<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boing Boing &#187; breakthroughs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/tag/breakthroughs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of good and bad reporting on leukemia gene&#160;therapy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/11/comparison-of-good-and-bad-reporting-on-leukemia-gene-therapy.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/11/comparison-of-good-and-bad-reporting-on-leukemia-gene-therapy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakthroughs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence-based everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=113003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gary Schwitzer, whose Health News Review should be your first stop for evaluating health and medicine journalism, has<a href="http://www.healthnewsreview.org/blog/2011/08/striking-contrasts-of-hype-versus-rational-reporting-in-leukemia-story.html" target="_blank"> a quick line up of the good and the ugly</a> in the coverage of <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/08/11/139536661/gene-therapy-breakthrough-trains-immune-system-to-fight-leukemia" target="_blank">the recent leukemia gene therapy study</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gary Schwitzer, whose Health News Review should be your first stop for evaluating health and medicine journalism, has<a href="http://www.healthnewsreview.org/blog/2011/08/striking-contrasts-of-hype-versus-rational-reporting-in-leukemia-story.html" target="_blank"> a quick line up of the good and the ugly</a> in the coverage of <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/08/11/139536661/gene-therapy-breakthrough-trains-immune-system-to-fight-leukemia" target="_blank">the recent leukemia gene therapy study</a>. Notice I didn't say "cure for cancer." Notably, neither did the good reporting that Schwitzer highlighted on his blog. More to come...]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/11/comparison-of-good-and-bad-reporting-on-leukemia-gene-therapy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
