science books, hand-picked by me and mailed to the recipient's door.</strong> Good at finding cool tidbits of information in unexpected places? The min-library could be yours. People who can bring information from books and other print resources to the web, and who show some serious dedication to making sure that their work is both accurate and intriguing. Citing Wikipedia won't help you. You've got to dig deeper than that. </p>

<p><strong>Most Descriptions: An Apple Wireless Bluetooth Keyboard.</strong>  If you have the time and inclination to turn out a bunch of well-written, well-researched entries, then you might stand a chance. Remember, we're looking for quality, not just quantity. This works with all Apple products (obviously), but it also works with Windows 7-powered PCs. Use it as part of your standing or walking desk work space, or just to make tablets a little less obnoxious. </p>

<p><strong>Best Overall Description: A private, behind-the-scenes tour at the Smithsonian.</strong> One reader will get to go backstage at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History, to meet scientists and see collections that aren't available to the public. If you can get to Washington DC on your own, the tour (led by an EOL staffer) can be in person. If not, there's a great virtual setup that will allow you to have a fantastic, live, personal experience from the comfort of your living room. To stand a chance, everything counts: the entry has to be well-researched. It needs to include a fact or two worthy of sharing with friends. And the writing needs to make us go, "Wow." </p>

<h2>Got Questions? Want To Know More About&nbsp;Taxonomy?</h2>

<p><p>Post questions in the comments.
<p>Check out our weekly series on taxonomy and speciation: 
<br />&bull; Part 1:<a href="http://boingboing.net/2013/04/24/leeches-are-a-hypothesis-why.html"> Leeches are a hypothesis: Why it's so hard to say what a species really is</a></br></p></p> 





	<div style="width:80%;padding:0px 1em 0px 1em; border:3px double black;text-align:center;position:relative;margin:0px auto;">
	
		<h4><a href="http://boingboing.net/tag/science">Read more about <em>Science</em></a></h4>

	</div>

		
		<p style="text-align:center;">
		<small>
			Design and Layout: Rob Beschizza
		</small>
		]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/22/armchairtaxonomist.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fish with clear&#160;blood</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/11/the-fish-with-clear-blood.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/11/the-fish-with-clear-blood.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=223913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ocellated icefish live deep underwater in the cold oceans surrounding the Poles. They have clear blood. If you remember your childhood biology classes, you should remember that this kind of makes no sense. After all, blood is red because of hemoglobin &#8212; the iron-rich protein that carries oxygen around in your blood stream. No hemoglobin, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ocellated icefish live deep underwater in the cold oceans surrounding the Poles. They have clear blood. If you remember your childhood biology classes, you should remember that this kind of makes no sense. After all, blood is red because of hemoglobin &mdash; the iron-rich protein that carries oxygen around in your blood stream. No hemoglobin, no oxygen. No oxygen, dead fishies. Right? <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-04/weird-fish-has-clear-blood">Popular Science explains how ocellated icefish get around this little conundrum</a>. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/11/the-fish-with-clear-blood.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And all the vaginas are well above&#160;average</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/01/and-all-the-vaginas-are-well-a.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/01/and-all-the-vaginas-are-well-a.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lady parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaginas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulvas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=222498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Double X Science, Jenny Morber has an excellent piece about the wide range of diversity seen in human lady parts. "Are you normal? Yes. Are you average? No. Most likely," she writes. What follows is a fascinating tour of human biology, from the different lengths and colors of labia to the wide range of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[At Double X Science, Jenny Morber has<a href="http://www.doublexscience.org/the-average-human-vagina/"> an excellent piece about the wide range of diversity seen in human lady parts</a>. "Are you normal? Yes. Are you average? No. Most likely," she writes. What follows is a fascinating tour of human biology, from the different lengths and colors of labia to the wide range of shapes exhibited by the inside of the vaginal canal, itself. Even better, all of this can change over the course of an individual woman's life, rendering "average" even more meaningless. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/01/and-all-the-vaginas-are-well-a.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast milk is weirder than you&#160;think</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/21/breast-milk-is-weirder-than-yo.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/21/breast-milk-is-weirder-than-yo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boob juice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast milk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=220181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think about lactation too hard, it starts to seem a little strange &#8212; like the biological equivalent of saying the word "that" over and over until it's just a weird sound you're making. But, writes Nicholas Day at Slate, the sort of existential weirdness of breast milk is nothing compared to what's going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you think about lactation too hard, it starts to seem a little strange &mdash; like the biological equivalent of saying the word "that" over and over until it's just a weird sound you're making. But, writes Nicholas Day at Slate, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/how_babies_work/2013/03/20/the_science_of_breast_milk_latest_research_on_nursing_and_milk_vs_formula.html">the sort of existential weirdness of breast milk is nothing compared to what's going on in the stuff at a chemical level</a>. For instance, breast milk contains sugars that aren't actually digestible by human infants. That's because they aren't meant for the infant, itself. Rather, your breast milk is helpfully feeding your baby's intestinal bacteria. Freakier still: In monkeys, the chemical composition of breast milk can change, depending on factors like your baby's sex and whether your baby is showing signs of illness. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/21/breast-milk-is-weirder-than-yo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The power of the&#160;swarm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/21/the-power-of-the-swarm.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/21/the-power-of-the-swarm.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long reads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=220166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Wired, Ed Yong has an incredible long-read story about the researchers who are figuring out how and why individual animals sometimes turn into groups operating on collective behavior. That research has implications far beyond the freakish, locust-filled laboratories where Yong's story begins. Turns out, bugs and birds can teach us a lot about the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[At Wired, Ed Yong has an incredible long-read story about the researchers who are figuring out how and <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/03/powers-of-swarms/">why individual animals sometimes turn into groups operating on collective behavior</a>. That research has implications far beyond the freakish, locust-filled laboratories where Yong's story begins. Turns out, bugs and birds can teach us a lot about the brain, cancer, and even how we make predictions about our own futures. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/21/the-power-of-the-swarm.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are we&#160;curious?</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/why-are-we-curious.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/why-are-we-curious.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great ramble from the always-fascinating Venkatesh Rao entitled "The Dead-Curious Cat and the Joyless Immortal," considers several explanations for our species' curiosity, and asks whether our weird, ubiquitous artificial life-forms (corporations) share this trait, and why: Alone among the curious animals (though this seems like a conceit that more research might invalidate), we seem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>

Another great ramble from the always-fascinating Venkatesh Rao entitled "The Dead-Curious Cat and the Joyless Immortal," considers several explanations for our species' curiosity, and asks whether our weird, ubiquitous artificial life-forms (corporations) share this trait, and why:

<blockquote>
<p>
Alone among the curious animals (though this seems like a conceit that more research might invalidate), we seem to be curious about clearly useless things. Or at least, things that have no obvious and immediate use. Humans seem to frequently poke at things that yield returns, if at all, only generations later. And often in ways unsuspected by those who do the poking.
<p>
We stare at the stars, we peer through microscopes, we climb mountains and we dive to the ocean floor.
<p>
This behavior, so natural to humans, is incomprehensible to human organizations. So things like space programs or other pure curiosity driven efforts have to be justified by politicians on the basis of “will improve life here on earth through the discovery of new materials and advances in medicine.” This is probably the mother of all idiotic fictions. Fortunately, we don’t seem to require our institutional fictions to be credible. Merely sufficient to stop conversations we don’t want to have.
<p>
There is an interesting symmetry here. Organizations naturally try to avoid pain — the pain of business model obsolescence or national decline for instance – through institutionalized “curiosity.” They find joy-seeking unnatural and in need of justification (hence the paradoxical notions of “efficient” innovation with high “yield” or “impact” and the relentless war on waste).
<p>
This has even been turned into a depressingly banal formula for innovation: what pain are you seeking to relieve?
<p>
For humans the reverse is true. Curiosity driven by pain-aversion is unnatural, but curiosity driven by joy-seeking is natural and requires no further explanation. Efficiency is the last thing on our minds when we are being curious. The concept does not even apply: efficiency pre-supposes a goal. Waste is pain in the efficient pursuit of goals.
</blockquote>



<P>
<a href="http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2013/03/13/the-dead-curious-cat-and-the-joyless-immortal/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Ribbonfarm+%28ribbonfarm%29">The Dead-Curious Cat and the Joyless Immortal</a>

<div class="previously2">
<em>&nbsp;</em><ul><li><a href="http://boingboing.net/2011/10/07/tempo-transformative-difficult.html#previouspost">Tempo: transformative, difficult look at advanced decision-making ...</a></li>
</ul>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/13/why-are-we-curious.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sucking up to&#160;shrimp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/sucking-up-to-shrimp.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/sucking-up-to-shrimp.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behind the scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invertebrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say you're a marine biologist and you want to study the little bitty creatures of the sea &#8212; shrimps and worms and things like that. How do you go about capturing them? Why, with an underwater vacuum, of course. At the PNAS First Look blog, David Harris writes that this "SCUBA-tank powered vacuum, called an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/deepcleaning.jpeg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/deepcleaning-600x399.jpeg" alt="" title="deepcleaning" width="600" height="399" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-218024" /></a></p>

<p>Say you're a marine biologist and you want to study the little bitty creatures of the sea &mdash; shrimps and worms and things like that. How do you go about capturing them?</p>

<p>Why, with an underwater vacuum, of course.</p>

<p><a href="http://firstlook.pnas.org/deep-cleaning/">At the PNAS First Look blog</a>, David Harris writes that this "SCUBA-tank powered vacuum, called an “airlift,” inhales shrimp, sand fleas, marine worms, and 'things that would swim away if they had the chance.'"</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/11/sucking-up-to-shrimp.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An appreciation of the Sawfish, one of Earth&#039;s most threatened&#160;fish</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/an-appreciation-of-the-sawfish.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/an-appreciation-of-the-sawfish.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xeni Jardin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The earliest sawfishes likely arose in the shallow Tethys Sea, that ocean surrounded by the ancient continents of Godwanda and Laurasia, during the Cretaceous period at least 60 million years ago," writes Dr. M. at Deep Sea News. These "sole survivors of an ancient bloodline" now number only seven species which roam the muddy bottoms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/sawfish1.jpeg" alt="" title="sawfish1" width="500" height="333" class="bordered aligncenter size-full wp-image-214070" /><p>
"The earliest sawfishes likely arose in the shallow Tethys Sea, that ocean surrounded by the ancient continents of Godwanda and Laurasia, during the Cretaceous period at least 60 million years ago," <a href='http://deepseanews.com/2013/02/exaltation-to-extinction-for-sawfishes/'>writes Dr. M. at Deep Sea News</a>. <p>
These "sole survivors of an ancient bloodline" now number only seven species which roam the muddy bottoms of coastal areas, bays and estuaries.  
<p>


<blockquote>All sawfishes can move easily between fresh and saltwater and often venture deep upstream into rivers. The sawfish lifestyle puts this both their size and saw near humans.  All seven species are considered critically endangered by the IUCN.  As much as we have impacted them, sawfish have also greatly influenced our culture.</p></blockquote>

<p>And now, they're one of the most threatened species on our planet. Thanks, humans!<p>
 More: <a href='http://deepseanews.com/2013/02/exaltation-to-extinction-for-sawfishes/'>Exaltation to Extinction for Sawfishes</a> [Deep Sea News]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/an-appreciation-of-the-sawfish.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resurrecting the dead &#8212; one piece at a&#160;time</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/resurrecting-the-dead.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/resurrecting-the-dead.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammoths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paleontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=214006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Jurassic Park, we tend to focus on one use for the DNA of extinct creatures &#8212; resurrecting them, in full, to live here in the modern age. But it's not necessary to go that far to learn a lot about those animals, and the evolution of life, in general. At the Experimental Podcast, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks to Jurassic Park, we tend to focus on one use for the DNA of extinct creatures &mdash; resurrecting them, in full, to live here in the modern age. But it's not necessary to go that far to learn a lot about those animals, and the evolution of life, in general. At the Experimental Podcast, Stephanie Vogt talks about<a href="http://experimental-podcast.tumblr.com/post/43482760407/raising-the-dead-one-protein-at-a-time-episode"> the paleophysiologists who are reconstructing the proteins of extinct animals</a> using fragments of DNA found in long-dead remains. Those proteins, simple as they may seem, hold some amazing stories. For instance, reconstructed haemoglobin from wooly mammoths could someday help doctors get oxygen to the brains of high-risk human surgery patients.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/19/resurrecting-the-dead.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why your mixer&#160;matters</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/why-your-mixer-matters.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/why-your-mixer-matters.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=211340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting tipsy is more than just a simple equation of "Insert booze, receive stupid behavior". There's some complicated chemistry at work &#8212; especially when you begin to factor in the stuff you mix your alcohol into. For instance, the sugar in soda actually prevents your blood stream from absorbing as much alcohol as it otherwise [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Getting tipsy is more than just a simple equation of "Insert booze, receive stupid behavior". There's some complicated chemistry at work &mdash; especially when you begin to factor in the stuff you mix your alcohol into. For instance, the sugar in soda actually prevents your blood stream from absorbing as much alcohol as it otherwise would. Which means, as Allison Aubrey explains at NPR, <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/01/31/170748045/why-mixing-alcohol-with-diet-soda-may-make-you-drunker">your choice of mixer could be the difference between a blood alcohol level that is within legal limits and one that is most decidedly not</a>. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/why-your-mixer-matters.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does the world look like when you&#039;re color&#160;blind?</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/what-does-the-world-look-like.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/what-does-the-world-look-like.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subjectivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=210985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the left is a picture of me with my bike, taken by my friend Laura Kling. On the right is the same image, as it would be seen by a person with protanopia &#8212; a relatively common (as in, still very rare) form of color blindness that affects the ability to see green, yellow, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/normal.jpg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/normal.jpg" alt="" title="normal" width="223" height="250" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-210997" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/protanopia.jpg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/protanopia.jpg" alt="" title="protanopia" width="223" height="250" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-210998" /></a>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</br></p>

<p>On the left is a picture of me with my bike, taken by my friend Laura Kling. On the right is the same image, as it would be seen by a person with protanopia &mdash; a relatively common (as in, still very rare) form of color blindness that affects the ability to see green, yellow, and red colors.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.etre.com/tools/colourblindsimulator/">The Color Blindness Simulator </a>will allow you to do this with your own photos.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/05/what-does-the-world-look-like.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ads that depict the human body as a&#160;machine</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/23/ads-that-depict-the-human-body.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/23/ads-that-depict-the-human-body.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=207828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the Vintage Ads LJ group, the awesome Man Writing Slash has rounded up a series of old ads that use mechanical methaphors for the human body. One of my favorite ad tropes is the Body=Machine/Body=Factory idea, because the imagery is often more detailed and also more hilarious than in most ads. As a kid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/814601_original2.jpg" class="bordered"><br />
On the <a href="http://vintage-ads.livejournal.com/">Vintage Ads</a> LJ group, the awesome Man Writing Slash has rounded up a series of old ads that use mechanical methaphors for the human body.

<blockquote>
<p>
One of my favorite ad tropes is the Body=Machine/Body=Factory idea, because the imagery is often more detailed and also more hilarious than in most ads.  As a kid I used to LOVE any illustrations of the body that depicted tiny workers inside, such as The Human Body, for example. :D   This link to a book about Fritz Kahn's Der Mensch als Industriepalast is also fascinating (although not advertisement).   Brief video version of that book HERE (well worth 3 minutes of your time.)  This series of articles and illustrations in the same vein (XD) appeared in the Berliner Morgenpost in 1931 and is simply breathtaking.
</blockquote>

<P>
<a href="http://vintage-ads.livejournal.com/4070213.html"> Body = Machine: A Series </a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/23/ads-that-depict-the-human-body.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utensils probably gave us all&#160;overbites</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/utensils-probably-gave-us-all.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/utensils-probably-gave-us-all.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=206410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a new book, the human overbite developed at different times, in different places &#8212; and was always coincident with the widespread use of eating utensils. In Europe, for instance, evidence suggests that humans have only had an overbite for about 250 years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[According to a new book, the human overbite developed at different times, in different places &mdash; and was always coincident with the widespread use of eating utensils. <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/01/how-forks-gave-us-overbites-and-pots-saved-the-toothless/267252/">In Europe, for instance, evidence suggests that humans have only had an overbite for about 250 years. </a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/17/utensils-probably-gave-us-all.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man vs. duck (or a bunch of little&#160;horses)</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/man-vs-duck-or-a-bunch-of-li.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/man-vs-duck-or-a-bunch-of-li.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delightful Creatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=205239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you rather fight 100 duck-sized horses or one horse-sized duck? President Obama refused to address this pressing question. But science has the answer. (Via Tim Maly and kottke)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Would you rather fight 100 duck-sized horses or one horse-sized duck? President Obama refused to address this pressing question. <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/01/president-obama-would-choose-to-fight-the-horse-sized-duck/267071/">But science has the answer</a>. <em>(Via Tim Maly and <a href="http://kottke.org/13/01/would-you-rather-fight-100-duck-sized-horses-or-one-horse-sized-duck">kottke</a>)</em>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/11/man-vs-duck-or-a-bunch-of-li.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The medical implications of space&#160;tourism</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/the-medical-implications-of-sp.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/the-medical-implications-of-sp.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=201253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article from the British Medical Journal should give aspiring space tourists some food for thought. The basic gist: Traveling into the heavens is not really comparable, physically and medically, to Earth-bound travel. In fact, up until now, extreme physical fitness has been a major factor in how we select space travelers. What happens when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e8124">This article from the British Medical Journal</a> should give aspiring space tourists some food for thought. The basic gist: Traveling into the heavens is not really comparable, physically and medically, to Earth-bound travel. In fact, up until now, extreme physical fitness has been a major factor in how we select space travelers. What happens when less-fit people start flying? What happens to sick people? These are questions that matter a lot, given the fact that current astronauts report everything from reduced eyesight to potentially dangerous immune system changes. <em>(Via <a href="http://inkfish.fieldofscience.com/2012/12/are-you-healthy-enough-to-be-space.html?spref=fb">The Inkfish blog</a>)</em>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/18/the-medical-implications-of-sp.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open science event in London this&#160;weekend</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/open-science-event-in-london-t.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/open-science-event-in-london-t.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomedicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're in London this weekend, you should know that the Wellcome Trust is sponsoring a two-day bioscience hackathon with prizes awarded for the best ideas in four categories: Open Me &#8212; collecting data on yourself and making it useful to yourself; Open Research &#8212; making biomedical data produced by professional scientists more accessible and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you're in London this weekend, you should know that <a href="http://rewiredstate.org/hacks/wellcome-trust-open-science">the Wellcome Trust is sponsoring a two-day bioscience hackathon with prizes</a> awarded for the best ideas in four categories: Open Me &mdash; collecting data on yourself and making it useful to yourself; Open Research &mdash; making biomedical data produced by professional scientists more accessible and useful to everybody; Open Data &mdash; creating apps and hardware that allow doctors to better follow what's really happening with their patients; and the idea that is most useful to the public at large. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/open-science-event-in-london-t.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iron Egghead: Explain biology using eight everyday&#160;items</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/iron-egghead-explain-biology.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/iron-egghead-explain-biology.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enter Scientific American's video contest!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1399191810" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=2008487975001&#038;playerId=1399191810&#038;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&#038;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&#038;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&#038;domain=embed&#038;autoStart=false&#038;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="510" height="550" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></p>

<p>Scientific American has an awesome contest going on right now. They're challenging you to make a video explaining some part, process, or system in the human body using eight objects: Yourself, a writing surface, a writing implement, rubber bands, paper clips, string, cups , and balls. You <em>have to </em>use all eight items. You <em>can't</em> use anything else.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.scivee.tv/node/48834">You can read the full instructions and rules online</a>. And check out the sample video, made by Scientific American interns Isha Soni and Mollie Bloudoff-Indelicato.</p>

<p>Bonus: The first 100 qualified entries all get a free digital subscription to Sci Am.</p>

<p>Via <a href="https://twitter.com/BoraZ">Bora Zivkovik</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/iron-egghead-explain-biology.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The effects of space travel on the human body (past and&#160;present)</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/the-effects-of-space-travel-on.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/the-effects-of-space-travel-on.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronauts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 1956 video about the then-still-theoretical physiology of space travel ... with a special appearance by Chuck Yeager!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!--youtu.be--><div class="video-container"><iframe width="600" height="338" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nG9ksI_cT9w?fs=1&#038;showinfo=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

<p>Last week, an American and a Russian &mdash; Scott Kelly and Mikhail Kornienko &mdash; were selected to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/nasa-russian-space-agency-name-crew-of-2-for-yearlong-international-space-station-mission/2012/11/26/04cbff04-37d9-11e2-9258-ac7c78d5c680_story.html">spend a year living continuously in space</a>, aboard the International Space Station. Only four other people have done this before. All them were Russian, so Scott Kelly is going to break the American record for time spent in space.</p>

<p>The mission won't start until 2015, and it's part of a much longer term goal &mdash; sending people to Mars. We know that spending time in space does take a toll on the human body. For instance, hanging out without gravity means you aren't using your muscles, even the ones that you'd use to support your own weight on Earth. Without use, muscles deteriorate over time. Bone density also drops. Basically, after a few months in space, astronauts return to Earth as weak as little kittens. Which is, to say the least, a less than ideal situation for any future Mars explorers.</p>

<p>Having Kelly and Kornienko stay up for a year will give scientists more data on what happens to the human body in space, give them a chance to test out preventative treatments that could keep astronauts stronger, and allows them to see how the amount of time spent in space affects the amount of time it takes to physically recover from the trip. As an extra research bonus, Kelly is the identical twin brother of Mark Kelly, the astronaut married to former congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. Which means that there will be a built-in control to compare Kelly to when he comes back from his mission. </p>

<p>In honor of that upcoming experiment, here's an old video that will give you an idea of what we knew (and didn't know) back at the dawn of the space age. <em>Science in Action</em> was a TV show produced by the California Academy of Sciences. In this 1956 episode, they explore the then-still-theoretical physiology of space travel ... with a special guest appearance by Chuck Yeager!</p> 

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_of_spaceflight_on_the_human_body">Wikipedia page on the effects of space travel on the human body</a></p>

<p>Science in Action: Aero Medicine &mdash; <a href="http://archive.org/details/Sciencei1956">Part 1 </a>and <a href="http://archive.org/details/Sciencei1956_2">Part 2 </a>at the Prelinger Archives.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/the-effects-of-space-travel-on.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sauropods might have had trunks, but probably&#160;didn&#039;t</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/sauropods-might-have-had-trunk.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/sauropods-might-have-had-trunk.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dinosaurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elephants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sauropods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trunks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=195342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine an apatosaurus with a long, elephant-like snout. Plenty of people have. That's because the nostril placement on sauropod dinosaurs is, in some ways, remarkably similar to that of trunked animals that live today. In both cases, the nostrils are large, and they're located up around what we'd call the forehead, kind of smack between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Sibbick-trunked-Diplodocus-Nov-2012-Darren-Naish-Tetrapod-Zoology-600-px-tiny.jpeg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Sibbick-trunked-Diplodocus-Nov-2012-Darren-Naish-Tetrapod-Zoology-600-px-tiny.jpeg" alt="" title="Sibbick-trunked-Diplodocus-Nov-2012-Darren-Naish-Tetrapod-Zoology-600-px-tiny" width="600" height="185" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-195343" /></a></p>

<p>Imagine an apatosaurus with a long, elephant-like snout. Plenty of people have. That's because the nostril placement on sauropod dinosaurs is, in some ways, remarkably similar to that of trunked animals that live today. In both cases, the nostrils are large, and they're located up around what we'd call the forehead, kind of smack between the eyes.</p>

<p>On the one hand, this is one of those things that it's really hard to ever know for certain. We don't have preserved soft tissue, so when we make models of what dinosaurs might have looked like we're really going on clues from the bones and comparisons to living animals with similar bone structure. Because of that, it is somewhat reasonable to suggest that hey, maybe, sauropods really did look like grumpy diplodocus in the image above. It's fun to speculate.</p>

<p>But not all speculations are created equal. In a fascinating post at the Tetrapod Zoology blog,<a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/2012/11/20/no-trunks-for-sauropods-2012/"> Darren Naish explains why a superficial similarity to trunked animals isn't enough to counteract the much-more prevalent evidence against sauropod trunks</a>. One of the more interesting lines of evidence he points out is the fact that dinosaurs apparently lacked the facial which form the trunk in living animals. We know this partly because muscles leave their signature on bone, and Naish says there's no evidence sauropods had the right facial muscles. It's further bolstered by the fact that the animals most closely related to sauropods don't have those facial muscles, either.</p>

<p>Naish's piece reminds me of the last time we talked about sauropod biology here. That, too, dealt with the fact that superficial similarities aren't enough to infer that two animals must have identical biology. Only, in that case, we were talking about the differences between <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/27/why-dont-giraffes-have-necks.html" title="Why don't giraffes have necks as long as a brachiosaurus?">the long necks of giraffes and the long necks of sauropods</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/sauropods-might-have-had-trunk.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To: Preserve a bat for museum&#160;display</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/how-to-preserve-a-bat-for-mus.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/how-to-preserve-a-bat-for-mus.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behind the scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[museums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skeletons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfect, little bat skeletons don't grow on trees, you know. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!--youtu.be--><div class="video-container"><iframe width="600" height="338" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VwT6RLsYe1c?fs=1&#038;showinfo=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

<p>Here's a big difference between nature and a natural history museum: In the wild, when you find a skeleton of anything, it's seldom arranged in a neat, orderly, anatomically correct manner. Even if an animal dies in captivity, nature won't just conveniently produce a skeleton suitable for mounting.</p>

<p>So how do museums get the perfect skeletal specimens that you see behind glass?</p>

<p>The answer: Lots and lots and lots of tedious work. Plus the assistance of a few thousand flesh-eating bugs.</p>

<p>This video from the University of Michigan traces the creation of a bat skeleton, from a fleshy dead bat in a jar, to a neat, little set of bones in a display case. It's painstaking (and moderately disgusting) work. Sort of like building model cars, if the Ford Mustang had realistic organ tissue.</p>

<em><p>Thanks to Neil Shurley!</p></em>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/how-to-preserve-a-bat-for-mus.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cool science behind a really cute video of a &quot;snoring&quot;&#160;hummingbird</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/the-cool-science-behind-a-real.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/the-cool-science-behind-a-real.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can learn a lot about this bird's biology by listening as it saws some logs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!--youtu.be--><div class="video-container"><iframe width="600" height="338" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pj5huCuhD_Q?fs=1&#038;showinfo=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

<p>This hummingbird is sleeping in a specialized research container connected to a machine that measures how much oxygen it is breathing. According to  forrestertr7, who posted the video to YouTube, this experiment was part of research aimed at understanding the differences between the metabolism of hummingbirds and that of larger species. After its nap, the hummingbird was released back into the wild.</p>

<p>But what about the snoring? Does the hummingbird really need a tiny, little beak strip, or what? I asked science blogger Joe Hanson, who posted this video to Twitter earlier today, and he did some research. Turns out, it's not totally unreasonable to call that adorable little wheeze a "snore". But, at the same time, hummingbirds have very different biology than we do. A snore for them isn't the same as a snore for us.</p>

<blockquote><p>Hummingbirds have incredibly high metabolic needs. To do all that buzzing around and to keep their tiny bodies warm, they eat the human equivalent of a refrigerator full of food every day, mostly in the form of high-energy nectar and fatty bugs. Because of their small size, they also lose a lot of body heat to the air. In order to preserve energy on cool nights, they have the ability to enter a daily, miniature hibernation called torpor.</p>

<p>...Just before morning, their natural circadian rhythms kick in and they start to thaw out, like heating a car engine on a cold day. What we see in the video is probably a bird coming out of torpor (which is what the scientists in the video were studying), starting to breathe in more oxygen to raise its body temperature, and making that adorable snoring noise.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.itsokaytobesmart.com/post/35574961577/cute-snoring-hummingbird-torpor">Read the full story at Joe Hanson's blog</a>, It's Okay To Be Smart</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/the-cool-science-behind-a-real.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Positive pregnancy test diagnoses man&#039;s&#160;cancer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/positive-pregnancy-test-diagno.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/positive-pregnancy-test-diagno.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horrors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The science behind the story of how Reddit saved yet another life. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a lady, and you think you might be pregnant, you can take an at-home test to find out. You simply pee on a stick. Whether the results are measured in pink lines, blue lines, plus and minus symbols, or a "pregnant"/"not pregnant" digital readout, all the home pregnancy tests on the market are really looking for the same thing &mdash; Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG).</p>

<p>HCG is a pregnancy hormone. It's produced by the placenta, a temporary organ that only forms in female bodies when an embryo has attached to the uterine lining. And so it was kind of weird when a male friend of a Reddit user known as CappnPoopDeck peed on a home pregnancy test and it came back <em>positive</em>.</p>

<p>Turns out, HCG can show up in men, too. And when it does, bad things are happening. You might have seen this story on Gawker earlier this week, but the science behind it is so crazy that I wanted to discuss it in a little more depth.</p>

<span id="more-192668"></span>

<p>First, let's talk about HGC in ladies. The specific cells that produce HCG are called trophoblasts. At the point where a human is quite literally nothing more than a ball of 70-100 cells, trophoblasts form the outer layer. The mochi to our ice cream center, if you will. These cells eventually grow into the placenta, but at the earliest stages of pregnancy, their primary function is to rip through flesh and secure the embryo to uterine wall. Seriously.</p>

<p>I'm going to quote from Jon Cohen's excellent book on miscarriage,<em> Coming to Term</em>, because it has heavily influenced the mental pictures I see when I think "trophoblast".</p>

<blockquote><p>Successful implantation occurs only if the embryo properly "invades" the lining of the uterus, which requires that the placenta's trophoblast cells penetrate deeply, boring into maternal arteries to shunt blood to the growing baby. If the mother did not stop the trophoblasts' drilling, they might burrow so deeply into her uterus that she could hemorrhage and die. <em>[He goes on to explain how the female body prevents this. Although he notes that, sometimes, it doesn't work.]</em></p></blockquote>

<p>Fun!</p>

<p>The outermost cells in a layer of trophoblasts are called syncytiotrophoblasts. These are the cells that actually produce HCG, which plays a huge role in making sure that you actually miss that first missed period. The chain of command works like this: When you ovulate, you release an egg from a follicle on your ovary. But that follicle doesn't just instantly disappear afterwards. Instead, it hangs out, producing progesterone &mdash; a chemical that is instrumental in preventing you from shedding your uterine lining and having a period.</p>

<p>On a normal, non-pregnant cycle, progesterone levels will go up for a bit, but then the spent follicle &mdash; the corpus luteum &mdash; will wither away. Your progesterone levels will drop. And you'll ride the crimson wave.</p>

<p>But, if you're pregnant, the corpus luteum doesn't go away. It keeps on producing progesterone, and no period happens. What keeps the corpus luteum alive and kicking? Human chorionic gonadotropin, that's what.</p>

<p>So why on Earth would HCG end up in a man?</p>

<p>When that pregnancy test came back positive, <a href="http://imgur.com/Xt6B5">CappnPoopDeck made a rage comic about it</a>, and posted it to Reddit. The very first response, from a user named goxilo, was this: "If this is true, you should check yourself for testicular cancer. Seriously. Google it."</p>

<p>Yes, HCG in men can be a sign of a rare (and dangerous) form of testicular cancer &mdash; choriocarcinoma. This is a cancer made up of syncytiotroblastic cells, said Katherine McGlynn, a senior investigator with the National Cancer Institutes. The tumor secretes HCG because that's what syncytiotroblasts do. They secrete HCG. And they don't particularly care whether they're secreting it into a man or a woman.</p>

<p>But how do they get into a guy, to begin with? That's where things get really weird. The truth is that nobody is entirely certain, McGlynn told me. But there are a couple of theories. One possibility is that these syncytiotroblasts that turn cancerous were leftovers &mdash; remnants of the time when that guy was just a ball of 70-100 cells. One way or another, they persisted in his body and then started to grow out of control.</p>

<p>The other theory: Somehow, normal cells in the man's testes just start regressing, reverting to one of the earliest forms of cells in a human's life cycle. Either way, one thing is certain, "It's exactly the same cell as in the placenta," McGlynn said.</p>

<p>The bad news: Choriocarcinomas move really fast. They're more common in men under 30 and the prognosis is usually bad, because most of the time nobody catches them until they've already spread to other parts of the body, especially the lungs. In that, CappnPoopDeck's friend is incredibly lucky. Both that he decided to pee on a stick for LULZ and that his friend posted the news to Reddit. In a follow-up, CappnPoopDeck reported that doctors found a very small tumor in his friend's right testicle. But they found it early enough that it's going to make treatment much easier.</p>

<p>The good news: Men should know that their chances of developing a choriocarcinoma are extremely rare. <a href="http://www.cjem-online.ca/v4/n2/p111">A 2002 paper in the Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine</a> reported that only about 2 men in 100,000 will get any kind of testicular cancer. Pure choriocarcinomas &mdash; the dangerous kind that I'm talking about here &mdash; make up less than 1% of those diagnoses. It's not clear whether CappnPoopDeck's friend has a pure choriocarcinoma, or a much-less-deadly form of testicular cancer that happens to incorporate some syncytiotrophoblasts.</p>

<p>Either way, McGlynn wanted to make it clear that you all shouldn't feel like you need to run out and stock up on home pregnancy tests. In fact, at least twice during our interview, she marveled at how amazing it was that this story even happened. "The actual odds of the man having this particular cancer, and then using a pregnancy test, are sky high. It's kind of amazing that this happened," she said.</p>

<p><strong>Read More:</strong>
<br />&bull; <a href="http://gawker.com/5958323/dude-takes-pregnancy-test-as-joke-finds-out-he-has-testicular-cancer-via-rage-comic-on-reddit">Read the Gawker story about this case</a>
<br />&bull; <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu/comments/12kihx/pregnant_man_rage">Read the original Reddit thread</a>
<br />&bull;<a href="http://history.nih.gov/exhibits/thinblueline/research1.html"> Read a history of home pregnancy tests</a>, which includes a lot of information about HCG
<br />&bull;<a href="http://www.cjem-online.ca/v4/n2/p111"> Read a full research paper about a different case of testicular choriocarcinoma</a></br></p>

<p style="caption">Photo: <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-50465716/stock-photo-a-hand-holding-a-positive-pregnancy-test.html?src=db6664ab4c754a23627c6bf3d039659d-1-84">Shutterstock</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/positive-pregnancy-test-diagno.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pssst, hey kid. Wanna see some sea lice eat a dead&#160;pig?</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/pssst-hey-kid-wanna-see-some.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/pssst-hey-kid-wanna-see-some.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delightful Creatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on. It's for science. In fact, it's meant to help people. Researchers at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, put a dead pig in a shark-proof (and octopus-proof, as you'll see) cage and stuck it in the ocean in order to learn more about how human remains decompose underwater. That knowledge will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=1912778493001&#038;playerID=2227271001&#038;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAADqBmN8~,Yo4S_rZKGX0rYg6XsV7i3F9IB8jNBoiY&#038;domain=embed&#038;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=1912778493001&#038;playerID=2227271001&#038;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAADqBmN8~,Yo4S_rZKGX0rYg6XsV7i3F9IB8jNBoiY&#038;domain=embed&#038;dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>

<p>Come on. It's for science.</p>

<p>In fact, it's meant to help people.</p>

<p>Researchers at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, put a dead pig in a shark-proof (and octopus-proof, as you'll see) cage and stuck it in the ocean in order to learn more about how human remains decompose underwater. That knowledge will help forensic scientists interpret crime scenes.</p>

<p>Most of the work is done by maggots known as sea lice, but towards the end, after the maggots have eaten the good bits, you can watch some fat, red shrimp move in to pick apart the cartilage.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2012/10/sea-lice-mob-devours-pig-from-the-inside-out.html">Read the full story about this research at New Scientist</a></p>

<em><p>Via <a href="http://deepseanews.com/2012/10/in-the-deep-sea-bacon-doesnt-last-long">Deep Sea News</a></p></em>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/pssst-hey-kid-wanna-see-some.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protein&#160;art</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/protein-art.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/protein-art.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art and Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proteins are made up of chains of amino acids, folded and twisted in on themselves to make incredibly complex shapes. The human brain, it has been said, is kind of a pattern-finding machine &#8212; prone to spotting faces on the moon, fat bunnies in the clouds, and Jesus on slices of toast. When the two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/7895470720_13ec13ac4e.jpeg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/7895470720_13ec13ac4e.jpeg" alt="" title="7895470720_13ec13ac4e" width="500" height="386" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-191643" /></a></p>

<p>Proteins are made up of chains of amino acids, folded and twisted in on themselves to make incredibly complex shapes.</p>

<p>The human brain, it has been said, is kind of a pattern-finding machine &mdash; prone to spotting faces on the moon, fat bunnies in the clouds, and Jesus on slices of toast.</p>

<p>When the two meet, you get Protein Art. May K., a Russian-born artist who lives in Germany, takes actual protein structures, sees the other things those structures seem to look an awful lot like, and then draws cartoons based on the resulting apophenia.</p>

<p>For instance, take a look at the protein structure above. After the jump, you can see the picture that May K. saw in its folds.</p>

<span id="more-191628"></span>

<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/7895470984_8598780b26.jpeg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/7895470984_8598780b26.jpeg" alt="" title="7895470984_8598780b26" width="500" height="386" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-191644" /></a></p>

<p>Bonus: The protein pictured actually comes from a dromedary camel. May K. writes:</p>

<blockquote><p>This small protein is called nanobody. Sounds cool, but what is a nanobody? It is a fragment of an antibody, in this case an antibody from a camel. Antibodies serve our immune system, they can bind pathogenic substances and protect our body from dangerous invaders. Antibodies are widely used in medicine and biology, e.g for passive immunization or targeting of substances (mostly proteins) of interest. In both fields nanobodies have their advantages. They are stabler and much smaller than conventional antibodies and can pass narrow holes. So literally, for this nanobody camel it is easy to go through the eye of a needle.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://may-k.livejournal.com/">Read more at May K.'s Live Journal</a>, where her protein art is collected</p>

<em><p>Via <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/sciencepunk/2012/10/29/cartoons-based-on-protein-structures/">Frank Swain</a></p></em>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/protein-art.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Field biologist describes horrific&#160;foot-fungus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/25/field-biologist-describes-horr.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/25/field-biologist-describes-horr.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=189754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuzzyatelin, a field biologist, offers graphic and compelling advice on keeping your feet dry during your fieldwork. 1) For frak’s sake, DRY OUT YOUR SOCKS. Put them over the fan over night so that you have 5 precious, precious moments of dryness before stepping out that door into the rain again… 2) Air everything out. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>
<img src="http://craphound.com/images/5044098992_166e484cd1_z.jpg" class="bordered"><br />
Fuzzyatelin, a field biologist, offers graphic and compelling advice on keeping your feet dry during your fieldwork.

<blockquote>
<p>
1) For frak’s sake, DRY OUT YOUR SOCKS.  Put them over the fan over night so that you have 5 precious, precious moments of dryness before stepping out that door into the rain again…
<p>
2) Air everything out.  For real.  I mean everything. If you have electricity, lay in front of a fan in the buff for at least two hours every evening.  You think I’m joking… but:
<p>
3) When your feet start to bleed - and boy, will they ever - don’t panic. The hole that appears to be eating its way into the space between your 4th and 5th toes on your right foot won’t go any deeper than a full centimeter (you know this because you stuck your finger inside of it and then measured the extent of the bloody seepage on your pinkie finger… the hole is that wide and deep).
<p>
4) Ditch the hat.  Ditch the hat.  Ditch the - oh. Now it’s on your scalp.
</blockquote>

<p>
It gets worse.

<p>
<a href="http://evopropinquitous.tumblr.com/post/34218973532/things-i-learned-as-a-field-biologist-639">Things I Learned as a Field Biologist #639</a>

(<i>via <a href="http://www.jwz.org/blog/">JWZ</a></i>)

<p>
(<i>Image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dmclear/5044098992/">Fungi</a>, a Creative Commons <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">Attribution (2.0)</a> image from dmclear's photostream</i>)

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/25/field-biologist-describes-horr.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genetically-modified mouse to sniff out&#160;landmines</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/genetically-modified-mouse-to.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/genetically-modified-mouse-to.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pescovitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explosives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetically modified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MouSensor is a lab mouse genetically-engineered to sniff out land mines. Mice have already been trained to find explosives by scent but according to Hunter College biologist Charlotte D'Hulst, the MouSensor is ultra sensitive to the odor of TNT. From The Guardian: Given its extreme sensitivity to TNT, the mouse would probably have some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="display:block; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;" src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/NewImage119.png" alt="NewImage" title="NewImage.png" border="0" width="600" height="360" class="alignnone"/>
<p>
The MouSensor is a lab mouse genetically-engineered to sniff out land mines. Mice have already been trained to find explosives by scent but according to Hunter College biologist Charlotte D'Hulst, the MouSensor is ultra sensitive to the odor of TNT. From The Guardian:
<blockquote>Given its extreme sensitivity to TNT, the mouse would probably have some sort of seizure when it sniffed explosives, said D'Hulst, because so many neurons in its olfactory bulb would be firing at once. And that seizure might be detectable by some device implanted into the mouse.
<p>
"We are thinking along the lines of implanting a chip under the skin of these animals that would wirelessly report back to a computer when the animal's behaviour is changing upon being triggered by a TNT landmine," said D'Hulst. Once the location of a landmine had been identified, a bomb-disposal expert could go in and neutralise it in the normal way. The mouse itself would be safe from the landmine, since it would be too small to trigger an explosion.</blockquote>
<p>
"<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/oct/15/gm-mouse-detect-landmines">GM mouse created to detect landmines</a>"]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/genetically-modified-mouse-to.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New study suggests &quot;arsenic life&quot; is actually a phosphate&#160;glutton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/new-study-suggests-arsenic-l.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/new-study-suggests-arsenic-l.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mono lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember arsenic life? In 2010 NASA researchers thought they'd found evidence that certain bacteria could use arsenic in their DNA where all other forms of life on Earth use phosphate. Then it turned out their research was really flawed. Then it turned out they were wrong. In general, there was a to-do. Fast forward to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/arseniclife.jpeg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/arseniclife.jpeg" alt="" title="arseniclife" width="640" height="320" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-186798" /></a></p>

<p>Remember arsenic life? In 2010 NASA researchers thought they'd found evidence that certain bacteria could use arsenic in their DNA where all other forms of life on Earth use phosphate. Then it turned out their research was really flawed. Then it turned out they were wrong. In general, there was a to-do.</p> 

<p>Fast forward to this month, when scientists from the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel published a study in which they were trying to figure out how bacteria can tell the difference between phosphate and arsenate and "know" to prefer the phosphate. They used phosphate-collecting proteins from four different species of bacteria in their research, including the one that had been at the center of the arsenic life controversy. And along the way, they discovered a fun twist to that story.</p><span id="more-186766"></span>

<p>This new study suggests that "arsenic life" bacteria is, indeed, able to survive in arsenate-heavy solutions where other bacteria fail. But, the Weizmann researchers say their data shows that success isn't due to a <em>preference</em> for arsenic, or even an ability to use it. Instead, "arsenic life" is probably just much, much, much, much better at collecting and using every tiny trace of phosphate it can get its metaphorical paws on.</p>

<blockquote><p>The researchers looked at five types of phosphate-binding protein — which bind phosphate in a molecular pathway that brings it into the cells — from four species of bacteria. Two of the bacterial species were sensitive to arsenate and two were resistant to it. To test how effective these proteins were at discriminating between phosphate and arsenate, the researchers put them in solution with a set amount of phosphate and different concentrations of arsenate for 24 hours, and then checked which of the molecules the proteins would bind to.</p>

<p>Their threshold for when ‘discrimination’ broke down was when 50% of the proteins ended up bound to arsenate — indicating that the ability to discriminate had been overwhelmed. Even in solutions containing 500-fold more arsenate than phosphate, all five proteins were still able to preferentially bind phosphate. And one protein, from the Mono Lake bacterium, could do so at arsenate excesses of up to 4,500-fold over phosphate.</p>

<p>... The latest paper shows that the “arsenic monster” GFAJ-1 goes to a huge amount of effort, “even more than other life”, to avoid arsenate, says Wolfgang Nitschke from the Mediterranean Institute of Microbiology in Marseilles, France, who co-authored a commentary questioning the conclusion that GFAJ-1 could replace phosphate with arsenate.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/news/arsenic-life-bacterium-prefers-phosphorus-after-all-1.11520">Read the rest of the story at Nature News</a></p>

<em><p>Via<a href="https://twitter.com/_ColinS_"> Colin Schultz</a></p></em>

<p><small>Image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikebaird/6265237090/">Mono Lake with Tufa Towers at Sunrise 16Oct2011.</a>, a Creative Commons <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">Attribution (2.0)</a> image from mikebaird's photostream</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/new-study-suggests-arsenic-l.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
